7/7: Crime and Prejudice

Ratings: 7.08/10 from 13 users.


7/7: Crime and PrejudiceThis documentary explores the 7/7 cold case via new evidence from the recent inquests and discusses the war on terror in the context of numerous miscarriages of justice and acts of violence committed by the state. The first section of the film examines the history of the British state's use of double agents, from the Victorian Anarchists through WW2 to the war in Northern Ireland. It concludes by examining contemporary cases of injustice and violence carried out as part of the war of terror against Muslims.

The second section of the film is a multi-dimensional study of the new evidence made available at the recent inquests. It looks at the evidence of a wider conspiracy and the fundamental flaws in the official narrative and the police investigation. It also discusses why the dialogue about 'intelligence failures' itself fails to address the very real possibility of state involvement in the attacks.

The final section of the film returns to the Anarchists and the case of Martial Bourdin, Britain's first suicide bomber, in 1894. The mythology surrounding Bourdin is used as a foundation for examining the numerous films, tv shows training exercises and real life events that either predicted 7/7 or were influenced by the attacks. The question of conspiracy theories is addressed through an original analysis unique to this film.

7/7 Crime and Prejudice combines a presentation of the cutting edge of July 7th research with a deeply contextual analysis that casts light on largely unexamined aspects of the war on terror.

More great documentaries

19 Comments / User Reviews

  1. Tracy Jo Klatke Anctil

    This looks good, can't wait to finish it!

  2. Dave Bliss

    Inside Job, just like 911. Blair lied throgh his teeth as with WMD, etc. We are fools to allow our agencies to play us like a violin. Wake up UK sheep, we are being used.

  3. westcoastwoman

    what happened to the film - I got to 1:39 and it froze - I would like to see the last part - the first part is very interesting!

  4. James Irvine

    dont you need a motive to do things like this? so what is it?

  5. Yavanna

    what do you want? An essay or a thesis? In a few easy words. Money Power. Control. Provoke fear and you get all.

  6. free masion

    bush and blair and all the freemason plan all this wake up

  7. James Irvine

    what this video is trying to say is that Muslims are not capable of acts of terror, so what about beheadings of innocent people in the philippines, acts of terror against school children in Chechnya and lets not forget the smoking gun the suicide bomber indoctrination of palestinians, what a load of pants this video is

  8. Jeff D

    and let's not forget historical evidence that govt's stage events to get public support for war.

  9. Edward Richtofen

    all the hallmarks of a false flag operation.

  10. Edward Richtofen

    in all those examples they were caught and was proveable. This 7 7 event is not.

  11. Jamie

    Nowere would any inteligent person say what you just did.Arabs an any race in capable to commite terrorist attacks.But like so many USS Lyberty that Israrel tryed to kill everyone and say it was egypt to lie and bing America into the war,what about the Lavon Affaire the King David Hoyel all done by Israel and that just scratches the surface.And no 9/11 and 7/7 withch were both 100% fauls flags.It's slow people like you the tyranicle governments love because your gullable and belive what these criminals that own the MSM tell you.

  12. Jamie

    Ya the moyive for 7/7 was the lose of public support for the illegal wars and Tony Blairs low approval rateings.Just like 9/11 the people that benifited are the government involved in there lies.Bribes from the military indutrial complex and the support that onlt lies like this woulg get public support.Now they have taken many freeodms and the president declares war whenever told.So many have seen the truth but people like yoy still belive the corrupt tyranicle governmts,that claim to be free witch it also a lie.

  13. Kamat Singh

    I wonder if you really watched the video? Nowhere does it say that Muslims are not capable of terror attacks. What is says is that some people were falsely accused of terrorism and were later acquitted. The video is also not based on the theory that the four guys did not do it. In fact three of the four scenarios that it lists suggests that the four guys did indeed plant the bomb. What it is trying to say is simply that the official version of the terror attacks as put forth by the government is most likely false. That there may be a coverup..not of protecting the "mastermind" but most probably of the fact that the intelligence community had the information which pointed to the possibility of the attack and they were either too dense or incapable of coming to that conclusion or willingly allowed it to happen (the false flag bit).

    On a different note..it is interesting to note that the British were carrying out mock drills about bomb attacks on the exact railway stations on the same day that the attacks took place...same as the US authorities were carrying out mock drills about planes being hijacked and flown into the Pentagon and WTC on the exact day that the terror attacks took place...and people want to believe that it was just a coincidence.

  14. Joseph Molnar

    Nobody benefited from 9/11.

  15. Joseph Molnar

    Yeah those people would be called Hitler and other dictator's not free government runned countries...smh.

  16. Joseph Molnar

    Yep you're totally right, because you have inside information to this correct? Oh, that's right you don't lol.

  17. Lito Magnanimous

    Really ... Do Tell

  18. Ajene Farrar

    That's actually not true...the US has is its own fair share of made up/embellished attacks to get its people fired up. See: Gulf of Tonkin

Leave a comment / review: