;)

Another one was Bill Manning, the Editor of Fire Engineering magazine, calling the investigation a “Half-baked farce.”

And no I’m not done, I just get frustrated sometimes.

Having people give up unfortunately is what they (yes the infamous “they”) want to happen, at some point something has to give. Whether it is your head or the wall you are banging it against.

Your list didn’t include the funny business that went on at the stock market involving put options and call options. Where certain people got very rich because they had prior to 9/11 put these options in place and I guess just got lucky to have gotten put and call options on the stocks of particular companies that coincidently happened to either hugely profit or lose their shirts because of 9/11. Allowing these people to either buy or sell stocks at a set price that, now this part may be hard to believe, was greatly in their favour.

Math

Physics

Scientific Method

Actual Mainstream, Eye-witness reports

Pre-destruction by a News caster

Lack of video from the most protected structure in the world

The fact that no witnesses ever saw any plane staggering across the sky “under the radar”

No change in the actuary tables for insurance companies

OBL, was never on the FBI’s most wanted list for that day

Of the 19 terrorists at least 7 were found to be alive, but no update EVER came to pass

Or any of the evidence of collusion with the so called, “Terrorists” prior to that day

I. OFFICIALLY GIVE UP!.

It happened “Just like they told us.”

I will be in sheering station 123, hope to see you there.

(Quote) ; -”Building 7 was brought down to prevent further damage to other buildings” ???

I seen on a technical data sheet that either thermite or nanothermite can and do ignite when subjected to hight temperature. (Such as a fire from most diesel fuels).
So, no real need to wire if one just happens to know that it’ll the case in a specific event.

However, if such heat is not available for “X” reason?
If one cannot rely on the heart generated by a huge load of accelerant as it was the case for WTC#7, what can be done, hum?

A specially re-enforced building to accomodate the Gov. agency that it house. And as anyone knows, wiring takes months!

Lemme figure that out a little…
Bizarre, bizarre…

Pierre.

His “Building 7 was brought down to prevent further damage to other buildings, simple.” comment contradicts his arguement so blatantly it would be ingenious if he was being facetious. But since he is actually being serious I am at a loss for words.

I almost feel like explaining to him why that comment is so ridiculous but it would probably be pointless so why bother.

Too bad you don’t come across as even close to intelligent. You grew up? How old are you now, 12?

I’m not even entirely sure what your point is here.

You deny the Twin Towers were deliberately destroyed and yet you concede that building 7 WAS brought down????

Brilliant argument!

Those videos were produced by the USA Gov. “Public) inquiry who requested (Contract) specialized firms to try to reproduce the phenomenon that “They” took for granted, to have caused the crash of both WTC1 & 2.

For the least, on TDF, there’s a documentary from one of the employees of that firm (Under a contract with the 9/11 pseudo public commission), gives quite a bit of an expose on how the tests were carried out.
One of the only purely technical documentary.
Left aside the one of the scientist who detected some sort of themite in the dust of the WTC dust.

He’s been working in that laboratory division for many years.
He may have later gotten a Ph.D. or Msc after being hire there, but he is the one who carries that type of tests. A technologist….

Indeed, that “Hired” laboratory had to repeat the tests until the results could vaguely reflect the mandate that the 9/11 USA Gov. commission expected.
But the technologists couldn’t fit his results (Facts) as a proof that the steel beams (Cross members) had really bend enough to give way to the upper floors. Not at the maximal temperature at which jet fuel burns. From there, the technologists carrying the tests began to be somewhat “Uncomfortable” with the mandate their own bosses have signed with the 9/11 commission. Most shut up but a few got frustrated.

The 9/11 advocates or “Inquirers” imposed the reasoning that those steel beams may have not bended enough but that the inserts to which the floors where hang, simply broke apart. Freeing the steel beam on which the floors were resting, triggering the “Pancake” theory.
Theory later abandoned because it was obvious according the many live movies that not even one floor below the damaged ones did slow down the speed at which the complete collapse occurred.

I don’t know what is the final 9/11 explanation ’cause when I seen that all the debris would be sent abroad where no further analysis can be done, I understood that no one would ever know what happened on that day.

Beside, I am not much concerned since I ain’t no US citizen.
Only lost a retired scientist in there whom once trained me in my professions. Seen him last some 5 months before 9/11.

Building #7? Not of any concern for the 9/11 commission coze it ain’t a criminal case for the 9/11 commission since no one died in the crash.

Pierre.

Yes, people hated you enough to fly planes into your skyscrapers.

I get it, your life sucks and everyone and everything on the planet is a lie. I used to think that way as well, then I grew up!!