9/11: Decade of Deception

2015 ,    »  -   59 Comments
839
8.68
12345678910
Ratings: 8.68/10 from 217 users.
Storyline
9/11: Decade of Deception

In the years since the tragic events of September 11, 2001, a growing number of skeptics have come forward to challenge the official story of what occurred on that horrific day. On the tenth anniversary of the terrorist attacks, these witnesses and researchers gathered for a four-day conference hosted by Ryerson University in Toronto. There, they collectively delivered their strongest evidence of conspiracy to an international panel of judges. 9/11: Decade of Deception documents the highlights of this milestone event.

The ultimate purpose of the conference was to produce a rallying cry among the masses for a new and objective investigation into the events of that day. The panel, which consisted of an esteemed group of academics, would submit to the government an official re-investigation request based upon what they believed were the most convincing findings presented in several categories including structural engineering, physics, chemistry and world history.

Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, runs a televised side-by-side demonstration of the World Trade Center collapse and a controlled demolition, and expands upon the inconsistencies that he believes spark doubts upon the accepted story of the towers' demise. Others contribute additional confirmation of this theory, citing the existence of specific explosive elements hidden within the debris. Survivors and family members of the fallen provide emotionally raw accounts of the events which led them on their own personal crusades for truth.

On-camera interview subjects challenge the automatic dismissal of "conspiracy" as a concept. They point to other incidents throughout history - including Watergate and the lone gunmen theory in the assassination of President Kennedy - as key examples of widely held conspiratorial views.

The events of September 11 have left great wounds all over the world that remain unhealed. It brought forth the troublesome war in Iraq, and a seismic shift in the arena of public policy - from the enactment of the Patriot Act to the increased prominence of invasive surveillance to the slow erosion of certain civil liberties. The need for answers and closure permeates each of the presentations and testimonials featured in 9/11: Decade of Deception, and it's an instinct that is shared by even the most hardened conspiracy deniers.

59 Comments / User Reviews

  1. Tracy

    I don't need to waste my time watching this to know it's a load of shit. All of these 9/11 conspiracy videos never really say how "should" the building have collapsed if they were hit by planes like they were. What "should" it look like if it supposedly happened all wrong? The buildings were hit by planes you dummies. If that does not cause a building to collapse you have too much time on your hands to be paranoid freaks. What's even worse is some people are dumb enough to believe the shit that you say. Rather than making these docs you really should put your money into feeding the poor or something useful rather than this embarrassment. I know you are too stupid to be embarrassed but trust me I am embarrassed for you. Please don't make any more of these.

  2. Rich

    Tracy, Tracy, Tracy......I'm embarrassed for you!!! The buildings shouldn't have collapsed if they were actually hit by just planes you moron! Please go back to grade school and study at the very least one physics course and you might.....might be able to grasp what these documentaries are trying to tell you. Now I'll admit this is not one of the best 9/11 documentaries out there, but that still does not excuse your ignorance....Please, please don't post anymore you don't have enough mental muscle to waste it on comments my dear!

  3. Mike

    Tracy, what about the numerous explosions going off in the building and heard by numerous people including police and firemen. Did they fall out of the plane and go boom? The real question is who placed them there? I guess that's a stupid question also. What about building 7 being pulled as the owner said, as it also came down around 5:20pm with very little damage. Once all is over we go to WAR!

  4. Felix

    yes they do Tracy, they explain numerous time in this video how it should have....oh but it true, you are not listening..

  5. jay

    Free fall, Tracey. FREE FALL.

  6. mike

    Tracy appears to be the typical plant to grab the numero uno spot with an inane posting to try to discourage others who might view this documentary and maybe start digging a little deeper into the crime scene of 911. THE DAY THAT PHYSICS STOOD STILL!

  7. Truth prevail

    What is it we want as individuals? Personally I have to say Respect, Honesty and Loyalty. I speak for myself of course when I say that. It is very important to go into the facts presented with an open mind, NEVER a predetermined for or against opinion. Only then will your common sense and intuitive gut feeling start to shift toward the truth. and at Tracy, take the amount of time it took you to respond n ur comment-and actually watch the whole damn film before u make more a fool of yourself by commenting so ignorantly and disrespectfully as you did. Clearly you had your intentions already set by before watching this!!!

  8. Really?

    Tracey, the whole point is that it SHOULDN'T have fell, 10% of the building was damaged and 100% fell straight down at the speed of gravity. To put that in perspective thats like saying that if you have a tower of boxes and you damage 2-3 blocks at the top the whole tower will fall straight down at the same speed as if you just dropped a box from the same height. Had you watched the video you wouldve seen the credentials of the experts. If you honestly believe that professors from McMaster University, University of Coppenhagen and multiple Harvard PHDs, have no idea about what they are talking about then there is honestly nothing anyone else can say.

  9. darlene

    I remember the cbc doing a piece on the towers in dec of 2001 , in it they showed the molton medal still running after 3 months ? This was when i knew the goverment of the USA lied to the people . This does not explain why or how the towers TURNED TO DUST ? tc .

  10. nicholas

    Tracey, beLIEve me when i tell you it is almost unbelievable what our goverment did that day! I heard the conspiracy theories and thought there was no way. However, they had the motive and resources to do it. More important a country too asleep to question it. The FACTS and SCIENCE says so!

  11. CarimboHanky

    man the level of ignorance on Tracy's comment its just... wow!

    if you still have doubts about the buildings collapse, just look for a non-conspiracy documentary name "ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH"

    there you would have architects and engineers explaining why the building shouldnt collapse and offer explanation to the freefall collapse, which goes against everything stated on the official 9/11 report.

  12. Adam

    A 10 year old can debunk this garbage..... Seriously..... Planes hit them.... They collapsed.... And if anyone want too get this moron too debate me publicly, more then happy too do so....

  13. Wayne

    Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and the rest of the gang need extrordinary rendition to Gitmo, where interrogation techniques can be used to extract the truth. If the truth is not forthcoming, a quick jab with pentathol will loosen their tongues. A media contingent present at the gates can then inform the world what actually happened on 9/11. If the gang are guilty of this criminal conspiracy, a public trial can be held and punishment decided by the public.

  14. trumpsahead

    Tracey. get a life. We live in a matrix. Unfortunately the majority see the same as before, while some of us see the truth as never before 9/11. 9/11 uncovered the matrix our govt has been creating for so many decades. The more govt intervenes in our lives the more we lose sight of reality. People will only see the truth when they start taking responsibility for themselves and not rely on govt telling them what they perceive.
    Never take anyone's word for something, but investigate for truth.
    We've all been duped. Things aint what they seem.
    I won't be happy until Bush and Cheney hang and their entire adminiscabinet.

  15. Lindal

    I've followed the 911 truth movement since 2006. It is inconceivable that these highly educated men and women, who have time and time again shown that we have not been told the facts of that terrible day, have not had their day in front of our Congress. That is until you consider that our Congress is made up of insider trading, war profiteers.

  16. Alison Ellis

    Read Dr. Judy Wood's book, then you might be able to take the blindfold's off your eyes. A 'plane hitting a building does not turn it into dust in mid air. I know it is frightening to believe that your government would kill hundreds of it's own citizens and see them as collateral damage, but they were determined to attack Iraq and needed a good excuse to get the the public onside. Please step out of the herd of sheep and start to think for yourselves - before it is too late.

  17. james

    Who cares what these ultra-liberals say about ANYTHING!!! Canadians stay in your own sh..hole!

  18. Kathy

    Well, the panelists could have been better. One is an investigative judge from Italy, specializes in terrorism. That one's okay. Next we have a Psychologist, then an Urban and Regional Planner, and finally an Anthropologist. I would have liked to see a distinguished engineer or architect. I think the other film mentioned, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is more convincing. But folks, just keep making these films. They are good. Someday all may know the truth.

  19. Barry Y

    I heard Larry Silverstein say they pulled building 7 with my own ears on the brainwashing box when the whole sorry affair was unfolding, later he makes all sorts of excuses and denies he meant demolish it - there is no doubt in my mind whatsoever that building 7 was demolished - that should be suspicious enough to call it all into question PERIOD!

  20. Collie

    Well Tracy I think you should take notice to what some of the comments made above. You see I am thinking that you have made the comment you have made just for the reaction since if you understood even the basic physics you would understand that buildings made from Steel and concrete dont collapse in the way the towers collapsed. You actually made that comment without even watching the doco and without giving the scientific minds a chance to at least show you the mechanism of demolition. Surely you have to respect what they know. What does bother me is that all the proof in the world isnt going to bring these politcal leaders to justice. Thanks for reading.

  21. Harry

    Assuming that the official explanation for the 9/11 disaster was a fabrication and that what happened was intentionally caused by the powers-that-be, one way to expose the lie is for a whistle blower from the inside to name names, giving details not only of modus operandi but also of reasons behind the horrific crime. Even if those responsible cannot be brought to justice, history must reflect the truth.

  22. jackal

    James, it is people like you who haven't got a clue of what is going on in your own country. You obviously lack an education, and anything else you will say about that is unbelievable. However, I hate to see someone like yourself getting in the last word on this topic. It was people from Europe who were the first to disbelieve that the incidents of 9/11 were anything but the things your government said it was. It took your government 7 years to have some sort of an investigation, and out of that came nothing but lies. It was your people in the States that have fallen for things that Cheney, the possible instigator of the whole charade, said, along with Bush. This was not the only video made. But if you don't believe what was said in this document, feel free to stay ignorant.

  23. Collie

    Ok, So now what...when are these people going to be brought to justice for what they have quite evidently done. They have killed so many people so they can justify war.

  24. Brad

    Tracy, Adam, and james... people like you are the reason why I have little faith in humanity's chances at learning anything beyond self-satisfaction and power-mongering. Congratulations on your ability to see nothing that is real but only what your fearful and small minds will allow. I ask though is it really that comforting to remain a fool in a fool's world?

  25. Mathias

    The pieces starts to fall together, independent sources are saying essentially the same thing and it´s all over the net. Just one example is Susan Lindauer former CIA asset mention how she and her supervisors had prior knowledge (6 months before 9/11) of a planned attack of the twin towers or NYC, small nuclear bombs was going to be used what that ever means. As they mention in this doc. they had prior knowledge of the event at least of the pentagon. And now whole Europe are flooded with refugees, from Middle East and Africa the politicians are opening the borders like there is no tomorrow, a coincidence? nope! The owners of this planet are playing with us like it´s a game and we need to put an end to it, and we don't beat them with the same game we invent a new one, open source movements and empowerment of communities around the globe take away these centralized systems it doesn't work and lets share our progress on the net, forget all this psychos we can live without them but not the other way around.

  26. Collie

    Well just watched doc over again. Very interesting and I was going to say shocking but I am not surprised in the least at the measures these people will take and the lengths they will go to so they can justify war. The official story put forward is so ridiculous and they know it. They are so arrogant about it because they no they have total power which means that they can churn out any explanation because the people cant do anything about it. When the bombings took place in London re 7th July 2005, again terrorists were blamed. The official story was just as lame as 9/11. In fact on that day, again, there were numerous inconsistencies and discrepancies in the official story. In fact, when asked why the emergency services were already there in force, before the bombings, they said that there was an emergency services training exercise taking place in the area. What???

  27. Allen

    USA have carried out a False Flag of all False Flags!

  28. Gerard

    Tracy, ¡¡How can you be so ignorant after more than 14 years!! Any one with a bit of brain knows that the destruction of the towers was something planned by the US government, and one day, perhaps not too far away, the guilty people who planned and directed the destruction of the towers , will be taken to court, to pay for the horror the committed to the whole world and the wars due to this action.
    Hope it will be sooner than later.
    CarpeDiem

  29. John Novak

    I was a Combat Engineer in the Army. Coming home from Viet Nam, I was assigned to the Demolitions Mine Warfare Section at Ft Belvoir, Virginia. Worked with TNT, C-4, time fuse, det cord. It took a day for me, to get over the initial shock of what happened. As I watched the plane hit the tower and the destruction that followed, my jaw hit the floor. WHAT??? impossible !! The HUGE question is WHY, who gained from this? Questions that still remain.

  30. Caroline

    Tracy, please be aware that a building fell that day that wasn't hit by a plane. The reason that most people now believe that it was an inside job is because of how fast that building fell. It fell just about as fast as a bowling ball dropped from it's roof. That means that there would have been no obstructions below it (as in concrete floors and steel frames). The only way that could be true is if it was brought down by controlled demolition. That takes weeks of preparation and work. So you see that scientifically, it's impossible to have come down the way our government claims. Perhaps watch Dr. Daniele Ganser's presentation 10 Years after 9/11 on Youtube to better understand.

  31. Lee

    The WHY? is a question that I often ask myself. I have a hard time believing that my own government would kill so many of it's own citizens, including a large number of first responders. But, it has become obvious to me that we were lied to. It's easy to lash out at the US government and blame it. I believe that the Federal Reserve was behind this. They are the ones who have benefited the most from this tragedy. I think that they gave a list of demands to top government leaders and basically said "give us what we want or else". Well, I think our leaders tried to stand up for us, and told the federal reserve "no" and then we got the "or else". Regardless, there is much more to the story that is still yet to be uncovered, and the rabbit hole likely goes much deeper than most realize.

  32. Maurice

    What is so overwhelmingly alarming is the inability of people to pull their heads out of the sand and actually challenge the abundance of inconsistencies in the official version of events. The American government now has absolute proof that they can get away with pretty much anything and that the majority of people will unquestionably and patriotically, swallow every last morsel of shit fed to them, by a people who's interests don't include their interests. So successful has the American government become over the last five decades, at refining the propaganda tools to discredit and marginalize anyone prepared to challenge their dirty business that the future looks bleak indeed.

    Most people are not just sheep but sheep on steroids that will violently scream and shout to protect the evil bastards who use them as fodder. The meaning of conspiracy has now successfully been redefined to mean that it's utterance will reveal a mental disorder that causes a person to defiantly step out of line, like they have some over the top paranoid obsession to challenge the powers that be. They must be sick, weak and an abrasive trouble maker. Someone wh's lost all touch with reality. So lets all block our ears and ignore everything they have to say, and just for a laugh we can patronize and ridicule them.

    What the f*** have they made us become?
    I guess it's not so strange or new, Socrates was burdened heavily by this very sad sheep like human frailty some 2,400 years ago.

  33. Ed

    Tracy was the mole. The rabbit in a dog race. The shit I step in that prompts me to watch more carefully where I'm going. Mind altering documentary. America is the cause of terrorism foreign and domestic. Mostly I should say. Who are we really? Homicidal maniacs? Terrorize ourselves? just to terrorize others? Yep a sad sad day for the " land of the free to kill".

  34. Blaice

    Wow, that demolition control example was literally enough for me to concede that it was undoubtedly planned, besides the planes hitting. There is unquestionably more detail to the truth than is presented by our "media".

  35. Sharon Pickering

    Tracey, I absolutely agree with you. I question the editorial decision of this website to post docos by conspiracy peddlers or speculators or wackos (they are not 'theorists' by any reasonable definition of that word). I am so glad I am not as dumb as these people posting in support of this piece of crap. To support these documentaries is un-American and immoral to the memories of those killed.

  36. fadsfsdaf

    Jet fuel can't melt steel beams.

  37. RAT

    Dear, Tracy!

    The towers was hit indeed by planes. But the planecrash itself didnt take down WTC, atleast not WTC7 but you are a sheep (i cant blame you, but i can blame your ignorance), nothing is wrong here. Enjoy your dream!

  38. eddy

    As frustrating as it might be for some, I think it contributes to the "blinders, and earmuffs" that come on to the believers in the "official story" when referring to the "government" as the perpetrators of whatever actually happened that day.. yes, of course, members of the administration and government had to have quite a bit of involvement in many aspects of the events that day (if in fact it was an inside job) - but, perhaps changing the "title" of the guilty may make it a bit easier for those who can't see or can't accept all the obvious evidence contradicting the official story, as well as the many attempts in the "cover-up" the evidence that supports the "conspiracy theory".. just my 2cents

  39. Aijazz

    9/11 symbolized the end of the westernised, pornographic, inhuman worldview. Period.
    Come to India. I give you Pav Bhaji for free!

  40. Bull detector

    As a former Royal Engineer and Member of the Institute of Explosive Engineers, it is impossible for the buildings to have collapsed as per the official version. Building 7 was an irrefutable, conclusive, unambiguous controlled demolition.

  41. Stephen

    People are so dense. If the structural support had been severely damaged on one floor and buckles under all the weight, it's not inconceivable that it would give way and as the weight increases, the speed of the fall increases. What's so hard about that? And what about it requires steel to be melted? How about it being bent? All those millions of tons on weakened support. It's not a huge leap

  42. zigfr33

    all that should have happened if it was only planes that hit the twin towers. the sections above might have fallen on the section below

    but all the sections below that did not get hit should maintain it's full strengh even with the top part compromised. fyi the supports could carry multiple times their normal working loads.

    so the top should have fallen to one side or not at all.

    there is no way the top falling on the bottom would make the bottom give out. think about it for a sec. really just think.

    nano thermite did it without a doubt.

  43. zigfr33

    sharon pickering. clearly a cia troll. being un-american is the right thing to do right now, because America is out of control, non-stop war and empire expansion. American's need to shut down wall street with even bigger number than time, make sure it's a peaceful protest, also make sure you are armed in case the police open fire. if the military is called in they wont attack american citizens

  44. Lawrence

    Planes hit the building. Buildings collapsed. Get over it.

  45. Jason e

    Yeah well said Brad. There are alot of people who are stupid & they excel at it. You could put the most obvious facts & evidence in front of them & stupid is as stupid does. "But a plane hit the building...cant you see that". Could you imagine living with these muppets!

  46. Glen

    No one seems to be wanting to find out what the pilots ID was made out of..it went all the way across a burning building and landed on the foot path with out a singe

  47. Muhammad Rafiq Abdullah

    Don't see how any of above can be believed......whether theorists or debunkeroos!?

  48. gani

    In all fairness to Tracy and others who have probably not spent much time with this information, or have been exposed to the horrors of our policies world wide and internally, it might be good to remember how you reacted to people who spoke of such things immediately after 911.

    I began to watch 911 on TV right after both planes had hit and the buildings were on fire. I voice right then and there, that we as a nation were fucked, that the powers that be had all they needed to reek havoc on 'we the people' and the world. Then when the first building drooped, I said that building was 'pulled', demolished by controlled blasts. Nobody wanted to hear that and look what happened immediately after 911. I cannot tell you how many times for years people threatened to do me harm at the mere mention that 911 was an inside job. Probably many of you. Now it's 2016 and some of the same people who thought I was a cynical asshole are coming up and telling me the 'news' as if they knew it all along. Any of you here who had such insights know what I am talking about. It was brutal and very frustrating, because it was sooo obvious to anybody willing to look, but nobody did. Hell, by the end of the day of 9/11/01, I knew, minus the details, pretty much what is being said here. We were dupped. I called a lot of people stupid and blind, but mostly I didn't talk about it, there was no way I was going to convince anybody of anything they didn't want to believe.

    So before treating Tracy and her ilk as dimwitted morons, look in the mirror. How would you have reacted to me, say in December 2001, when I told you 911 was a staged farce by people who care only for power and greed?

    Some people need more time than others to see through the deceptions, but their 'reality' is every bit as real to them as yours is to you.

  49. Kevin

    As a former infantry Marine who fought in Afghanistan, the last thing I want to believe is that all the evidence presented in this documentary is true. I have lost friends, almost been killed on multiple occasions, fought in direct combat, and in doing so, assumed myself and my fellow Marines were fighting for a righteous and just cause. The fact is, however, the empirical evidence and laws of physics DO NOT coincide with the official report in regard to what took place on September 11, 2001. It is a painful and confusing epiphany; that the events before, during, and after September 11th were highly orchestrated and carried out by individuals in supreme positions of power, not a handful of Arabs from a third world country. The laws of physics do not allow certain events to take place, and according to the official report, those events took place entirely against the laws of physics. This is a very insightful documentary outlining huge differences between what our government said happened, and what actually happened.

    I would like to add that I am very proud of my service, and if given the chance, I would do it all over again. The men I met and became life-long friends with through hardship and turmoil is absolutely priceless. With that being said, the events of 9/11 need to be re-examined, and a new investigation must be launched. I find myself staring at the screen asking the question, "If there is so much evidence that the actual events of the 9/11 terrorist attacks are completely and utterly inconsistent with the Coalition Report released by our government, then why hasn't it caught much traction in way of every news station and media outlet demanding congress address the major inconsistencies, not only within the report, but with the laws of physics and science?" I am quickly reminded of a time when I heard the "conspiracy theories" for the first time, and denounced them entirely. In the form of cognitive dissonance, there was no way my government founded on principal and freedom could ever do this. But the more I looked at the evidence, the more the facade didn't stand up to logic and reason.

    I love my country. I love that I served my country, and as stated earlier, the last thing I want to believe is that individuals within the government that I put my life on the line for and my friends have died for, have a vagrant disregard for their own citizens, and citizens of other countries. Ladies and gentleman, the evidence, logic, reason, laws of physics, and the events precipitating 9/11 say otherwise. It is a hard truth to swallow, especially for someone in my position, but history must be recorded accurately, and those responsible must be brought to justice. I cannot take another lie from those entrusted in securing our protection and freedoms. It's absolutely ridiculous and disheartening to say the least. God bless the innocent who were murdered at the hands of tyranny and absolute power. If in doubt remember, history repeats itself. Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.

  50. Matt

    If the US government was really set to go to such great lengths to justify war in Iraq, including the very real and almost inevitable risk of it being found out, why would they use bombs which leave residue and would be clearly obvious? More importantly, why after all that, would they admit that none of the hijackers had anything to do with Iraq? And finally (and the logical dealbreaker for me), WHY would they murder 3,000 of their own citizens and go through the whole incredibly difficult and major process of planning and executing 9/11 to have an excuse to invade Iraq (and claiming they had WMD's) - only to admit that there actually WERE no WMD's when they got there?!! You would think that after going to such great lengths, simply misleading the public about what may or may not have been found in Iraq would be child's play!

    I'm not saying that people should have a closed mind on the issue or ANY issue, and I know that the attacks did galvanize support for the war. But this conspiracy theory is completely illogical! For something so immensely time-consuming and complex, literally THOUSANDS of people would have to be in on it, in which case it would eventually have been leaked in great, undeniable detail for SURE.

  51. Kevin

    Matt, I totally understand what you are saying, and sometimes I too find it hard to believe. It wouldn't make sense that so much evidence would be prevalent in suggesting it was an inside job if it really was, right? How could they leave so many clues to suggest it was an attack by our own government to justify making billions and going to war in order to occupy foreign countries, establish American systems, and utilize their natural resources? Regardless of these questions, all one has to do is look at what the official story is saying versus the irrefutable scientific evidence and laws of physics.

    Let's entertain the idea that Arab terrorists actually flew into the towers and the resulting fire caused catastrophic failure of the first three buildings in history to collapse at free fall speed, two of which fell in approx. 1 hour. Let's, for the sake of intellectual conversation, say that story is true. It still does not explain the fact that there was no evidence of a plane hitting the pentagon, nor a plane crashing in Pennsylvania. Any logical person who looked at the evidence would be able to surmise that something is, at the very least, extremely strange about the government saying planes crashed in those locations without having any evidence of planes crashing in those locations. It simply does not compute.

    I 100% respect your questions and opinions, for I too had a very hard time accepting the evidence initially. In response to your question about the government admitting there were no WMD'S in Iraq, if I were a criminal, admitting some wrong doing would absolutely make me look innocent in the implication of other crimes. People would automatically suggest, "Well if he is telling the truth in this instance, then he seems like an honest person and could not be lying about other alleged crimes." It is a logical assumption. However, this appears to be a ploy. Fire cannot melt steal to the point of causing a small portion of multiple buildings to cause large portions of undamaged structural steal to fail as well to the point of being reduced to rubble and fine dust. Not to mention the presence of thermite and countless eye witness accounts (including first responders) of multiple explosions during the collapses.

    I could be totally wrong, and if so, I am willing to accept that. All one has to do is remove the questions and supposed allegations surrounding this terrible event. Just look at the facts of what occurred, and the official story being broadcasted...the two do not add up. In any other crime being investigated, if stories did not align and what was being said did not coincide with where the evidence is pointing, an ongoing investigation into the matter would ensue. Yet we have a scenario where the story being told and the evidence do not add up, and seemingly everyone is okay with that. Like I said, as a former Marine I DO NOT want to believe this, but as a rational, logical, and intelligent person, I can look at the evidence subjectively and determine that multiple (not just a few) pieces of evidence are not aligning with the official story. That in and of itself, should raise some serious questions. You have some interesting points in this matter that require some consideration though, thank you for your input.

  52. Emma

    After watching just about everything conceivable about what happened re 911, including the hundreds of testimonials by various types of engineers, I agree that the building should not have been able to come down due to plane impact. I recently watched youtube video on how planes could not withstand the impact of hitting a building with the infrastructure of the WTC and be able to leave a distinct 'plane and wings' impression in the side of the building. In reality, a plane would have concertinaed and the wings fallen off down the face of the building when it struck and in addition, aviation sources have said that it is impossible for that type of plane to travel at the mentioned speeds (750 and 950 km/hr approx) at that altitude and that at a much lower speed, the planes would have simply fallen out of the sky.

    Most firemen who escaped the WTC say that explosions occurred under them (basement) before the big explosions on the high floors and that there were many small explosions just prior to the collapse happening. To independent engineers, the building did not pancake because if it had the internal infrastructure would have generally been intact. They said even the towers looked like controlled demolition, like WTC7. What initially happened was not external impact but internal explosions. The plane shots shown on our TVs were probably pre-planned and graphic assisted.

    I know you all probably know this stuff.

    Everything .... everything ... points to 911 being an inside job and the Pearl Harbour that was needed to get this last 16 years of oil monopoly and money making, off and running.

    So we can ruminate over it but I doubt we will ever know the truth and extent of it. Just don't vote the regulars in this coming October.

  53. Alfredo

    On a very basic level, are there examples of buildings being hit by jumbo jets full of fuel where they fell over asymmetrically? Buildings on fire that fell over asymmetrically? Because you're arguing that's what should have happened.

    Also planting all the explosives needed to kill American civilians into a controlled demolition-- that takes a lot of people and work crews to do. Not a single witness or person of conscience to mention it happening? Just magical black ops people from teh recesses of paranoid imagination.

  54. Robert

    It's over...planes ran into buildings and people died, period.

  55. Joe

    Robert in denial.

  56. Ben (UK)

    Everybody is entitled to opinion and allowed to formulate their own theory regardless of how they got there, but ask this very question "how did I get here"? Fighting pre conceived ideas is difficult if it is in line with a set belief . How do you change a belief? exploration and open mindedness or is it conformity? You have a choice. Do your research, question its validity, how strong is the evidence...make it easy, does it make sense, is it logical, is there motive?is there an agenda?most of the time there is. facts speak for themselves but be mindful of what you consider a fact. my conclusion...Oil. (Anybody will do anything if it's important enough)

  57. LeanMean

    Alfredo - Seems like you have missed some of the details in the documentary. Your first question on buildings falling asymmetrically after being hit by a plane, well truth is that it took quite some time for the building to fall down after being hit by a plane, and when it did fall, it did fall asymmetrically. Now here's the interesting thing - once the top part started falling over, it was consumed in what can only be described as a series of explosions and it just got turned to complete dust. Watch the part between 28 and 34 minutes.

    Your second question on buildings on fire that fall asymmetrically, well that has not happened in the history of man building buildings and the only time it happened was on 9/11. The reason why it has not happened before or after 9/11 is because its contrary to physics. By discrediting the findings of the documentary you are discrediting physics and the laws of science.

  58. David

    I have a truck. It weighs 10,000 pounds it has 10 wheels the weight of the truck is distributed equally over 10 scale's. Each scale reads 1000 pounds and I start removing tires I get to the point to where there is only two tires left on the truck The two corner tires and I look at the scale and it reads 5000 pounds each. This is what no one realizes in the 911 towers. When the plane flew into the building it's separated the building into two pieces, the building above the plane and the building below the planes entry. When the plane hit the building it immediately removed several tires from the truck raising the forces dramatically on the remaining pillars. As the building burned more and more pillars were being removed increasing the total weight distribution of the remaining pillars to the point where they finally gave out. You have to understand that the building above the plane would only have to move a quarter of an inch down and it was doomed. there was nothing below it to stop the inertia that was just created. And just before that the explosions that were seen below can be explained by the crushing energy absorbed in the remaining pillars snapping and blowing apart the bolts or rivets that held the structure together. These bolts or rivets were around 1 inch in diameter and between eight to ten were used on vertical plates, that's 10 inches of steel that's being sheared and blown appart, yes that would create quite an explosion. I think the most amazing thing that no one has ever said or figured out is that these terrorist really messed up, it could've been a lot worse than what it was. If the planes would've entered at the 10th floor the buildings would've fallen immediately again it is the separation of the buildings, the building above, the building below,the integrity of the structure and gravity

  59. Anderson

    All of the 9/11 conspiracy theories have been thoroughly debunked at least a thousand times over now! Free fall speed has been debunked! Bombs planted in the WTC towers has been debunked! The collapsed of WTC building 7 has been explained hundreds of times over! It was on fire for seven hours because fire fighters could not reach it! The WTC building were NOT the first steel framed buildings in the world to collapse through fire! Furthermore the FBI thoroughly investigated the 9/11 terrorist attacks using thousands of agents. In the run up to 9/11 Al Qaeda made repeated threats against America that it would carry out a devastating attack on that country. The 9/11 terrorist attacks did not happen in isolation. In the years running up to 9/11 Al Qaeda bombed US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and bombed the USS Cole. And back in February 1993 Islamic terrorists bombed the World Trade Centre. After 9/11 Al Qaeda went on to bomb Madrid, Bali, Mumbai and London. Do some proper research before believing crackpot conspiracy theories.

Leave a comment / review: