Comments on: Ancient Mysteries: Bigfoot

By: Raptor jones

Raptor jones — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:04:00 +0000

Too pixelated, not worth watching if you cant see what presenters are referring to. ‘Ahh 240p my old friend, we meet again’

By: Timmy Suckmeister

Timmy Suckmeister — Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:52:00 +0000

Perhaps they are the unwanted offspring of Rosie O’Donnell and Danny DeVito…the unholiest of unions.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:49:00 +0000

Their is all ready hair,blood,tissue,fecal matter and DNA of an “unknown primate” that has been found in Canada,a country that has no indigenous primates,so their is your irrefutable proof that a bigfoot type creature does exist their…

By: Timmy Jimmy

Timmy Jimmy — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 06:54:00 +0000

This comment is total Bullshit…..

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:33:00 +0000

another possibility, or theory that has yet to be explored is the fallen angel theory. Some believe that the days of Noah, when the angels corrupted the race of mankind and giants were on the earth, resulting in the flood, and also afterwards as history and biblical records show accounts of, all the way into King David’s era; What if the Bigfoot are possibly a type of inter-dimensional creature, genetically made by alien/fallen angle technology, and they wander into our dimension from time to time? I love theorizing. wish I was a scientists and all I had to do was study and explore mysterious theories.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:22:00 +0000

another cool thing is the areas of the creature’s body where the fur/hair was wearing thin, primate specialists say these areas are consistent with primates and many other fur bearing creatures. and they are not manufactured in to the design of monkey suits one can rent. I want to believe! I want to believe!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:19:00 +0000

The coolest thing I think about the Patterson film is that the experts who digitized the film and examined it, said the because you could see muscle movement in the arm and legs and buttocks of the creature makes them believe the creature was real. The type of suits they have even in Hollywood today would not have allowed for any muscle tone, let alone movement. Plus, primate experts say the fact the creature turned her whole upper body to look towards him, as opposed to just turning her head, also casts favor in the creature being real. I think it’s really cool.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:12:00 +0000

I believe that Bigfoot are inter-dimensional creatures who come through into our dimension, just as I believe UFO’s and aliens are. I also believe that Bigfoot may possibly be guardians who guard the dimensional doorways that appear sometimes and they try to make sure people don’t wander into their dimension. Could be wrong, but it explains why we never have managed to capture one, find one’s grave or body, and why they seem to appear and disappear so suddenly from time to time in the same remote locations. As far as skeptics go, many sightings are hoaxes, but a percentage of sightings are made by reputable people, Native Elders, Teddy Roosevelt, as well as numerous witnesses and the sightings can’t be explained. And, as Jacques Valle said about aliens and UFO’s, where are they when we don’t see them?

By: R M

R M — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 07:08:00 +0000

Hello? Anyone? :-/

By: R M

R M — Sun, 31 Jul 2011 07:07:00 +0000

Okay, Okay, Ooooooooooooookay. I admit it. I have to tell the truth. I AM BIGFOOT. Sorry for fooling you all for so long. Just having a little fun. I’m sure you understand, right? Anybody up for a game of LAWN DARTS??? :D

By: matt g

matt g — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:12:00 +0000

You hoax guys are funny.

Sure MAYBE Patterson’s film was a hoax (I do not think so) but how do you hoax 50+ years of footprints across a wide area with similarities that would fool the world’s most prestigious fingerprint experts (Jimmy Chilcutt, for example, google is your friend)? The answer is, you don’t, you can’t and it counts as valid evidence that something created them.

The other side of the coin ,the one hoaxers support, suggest that there was at least a country wide conspiracy, of over 50+ years, to plant footprints of such high quality (with similar characteristics that exclude known species) that modern science can’t ascribe them to any known living mammal. All have the same cross cut dermal ridge patterns that are similar to humans as well as apes, but not an exact match to either.

As for “Patty” being a guy in a suit… look up ‘gastrocnemius muscle’ and then watch the film. After that, look up the type of fake fur that was available in 1967 (not the flexible kind available today) and get back to me.

Better yet, don’t.

By: ufo lies

ufo lies — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:07:33 +0000

how ridiculous.. if you havn’t seen an elephant how would you know its a more fantastic creature than something that nobody has ever seen anywhere.

Bigfoot is just mumbo jumbo hoax..like aliens from outerspace and moon landings and moslim terrorists doing 911.. get real.

By: ufo truth

ufo truth — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:59:03 +0000

why is it so hard to belive for some people !?
if u never seen an elephant and somebody told u about one, u would never believe it , an elephant is a way more fantastic creature then big foot !!

By: toddy

toddy — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:32:33 +0000

to yavanna i saw the one you were talking about and that one was kind of freaky, espically when the rocks were tossed back at the cabin. My question is why they didn’t stay there , since they seemed to have some form of proof showing up. Perhaps they could have obtained permission condidering what happened and they are supposed to be scientist and being a scientist you shouldn’t go running every time something goes bump in the night. I guiess the only reason i watched this one because of memories of lenoard nimoy doing a series back during the 1970′s, lenoard nimoy did a series i think it was called mysteries of the unexplained. this one was very similiar some of the same footage as i recall on the one about big foot. I just think he has the right voice for it.

By: Charles B.

Charles B. — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:51:52 +0000

Truth: Might the person who claimed to be in the Bigfoot “suit” be a liar? It’s a convenient fact that this “came out” after Patterson’s death.