Comments on: Black Box UFO Secrets

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:44:00 +0000

Very well put! That is my point. True skeptics and scientists don’t have an issue accepting that which is proven unconventional in an unconventional standard of evidence because their goal is truly to progress and evolve.
The rest of so called skeptics and scientists, which eerily represent a majority, are driven by something that goes against the grain of true progress.

Then again, true genius is usually represented by a minority.

Thanks for making this point.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:37:00 +0000

You read like you overlook the fact that these sightings are by people who can differentiate between all of the number of other things that you think these things might be.
You are assuming that certain people cannot know what they see because they cannot differentiate what behaves intelligently as opposed to what behaves naturally. As stipulated in the documentary in many instances, all of these things that you mentioned, which are actually part of the 90 or so percent of the dismissed cases were dismissed in this documentary. This documentary is presenting the 5-10% exception. And yet you still seem to be having an issue accepting it.
You want scientific proof of something otherworldly/ultra-dimensional implication, see the “Hesdalen lights” and “The new twirl order” here on top docs.
Your requirement of strict scientific evidence may have more to do with how you’re wired as opposed to those who can accept proof presented in “out of the box” human evidence. You represent one of the two conflicting sides of what makes us human. But the balance seems to elude you.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 01:20:00 +0000

Because we are not driven nor made up of strict logic, proof in effect cannot rely on these narrow conventional scientific standards. We reach a point where we dismiss possibilities of what these things cannot be in order to get closer to what they probably are. In effect to just conclude that this or that are just lights or just unknown implies a state of possibly fearing the incredible possibility of what they are.
We have feelings and instincts many of the times that are driven by an unexplained sense of wisdom. Because of this reality, when something amazing is observed, some of us will draw an intuitive and yet intelligent conclusion as to what it feels that we have just observed.
This is what you’ve gotten from many of these very credible sources.
So your desire for a simple math to produce truth isn’t much less than
the sophistication that some of us embody.
In effect i can only chalk up your comments to pragmatic and narrow-minded idiocy driven by a fear to accept that which lies outside the box.
Scientific process of proof does not evidence make. That is human.

By: Mickey Bigmick Lee

Mickey Bigmick Lee — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:27:00 +0000

i agree but it seems like people don’t care about the truth, hell idk if people are ready for truth, could be wrong but it just seems like everyone is too selfish :

By: Mickey Bigmick Lee

Mickey Bigmick Lee — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:22:00 +0000

I tell ya what when i read any comments on anything on the web…damn…wth is everyone so mad for?? jesus…find some other way to vent

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:06:00 +0000

this comment is an online ad!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:14:00 +0000

Yeah thats it…I’m egotistical…HUH?

If thats what you get out of my comments, I suggest that you try to stay away from a career in psychology.

I have a lot of angst. Egotism, is feeling that everyone should serve me. Everyone, in my idiom, should serve the downtrodden.

However, I am not one of the current, (media) definition of “downtrodden”. So I feel guilt, because all I can do is talk.

But keep on trying! You almost have an opinion and maybe you can make a valid point in the near future.

From reading your posts, I will bet that you believe in intelligent design.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:29:00 +0000

Ive read quite a few of your comments on different videos and its clear to me that your egotistical, you have a “what about me” complex going on.
You should perhaps change your name to “me me me me me” or “I I I I I”.
Its because of people like you why they probably cant be bothered with contact on a global scale.
Theres too many “You You You’s” out there.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:15:00 +0000

as an unapologetic “conspiracy theorist” (love that term) I believe that people have seen these anomalies. However, its just a distraction from things that I really want to see answered.

Right now, unless there is, as I saw in MIB an immediate threat from these Aliens…I’d rather just concentrate on the fact that we no longer have any say in the day to day dealings of our planet…

If there are Aliens…I hope that Money didn’t make them space explorers… cause we have enough of that idiocy here.

And if they are infinitely more advanced than us…they would have probably just contacted … well frankly…me…I’m pretty unassuming and I can rock a global podium.

All I really want, is an audit of the entities who currently call themselves our leaders…there is something definitely alien about them.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:59:00 +0000

I called Alien Busters…but they just ended up breaking the saucer…morons

By: Seldric Herrholz

Seldric Herrholz — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:53:00 +0000

@Everyone who didn’t see a UFO yet:
Visit James Gilliland, ECETI Project, Troutlake, WA, close to Mt. Rainier, and stay there for a night or two. Chances are quite good you will see one or more.

By: Conspiracy Detective

Conspiracy Detective — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:15:00 +0000

Its getting silly now, so much is coming out, how long will the government take to tell us the truth? we are not stupid and can handle the truth. Learn you true history. Take a look ay my blog for more conspiracy theories

By: paul

paul — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:00:34 +0000

I am too skeptical but have an open mind, I see, I know that there are events that can not be explained over the centuries, but I still can not find myself believing even when I want to believe. I have even been in a car with friends driving in the country late at night, that was followed by lights in the sky for a while and that could not be explained. But, they were just lights, no prove of anything at all.

By: Clayton Bigsby

Clayton Bigsby — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:12:36 +0000

Why do I watch this? UFOs and Bigfoot will never be proven because………just because.

By: Soeren

Soeren — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:50:29 +0000

gero2006

“This documentary shows evidence of ‘unidentified flying objects’. It then invites the viewer to identify these objects as evidence of alien life. No additional evidence is produced to support the conclusion that UFO sightings are evidence of alien life. This means that very big claims are made on very flimsy foundations.”

alrite then, lets look at this case from a logical point of view shall we? with ALL the info this documentary adds, the only logical reason is to believe there is something there, making up excuses like “oh its a wether balloon, hurr durr durr” are completely nonsense, and these people talking about this really have MUCH more credibility than the government, as it is a very secretive place

lets have some more logic, there MUST be civilizations out there that are much MUCH more advanced than us, why isnt it reasonable to think that they want to search out new life too, like we do, and i would really like to hear your opinion on this, cause you cant argue against that, unless ure a biblef*g who believes mankind is 5k years old (hahahahahaah)

but then again, why am i discussing this with you? you seem completely lost in all that is called logic. have fun living your empty live in this extremely small world you call your head. you really show how narrowminded some of mankind are. illogical and narrowminded, so grow up