Dan Aykroyd Unplugged on UFOs
2001 was a real space odyssey for me. Instead of flying on a spaceship to the moon, Jupiter, or beyond the solar system, I met Dan Aykroyd for the first time to talk about UFOs. That’s when I knew I had to sit him down in front of the camera, just let him talk about the truth and make a documentary film out of it. Because if I didn’t no one would believe we had this amazing conversation. In this long conversation with Dan Aykroyd about UFOs, I thought it was like Einstein was hiding inside of a comic genius, just so that if he told us the real truth he wouldn’t have to believe it. If Einstein had told us UFOs were real, would we have believed *him*? He never spoke about it. But Dan Aykroyd speaks about UFOs as if he were a full professor on the subject. Hollywood star Dan Aykroyd, who is a believer in the existence and government cover-up of alien life-forms, hosts this look into the phenomenon of UFO sightings.
Akroyd shares his personal experiences in this field and also discusses recent findings with author and UFOlogist David Sereda. DAN AYKROYD UNPLUGGED ON UFOS features UFO footage as well as testimonial material from Astronaut Gordon Cooper and others, including former president Ronald Reagan.
Watch the full documentary now
Hi All;
Here’s something “different” to think about.
We build and use bathyspheres to go very deep into the oceans because without them, we would be crushed having gone from one atmosphere of pressure to hundreds. And the oceans are the least known parts of our planet. Now imagine a planet being visited by alien intelligence. What percentage of our planet do you think they see as the majority life supporting area of our planet? The oceans are the best place to hide and remain “on site” as it were. Now imagine these beings having come from a “location” either parallel with ours or otherwise which has a very low atmospheric pressure. They would, by necessity, build a ship of sorts, a bathysphere to enter OUR living space pressure. Most UFO’s, if looked upon with this frame of mind, fit the necessary geometry of build to duplicate a pressure vessel necessary to support life which can live in near space pressure. This may very will explain the shape and sizes of the “objects” seen in space by our astronauts in orbit since these seem to change size and shape and even appear and disappear at will since low pressure would allow for an evolution which permits very high “flexibility” of shape. Think about it. A living organism “from earth” which has evolved to live in very near space pressures, just like the deep sea fish can live at thousands of PSI in the deep oceans. Far fetched? I think not. Parallel universe, try parallel evolution on earth that has gone un-noticed since we ARE the dominant species living on the minority of the earth’s surface ONLY.
Think outside the box and the possibilities become obvious.
Live long and …. well, you know the rest….
David
It would be very narrow minded to believe in all the galaxies that exist that we should be the only intelligent life form.
With the technologies our government is experimenting with today i.e. the H.A.A.R.P. project, the weapons in space, etc., it should come as no surprise that we’re being watched and our behaviors evaluated and monitored. What we choose to do to our planet and galaxy, in the long run effects all planets and galaxies.
Dan akroyd and this other fella have been smoking something. i never really thought he was a good actor, this doesnt help. i hope for dans sake, this guy paid him a decent sum to say this rambling jibberish.
“i hope for dans sake, this guy paid him a decent sum to say this rambling jibberish”
How incredibly arrogant (or ******) to believe that in hundrads of billions of star systems there is only one intelligent race. Maybe Chris should take a look at the latest theories on string or MT before pronouncing his intelligent responses.
Good comment jono. Yes it is true, more people need to start thinking and opening their minds, rather than immediately jumping to their established/personal preference explanations (scientists who take skepticism to an extreme point where it is not even skepticism anymore but just denial of evidence, and religious people or people with dogmatic beliefs that have no real basis).
Here’s to a more enlightened future.
Why does Aykroyd talk in terms of ‘we’ when talking about the US? Isn’t he Canadian?
This is serious subject that is being treated in a childish way with this rediculous footage, and what in the hell is Dan Aykroyd talking about anyway. Is he high? My god , there is a hell of alot better evidence then this.
I gotta say I’m not knocking the subject matter , but damn, lets not put up cheezy photos and pretend like they say something . There are many really good photos that cannot be explained that might have been more apropriate.
Dan Aykroyd and the other believers are truly space cases. Bet jono659 is a fellow traveler.
I always love seeing anything 2 do with other lifeforms and science based reports. I know there are the sceptics but I KNOW we r not alone. though some choose not to “believe” that DOESNT MEAN it doesnt exist. Just recently saw a crazy boggling movie with Mila Jovavich about other lifeforms. was truly shaking! Its on-demand now or rental.
Even the traditional christian believer should take note that Jesus said there are MANY WORLDS and things that we just could NOT understand with our human minds! He was the ultimate strength and power to bring a message of self saving and using the power within u to realize U R not alone and can accomplish anything u can dream or imagine! we r creators.
as others have said
its sheer arrogance,and in my opinion a little bit backward thinking,to say,in the vastness of space,we are the only beings capable of space travel.
as for dan akroyd,
i would love to share a beer and a joint with the man.
although,
it would have to be proper beer,and by that, i mean ale.
not that fizzy,urine coloUred stuff that you north americans call beer.
another great doc
keep them coming,
cheers vlatko.
@Oj Um when speaking of aliens it would be correct to use we. It is amazing that out of the entire documentary that is what you picked out. Nationalist much?