Comments on: Heavy Watergate: The War Against Cold Fusion

By: Thien Warder

Thien Warder — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:57:00 +0000

To give everyday people thing to worry about , and really… to stop Africa and Asia from developing ?

Because North America is the only places that didn’t join the Kyoto Protocol to reduce global warming, even though probably one of the biggest user of oil. So there is no intention of doing anything about it on a national and industrial level.

that’s just my thought and observation. There’s too many sides to this 21st century story.

By: Kyle Zeiszler

Kyle Zeiszler — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:59:00 +0000

If you only have water then Helium can not be made by a chemical reaction because you only have hydrogen and oxygen. In there experiment they produced excess heat and helium. they said themselves that they dont know exactly what is going on, but it could not happen with the principles of physics that we except today.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:37:00 +0000

If “mainstream science” is so scewed by the “evil corperations” and their so called corperate greed, then how is their so much climate change this and global warming that hype in the “mainstream media”?

By: Sharad Bailur

Sharad Bailur — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:41:00 +0000

I do not agree with this documentary. It is not a war of personalities but of the first principles of Physics. IF the relative strengths of the four fundamental forces of nature are actually what they have been proved to be, cold fusion is not possible. If not the whole of Physics needs to be re-examined. And what does that scientist mean by saying:”Helium cannot be produced by a chemical process”? What is it that goes into balloons nowadays? Lastly if there is really something happening in those chemical processes, it is probably something as yet undiscovered; it need not be fusion.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 04:03:00 +0000

If the world listened to people like you we would all be conformists and think the earth is flat.
Just because something doesn’t work the first time we shouldnt pursue it..?!
C’mon now… open your mind.
PS. Conspiracy theory in itself is nonsense when you put them all together. Tree through the forest my friend.

By: Rich M

Rich M — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:29:00 +0000

Amazing that so many of you buy into this tripe.

This is a video about sour grapes. Of course hot fusion is going to get funding. It’s real science. Cold fusion is basically proven cold and dead. That is how science works. Science that produces results gets more money. Science that doesn’t, dies….but cry babies are just cry babies. Conspiracies are created by cry babies.

By: Jordan Stevens

Jordan Stevens — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:33:00 +0000

Cold fusion is real and Frank Znidarsic has the best theory as to how it works. In fact, many things are possible once you have the right theoretical model. Modern physics has a terrible model at the moment and that’s the main reason they are stumped. Yes, I am a physicist and amazed how long we have gone with qm in such a bad state. All forces are undeniably unified under FZ’s theories and cold fusion results are easily explained.

By: Brad Brown

Brad Brown — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:25:00 +0000

I would be interested on your comments on the following article:
http://www.24hgold.com/english/contributor.aspx?contributor=Mish&article=1283705988G10020

By: Ma'inganens Shkode

Ma'inganens Shkode — Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:40:00 +0000

water burns at room temperature, when put under a strong electromagnetic field it has a blue “flame” coming off of it, this is evaporation, deuterium is heavier water and evaporates at a much faster rate then normal water releasing more heat energy.

“don’t believe anything unless you can prove it with your own research”
William Cooper

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:18:00 +0000

If cold fusion is a scam, would you then call it Con-fusion?

By: Giulio Camuffo

Giulio Camuffo — Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:02:00 +0000

@ Anemone Jones

“Find me a peer reviewed paper proving the process of cold fusion and I’ll dump every dollar I have into the project.”

Are you serious about that? Here you are:
“Correlation of excess power and helium production during D2O and H2O electrolysis using palladium cathodes”, from Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry.

By: Anemone Jones

Anemone Jones — Thu, 26 May 2011 13:41:00 +0000

It is absurd to give this documentary any credit what so ever. “Main stream science” is used in this documentary as some type of slur. Apparently publicly verifiable evidence is a sham to the makers of this documentary. If all of these people had such great data proving the effect it would only take one published paper that could be verified to completely reverse the consensus. Science is so amazing because of the vigor in which scientists try to disprove the discovery of other scientists. That’s why we can trust peer review to a point. The more something has been critiqued the greater the foundation the science stands on. This documentary seems to believe that “Main stream science” is scared of things that don’t seem to make since to the standard theory. It takes only a rudimentary knowledge of physics to think of many examples of publicly verified experiments that would have seemed ridiculous during the first reading. A very easy example would be the 2 slit experiment in quantum physics. One of the most important concepts in science is strict experimentation with control that have qualities that make the hypothesis and theory falsifiable. Not only was the theory incorrect and experiment poorly setup, because of the lack of environmental control the experiment produced different results at different places with the same setup. Find me a peer reviewed paper proving the process of cold fusion and I’ll dump every dollar I have into the project. It’s sad to see scientists give up their intellectual integrity over pride. They were not as smart as they thought, and made a huge mistake and now cant admit they were wrong. Science is willing to change, criticize and reconsider everything but not without evidence. (If you think this documentary presents evidence you don’t understand the standards of evidence in the scientific community.) The only thing I learned from this documentary is how gullible some of the commenters are on this site. Please move this documentary to religion, the only way you can believe this quackery is on faith.

By: Henk

Henk — Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:48:40 +0000

Sandor obviously is an oil company shill! Ignore ‘it’!

By: awful-truth

awful-truth — Fri, 14 Jan 2011 04:09:48 +0000

Although it may be to good to be true, this does not guarantee that it is impossible. I have watched this story unfold since it first occured and the one thing that is certain, is that the doctoring of results (MIT)is undeniable. Money rules the day, and the same people that own the oil industry will not give up control until they own all the possible alternatives. Until this control is broken, humanity will maintain it’s course towards self extinction. We are the weakest link, goodbye!

By: Ngel

Ngel — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:25:46 +0000

This is not the first alternate energy documentary i have seen. The problem with all of them (and this is no conspiracy theory at all) is “it is not financially viable at this time”. In this documentary it is repeated at least 4 times.

And that is the essence of all things. Scientific progress? Open mindedness? Yeah sure, but i am afraid that currently the only scientific axiom that holds true is “money talks and…” i believe you know the rest.