<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Heidegger: Thinking the Unthinkable</title> <atom:link href="http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/</link> <description>Watch stunning, eyeopening, interesting, free, streaming, full, online documentary films and movies.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: vvindred</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-183483</link> <dc:creator>vvindred</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-183483</guid> <description>i thought i was at the philosophy section not the anti nazi one</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thought i was at the philosophy section not the anti nazi one</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TanongSak</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-177751</link> <dc:creator>TanongSak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-177751</guid> <description>You sound like the garden-variety sour grapes dilettante. Since you can&#039;t understand what he&#039;s saying, he must not be saying anything worthwhile. Unfortunately (for you), a great many thinkers and historians of philosophy disagree with you. As far as comparing Heidegger with Einstein, the notion is puerile. Einstein was a scientist, and as such, he couldn&#039;t address the same sorts of questions that Heidegger did, let alone give answers to them. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sound like the garden-variety sour grapes dilettante. Since you can&#8217;t understand what he&#8217;s saying, he must not be saying anything worthwhile. Unfortunately (for you), a great many thinkers and historians of philosophy disagree with you. As far as comparing Heidegger with Einstein, the notion is puerile. Einstein was a scientist, and as such, he couldn&#8217;t address the same sorts of questions that Heidegger did, let alone give answers to them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TanongSak</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-177749</link> <dc:creator>TanongSak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-177749</guid> <description>You&#039;re quite right. Heidegger himself is supposed to have said that, if you&#039;ve studied Aristotle for 10 years, then you&#039;re ready to study him (Heidegger).  I always advise people to start with a commentary on Heidegger, such as Hubert Dreyfus&#039; &quot;Being-in-the-World,&quot; before going to Heidegger. Heidegger&#039;s German is no easier to understand than the English translations of his work. However, one really can&#039;t do serious philosophy nowadays and ignore Heidegger. Even the stalwarts of the one-dimensional &quot;analytic philosophy&quot; tradition are beginning to understand this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re quite right. Heidegger himself is supposed to have said that, if you&#8217;ve studied Aristotle for 10 years, then you&#8217;re ready to study him (Heidegger).  I always advise people to start with a commentary on Heidegger, such as Hubert Dreyfus&#8217; &#8220;Being-in-the-World,&#8221; before going to Heidegger. Heidegger&#8217;s German is no easier to understand than the English translations of his work. However, one really can&#8217;t do serious philosophy nowadays and ignore Heidegger. Even the stalwarts of the one-dimensional &#8220;analytic philosophy&#8221; tradition are beginning to understand this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-158606</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-158606</guid> <description>This smooth documentary is an affront to standards of intelligent appraisal and good judgement. Its quiet voice-over, smooth editing and selected biographical details are dedicated to destroying Heidegger&#039;s reputation and demonizing the man. The film says little about Heidegger&#039;s philosophical perspective and repeats platitudes about German society&#039;s alleged injustices and persecutions during the 1930s.Heidegger, a peasant at heart, successfully maneuvered a path through class-rigid German society. And for this, as much as for his philosophical insights, he will be remembered.In its time, the Nazi Party offered similar opportunities to millions of other young people without work and dispossessed by the terms of the 1919 Versailles Treaty. Among other punishments for losing World War I, Germany was forced to pay 269 billion gold marks to international bankers - one of the most monstrous fines in all history. In 1933, Hitler refused further payments - the real reason for Britain starting World War 2 six years later. Germany&#039;s sovereign debt was finally paid on Sunday 3 October 2010 - a completion date unnoticed by most of the world&#039;s media.If a just appraisal is to be made of Heidegger and his society, the biased perspective of ethnicity so painfully over-emphasized in this documentary must be abandoned. Economics and social psychology offer a broader and more salubrious platform.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This smooth documentary is an affront to standards of intelligent appraisal and good judgement. Its quiet voice-over, smooth editing and selected biographical details are dedicated to destroying Heidegger&#8217;s reputation and demonizing the man. The film says little about Heidegger&#8217;s philosophical perspective and repeats platitudes about German society&#8217;s alleged injustices and persecutions during the 1930s.</p><p>Heidegger, a peasant at heart, successfully maneuvered a path through class-rigid German society. And for this, as much as for his philosophical insights, he will be remembered.</p><p>In its time, the Nazi Party offered similar opportunities to millions of other young people without work and dispossessed by the terms of the 1919 Versailles Treaty. Among other punishments for losing World War I, Germany was forced to pay 269 billion gold marks to international bankers &#8211; one of the most monstrous fines in all history. In 1933, Hitler refused further payments &#8211; the real reason for Britain starting World War 2 six years later. Germany&#8217;s sovereign debt was finally paid on Sunday 3 October 2010 &#8211; a completion date unnoticed by most of the world&#8217;s media.</p><p>If a just appraisal is to be made of Heidegger and his society, the biased perspective of ethnicity so painfully over-emphasized in this documentary must be abandoned. Economics and social psychology offer a broader and more salubrious platform.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-158505</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-158505</guid> <description>When I first read Being and Time (1956 Macquarrie-Robinson ed.), I had a difficult time understanding their translations of key phrases. I finally came across a book by Hubert Dreyfus (Being-In-The-World, a Commentary on Being and Time, M.I.T Press,1991) and the light bulbs went off! Afterwards I came across a new translation of Being and  Time by Joan Stambaugh (1996, State Univ. Of New York Press) and found it far superior to the 1956 ed. As far as I&#039;m concerned, his philosophy has nothing to do with Nazi-ism. He took his dedication to Husserl out of Being and Time during the Nazi era, but put it back after WWII. Like Nietzsche he had a higher ideal of authentic human-being, but with our culture and fascination/reliance on technology and the &quot;newest fad&quot;, we&#039;ll never be visited by extraterrestrials, because they haven&#039;t seen evidence of intelligent life here. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first read Being and Time (1956 Macquarrie-Robinson ed.), I had a difficult time understanding their translations of key phrases. I finally came across a book by Hubert Dreyfus (Being-In-The-World, a Commentary on Being and Time, M.I.T Press,1991) and the light bulbs went off! Afterwards I came across a new translation of Being and  Time by Joan Stambaugh (1996, State Univ. Of New York Press) and found it far superior to the 1956 ed. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, his philosophy has nothing to do with Nazi-ism. He took his dedication to Husserl out of Being and Time during the Nazi era, but put it back after WWII. Like Nietzsche he had a higher ideal of authentic human-being, but with our culture and fascination/reliance on technology and the &#8220;newest fad&#8221;, we&#8217;ll never be visited by extraterrestrials, because they haven&#8217;t seen evidence of intelligent life here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Wershof</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-158479</link> <dc:creator>Ben Wershof</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-158479</guid> <description>How are Jews the real Nazi of our time?Nazis are members of a political party. Nazis tried to take over the world - as well as eliminate all jews, homosexuals, gypsies, blacks, political oppositions and communists. (sorry for most people that have to read this incredibly patronising comment - but some things need to be said - and said quite clearly)I&#039;m not trying to say that there are no evil jews in this world , because there are evil people from all religions, races etc.. - and i&#039;m not trying to justify everything in palestine/israel. However I think you need to reconsider what a &#039;nazi&#039; actually is - because one thing i&#039;m pretty sure on, is that a nazi is NOT a jew... i think thats one of the more obvious lessons of WW2 - you absolute moron.and i quote you &quot;nobody says anything&quot; - hmm are you sure about? Every corner i turn these days theres someone trying to push their political beliefs regarding palestine/israel.Do us all a favour, next time you want to promote hatred, or to start a completely irrelevant discussion about palestine/israel - please find the nearest bridge and feel free to jump off.Kind regards,</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are Jews the real Nazi of our time?</p><p>Nazis are members of a political party. Nazis tried to take over the world &#8211; as well as eliminate all jews, homosexuals, gypsies, blacks, political oppositions and communists. (sorry for most people that have to read this incredibly patronising comment &#8211; but some things need to be said &#8211; and said quite clearly)</p><p>I&#8217;m not trying to say that there are no evil jews in this world , because there are evil people from all religions, races etc.. &#8211; and i&#8217;m not trying to justify everything in palestine/israel. However I think you need to reconsider what a &#8216;nazi&#8217; actually is &#8211; because one thing i&#8217;m pretty sure on, is that a nazi is NOT a jew&#8230; i think thats one of the more obvious lessons of WW2 &#8211; you absolute moron.</p><p>and i quote you &#8220;nobody says anything&#8221; &#8211; hmm are you sure about? Every corner i turn these days theres someone trying to push their political beliefs regarding palestine/israel.</p><p>Do us all a favour, next time you want to promote hatred, or to start a completely irrelevant discussion about palestine/israel &#8211; please find the nearest bridge and feel free to jump off.</p><p>Kind regards,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Wershof</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-158472</link> <dc:creator>Ben Wershof</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-158472</guid> <description>the simple truth is that Heidegger was a nazi, perhaps for purely selfish reasons, however the matter is a perfect example of &#039;Ad Hominem&#039; - where ones work is judged by their character - I guess if you&#039;re interested in Heidegger then his political activities holds some importance to some extent. However, I find it such a shame that possibly one of the greatest philosophers to ever live has more attention put on his lifestyle than his actual philosophies.For those of you that have never read Heidegger, I highly recommend it - it may seem like utter nonsense, but you simply need to give it time, I&#039;ve been studying Heidegger for almost 4 years now, and I still need to re-read paragraphs a few times.Once you can gain understanding of the main german/latin/greek terms - and grasp the main logical points then it gets a lot easier - and believe me, it&#039;s worth it.I think it&#039;s easy to criticise this documentary about its lack of focus on his actual ideas, but you need to remember that it&#039;s really difficult to explain Heidegger in 50 minutes. His philosophy is very, VERY, advanced, its not as easy as saying &#039;A + B = C&#039; - you honestly need to give it time and some dedication if you want to get as much as you can from his writings.
Yes you can argue &#039;they could have explained the basics&#039; - but even the basics require lengthy historical research into language, philosophy and also debate, discussion and time to reflect. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the simple truth is that Heidegger was a nazi, perhaps for purely selfish reasons, however the matter is a perfect example of &#8216;Ad Hominem&#8217; &#8211; where ones work is judged by their character &#8211; I guess if you&#8217;re interested in Heidegger then his political activities holds some importance to some extent. However, I find it such a shame that possibly one of the greatest philosophers to ever live has more attention put on his lifestyle than his actual philosophies.</p><p>For those of you that have never read Heidegger, I highly recommend it &#8211; it may seem like utter nonsense, but you simply need to give it time, I&#8217;ve been studying Heidegger for almost 4 years now, and I still need to re-read paragraphs a few times.</p><p>Once you can gain understanding of the main german/latin/greek terms &#8211; and grasp the main logical points then it gets a lot easier &#8211; and believe me, it&#8217;s worth it.</p><p>I think it&#8217;s easy to criticise this documentary about its lack of focus on his actual ideas, but you need to remember that it&#8217;s really difficult to explain Heidegger in 50 minutes. His philosophy is very, VERY, advanced, its not as easy as saying &#8216;A + B = C&#8217; &#8211; you honestly need to give it time and some dedication if you want to get as much as you can from his writings.<br
/> Yes you can argue &#8216;they could have explained the basics&#8217; &#8211; but even the basics require lengthy historical research into language, philosophy and also debate, discussion and time to reflect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zach Fraser</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-141490</link> <dc:creator>Zach Fraser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-141490</guid> <description>wow im pretty sure einstein had alot more knowlege than you an he may have been considerd as you put it retarded but most of the greatest minds are vastly differnt than the norm which enables them to think DIFFERNTLY he may have failed but failiure is still progress.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow im pretty sure einstein had alot more knowlege than you an he may have been considerd as you put it retarded but most of the greatest minds are vastly differnt than the norm which enables them to think DIFFERNTLY he may have failed but failiure is still progress.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SS</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-137723</link> <dc:creator>SS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-137723</guid> <description>Actually, that&#039;s not true. Now I know cracked.com is a mostly humorous site, but take a look before you continue to think Einstein was stupid.  http://www.cracked.com/article_16101_the-5-most-ridiculous-lies-you-were-taught-in-history-class.html
(P.S I agree that Heidegger is a worthy philosopher)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that&#8217;s not true. Now I know cracked.com is a mostly humorous site, but take a look before you continue to think Einstein was stupid. <a
href="http://www.cracked.com/article_16101_the-5-most-ridiculous-lies-you-were-taught-in-history-class.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cracked.com/article_16101_the-5-most-ridiculous-lies-you-were-taught-in-history-class.html</a><br
/> (P.S I agree that Heidegger is a worthy philosopher)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sašo Sla?ek</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-136258</link> <dc:creator>Sašo Sla?ek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-136258</guid> <description>No, Heidegger was an &quot;alter Kämpfer&quot;, which is a term the NSDAP used for its earliest members, those that did not join out of opportunism when the party came to power, but were there even when the party was weak and its prospects bleak or at best uncertain - those people that supported the party simply because of their firm belief in the principles of national socialism.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Heidegger was an &#8220;alter Kämpfer&#8221;, which is a term the NSDAP used for its earliest members, those that did not join out of opportunism when the party came to power, but were there even when the party was weak and its prospects bleak or at best uncertain &#8211; those people that supported the party simply because of their firm belief in the principles of national socialism.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nathan Knight</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-134497</link> <dc:creator>Nathan Knight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-134497</guid> <description>Could Heidegger not have been forced or coerced to campaign and support the Nazi party?
I guess, though, if he remained in the party so constantly, it is unlikely.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could Heidegger not have been forced or coerced to campaign and support the Nazi party?<br
/> I guess, though, if he remained in the party so constantly, it is unlikely.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack McJuicypants</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-116200</link> <dc:creator>Jack McJuicypants</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-116200</guid> <description>its BBC mate, how unbiased do/can you expect the doc to be?
isn&#039;t the sinister music on the background when the Hitler talks begin enough of an indication? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its BBC mate, how unbiased do/can you expect the doc to be?<br
/> isn&#8217;t the sinister music on the background when the Hitler talks begin enough of an indication?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: octavio</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-111781</link> <dc:creator>octavio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-111781</guid> <description>Does not outline some of Heidegger&#039;s most important contributions to philosophy. Just another historical assessment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does not outline some of Heidegger&#8217;s most important contributions to philosophy. Just another historical assessment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-122892</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-122892</guid> <description>You&#039;re such a fool.  Einstein failed almost all of his classes, his teacher&#039;s thought he was retarded yet he was brought to the fore through the Royal Society in England; the same scum to promote Newton over Leibniz.  None of the jewish scientists or philosophers could hold a candle to anything coming out of Germany during WW2.
Muller and Bohm supersede Einstein.  Read Global Scaling Theory before relativity.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re such a fool.  Einstein failed almost all of his classes, his teacher&#8217;s thought he was retarded yet he was brought to the fore through the Royal Society in England; the same scum to promote Newton over Leibniz.  None of the jewish scientists or philosophers could hold a candle to anything coming out of Germany during WW2.<br
/> Muller and Bohm supersede Einstein.  Read Global Scaling Theory before relativity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/heidegger-thinking-the-unthinkable/#comment-104240</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3766#comment-104240</guid> <description>This documentary is based on the typical political correctness paradigm    (anti-Semitism) which is currently so pervasive in our society today. Then it blames Heidegger for being a politically correct Nazi merely for being on the opposite side of the political spectrum. Pure hypocrisy. The subject matter is completely drowned in a sea of political clap trap. How disappointing. This program purports to be about philosophy.Alas it is not but pure rhetoric.Hopefully I can find some alternative and more informative source elsewhere.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This documentary is based on the typical political correctness paradigm    (anti-Semitism) which is currently so pervasive in our society today. Then it blames Heidegger for being a politically correct Nazi merely for being on the opposite side of the political spectrum. Pure hypocrisy. The subject matter is completely drowned in a sea of political clap trap. How disappointing. This program purports to be about philosophy.Alas it is not but pure rhetoric.Hopefully I can find some alternative and more informative source elsewhere.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 319/320 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.tdfimg.com

Served from: topdocumentaryfilms.com @ 2012-05-23 21:33:22 -->
