Comments on: Holes In Heaven? HAARP and Advances in Tesla Technology

By: WilliamR

WilliamR — Thu, 03 May 2012 17:40:00 +0000

Just watched this doc, and I was going to post something about it here. You said exactly what I wanted to say.

I’m not saying that there aren’t any potential negatives to HAARP tech (I honestly don’t know, and this doc didn’t help either), but they seem to blame HAARP on everything in this doc. Here’s the thing though. They don’t present one shred of proof.

It is all “what if” arguments, hypothesis, and guessing at causality. This is not science. A valid argument rarely if ever starts with “I think”. Take note people. This documentary, while entertaining, is JUNK. It’s a shame too, because there are valid questions to be asked (some of which were asked in the doc), but the responses given to most of the question posed are answered by people just making stuff up. Remember, just because someone says something is true, doesn’t make it so.

By: haloween

haloween — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:58:00 +0000

It seems that the only thing “mankind” is good at is to destory humans and earth. HAARP should not be allowed but when you have government that is all about greed and power and telling the truth is a myth this is what you get. A few can destory many.

By: nick98514

nick98514 — Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:35:00 +0000

What a moronic idea to state “there is no ionosphere on the night side of the earth”….I didn’t know anybody could be so STUPID with only one head!

By: Michael Kinsey

Michael Kinsey — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:50:00 +0000

It’s all an accident, including your death, as accidental as your life. The fool in his heart, says there is no God. I don’t think your name is capable of being abused, it is flat lined already.

By: Michael Kinsey

Michael Kinsey — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:35:00 +0000

Was this Harp guy one of the 911 NIST report authors. Perhaps not, but if they needed another expert opinion, I am sure he would have been considered to have the right stuff by the government. The odds against this system not being engaged in a weapons system experiment, are slim to none. Oppenheimer has been eclipsed, at least he was deeply unhappy about what he put together.

By: Grizzlee

Grizzlee — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:54:00 +0000

One pill makes you larger, one pill makes you small…………..

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:18:00 +0000

You can’t destroy the ionosphere. The only way to do that would be to take away the atmosphere. The ionosphere is just a reaction to sunlight on the atmosphere(specifically UV). There is basically no ionosphere on the night side of the earth.

By: Jessica Smith Lovison

Jessica Smith Lovison — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:39:00 +0000

HR 2977 IH. — Space Preservation Act of 2001. October 2, 2001 Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations. http://tinyurl.com/e4oqv CHECK OUT THE INFO FOR YOURSELF. (2)(B) (ii) chemtrails; (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; (C) weapons (ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather http://tinyurl.com/e4oqv
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons. (1) The term `space’ means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space. (2)(A) The terms `weapon’ and `weapons system’ mean a device capable of any of the following: (i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by– (I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object; (II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object; (III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or (IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means. (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)– (I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B); (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or (III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person. (B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as– (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; (ii) chemtrails; (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; (v) laser weapons systems; (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons. (C) The term `exotic weapons systems’ includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:25:00 +0000

I don’t see how these guys could know what damage could be done to the earth. Its not something that anyone knows enough about. We dont know enough about our planet and solar system and others to really understand what could happen. I wonder when is it ever gonna be enough creating without looking at the outcome. I am not a hippie, and I think more research should be done with people of various fields. And you dont have to be a scientist to figure this out…………………………. thosae haaarp gouys are idiots

By: shotenzenjin16

shotenzenjin16 — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 05:43:00 +0000

At 46:30 a figure of 3trillion is stated as 60% of the deficit , i infer that the deficit (100%) was 5trillion during the 1998 copyright period of this doc. BUT the last figure today is14TRILLION my question is what costs 9trillion dollars in the last 13 years and was/is it worth it ? ? ?…

By: shotenzenjin16

shotenzenjin16 — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:37:00 +0000

Remember folks,”Truth helps the people against rapacious elites everywhere” at least that’s what i’ave heard.

By: shotenzenjin16

shotenzenjin16 — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:30:00 +0000

Very plausable…could the drum beat about war vs Iran also be related to the possible undermining of “petro”$ by Iran trying to setup a EU dollar replacement for said “petro-$” ???

By: shotenzenjin16

shotenzenjin16 — Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:24:00 +0000

It was reported for at least a year that the Wright brothers ‘heavier than air flight’ was bunk…so I guess everything about everything is a scam???Gawd i’m so tired of Luddite luftmensch lack of imagination driven comments…look-up Ben Rich of Lockheed-Martin.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:23:00 +0000

Wow. Every interviewee in this doc had an IQ of about room temperature.

They were seriously questioning the dumbest people on both sides of the argument. In fact, the “argument” itself is completely one-sided. The gov’t guys appear to be defending their jobs, knowing that what they do is a waste of cash, while the conspiracy nutjobs are just trying to write books. Serious waste of time.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:32:00 +0000

actually anyone with a functioning concsiousness and a desire to protect the planet should care about this …. it has the capabilty of completely destroying the ionosphere !!! NO “CONSPIRACY THEORY” HERE! also most contesting haarp these days aint old or hippies they are the future … who actually research something properly before forming an opinion.