Parallel Universes
Filed under Science, 35 Comments,
Everything you’re about to read here seems impossible and insane, beyond science fiction. Yet it’s all true.
Scientists now believe there may really be a parallel universe – in fact, there may be an infinite number of parallel universes, and we just happen to live in one of them.
These other universes contain space, time and strange forms of exotic matter. Some of them may even contain you, in a slightly different form.
Astonishingly, scientists believe that these parallel universes exist less than one millimeter away from us. In fact, our gravity is just a weak signal leaking out of another universe into ours.
Watch the full documentary now (playlist)
You might also like to watch these documentaries:






September 18th, 2009 at 21:47
I don’t really understand where the get the idea of long and thin from? Clues?
September 19th, 2009 at 02:35
Hunter:
I guess what that means is, our Universe is a Vibrating Membrane, like an infinite long, thin, vibrating string. And we have another Universe that is vibrating along side of ours, an “nanometer” one billionth of a meter away.
You need some high Math to prove this, which I do not have.

October 1st, 2009 at 00:23
Razor – hey dude – what ever you’re smoking must be good.
I need long time to digest this…….hope i don’t loose more hair……tell me something..you buy this?
When did our science flew past Star Trek? Dayum
I shouldn’t have watched this..this gonna mess me up for awhile…maybe i should shave my head and join Alex Church…………………………
October 1st, 2009 at 00:49
Oh, come on Joe, what do you think the Star Trek is based on? If you can’t handle that things beyond your limited understanding are possible, at least restrain from posting comments like the one above.
October 1st, 2009 at 00:56
Joe:
I smoke Canadian Classics light, cigarettes.
You made me laugh Joe,you should of been a comic, (LOL). I knew this stuff in the 1980’s.
By reading “Seth Speaks” by Jane Roberts, plus all her other books about Seth. And now scientists are just figuring all this stuff out thinking it is all new.
October 1st, 2009 at 14:47
Dear Razor
I meant the other stuff you smoke.
(First, I have to admit this concept is really pushing my limit. I grew up on science fiction like any other public school kid who dreamed of Luke’s light saber to Shaolin flying kicks. And I always knew at the back of my head that these weren’t real. How can they be – they are fiction to entertain us. I never doubted this. But now, with all these prominent scientists talking about Hollywood science fiction as if they are real, I am utterly confused.)
Now, on to this thing called parallel universe. You said you knew this stuff in 80’s. Please, enlighten me.
1. Is existence of parallel universe accepted in general academia?
2. Anyone proved the existence of parallel universe not using theoretical math?
3. Is M-theory the latest theory?
4. What is 11th dimension (in plain language)?
5. Who came first? R.Bradbury or M-theory
6. (This one is personal and optional)How old are you and what is your background?
7. And lastly, please provide more credible links on M-theory.
Sorry if I asked too many questions.
RE:Seth Speaks
I googled awhile ago when you first mentioned it. I couldn’t stomach it. But will try later. Maybe I will be more open-minded
October 1st, 2009 at 14:52
Dear WTC7
Sorry for not restraining. The doc was earth shattering for me like that time when I found out Jesus wasn’t a white man with blond hair and blue eyes.
October 1st, 2009 at 15:36
October 1st, 2009 at 16:28
Dear Joe:
I knew in the 80’s every thing is multidimensional. Force yourself to listen to the 13 Audio presentations on Seth speaks.
1* How can it not be accepted!
2* How can you prove something you can not see, except by Theoretical Math.
3* M Theory is one of the proven theory’s, don’t worry they will find more. 11- dimensional M-theory requires “spacetime” to have 11 dimensions, since time is an illusion, they will have to revamp the theory somewhat.
4* It is a vibrational level. As an analogy AC current is 60 cycles per second. If you could slow down time an electric light bulb will seem to go on and off. Slow down time even further, we will seem to go on and off, we are here and then we are not here, ad infinitum.
5* M-Theory created R. Bradbury.
6* I am older than you are. I am just a person that wants to know how thing work.
7* All you have to do is Google M-Theory.
Never be sorry for asking questions!
October 1st, 2009 at 17:07
‘This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.’ – Morpheus
October 1st, 2009 at 17:31
Joe:
You got it!
October 1st, 2009 at 18:25
It’s ‘Occam’s razor’
October 1st, 2009 at 18:35
Tigerass:
I know what it is, you could also use occem’s ockham’s, I was listening to some Audio on Achems Razor site, so I decided to use it.
At least you are thinking!
October 1st, 2009 at 20:10
I always thought it was some blokes name.
Either way, the name seems a bit of a paradox for a guy with a keen interest in theoretical physics.
October 1st, 2009 at 21:37
Not really Tigerass:
Right on this site after 30 years, they finally incorporated the 11th dimension into string theory, which ended up to be the simplest solution!
By the way I really like your name!
October 9th, 2009 at 15:28
Razor – I am still learning about Parallel Universe. But I have to admit it is very hard – I feel LIMITED. Perhaps, some guidance?
October 9th, 2009 at 18:55
Joe:
We are all limited Joe.
There is no easy solution, especially for the scientists. Keep persevering and you will get it!
This is something that is difficult to learn overnight. You can call these paradigms Consciousness Evolution! Because of our Linear Time, it is hard to imagine that everything is all ready done, no past, present and future. But we have probabilities, from the vast sea of Quantum energy.
Watch right here on TDF. Watch.
“The Primacy of Consciousness”
“What the Bleep Do We Know!?”
“The Elegant Universe”
These should give you more insight!
Regards….
December 12th, 2009 at 00:56
They can’t pinpoint the atomic elements. String theory, M theory, parallel universes and the theory of everything are basically the same theory and to me it is all rubbish. I am certainly a lay man, but just if you pay attention to what they say it is in fact that all these fantastic things that they theorize about come from the basic fact that They Cant Pinpoint Atomic Sub-elements. That is it. They cant pinpoint them so they come up with all kinds of theoretic science to explain that inability. Why not just say “we don’t have the ability to do that yet” and go on. Instead we get this, going as far as to doubt gravity!? There are no parallel universes and claiming that there are such things is no more sophisticated then calling things God when you lack the knowledge to explain them. This is one fancy “God” cry.
I think that there are definitely some attention whores in the science community of which Michio Kaku is at the forefront. All he does is show up in documentaries, somewhat like Paris Hilton of the science world.
December 20th, 2009 at 20:37
To George, You sound just like the nay sayers of Orville and Wilber’s day. You also sound like the many scientists of recent years that said that the atom was the smallest particle possible before we found sub atomic particles existed. Quarks were a theory at one time. Strings are the next “boogey man” to fall and perhaps the doors to other dimensions finally.
January 21st, 2010 at 10:30
To me the theory of brane collisions explains nothing. They have avoided saying that our universe did not simply pop into existence using it, but then it begs the question where did these branes come from? and if you manage to form some explanation for that… how do you explain that explanation? Is it just “turtles all the way down”?[1] It seems pointless to me, as there is always going to have to be some point where time did not exist.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down
January 25th, 2010 at 22:55
Without brain collisions there would be no art!
January 26th, 2010 at 01:09
@ Eli:
Finally, something that makes sense. “Turtles all the way down”
January 30th, 2010 at 18:12
If there are infinite parallel universes doesnt that mean that everything that is possible can, will and has already happened?
So if intelligent design is possible does that mean its true?
If its possible for inteligent life from parallel dimensions to come to ours than they are?
January 30th, 2010 at 21:27
@c2:
1- Yes
2- Yes, if intelligent design made everything, if not, no.
3- Beings that can bend space time.
January 31st, 2010 at 14:49
Im agnostic. Im just having fun thinking about infinity.
If universes are created through a natural process, then there are an infinite number of these.
If and this is a huge,IF, If it is somehow physicly possible for something or someone to create a universe then wouldn’t there be an infinite number of these as well?
Because all possible outcomes/scenerios will occur an infinite number of times.
January 31st, 2010 at 23:49
…they can’t pinpoint the atoms. That is all. The fairytale that they spin out of that is a good one though.
February 5th, 2010 at 10:04
@ all the doubters!
… Never the less the whole Universe IS vibrating and you can actually harvest energy directly from it…. Go spoil yourself on some Nicholas Tesla docus….!
Human minds can do it all – even block our own reality…..
With an open mind intuition starts to work and universal co-creation submerges from within…..
February 15th, 2010 at 19:39
Didn’t really get it.
February 15th, 2010 at 21:34
Achems – Joe pwnd you on this topic – you are still avoiding the question and pass the goddamn spliff!
February 15th, 2010 at 22:22
Yavanna:
Ain’t got no spliff, and don’t do no spliff, (honest)
February 17th, 2010 at 00:01
Dear Joe,
You say this stuff Is really pushing your limit.
Isnt that the whole point?
It seriously pushed peoples limit when they were being told the earth wasnt flat. That sounded crazier than any of this at that time.
My own view Is that this other universe Is directly beside us, and around us. It may be outside of our senses, In the same way that science has now proved that sharks can see the energy field around the body, but the human eye Is not sensitive enough to pick It up. Perhaps In more ways like that, our mind Is like a radio reciever, that Is tuning Into a certain frequency, and this other dimension, Is just vibrating at a different frequency. Something like ‘Acchems’ analogy of the AC current.
Regardless of what Is true or false, I look forward to the scientific discoveries of the next 10 years!!
February 17th, 2010 at 00:26
Very similar to what I said back on Dec 20. Your reference to frequencies immediately make me think of Tesla. I wonder how the Tesla field in Alaska is truly being utilized? You know , HAARP?
February 18th, 2010 at 17:27
joetmml
Yes I see now your comment Is simular.
I Yahoo`d HAARP, plenty of different theories about It out there!
February 21st, 2010 at 18:01
@george
I dont understand when you say “pinpointed”..if you mean scientists havent directly observed subatomic particles then you’re mistaken. Electrons are subatomic particles. You should read up on Neutrinos, anothr subatomic particle way smaller than an electron, which has also been “pinpointed”.
Time is but a measurement(creation of man)of movement/change in order for us to grasp it.
Everything is energy. Energy of the universe is infinite. Therefore everything consists of or is infinite energy. Anything infinite has no beginning and no end.
Food for thought!
February 23rd, 2010 at 07:20
The ancient Taoists pretty much had it figured out. It’s not only mysterious but illusive. The closer science thinks it is getting, it eludes them. Why?
From Chuang Tse…
“Do you exist or do you not?” asked Light of Nothing. Light received no reply and stared hard at him. Nothing was dark and empty. All day Light looked but could not see him, listened but could not hear him and tried to touch him but could not find him.
Finally light said to himself, “This is the highest limit! I can be conscious of not-being but cannot be unconscious of not-being. When I am conscious of not-being, there is still consciousness. How does he (Nothing) ever attain to this height?”