Comments on: How to Commit the Perfect Murder

By: ProudinUS

ProudinUS — Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:15:00 +0000

What the h*ll is going on in this world!??? Doc.s showing how to murder…..the correct way!…….well it is for educational purposes. You think they would throw in on how to commit the dumbest murder and then flip the titles.

Well, since they don’t have a dumb murder guide video, I feel it is my duty as an active member of Dummies-n-the Room to illustrate how a secret society of retards found a way to kill. Here’s a few.
> Dummy +photo: MURDER and a Resume!<
1.) Go into a market and grab the victims hair. Then forcefully drag them outside and make them lay on the ground while you pick up a Pogo stick and begin to hop around a few times to get some rythm going and then jump for joy on their face while singing some gangster rap.

2.) Stop at a bridge toll booth around rush hour and grab the toll booth attendent and throw him off the bridge. Get back in your car and wait patiently in line until it's your turn to pay.

3.) Bring your enemy into a crowded church and drown them in the Baptismal water telling the pastor your just cleansing him of his sins!

4.) Take an enemy behind one of the targets at a shooting range and beat them to death with the blunt end of a pistol.

This is only for entertainment puposes only.
copyright: ???? dumb ldt.

By: Derek

Derek — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 02:14:00 +0000

Apparently you have never heard of frangible ammunition.

Secondly, the worst place would be inside of a closed area. Powder, soot, etc. deposits would be more concentrated. It would also be enclosed from the elements and therefore help preserve evidence. Just the opposite of what you would want…

And much more…

By: Derek

Derek — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 02:02:00 +0000

Luckily, most investigations are barely conducted by the police. The majority of evidence is collected, processed, and testified by us.

By: Derek

Derek — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 02:01:00 +0000

Perhaps you should review Locard’s Principle of Exchange…EVERY contact leaves a trace…

By: New

New — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:06:00 +0000

That conclusion doesn’t comport. Just because you let someone into your house does not mean he knew the ‘suspect’. Secondly, DNA evidence is always collected no matter how remote the possibility because DNA enters several databases, with the possibility of familial DNA searches or John Doe warrants.

If a hit came up, they would interview that person anyhow. Or, they would at least interview all the ‘many’ people from that household.

Since woman generally do not commit murder ‘out of the blue’, she would always be the preliminary suspect and although motive is irrelevant in criminal trial, it may show a history that generated the end actions.

Also, a murder weapon is not always needed for a conviction. During autopsy, contusions and hematomas would most likely uncover the mechanism and cause of death. Manner of death would most likely follow from the above as death at the hands of another, homocide.

In that case, every person that had access to that house would need to be eliminated. Interviews with friends and family would most likely uncover the disdain the wife had leading up to the murder. Again, fingerprints, trace, DNA, etc. would have been collected and used to eliminate all people.

Sounds to me like the writer doesn’t really understand forensics or crime very much…

By: New

New — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:56:00 +0000

Why is it up to God to stop murderers? You either have free will or you don’t. if you have free will, mankind chooses to disobey God. If God does not exist and you have freewill, morality is illusory as you are simply a cosmic accidental collection of molecules.

If you do not have freewill, then the question is moot.

However, if you are a material atheist, then evolution is your ONLY option and ‘murder’ is nothing more than natural selection by another animal, Homo sapien and you cannot have a foundation to deem it morally wrong.

So, which are you?

By: Sue Dykhuis

Sue Dykhuis — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:15:00 +0000

I once read a book that had a perfect crime. The weapon was a frozen leg of lamb. The victim, a cheating husband. The murderer, his pregnant wife. She hit him on the head with the frozen leg of lamb. Then put it in the oven to roast, using the oven on/off timer. She went out of the house, shopping for clothes and for ingredients to serve with a roasted leg of lamb — her husband’s favourite dinner. Came home. Her husband was, can you believe this, dead on the floor! She called the police to report her husband dead at home. They came. While they were checking the home, she told them she needed to be occupied ’cause she was so crazy with grief and had to be doing something to keep her busy. One officer suggested she make dinner so later she would have proper food to eat. The police & detectives checked out eveything, looking for clues, especially the weapon. Found nothing. Wife was hysterical, crying, as she was making dinner, asking “how this could be? Did they think someone he had arrested in the past held a grudge big enough to kill him?” The police officers and detectives were co-workers of her husband. How could they not help her find the murderer? Try as they might, they could not. They asked where she was that day. She mentioned being out getting groceries, etc. Came home, found him dead. Called them. She was told they would have to check that what she said was true. In the meantime, dinner was ready. Crying, upset, she asked if they would join her in eating dinner as she did not want to be alone. All ate the delicious dinner she made. After dinner, helped her clean up and then one of them threw out the trash which included the bone of the leg of lamb they had for dinner. Months went on; the baby was born. All her husband’s co-workers supported her through this and celebrated the birth of her son. They attended the baptism and other events in her baby’s life. After two years of searching, they came to the conclusion that yes, her husband was murdered, killed in his own home and yes, they had no idea who did it, what the weapon was and where it could be hidden. They concluded he was the one who let the murderer into his home and later, the murderer let himself out of the house. Since the victim knew the murderer and let him in, it could one of many people he would let into the house on any occasion thus DNA in the house would match many. They concluded that none of the DNA pointed to which person could have murdered him.

The loving wife never let on and 8 years later, married a collegue of her late husband (who, we hope for his sake is not the cheating kind).

I love it.

By: Sue Dykhuis

Sue Dykhuis — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:02:00 +0000

too bad God doesn’t step up to the plate and stop a murderer.
guess God is too busy making sure the right team wins a big football game.

By: Derek

Derek — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:10:00 +0000

Anthony trial, that’s easy, as a forensic scientist myself, they had NO evidence of murder BY Casey Anthony. No mechanism of death, no evidence of abuse history with Caylee, nothing. The defense’s drowning scenario cannot be disproved. Nonetheless, the burden of proof is on the State to prove beyond a reasonable double to a moral certainty. They did NOT prove their case…it’s as simple as that. If you want to debate the forensic evidence…please do.

By: Dave Rhodes

Dave Rhodes — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:17:00 +0000

Forewarned is forearmed.

By: Dave Rhodes

Dave Rhodes — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:16:00 +0000

Really, then why doesn’t he do something?

By: Winston Smith

Winston Smith — Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:08:00 +0000

“9/11 is still unsolved” -This is true…but at least we know Islamist radicals could not have rigged wtc 1 2 & 7 with high tech thermitic explosives. So at least we know, with complete certainty, at least a bit of what did not happen.

The easiest way to get away with murder is to have absolutely no connection to the victim.
I cannot even kill insects.. so I can’t even imagine killing another person.

By: Daemous Abadonus

Daemous Abadonus — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 03:45:00 +0000

If the experts in this docu. are that good, then where were they during Casey Anthony’s murder trial? And there sure does seem to be an aweful lot of people out there that have gotten away with murder. 9/11 is still unsolved.

By: Derek

Derek — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:22:00 +0000

Kinda funny how even watching this documentary could be used as evidence against anyone dumb enough to try to put this hypothesis to execution. The FBI can track your search history for 5 years, trace it to your IP address, proxy servers don’t work for the most part. LOL you better be watching this from the library under someone else’s card.

I thought it was really entertaining! I’m a big Hitchcock buff so this is cool. The narrator’s voice was chilling.

By: Gdfgfh Sfsfsdf

Gdfgfh Sfsfsdf — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:23:00 +0000

I feel like this documentary over-estimates the competence of the autopsy technicians, forensic scientists, and legal system.