Comments on: Sex Sense: Love Chemicals

By: Yusiley S

Yusiley S — Tue, 20 Sep 2011 03:42:00 +0000

That is so beautifully typed up. It’s poetic even. Took the words right out of my mind too… though I actually did watch this doc and I do believe that sex is just a physical manifestation of a deeper love. I personally wouldn’t have sex just for physical gratification…. if so I wouldn’t bother with getting to know the person and being fully in love with that person. If I just needed to just have physical sex…I would just wam-bam thank you mam or sir and move on, but I don’t do that. I need to know and be open with that person. Hell even my fantasies are like that. LOL To me… I have to be totally connected with that person in order to have sex with him or her. Most men aren’t like this. I truly believe most men (beyond 80%) are incapable of true love which is why they go around and have sex with anything they could get their hands on. I view many of them as subhuman and not fully evolved beings. There is hope though… there are a few, very rare evolved male humans who need to feel that connection. My man, for example, gets mad with me when I don’t kiss and hug him enough. He needs that intimacy and connection. To him that is love. Anyways I agree love is more deep than chemistry in the air and sex… btw the love you’re referring to… the sacred kind… is called Agape by most psychologists and sociologists. It’s also one of the rarest and one that my man would properly score high on.

By: guerkan hantal

guerkan hantal — Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:08:00 +0000

I dunno. Discovery’s documentaries get worse and worse. Most of this documenatary’s just bla bla. No real new insights, nothing really unrevealing.

By: Sarah Bennett

Sarah Bennett — Sun, 22 May 2011 04:00:00 +0000

This was so sad. I’ve been with my wife for 3 years, and I still think she is the greatest partner I could ever want. I hope I continue to believe that my whole life.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:53:00 +0000

Ithink Eric has been reading Krishnamurti,all what you talk about is true,but difficult to put into practice……..unless your enlightened? Mike.

By: Colleen

Colleen — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:47:56 +0000

I kind of understand what you are saying, Eric. Your thoughts seem to be jumbled somewhat, but I take that is coming from your passion about this subject, along with the desire for people to understand. I think you should at least watch this program, Eric. Yes, people do throw the word “love” around, and this does deplete the meaning. The truth is though, if you are in love, it doesn’t matter if the word has been overused by others. Love is what it means to you and your partner. We can’t forget that we are made of chemicals and reactions and all sorts of things science doesn’t even completely understand, but that is the point of producing programs like this one, or books, or doing studies. We are all curious, we are all learning, we are being educated and educating others. There are different meanings of the word love based on who you are. This is about sex, chemistry, and why some people fall in love while others fall in lust. You really should watch it, because reading the description is not enough. You can’t know what is being said if you aren’t listening, so how can you really argue it? Please watch.

By: hannah

hannah — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:15:55 +0000

this made me depressed!

By: eric

eric — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:21:22 +0000

the thought of it is obviously not the thing, what you are deriving is something else, this is a question of pleasure, you dont love sex, you desire pleasure, which is really an act all on your own, even if is includes someone else, if you follow, in such an act there cant be love, this is a selfish gratification which one peruses throughout their life

By: ancientfossil

ancientfossil — Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:23:38 +0000

Some of you guys are way too funny (Tim, Eric) I agree with Dorani I love sex…the smell… the sight… the touch…the thought of it. cheers

By: Landless Peasant

Landless Peasant — Wed, 19 May 2010 23:53:01 +0000

Landless Peasant05/20/2010 at 01:16 Pls join the landless peasant party and help us take control of our land ! They aint making any more.

The Landless Peasant Party is a new political party representing the views and aspirations of Landless Peasants in the UK.

The UK is not our nation , we do not own it, the land of the nation is not held for our benefit nor on our behalf.
From the day we are born we are Peasants, with no right to the very essence of our nation.
Yet we are extolled to work, pay tax, fight and if necessary die to defend it.

We are liable for the debts of our nation, we are the mass of people from whom business extracts its profits.
We live in the 24 million homes on 7% of the land, unable to live by our own means.
We have little choice but to take part in economic slavery.
Our basic need for shelter must be provided by market forces supplying our homes to us for as much profit as the market can bear. These homes are not built for you to “live” in ,they are built for you to sleep in after work. They have no means to make energy, there is little or no facility to grow your food. Instead our food is flown in from around the world, manufactured on an industrial scale using the cheap labour of other Peasants in other lands. Our energy is suppllied by hugely profitable multinationals at great expense to us and the Earth. Even the supply of water makes vast profits. Our lives have been reduced to a collection of utility bills and what we do to earn money

By: ronanthem

ronanthem — Sat, 15 May 2010 14:22:15 +0000

Tim and Eric Awesome Show…….great job! Sorry I couldn’t resist :D I read every comment and still don’t have a clue what eric is talking about. Love is the best/worst thing to ever happen. Eric you do have a point in saying that hate is the yang to love. Seldom are they far apart from each other. But, you seem a little too jaded. Hope I never meet the one that took a dump on your spirit. I don’t think anyone is trying to make you feel stupid. You might be the brightest bulb on the strand. Your method of idea conveyance is….well….mind-boggling and a bit tiresome to follow. No, offence intended (we’re in the honesty tree here).
To me, love is like my apartment. The rent comes due every so often, tears are shed, rent gets paid anyways, cycle repeats next month…..life goes on. Hell, even Butters from Southpark figured it out. You would never know how happy you are, until you feel an equal part of sadness.
Take the good with the bad, pay your money and take your chances. You only get one shot @ this life. Nobody believes that, till it’s too late. (Damn that’s too many affirmations in one space!)I wish you folks all the best. I’m going to turn this robot box off and interact with the world for a bit. Thanks for your thoughts!

By: to eric

to eric — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:29:09 +0000

To eric:

Your a bigot. watch the f’ing documentary or stfu. Your so f’ing insecure about what ‘love’ is you cant even see some other person(s) point of view.

By: ...

... — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:12:55 +0000

eric and tim SHUT THE HELL UP! JESUS.

By: Stoke City

Stoke City — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:51:14 +0000

I haven’t heard anybody talk like Eric since I was in rehab for alcohol abuse and had a crack addict in my group.

it’s just a big pile of words that hurts your brain if you give him the time of day.

By: Lisa O

Lisa O — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:17:45 +0000

Good documentary, but you must realize this is offering a scientific perspective on love, not a philosophical one. If you are looking for something other than a chemical description of love, you are not going to find it in this documentary.

By: hmm

hmm — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:31:19 +0000

people for centuries have tried to redefine the mysteries of love/ sex .. learned very little from this doco but hey it’s still interesting.. :)