Comments on: The Elephant In The Room

By: David

David — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:44:00 +0000

I lived in New York in the early eighties and because I worked temp I had many occasions to go to the WTC complex. There were always maintanence people running around with toolboxes, rolls of cable, flatbeds of flourescent lights. There were filming crews, local news, commercials, and videos being filmed. It was always busy. A great deal of money was being made there. Why would a capitalist government kill the goose that was laying golden eggs five times a day? Why not the stock exchange? Because its harder to hit with an airliner piloted by Muslim extremists.

By: lateralus12

lateralus12 — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:53:00 +0000

This is documentary is a masterpiece. It really gives you a clear picture of how strongly people feel about the events that took place on that day and how it affected their lives afterward. Honestly, how can others accept the “official reports” about what happened when there’s so much evidence against it? So many of these victims who were there are speaking out.

By: Malfunction Junction

Malfunction Junction — Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:23:00 +0000

thats they’re job imbecile….to design for the future….yet another blind sheep who is in denial…wake up little man, we’re in for a butt load of trouble yet

By: pappa_aksie

pappa_aksie — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000

MMnn those engineers must have been able to see the future because the Boeing 747 was not even flight tested yet when the wtc was being designed. Lawyered r*tard

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:49:00 +0000

Of course they were asleep at the switch, nothing like this had ever happened here before. Deserved?? Nobody deserves that..

By: Mathew Scannell

Mathew Scannell — Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:58:00 +0000

if you watch it you’ll see a lot of british people saying the official 9/11 story is false, don’t be racist. it’s not cool

By: Paul jansen

Paul jansen — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:53:00 +0000

2 commercial planes crash in to the towers. I have watched and read a lot about this and the thing that always comes to my mind is if this is an insidejob directed by goverment agency`s then how far did the deception go?
How did they get people to hijack planes en sacrifice themself by flying into those towers? Could u get american soldiers (pilots) or agents to do the same as an palestine self bomber in Israel?
1. Were those hijackers indeed the ones identified after the attacks on those pictures and made some mistakes in some of them?
2. If so did they know they were actualy controled by agency`s of the US goverment?
3. If they dint know, did those agency`s (as they say “inside job”) know what this group was planning to do and had the time to “help” in the background by planting explosives for the aftermath from the crashing planes? (the powerdowntime of 30 hours a day before 9-11 like the guy said in this docu)
4. How many people would have knowledge of the fact that this was a false-flag operation? For such a project it must have been like 20? Or even a hundred people? The more people that know the more leaks are likley, why were there no major leaks if this was a false flag operation?
Not one of the people involved in a supposed big false flag operation has spoken out so far, not one got in trouble with his moral mindset and exposed something?

Its hard for me to understand the relations between the different powers, groups in this event.
The media like fox news or even in my country (netherlands) the main stream media reported it the same way at the time. Did they follow american media? Is there a “group” of people with power in the shades that can say to fox networks employees , this is the line u must follow in this story and to how many people and media organisations do u need to say that? How many media-based-people have to be told or pushed towards a way of looking and reporting on the events? Why did i not come accros one media-person that said something like “i got fired because the bosses of the mediaconcern i worked for forbidden me to bring this and this fact or statement”
How does this work.

See i have things to be answered on the other side to, when u accept a idear of an inside job , a false flag operation it is important to ask in both directions to come to a sense of a objective opnion or truth so to say.

That there are things in this that just dont make sense, the energy wars , the powerstruggle in the middleeast, the big powers behind the big company`s, todays current putin russian goverment (oil and power again hmm) , tens of thousands of local people in Iraq, Afghanistan that were killed (what contrast to the number on 9/11, no disrespect intented just numbers), The Bush puppet, patriotact, the things that happen behind the screens in all western goverments that cant be shared because of moral use of media. Each have an agenda that goes before a certain level of truth, its the way of the world so it seems. U find commercials on tv a normal thing dont u? The fact that in most of them they influence u, lie to u, decieve u into buying the goods, it has become normal. Only for 99,99 instead of 100… Deception is built in into western life and it a normal thing.

Aaaargh my head is spinning again..sorry for any spelling errors, im dutch, and just wrote down thoughts like they came, try it , its refreshing.

By: Guest

Guest — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:12:00 +0000

alterativly….****, how do I get one of these valued jobs?

By: Jeff D

Jeff D — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:03:00 +0000

I’m glad they told me it was a British documentary…now I don’t have to watch it to find out. Let me guess…a monotone narrator (female maybe?) apparently reporting in a non-bias way, but tipping the scales in favor of the typical British ambush truth twisting dirtbag bottom feeding journalists. Don’t let that superiority complex accent fool you.

By: Guest

Guest — Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:55:00 +0000

i remember when ppl kept diaries, and got really cross if other ppl looked at them. Now we have handycams and the web. There are what used to be called Documentarys..now we have *.docs. Just a thought…and now i can share? it God bless archive footage, digital enhancement and even the BBC(not on topic but who needs a big plasma screen to see ’50′s home movies?). You know any technology u see on your screen must have got dirt cheap

By: Justen Bontekoe

Justen Bontekoe — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:49:00 +0000

And you know what?

Who the hell are you telling us you don’t use the internet for information,

while sprouting propaganda in favor of the US (inc.) on a documentary website?

I don’t buy this.

By: Justen Bontekoe

Justen Bontekoe — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:59:00 +0000

You have GOT to be kidding me.

How do you think most of the information gets to news stations?

By pigeons?

By: Jeremy

Jeremy — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:04:00 +0000

Actually, the engineer’s that designed the building, are on several FILMS stating that they designed the buildings to handle SEVERAL impacts from 747. Nice try tho.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:29:00 +0000

Wow waht an amazing film. This film shed so much light on 911 and its victims. We care and respect all of the victims please write your congress men.

By: Michael James Kinsey

Michael James Kinsey — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:07:00 +0000

The Government knows it cannot disprove Newton’s Laws of motion. When most people are asked to pound a nail with a hammer,they usually take more than one swing. The hammers stops as the top of the tower should have when pounding the railroad tie beneath it. But the towers fell as fast as if they were falling through air. The top cannot fall as fast through the towers as it might have if it have fallen through air under any circumstances of weakening. There is still substantial resistance in the building, it must slow down or Newtons a liar.Getting ugly is the Gov’s only option