The Many Faces of Lee Harvey Oswald
Who created the intelligence legend that was Lee Harvey Oswald might lead us to the men behind the death of President Kennedy.” – Former FBI Agent Zack Shelton. There has been much controversy over the guilt or innocence of Lee Harvey Oswald in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Now, prepare for more controversy as New York Times Best-selling author Jim Marrs and award-winning photo analyst Jack White take you on a mind bending tour of evidence indicating that more than one Oswald existed in 1963. See for yourself the inconsistencies within government records and examples of impersonation. Laced with dramatic reenactments, this documentary presents a wide array of documents and photographs that will leave you wondering who was the man killed by Dallas nightclub owner Jack Ruby two days after the JFK assassination.
Watch the full documentary now
I think this documentary sheds some light on the subject of who killed J.F.K. The evidence presented needs alot of concentration to watch, the story twists everywhere, so it ends up telling you essentially that Oswald was not the assassin. But, it lead me to believe that it would shed light on who killed J.F.K. At the end there is a twist that the man in the grave that is supposedly Lee H. Oswald, may not be..but that’s all. That’s the key thing…but I am suspcious of this, because they say he had a craniotomy..he was shot in the chest! All you need is dental records.
Well.
This one was put together a LITTLE less sloppier than the prequel to this (which the “commentator” refers to in the beginning). The other one was SO poorly shot and assembled to “look” like a “Special Report,” complete with this same Pretend Anchorman and the same gang of contributers badly superimposed over Dallas locales (Lee’s residences, the boarding house on Beckley, etc)as if they were “on the spot.” It was literally like a parody of a “Special Report” and quite laughable, though the photo-comparisons were compelling. This sequel documentary had the added interest of the split-face examinations, which, as an artist, I have done myself and could grasp a LOT easier than I can the usual trying rhetoric about Russia, KGB/FBI/CIA and the Mafia, Mexico, imposters, gypsies, tramps, OR thieves, etcetera.
This program also suffers from some technical gaffs that don’t lend it any further credibility – just plain sloppy soundwork, odd jump-cuts where parts of sentences vanish, and other el-cheapo things, like the clocks that never change time behind our commentator (who actually used the phrase “turned up missing”)and the fact that NO one, save for the commentator, seems able to pronounce Lee’s name correctly – “OZ-wooled;” “OZZ-woll.” It is pronounced “OZ walled” (Oswald). At least say his name right, guys. So – dull and droning as this was, it DOES ask some interesting questions re: facial comparisons, photos, height discrepancies, etc. That was about all I got out of this that seemed “valid” or of interest. Lee was a kid, to be a spy is incredibly involved and for all that they allege he did, it just seems like – too much. Way too much. It all seems conveniently contrived – “look for a conspiracy and you’ll find one-” but, by the same token, I am not certain of any incidents linking little Lee Harvey to the death of a President, as I feel he was too cute to do anything like that.