Comments on: The Many Faces of Lee Harvey Oswald

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:04:00 +0000

Just watched the doc and it certainly was interesting with many things brought up as I said below that I have never heard of before. It is difficult to know what to believe and what not to plus with most every new statement comes a bunch more questions that will never be answered. One thing really caught my attention and that was that family members said when he came back from Russia there were a lot of physical changes in him. Now I dont know about you people but if my brother went away for a year or two when he was an adult (therefore his appearance wouldnt change much) and a different person came back saying he was my brother, even if they looked similar I sure as h**l would be able to tell right away that it was a different person. That part just makes no sense to me at all.

I noticed the two clocks on the wall behind the guy too. They were probably just trying to make their set look like a real news room where they tend to have clocks on the wall with names of major cities below them showing what time it is in each of those cities. They just didnt bother to put the names of any cities below the clocks, they probably blew their budget on the sign the said in big letter “Special Report”. The doc was clearly not filmed with a high quality camera and while the picture shook a few times at the start the quality was not that bad, lol it wasnt HD but also wasnt 8mm either.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 11 Aug 2011 03:08:00 +0000

Havent watched the doc yet but I have noticed people commenting on the poor quality of the film and the excuse being used is “it was made 20 years ago”. By my math that would make it 1991, admittedly video has come a long way since then but 1991 is hardly the dark days of video. From the sounds of it this doc was filmed in 8mm, maybe they borrowed the camera from Abraham Zapruder lol. I have to watch it to see the quality (and the clothes that Curious & Critical seemed to like so much lol) but also because it sounds like a fascinating doc. While it is 20 years old and I am mostly going by the description of it written above I have never heard any of these claims they are making before.

By: Martin

Martin — Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:52:00 +0000

Read Vincent Bugliosi’s book “Four Days in November” or Gerald Posner’s “Case Closed” and you will learn and believe that there was absolutely no conspiracy or any clandestine plot to kill our beloved JFK. Oswald was just a worthless piece of driftless excrement who needed to justify his worthless, piece (ditto) life. Jack Ruby was (like everybody else) appalled at what happened. There was no “magic bullet” or patsy or conspiracy!!

By: JUDYTH VARY BAKER

JUDYTH VARY BAKER — Sat, 28 May 2011 00:23:00 +0000

Read JFK & the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters, by James Douglass and Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald, by Judyth Vary Baker to get more information about Oswald and those who set him up as the patsy. Both checked as favorites by Jesse Ventura.

By: Karen

Karen — Thu, 26 May 2011 02:41:00 +0000

on the time thing- they are in different cities perhaps? like L.A. and Chicago- or they were flat filmed at different times- and edited- really not much of a thing to make an issue of-it has nothing to do with the inconsistencies in the supposed evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald

By: Roy Borrill

Roy Borrill — Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:10:00 +0000

Read ”Final Judgement” by Michael Collins-Piper if you want to know who really was responsible for the J.F.K assassination. It’s the number 1 underground best seller on the murder, but you won’t find it in any book store or in any library either. But it can be downloaded for free by googling ”scribd” Good luck and enjoy. Be prepared to be shocked and surprised. There’s a reason you won’t find it on the selves. It’s very controversial but probably the best book ever written on the subject. Even some of the experts say so.

By: Roy Borrill

Roy Borrill — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:30:00 +0000

Your correct, and along with the pressure he was putting on Israel to open up it’s nuclear research plant at Dimona, to weapons inspectors, is one of the many reasons that the Israeli’s where probably, in some way, involved in the assassination. Read Michael collins-piper, Final Judgement to find out more. Which can be downloaded for free from ‘Scribd’

By: Roy Borrill

Roy Borrill — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:19:00 +0000

Marina Oswald has stated she took the picture of her husband and has no reason to lie on this subject as she now believes him innocent.

By: Curious & Critical

Curious & Critical — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:40:07 +0000

Did I comment on what they were wearing? Oh I might have, it was so long ago now, I probably *DID* comment on what they were wearing, but I was really bent out of shape by that set and those clocks, as I recall…

By: Red

Red — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:37:28 +0000

I like how some people are making rediculous comments about what people are wearing and production quality of a film made 20 years ago.

By: Catherine

Catherine — Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:29:28 +0000

I think the conspirency theories that abound this case are so numerous who knows who did committhe assasination of one of the greatest presidents ever to hold office. JFK. RIP.

By: Curious & Critical

Curious & Critical — Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:22:10 +0000

Time,

THANK you! I agree 100%. If you scroll up 8 or 9 posts you will see my lengthy critique of same.

As I maintain, any legitimacy this may hold is compromised by poor set/production standards, and, yes, bad suits…

By: Time

Time — Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:29:20 +0000

Was this made in someones garage?

The two clocks on the wall have a time differential of 3 hrs and 50 minutes….where in the world is there that kind of time difference?

Also, the his suit looks like a rental….

By: kent

kent — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:40:10 +0000

Good doc,well worth the time. Thanks for sharing,

By: Curious & Critical

Curious & Critical — Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:04:00 +0000

(P.S.: and yes, in the heat of the moment, I too made some typos in that last post – “your” instead of “you’re,” and “conecture” instead of “conjecture,” et cetera. I hate that – but it happens; however the folks compiling presentations for the sale of Lee’s coffin and snippets of leather REALLY should know better. I mean Jeez…)