Comments on: The Root Of All Evil? http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/ Watch stunning, eyeopening, interesting, free, streaming, full, online documentary films and movies. Tue, 22 May 2012 12:48:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Anonymoushttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171455 Anonymous Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:28:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171455 You're absolutely correct--and that's why I hate the term Darwinism, even though I believe Wallace used it. The more accurate term is evolution.However, I don't believe that David Scott was referring to social Drawinism which, as you mentioned, is a completely different animal, having nothing to do with evolution, but the jury is still out. You’re absolutely correct–and that’s why I hate the term Darwinism, even though I believe Wallace used it. The more accurate term is evolution.

However, I don’t believe that David Scott was referring to social Drawinism which, as you mentioned, is a completely different animal, having nothing to do with evolution, but the jury is still out.

]]> By: brian rosehttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171448 brian rose Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:33:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171448 When you say Darwinism is just another theory are you talking about Charles Darwin's (and Alfred Russel Wallace's) scientific theory of natural selection, or the politically engineered idea of social darwinism? I'd assume you're referring to the latter of the two as both are inherently separate concepts, and your political dialogue that follows suggests pontifical assertion (colloquial theory) instead of empirical, objective evidence (scientific theory).I am only posting and responding because I hope to clear up any association between Darwin's theory of natural selection, and the completely unrelated, political propaganda that is social darwinism. "social darwinism" hijacks Darwin's name for political purposes even though it is utterly devoid of scientific rigor. In other words, the theory of natural selection as the driver of evolution is as separate from social darwinism as the meaning of bear (noun: animal) is to bear (verb: carry); similar sound, but completely unrelated. When you say Darwinism is just another theory are you talking about Charles Darwin’s (and Alfred Russel Wallace’s) scientific theory of natural selection, or the politically engineered idea of social darwinism? I’d assume you’re referring to the latter of the two as both are inherently separate concepts, and your political dialogue that follows suggests pontifical assertion (colloquial theory) instead of empirical, objective evidence (scientific theory).

I am only posting and responding because I hope to clear up any association between Darwin’s theory of natural selection, and the completely unrelated, political propaganda that is social darwinism. “social darwinism” hijacks Darwin’s name for political purposes even though it is utterly devoid of scientific rigor. In other words, the theory of natural selection as the driver of evolution is as separate from social darwinism as the meaning of bear (noun: animal) is to bear (verb: carry); similar sound, but completely unrelated.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171442 Anonymous Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:55:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171442 Honest self-betterment far exceeds concern for the poor.Debt is mostly voluntary and absent clear dishonesty, debtors have little to complain of. Honest self-betterment far exceeds concern for the poor.

Debt is mostly voluntary and absent clear dishonesty, debtors have little to complain of.

]]> By: David Scotthttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171438 David Scott Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:45:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171438 Its better to be rich but in order to become rich, wealthy, and powerful, the poor has to stop allowing themselves to be conditioned by religion, politics, spending a ton of money on education, and other institutions and ideologies that brainwash people into not using common sense and being a sheep. Their own book says "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free". That term is totally misunderstood, because they don't consider the time period and the delima in Jerusalem at the time of this so-called Jesus figure. I'm not a scientist, so I wouldn't concern myself with scientific context, but common sense is hindered by various so-called schools of thought today. Debt is another form of slavery and that is how the government thrive on the working class and the poor. Religous institutions do the same thing in a poor/middle class community. Sounds like the Pharisees and Saducees in the bible. Consumerism is a form of slavery unless people create their own market, but they are being pre conditioned to work for someone else. This is a design. This is no accident. Its better to be rich but in order to become rich, wealthy, and powerful, the poor has to stop allowing themselves to be conditioned by religion, politics, spending a ton of money on education, and other institutions and ideologies that brainwash people into not using common sense and being a sheep. Their own book says “Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free”. That term is totally misunderstood, because they don’t consider the time period and the delima in Jerusalem at the time of this so-called Jesus figure. I’m not a scientist, so I wouldn’t concern myself with scientific context, but common sense is hindered by various so-called schools of thought today. Debt is another form of slavery and that is how the government thrive on the working class and the poor. Religous institutions do the same thing in a poor/middle class community. Sounds like the Pharisees and Saducees in the bible. Consumerism is a form of slavery unless people create their own market, but they are being pre conditioned to work for someone else. This is a design. This is no accident.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171434 Anonymous Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:16:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171434 And that's exactly why it's better to be rich!Incidentally, evolution (not Darwinism--there is no such thing) is not just another theory; it is fact. If you have a problem with the term theory, please look it up in a scientific context. And that’s exactly why it’s better to be rich!

Incidentally, evolution (not Darwinism–there is no such thing) is not just another theory; it is fact. If you have a problem with the term theory, please look it up in a scientific context.

]]> By: David Scotthttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171424 David Scott Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:10:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171424 The moral code of the muslim overpowered Richard Dawkins too. But the Levitical customs and Islamic Shariah Law all condemn people to death, and based on the those laws, everybody should be dead, or disfigured. We've all fornicated, We've all stolen, so all of our hands should be cut off, We've all worked on Saturday in some form or fashion, another death sentence, Most of us have drank Alcohol either socially, moderatly, or in excess, etc. Not to mention religous zealots actually beleive God just dropped a book out of heaven and said "beleive this or go to hell". I won't knock the ****, but I don't have to believe a danm thing. All I have to do is take care of my responsibilities as a man, stay black, and die. People don't understand that religion was created within tribes that eventually became dynasties. Religion was attached to government like Shariah Law in an Islamic ruled country. Some bimbo had a philosophy about the beginnings of the world, he had customs that he thought were more civilized for him and his family, and other close relatives and people followed him. Anybody who disagreed with him did their own thing or were cast out from him if they were amongst him at one point. Its common ******* sense that people these days don't have whatsoever. The moral code of the muslim overpowered Richard Dawkins too. But the Levitical customs and Islamic Shariah Law all condemn people to death, and based on the those laws, everybody should be dead, or disfigured. We’ve all fornicated, We’ve all stolen, so all of our hands should be cut off, We’ve all worked on Saturday in some form or fashion, another death sentence, Most of us have drank Alcohol either socially, moderatly, or in excess, etc. Not to mention religous zealots actually beleive God just dropped a book out of heaven and said “beleive this or go to hell”. I won’t knock the ****, but I don’t have to believe a danm thing. All I have to do is take care of my responsibilities as a man, stay black, and die. People don’t understand that religion was created within tribes that eventually became dynasties. Religion was attached to government like Shariah Law in an Islamic ruled country. Some bimbo had a philosophy about the beginnings of the world, he had customs that he thought were more civilized for him and his family, and other close relatives and people followed him. Anybody who disagreed with him did their own thing or were cast out from him if they were amongst him at one point. Its common ******* sense that people these days don’t have whatsoever.

]]> By: David Scotthttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171421 David Scott Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:40:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171421 Who cares about Darwinism. Just another theory. Why don't people create their own theories and ideologies instead of blindly following everything some self righteous so-called intellectual person gives them?? Thats why organized religion sucks. They just want to make as much money as possible off the poor, keeping them poor and keeping the elite rich. Religion is an organized ideology to keep people in a box so that they don't out-think the elite. Notice how this government criticises other ideologies like Marxism, or Communism, Socialism, not because they are horrible concepts, but because they are a DIFFERENT IDEOLOGY THEN WHAT THEY WANT US TO BELEIVE. The poor need to incorporate some elements of working together equally and the rights to property being publically owned to CEASE BEING POOR. The government PROFITS OFF THE BACKS OF THE POOR. Anyone who tries to stimulate income and wealth into the communities of the so called "bottom feeders" is a so-called SOCIALIST, and then the government attempts to discredit them. I don't even know how someone can still be discredited in so- called America, theres so much blaitent corruption and disregard for authority, even by highly publicised and famous figures. politics is such a contradiction of itslef. Why do people vote? I helped the president to get into office twice so far, I'm only 24, and he's never put a doorknob on a building in my community, Neither has a church. I've a seen a church build another church, I've seen a church feed the poor and homeless, but I haven't seen them offer the poor & homeless a job, clean them up and send them on an interview. They give a food, some mis-translation of a two or more thousand year old book about some ancient mesopatanian tribe, and thats it. I'ma still be freezing my balls off twenty minutes after I leave the church, and I still haven't had a crack, danm a break, in my current fucked up situation. My stomache should be full for about a hour though. Who cares about Darwinism. Just another theory. Why don’t people create their own theories and ideologies instead of blindly following everything some self righteous so-called intellectual person gives them?? Thats why organized religion sucks. They just want to make as much money as possible off the poor, keeping them poor and keeping the elite rich. Religion is an organized ideology to keep people in a box so that they don’t out-think the elite. Notice how this government criticises other ideologies like Marxism, or Communism, Socialism, not because they are horrible concepts, but because they are a DIFFERENT IDEOLOGY THEN WHAT THEY WANT US TO BELEIVE. The poor need to incorporate some elements of working together equally and the rights to property being publically owned to CEASE BEING POOR. The government PROFITS OFF THE BACKS OF THE POOR. Anyone who tries to stimulate income and wealth into the communities of the so called “bottom feeders” is a so-called SOCIALIST, and then the government attempts to discredit them. I don’t even know how someone can still be discredited in so- called America, theres so much blaitent corruption and disregard for authority, even by highly publicised and famous figures. politics is such a contradiction of itslef. Why do people vote? I helped the president to get into office twice so far, I’m only 24, and he’s never put a doorknob on a building in my community, Neither has a church. I’ve a seen a church build another church, I’ve seen a church feed the poor and homeless, but I haven’t seen them offer the poor & homeless a job, clean them up and send them on an interview. They give a food, some mis-translation of a two or more thousand year old book about some ancient mesopatanian tribe, and thats it. I’ma still be freezing my balls off twenty minutes after I leave the church, and I still haven’t had a crack, danm a break, in my current fucked up situation. My stomache should be full for about a hour though.

]]> By: Georgia Lignouhttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171318 Georgia Lignou Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:51:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171318 I think I got the point religion.....baaad science.....gooood everything that is not science or religion.....baaad I think I got the point
religion…..baaad
science…..gooood
everything that is not science or religion…..baaad

]]> By: Brandon Costahttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171150 Brandon Costa Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:15:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171150 It means Im bored with this discussion and cant believe Ive let myself get into it this far..lol It means Im bored with this discussion and cant believe Ive let myself get into it this far..lol

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171148 Anonymous Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:46:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171148 "In book you are going to pick the atheist . . . "What does that mean? “In book you are going to pick the atheist . . . ”

What does that mean?

]]> By: Brandon Costahttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171147 Brandon Costa Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:42:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171147 @AchmedIn book you are going to pick the athiest because you cant stand anyone who is a believer, which is typical for an athiest. And dont lecture me on keeping on topic because your off subject comments are littered all over this website. @Achmed

In book you are going to pick the athiest because you cant stand anyone who is a believer, which is typical for an athiest. And dont lecture me on keeping on topic because your off subject comments are littered all over this website.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171145 Anonymous Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:29:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171145 "Some only babble on with their hands over their ears, unwilling or unable to actually receive or give information." That pretty much sums up your statements about Einstein's alleged belief in a supreme being.What do you know about either intelligence, wisdom or for that matter acceptable English: "Some are blind to only those they hold in academic regard." --I can't even guess what that means. “Some only babble on with their hands over their ears, unwilling or unable to actually receive or give information.” That pretty much sums up your statements about Einstein’s alleged belief in a supreme being.

What do you know about either intelligence, wisdom or for that matter acceptable English: “Some are blind to only those they hold in academic regard.” –I can’t even guess what that means.

]]> By: Achems_Razorhttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171141 Achems_Razor Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:46:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171141 @norlavine:You mean you are not going to stick up for your sweetie, robertallen1? tsk,tsk.In my books @Brandon Costa: started this preamble leading to adverse reactions on both parties concerning religion and evolution, and in my books @robertallen1 will without a doubt win hands down, if of course they can keep these arguments on topic without resorting to ad hominem, or name calling. This is after all a discussion board concerning the docs in question. @norlavine:

You mean you are not going to stick up for your sweetie, robertallen1? tsk,tsk.

In my books @Brandon Costa: started this preamble leading to adverse reactions on both parties concerning religion and evolution, and in my books @robertallen1 will without a doubt win hands down, if of course they can keep these arguments on topic without resorting to ad hominem, or name calling. This is after all a discussion board concerning the docs in question.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171140 Anonymous Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:26:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171140 And what is so great about your ignorant self? And what is so great about your ignorant self?

]]> By: john kayhttp://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-root-of-all-evil/#comment-171125 john kay Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:27:00 +0000 http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/?p=3925#comment-171125 root of all evil: 1. people root of all evil:
1. people

]]>