Comments on: UFOs: The Secret Evidence

By: humphreysmr

humphreysmr — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:17:00 +0000

I by no means am an expert on this subject ! That is the great thing about it ! One can have no knowledge what so ever and be just as professional and accurate as those that have studied and documented this question for years.
It is the age old question — which came first the chick or the egg ?
I am excited to think that there are folks not of this world ! I am open minded and would like to see hard cold evidence of such ! I watch the UFO programs on TV and am probably less intellegent as a result.
Every document, every show, every sighting , every individual , fails to present one thimble full of hard evidence that can be connected to something not of this world. We find rocks driven through space penetrating our atmosphere and landing upon our earth ! That is stone cold evidence. Why can we not find one screw — one piece of material–one fingernail—something that can be held in our hand that says >>>>>hey this ain’t from around here — lets show it to somebody —we think it may be from another world ? (oh but the fed’s got it all) !! They managed to find Bill’s drippings on her dress did they not ! But when the Document is read —THE video has been seen — the UFO documentary on T.V. Is over > It is still completely up in the air as to intellegent life beyond earth ! One never sees a T.V. Show or a document that reads in the heading >>>>>>>> hard cold evidence has been found and is in our possesion for your inspection !!!! Why not ???? There goes all the money ! Thats why ! DUUUUUUUUH !
I find it mathmatically incorrect to assume that life beyond earth ( intellegent Life at that ) would not exist ! Just give me one shred of cold hard — place in my hand evidence !
You have any idea how much money they( you)are making off folks that truly desire to believe ! How folks have their hopes up and loyaly await written in stone evidence !
I am not from MO. BUT SHOW ME !!!

By: Raptor jones

Raptor jones — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:05:00 +0000

Okay but your statements contradictory and holds no weight, You havent communicated very well when your express a plausibilty argument, mainly based on personal faith.What exactly are the more plausible aspects of the UFO-alien phenomena?

By: Walter B. Woodliff

Walter B. Woodliff — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:52:00 +0000

Have a Barbeque.

By: Wes Guptill

Wes Guptill — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:13:00 +0000

I can definitely be categorized with the ‘believers’ in the school of thought that says that we are (and have been, for that matter, since time immemorial ) being visited and influenced by extraterrestrial intellects. However, I do maintain a strong sense of skepticism which is aimed at some of the things, both physical and theoretical, that people conjure up to try and shove into place among the more plausible aspects of the UFO-alien enigma. More importantly, when I am discussing or pursuing a particular argument or perspective, I take the time to construct a coherent, readable, well-thought presentation. My feeling is that if I do so, then I may be able to capture the mind and interest of a cynic or disbeliever a lot more readily than if I just pasted drivel or garbled words on website or in a blog and expected the whole world to understand and endorse what it was supposed to represent. For a number of years, I have reviewed and studied thousands of reported sightings and encounters, and the alarming common denominator I keep finding is the consistent incoherency of the people who are posting these events and experiences. What is probably a very real, very significant event for an individual or even a group of people has suddenly became a farce, a joke to any who happen to read the entry for the sighting or experience. My point is this, if you want to come off as being credible or authoritative in some vein of this field, either as a commentator or as a witness, then maybe you should invest a bit of time and give people a better, more easily understood depiction of the event or your observations. Because, unfortunately, most of the comments and other offerings I have happened upon here (and in other locales) are gibberish and nonsensical. This degree of low level communication by ‘contributors’ makes them more subject to ridicule, doubt, and accusations than would be leveled at someone whose education and thought processes were more evident. Do yourselves a favor and learn how to communicate concepts and experiences; do that and you might just see people start to take the UFO experience more seriously.

By: daniel

daniel — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:11:00 +0000

make sum frikn alien burgers…nummy

By: Winston Smith

Winston Smith — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:45:00 +0000

See if you can find the Peter Jennings’ news special: “UFOs: Seeing is Believing ” -that testimony.. -especially the of the cops in Ohio I think it was will leave you convinced. They had effects artists draw animations of what they all saw.. and these were not just ‘lights in the sky.’ -it will leave you a complete believer in UFO’s!! Guaranteed.

It only makes sense that in a universe as vast and ancient as ours and with us being such recent arrivals here (amd how prolific life is under the right conditions) that more technologically advanced intelligent life forms most likely do exist out there somewhere in the vastness of the cosmos. They are probably just waiting for our humanity to match our technology and for us to stop killing one another like tribal bands of chimpanzees of the rampage before making full contact (Nothing against chimpanzees, -they can be very violent).

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 18 Dec 2011 18:06:00 +0000

If we found a cow on Mars, what do you think our scientists would do with it?

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:45:00 +0000

It doesn’t really matter what people think, we all have an opinion and everybody is entitled to mine.I am truely a believer. Beam me up Scotty….

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:46:00 +0000

Agree with much of your article:
The only thing you mentioned “Why fly millions of light years to cut open a cow?” that I wanted to comment on is that the assumption is that many of the reported advanced beings are 10s maybe 100s of light years away from our own solar system in our galaxy. In terms of interstellar distances, they are our neighbors.
WHile all is fair game in terms of intergalactic travel, the ones coming here are nearby. Though in terms of our technology, they are an impossible distance away even at 10 light years from us.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:28:00 +0000

Proof is elusive because as we are a confused conflicting and convoluted specie. It is a consequence of our level of evolution.
While some of us want proof too many of us will get in the way of it.
For example:
1-Hoax makers who find it funny to fake and ridicule the topic,
2-Mainstream Science that fear losing its identity if it were to go against its structure in order to investigate a phenomena without the formula that science knows,
3-Greed brought about by big corporations and a segment of the air force who have the money and resources to execute what they believe is their right to own and manipulate alien technology for control and profit while keeping everyone else in the dark about it,
4-The mainstream press which may be in bed with the big corporations is manipulated to ridicule the topic,
5-Politicians who fear losing their credibility if they were to embrace the topic,
6-A large number of us who are too caught up in our day to day life issues and struggles to care about disclosure,
7-The ETs may not want to be proven without a shadow of a doubt right now,
8-It is extremely difficult even for a UFO photographer/watcher with a zoom camera on a tripod to capture the image of a fast moving object that may be at a distance that even the professional zoom lenses cannot reach,
9- The the economic and religious structure would be turned upside down because the flow of things as we know it may have to be overhauled in order to update our current state of development if materially and spiritually,
10- The skeptic and realist who may have an internal fear of accepting this phenomena will do anything to reject the topic; even if an ET was to walk up to him/her he would attempt to remove its head
by mistaking it to be a mask.

This simply ten of many speculated reasons why the proof you seek is elusive. It isn’t that simple because of us altogether.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:52:00 +0000

While I disagreed with your take that the article was balanced, I do agree with your final conclusion.
The reporter in this article in many occasion, did conclude his belief
and angle. The feeling i had was that he crafted the documentary just enough to make his case. The legitimacy of the ET factor never came across that leaned towards accepting it.
I suppose each angle of this phenomena can be documented in a way that makes ne’s respective case pro or con.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:46:00 +0000

Sorry Joann, i beg to differ.
See my post above as to why I felt this reporter missed the mark.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:46:00 +0000

I do agree with you. See my post above.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:29:00 +0000

I totally agree!
The majority of the skeptic views on here comment as though proof should only be presented in a narrow and concrete form
as is, in my opinion a major flaw of mainstream scientific analyses and deduction.
Truth be told that we are a complex specie.Truth and evidence is not linear. Sometimes, the only way to discover truth is to take a leap of faith. unfortunately, only some of us get this range of the human sensibility. The rest tend to rely on a concrete equation that may suggest smarts in terms of a human being’s ability to deduct rational and mathematical truths. And yet these types are totally lacking in human intuition and the wisdom to make a deduction outside the box.
I believe that in order to accept the reality of extraterrestrial visitations here on earth, we must tap into the ability to accept possibilities outside of the confines of conventional scientific thinking. In order to reach this state, the stencil of evidence and proof as we know it has to be re-evaluated.

In this context the view of mainstream science and typical skeptics if it insists on asking the wrong and predictable questions, will never discover the wonders of the universe.

The acceptance that life does exist in such a vast universe as mainstream scientists will admit to, is the wrong question.

The bold question to ask is whether the life forms out there if so much more advanced than us have discovered ways to manipulate time and space to get here. This seems to be the question that mainstream scientists are rigid about.
Much of their reasoning is often man-made science based as-in
the impossibility of space travel. This is the perfect example of in-the box thinking.
The circumstantial evidence from former US officials, pilots, whistle blowers by an irrefutable number, as well as trace evidence representing 5 percent of the phenomena, is simply overwhelming. It is a travesty that so many scientists have stuck their heads in the sand or stick their fingers in their ear
while screaming in order to avoid listening to these testimonies.
My interest is not in believing in proven hoaxes and hoax makers, inconclusive photos, videos, testimonies and cases;I am wholly accepting of objective debunking as opposed to de-bunkers’ explanations against the phenomena that is more incredible than the phenomena itself. When this happens, you’re just dealing with someone with a subjective disbelief
that’ll lead him/her to do anything to discredit the phenomena.

If you’ve listen to the conclusion of many scientists outside of the US landscape, you’ll see that this topic and the highly credible circumstantial evidence has been taken seriously.

In conclusion, the film was not very good. It felt like the documentary presenter had a set of beliefs and angle that he had set out to prove. His theory pre-supposed that the US government and the CIA has this wizardry of world manipulation and has devised all of these clever disinformation devices in order to protect its top military secret aircraft experiments. I was not convinced by his sources
of information. They all sounded as though they shared his theories but were not stating that in fact they knew what he deducted to be the truth.
The documentary assumed that the technology was all man-made. So the whole ET factor was totally avoided. He left critical UFO encounters that would have badly weakened his conclusions.
His sources were not as clear in their belief as the former government officials who came forward in the “Disclosure Project”.

By: Roger Rhodes

Roger Rhodes — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:31:00 +0000

Great sight