Comments on: Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:27:00 +0000

where is the last chapter? shame is not here as i find the series very interesting,but maybe is because i’m some kind of ignorant, illiterate redneck, as the “archeologists” writing in this post see the program as a stupidity, amazing how people who know so much have as outlet for their knowledge a boring forum to dismiss the work of this person without any proof to challenge the program (so much for “scientific method”)and by the way, to all you amazing trained “archeologists” out there with your scientific methods i got a word for you. TROY!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 03 Dec 2011 02:27:00 +0000

How hard is it to imagine a bronze age culture during the climactic stability the ice age offered? Such a culture would have surpassed all neolithics. With bronze braces their ships or boats or floating craft of any kind would have been able to reach many shores. I don’t understand the proplem with modern academcs. Graham Hancock is a nutjob. So was Gallieo. So was Schliemann. So would have been Einstein if he could not back it up with mathematical equations. What I’m saying is the facts come from many directions: Ignore NONE of them.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:36:00 +0000

Ok. U are rite, but have u ever thought about that maybe we all do not have english language as our main language? How many languages do you speak? Don’t mind me if u are some kind of poliglot BUT Still… please… NWO didn’t win yet so there is few hundered languages around with few thousands of dialects and english is just one language, If u asketh me – it sounds quite poor.

By: Michaell Svendsen

Michaell Svendsen — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:45:00 +0000

very interesting. Just comes to show that you can take no knowledge for granted and that everything we think we know should be questioned every now and again.

By: Steve

Steve — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:17:00 +0000

Thank you for your comment. It’s nice to know we still have thinkers in the world.

By: Fake Name

Fake Name — Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:53:00 +0000

I find it interesting that someone that claims to have training in archeology , can’t be bothered to cite the BOOK they’ve studied on marine archeology looking for a link to current known civilizations with ones found in the flooded coastal regions around the world. While the journalist not only cited his sources, he interviewed them and let them speak for themselves. Although judging from your comment, its highly unlikely you’ve ever read such a BOOK to be able to cite. You don’t improve mans knowledge with that kind of comment or the thinking that creates it, as you have been formally trained, I find that extremely disturbing.

By: Fake Name

Fake Name — Sat, 06 Aug 2011 01:39:00 +0000

@ Js, I’m all for questioning accepted wisdom, but there is no “supposed ice age”. It’s definitively known through rigorously tested methods, that there have been many ice ages in earths past, distant and not so distant. Your thought on Adam and Eve is an excellent one! if they where put on earth fully formed, that would mean they are in fact E.T.s. as all native life evolved from more primitive forms.

By: Fake Name

Fake Name — Sat, 06 Aug 2011 01:31:00 +0000

If all of humanity where to assume that the knowledge we have now was definitive, there would be no more advancement. That is the problem with theocratic societies, they stop learning because every question can be answered with “God did it”. That is what lead to the dark ages, they are called the “dark ages” not because the light of God went out, but because people where blinded by the glitter of churches. Science, and archeology is a science, relies on funding for its research. If you go against the “definitive” knowledge that science offers, you get no funding. No person interested in a future in science is willing to do that, so we have come to a point where we are re-entering the “dark ages” only it is not religion that is pushing us that way, it is money. Graham Hancock is a journalist, he says so at the very start of this made for profit program. I may no completely agree with on everything, but I have a great deal of respect for him, for one Not portraying himself as a scientist, for two posing all his theories as just that , not definitive fact, and for three, not accepting what he’s told as being definitive. That is in fact what “critical thinking” is. A man that knows everything can learn nothing. We have a planet full of men that know everything, how about we give a little encouragement to those that don’t, just for varieties sake. Also, OzJorgo, you start your comment by attacking the presenter, then make the quote “but verbaly attacking and critisizing the debators is a sign of inner weakness” perhaps you should stop copying and pasting that quote and actually consider it.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:56:00 +0000

He spelled those words wrong on purpose as a joke, come on now…

By: Azilda

Azilda — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:54:00 +0000

@Ozxcba1
Hey OZ….got a brother?

I agree attacking is not necessary although a little *making fun of* is quite appropriate at times.
Critisizing on the other hand is what this forum is about.
We read, we think, we give our opinion and sometimes is goes against what was written by an other.
Every one has a way to look at life, all ways represent our level of knowledge, awareness, worldy experience, and amount of ego pride.
az

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:17:00 +0000

Ok, this guy is a crackpot and a journalist (god knows we need more of them, not) but he has a point in that his theory cant be proven wrong, just like the archeologists cant be either (they just make mistakes or errors), and he has opened up a door to us in that it is another theory, his theory…
BTW im an aussie and think critical is good but verbaly attacking and critisizing the debators is a sign of inner weakness, ty.

By: Leonard Legare

Leonard Legare — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:07:00 +0000

Clams and Watter would love to see a book you wrote….. He’s a journalist and a damn good one!

By: Leonard Legare

Leonard Legare — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:03:00 +0000

Wow …. You guys are ridiculous. He’s good1

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:12:00 +0000

*can’t

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:11:00 +0000

*totally and *overwhelming