Aftermath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11

2003, 9/11  -   12 Comments
Ratings: 8.00/10 from 19 users.

Aftermath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11With the ongoing controversy over the federal probe into the September 11 terrorist attacks, GNN decided to pre-empt the government and produce its own version of a 'truth commission' with AfterMath: Unanswered Questions from 9/11.

Narrated by Hip Hop legend Paris and featuring interviews shot by GNN syndicate producers in six cities, AfterMath features nine (9) people answering eleven (11) of the most pressing questions that emanate from the terrible and, as yet, unexplained, events of that day. As you will see, these are questions that continue to overshadow and critically challenge the official 'version' of the story.

More great documentaries

12 Comments / User Reviews

  1. robyn

    still relevant today. still unanswered questions.
    does anyone know who did the music at the end.

  2. Christopher M Dunn
  3. Christopher M Dunn

    Zbigniew Brzezinski would be worth a million points on scrabble!!!(I know there arent enough Z's, but you should never let facts get in the way of a good story :-)

  4. Kurrrt
  5. Kurrrt

    I think the US aircrafts poses a certain bomb of a kind that can completely vaporize bodies, but I'm not an expert. I went to bomb school long enough to know ther'd be a piece of a body in a crash involving many many humans. TNT spreads pieces like a spray, C4 explodes carving out pieces like a jig saw puzzle, jet fuel burns leaving remains, not a piece of a body requires new understandings.

  6. roy
  7. roy

    One issue i have concerning 9/11 is the explosives that where supposed to have been found in vans around the George Washington bridge area. If this is true why has no investigative journalist looked into it? Who where they, why weren't they arrested and who the police officers where who stopped them? Instead,to my knowledge,no-one has ever looked into this.I heard Israeli's where driving these vans and even that one had a picture on the side of a tower and a plane crashing into it, yet the media is silent on this. Surely there must be police reports of names and licence plate numbers? Because of this silence by the 9/11 investigators I'm inclined to believe the whole conspiracy thing is a load of rubbish. People believing what they want to believe.

  8. MyReligionIs2DoGood
  9. MyReligionIs2DoGood

    You believe this is all rubbish because there was no further investigation in this specific case?

    What do you think the police could do about it when some guys from some *fill in random acronym* agency in grey suits tell them 'Let it go - or face the consequences. Don't you have two kids?'?

    Why do you think anyone of the truth movement or any journalist could get any further info on this?

    Without the truth movement you wouldn't have ever heard about this in the first place!

    And besides that - the huge amount of scientific facts and other evidence is not enough for you?

  10. Earthwinger
  11. Earthwinger

    "Because of this silence by the 9/11 investigators I'm inclined to believe the whole conspiracy thing is a load of rubbish. People believing what they want to believe"

    Hmm, I see it the other way around. If it had been left to the official investigators and the mainstream media, most people probably wouldn't even be aware that Building 7 collapsed as well as the twin towers. Much that is suspicious about the events of that day have been brushed aside by the official investigators. It's also widely understood by all that work in the mainstream media - if they ask difficult and probing questions about 9.11, they can kiss their careers goodbye.

    So if anything, I would argue that all these omissions add weight to the alternative theories, rather than discredit them in any way.

  12. Karl Dulle
  13. Karl Dulle

    I sat there on 9/11 and said that VERY day.. things dont add up... too many questions unanswered, and ANSWERS provided that do not make any sense..

  14. batvette
  15. batvette

    Who cares what the indians think about it? All this guilt over European progress spreading across the world is bull huckey. The indians greatest enemy was their own willful ignorance. AKA failure to utilize the written word to document each generations discoveries and failures. THE WRITTEN WORD which allows you to express your opinion to me.
    They had cave paintings and campfire stories by old men telling tall tales to young braves. Of COURSE you people think they are some kind of noble majestic people living one with the land- you get to make it all up in your imagination and compare it to the written records of Europeans who wrote REALITY down for scrutiny of future generations, but also allowed future generations to avoid the mistakes of the past and build on their accomplishments.
    It's been well documented that Europeans did attempt to negotiate with and compensate the indians for land and goods. Then the next band of nomadic warring people come along and that's out the window- where do you think the phrase "indian giver" came from?
    When in history has an inferior people been allowed a sheltered existence on a vast expanse of land, to wallow incompetantly and not progress significantly in the face of others' expansion?
    You'd claim some great moral transgressions on the part of colonists, I'd say the moral transgression is defending a society prevail instead that would have us all living in teepees and caves, dying from starvation, the common cold or war with our immediate neighbors, and having each of our lives pass without significant contribution to future generations or study of previous generations' toward ours.
    Thus is the most damning point about self loathing over European colonialism- if it hadn't happened nobody would even know about it, they could all tell campfire stories about not doing things like that when they were young.
    BTW, let's not kid ourselves about the indians, they were merely the first immigrants.

  16. pjle
  17. pjle

    The revelation that the Taliban and AL Quaeda are one in the same and that the Clinton Administration as well as the Bush Gang were sponsors to help thwart Russia in the early to late eighties is nothing new Bush senior was friends with the Bin Ladens when he was foreign secretary in the early to late sixties and seventies.Why do you think Bin Laden was never killed.They were all friends and that is where the Bushs made their money.They could not kill him it would have exposed the whole stinkin lot.They made sure to let The President OBAMA get Bin Laden fact not fiction.It all stinks anyway.What the hell can we do about it? SWEET F>>>>ALL.Besides we will never get to the bottom it went down with BIN LADEN.

  18. futureunkown
  19. futureunkown

    i read the comments for reviews of the docs and i get the same peoples
    opinions of the events of 9/11. Not helpful. batvette

  20. rufusclyde
  21. rufusclyde

    scatvette is everywhere, teaching, always teaching! Indians are an inferior people, who warred with their neighbors. This is in contrast to Europeans, who did not engage in things like the Thirty Years War, the US Civil War, the Seven Years War, The Hundred Years War, nor World Wars I and II. Likewise, these inferior people died of disease, unlike the Europeans, who did not experience the bubonic plague, cholera, nor small-pox. And lastly, these inferior people deserved to be displaced because unlike Europeans immigrants who acquire land according to a set of laws, the Indians were the first immigrants so it was okay to displace them. The iron logic of scatvette the scholar!

  22. Matthew J Davidson
  23. Matthew J Davidson

    Yeah, were doing such a good job of using your so-called "written word" to avoid the mistakes of the past! .

Leave a comment / review:

→ Privacy Policy