Artifishal

Artifishal

2019, Environment  -   2 Comments
7.00
12345678910
Ratings: 7.00/10 from 29 users.

The documentary explores the implications of the changing relationship between humans and how we manipulate ecosystems for our benefit and survival. It focuses specifically on fishing of wild salmon. Throughout the piece, we can see a clear parallel path between the technological advancement of the society and communities that practice fishing and the depletion of the wild salmon population.

It is not a new trajectory. Societies were initially built around hunting and gathering. As generations advanced and humans developed technology, the way we interact with the environment changed. We began to use technology to manipulate ecosystems, and during that process we lost many unique species. Attempts are being made to ensure the entire salmon run does not meet that ultimate fate.

Different stakeholders have different takes on the situation. The main consensus is that preserving the species should be the ultimate focus. Initial efforts focused on regulation, but this was unsuccessful as a solution and continued societal advancement meant it would negatively affect natural reproduction of the salmon population. It was decided that a remedial approach in the form of artificial propagation was the best option.

This desire led to the creation of hatcheries to help preserve the species in a more controlled environment. However, the approach poses its own challenges. Some are of the view that any attempt to control nature rather than work with it will lead to an impoverished life. The effect of the hatcheries is not as one would expect since it lowers the quality of fishes in the wild.

The documentary gives a look beyond the finished salmon on the plate. It gives a view into the real interdependence of the communities that depend on salmon runs not just for food but as a part of their cultural way of life. It examines the role politics and commerce play and how they seem to trump preservation of the ecosystem in the short term.

The reality is that nature has proven quite capable of restoring what humans struggle to produce, but only in conditions where it can do so with minimal to no human interference. The main consensus is clear; salmon should not be allowed to go extinct. It remains difficult to conclude which is truly the best solution. Reducing the human footprint might only be achieved by reducing the human population. The ultimate question remains whether we can or will do what is necessary.

Directed by: Josh "Bones" Murphy

More great documentaries

2 Comments / User Reviews

  1. Gary

    I live in Oregon. Our hatcheries are nothing like California hatcheries.
    Case in point, Eagle Creek Hatchery. The original eggs and sperm were taken from wild stock which was then released back into the river they came from.
    Eagle Creek Hatchery uses water from the creek itself. The eggs are raised until they are a fry of a certain size then released. No food, no nothing but the natural nutrients from the creek. All of our hatcheries are like this. No fish food or processing. Just raise the eggs to fry and release them. A lot of people, people who don't fish, people who know nothing about the fisheries, have no education about fisheries, are up in arms because they think the hatchery fish will ruin the native runs. Well, the hatchery fish are native fish. The only difference is that they grow in the hatcher, protected from predators, and then released. This helps keep the fishery strong. Many fishermen catch native fish, which are illegal to keep, but there are holding tanks in many places that a fisherman can put these native fish to be milked, their eggs raised in a safe environment, and then released. People who know nothing should either quit talking or get educated.

    1. Larry

      You sound like your a fisherman. Maybe a little biased in support of the financial aspects. Anyone reading will have just watched a documentary on the subject. Maybe there is a way to keep the two separate but should it come at the cost of the taxpayers. I think not. You want to create an isolated river or pond to stock have at it in the venture of making money. But if contamination occurs there should be steep penalties. Maybe I'm wrong. But if the numbers are dwindling then let the data speak for itself and just come from a short term gains economic point of view based on a sport.