Frack Them All!

2014 ,    »  -   28 Comments
Ratings: 7.69/10 from 75 users.

Russia Today investigates the fracking epidemic in rural areas all over the United States in Frack Them All! Industry representatives claim every possible precaution is taken in the natural resource extraction process that has become popular, and a lightning rod for criticism, in recent years, but residents in areas where extraction sites have been built coming down with a slew of unexplained illnesses and ailments are just one example of the data being compiled showing those precautions are not nearly effective enough.

Whereas traditional drilling has been a vertical method straight down into the earth below it, fracking is a process where a drill descends to a desired depth, then turns at a 90-degree angle and extends for thousands of feet to the location where the natural gas is believed to be trapped. A mix of water, sand, and various chemicals are then pumped into the well at extremely high pressure to create fissures in the shale so the gas can escape.

The gas is extracted through the drill, and the waste water used in the process works its way to the surface where it needs to be stored and disposed of safely to avoid contaminating all it comes in contact with. The water is many times saltier than even sea water, and frequently picks up radioactive materials and toxic metals such as arsenic. Needless to say, these byproducts create a substantial health risk to communities surrounding the areas where the drilling takes place.

The film focuses on a number of residents in regions where this exact exploitation is running rampant. Randy Moyer, an activist in Portage, Pennsylvania that is also a victim of nearby drilling, is suffering from rashes, swelling, tooth decay and loss, tightening of joints - all of which have been diagnosed as chemical exposure symptoms, symptoms he and his wife believe to be correlated with nearby drilling.

A number of other activists are also profiled engaging in a range of protest and investigative efforts that are aimed towards bringing this issue further into the public eye and actually getting government officials to take action against companies reaping tremendous rewards at the expense of human life crippled and lost in the process.

28 Comments / User Reviews

    Fabien L'Amour
  1. Fabien L'Amour

    I don't deny poorly executed fracking can cause serious damage to the environment and leaks can cause health problems. But that documentary is very short on scientific evidence.

    The guy that says he has a water analysis before and after fracking and lists a bunch of isotopes that appeared after the fracking is misleading. No potable water analysis company I know of will test for uranium or thorium. We also don't get any concentration so they could be totally innocuous concentrations you can find anywhere on the planet.

    Where are the blood tests and medical reports for the man that says he has radioactive burns? The palm test is not a medical diagnosis...

    Also the guy that says that the Uranium 235 they find is weapon grade doesn't know anything about weapon grade Uranium. It needs to be highly enriched to be used in nuclear warheads. You can't possibly find that in nature or anywhere on the commercial market in U.S.A. so it's impossible there is highly enriched Uranium used in fracking.

    It was either a poorly researched documentary or it's trying to make believe the whole of Pennsylvania is highly radioactive which it is not.

  2. Patrick Adrien Varencaus
  3. Patrick Adrien Varencaus

    When you dont know , dont disinform ! Yaa they are all cooks ? ya thats right !! Should i wish you a bad cancer ? oh no i m just not like that ! Do you know wath pain is at least ? doubt it you puffed up with pride dude !!

  4. Fabien L'Amour
  5. Fabien L'Amour

    I was only questioning the radioactivity allegations. As I stated in my first sentence, there is serious risk of contamination.

    I only seriously doubt the radiation hypothesis as it's very easy to locate and diagnose. If the whole area or water was radioactive, it wouldn't be hard to have scientists measure it instead of spreading that "information" in a documentary without any verification.

    It's not like RT can't hire someone to conduct independent tests instead of having that "journalist" film himself taking pictures.

  6. Skeptic
  7. Skeptic

    Russia Today is there to brain wash everyone with conspiracy theories, so that actual events don't seem so bad.

  8. Pixie Roberts
  9. Pixie Roberts

    Get informed! There's plenty available out there, from the US, Australia, the UK, YouTube. Just don't seek info on mainstream American to as its part of the reason why so few people know about this n why you doubt it yourself. and Gasland etc.

  10. Fabien L'Amour
  11. Fabien L'Amour

    Nowhere do I see Uranium or Thorium mentioned in credible articles.

  12. Hikerdudette
  13. Hikerdudette

    And the U.S. doesn't?

  14. Doris
  15. Doris

    call Greenpeace

  16. Jatinder Sehgal
  17. Jatinder Sehgal

    There have been other conspiracy theories about misdeeds of the industry - coal mining, oil tar sands, tobacco, asbestos, thalidomide ... I could go on. In every case many people challenged the whistle blowers. In all those cases, the industry was proven to be acting criminally while stashing away billions of dollars. Given the record, I do not need any more proof from the whistle blowers. The industry is guilty unless proven innocent.

  18. TheDanishViking
  19. TheDanishViking

    Please! Russians today are hyped into a national frenzy and it is pathetic that the Russian media is meanwhile pointing fingers at other nations.

  20. Fabien L'Amour
  21. Fabien L'Amour

    With blanket accusations like that, courts will become irrelevant soon. With your industry accusation, you've declared every company involved in fracking guilty of the misdeeds done by probably a handful.

  22. Kansas Devil
  23. Kansas Devil

    It appear to be yet another emotional appeal documentary. Emotional appeals never work in fixing these kinds of problems. Cold, hard, indisputable facts presented by verified authorities is required.

  24. Paul Gloor
  25. Paul Gloor

    The courts are there for the to challenge the accusations. I understand they have security and whatnot to contend with, but they can choose to allow publicly selected 3rd party professionals to check the facts and make a lot of people happy, whatever the results. Things like this have to be transparent to the public.

  26. Fabien L'Amour
  27. Fabien L'Amour

    That should be the EPA responsibility. What's the point of having regulations if no one is responsible for testing if it is respected when a complaint is made? What are they protecting if they can't even test the water coming out of contaminated water treatment plants?

  28. fnertz
  29. fnertz

    Ok. Let me get this straight. What you want is a whistleblower.

    You want a whistleblower to stand up and shed everything he or she has - job, house, friends, collegues, everything. He or she will never get another job in their profession because they "spilled the beans" so to speak. They will be up against endless lawsuits from the companies that make HUGE sums of money from this industry. And they can keep it going for decades. And they will.
    What you want is this little person to stand up against these giants and completely ruin his or her life. Because that is what happens when you take these giants on.

    That's kind of a tall order. Who the hell are YOU to ask this of anyone? Hmm? Isn't it more fair of US to ask YOU to look at the evidence that is there already?

    Let me ask you finally: Are high levels of uranium and strontium in your water - is that "emotional appeal"? "Heavy nosebleeds"? Blowbacks, radiation. Still "emotional appeal"?

    Who the hell ARE you?!?!? How about I ask YOU to stand up and pay some attention already?!?!

  30. TGOBP
  31. TGOBP

    I have to correct you on a couple of points. The guy that was talking about the water tests showed the 'pre-test' paper, done by the gas company, which was tested by Northeast Environmental Laboratory, Inc. according to the paper. He said 'the DEP got involved' and found the contaminants after fracking began. So you are assuming he used a 'potable water analysis company', he said he went off the DEP's findings , a State department's test results.

    The guy who said they find Uranium 235 said that it was SOMETIMES good enough for weapons grade... not what you're indicating, all of it. The fact it isn't found naturally in nature at that refinement backs up his reasoning that it isn't natural if those concentrations are found. There was also the person with the radiation meter in their kitchen window sill that showed an above average reading.
    I do agree with you when you said the doco was short on scientific information. I too wish it stuck more with facts instead of going for the emotional response.

  32. Fabien L'Amour
  33. Fabien L'Amour

    You can't find any highly enriched weapon grade Uranium in nature, period. The only way you could maybe find it in nature is if some plane lost a nuke by mistake and it didn't explode. Enriched Uranium is a type of uranium in which the percent composition of uranium-235 has been increased through the process of isotope separation. Natural uranium is 99.284% U238 isotope, with U235 only constituting about 0.711% of its weight. Weapon Grade Uranium is 80% plus U235 and costs a fortune to produce.

    The entire production of the Manhattan project, about 50 kilograms (110 lb) of uranium enriched to 89% uranium-235 was delivered to Los Alamos by July 1945. The entire 50 kg, along with some 50%-enriched, averaging out to about 85% enriched, were used in Little Boy.

    It is completely insane to think they use weapon grade uranium in fracking as there are only 2000 tons of it on the planet, it is highly controlled by governments and it's definitely not something that ends up in the hands of civilians. A typical nuclear weapon contains Highly Enriched Uranium worth more than $600,000.

    You are correct when you say I am assuming he used a potable water analysis, too bad we only got a glimpse of it as that lab offers several types of analysis. My remark was that you can't compare 2 reports (before/after) if some isotopes weren't on the first test.

    As for the windowsill test, there are many sources of radiation in a house including Radon seeping in from the ground, granite countertops, old chinese ceramics and uranium-tainted glassware.

  34. TGOBP
  35. TGOBP

    I agree mate, I might have been a bit ambiguous in my wording. It looks like you know more about Uranium than I do, but I agree, from what I do know 'weapons grade' concentrations of Uranium is not naturally found in nature. Do you know much about the 'spent Uranium' that is used in non-nuclear weapons in recent times? He may have meant something along those lines... the term 'weapons grade' I agree was used to indicate the stuff used to make bombs in the past... he might have been talking about the 'spent Uranium'... technically I suppose that could be considered 'weapons grade' now?
    That's why I think if what the bloke claimed is anywhere near accurate it is important and enlightening.

    I also agree, very much, that the 'doco' would have been much better with some more defined, exact information, and better tests. I wonder if that reading from the window sill is within the normal range for that type of home?

    Here in Aus, especially in my State of Queensland, there is more and more fracking going on, and very little accurate information can be accessed though the companies or our government. Here, they are now even allowed to hire State Police as 'security guards' for their gas fields. They claim that is justifiable because the gov. considers the field a likely target of 'terrorism'. I have said before, obviously the 'terrorists' are the farmers in this case. :( I've seen footage of farm dams burning etc. from here. Quite disconcerting when the 'officials' either can't, or won't release proper details about what exactly is going on.

  36. Fabien L'Amour
  37. Fabien L'Amour

    I listened to what he said once more (20:15 mark) and he said "Uranium 235, that's something that's weapons grade, this stuff is so potent". I seriously doubt he meant depleted Uranium as that has a lower concentration of Uranium 235 than natural Uranium. Depleted Uranium used by the U.S. Department of Defense contain less than 0.3% U-235.

    I also couldn't find a credible independent source that cites Depleted Uranium as being used in fracking. My hypothesis is that bare chested truck driver is only spurting "stuff" all wrong because he doesn't understand what he is talking about.

  38. TGOBP
  39. TGOBP

    You're probably correct mate, I don't doubt most of the people 'quoting' things on this 'doco' don't fully understand what they're talking about. Most if not all.

    Proper testing results would have been very useful to help gain more knowledge. The fact they didn't show much better those supposed results does not sit well with me. I don't know, but I also don't rule it out as beyond possible... depleted Uranium would actually fit the requirement better would it not? It's a lower concentration than natural U, so it theoretically should be more easy to find those concentrations than 'weapons grade', making him technically correct. (I agree it doesn't fit the context, but he might have misunderstood that info/ results himself to mean that?) I also recall seeing that depleted U can cause health problems... it was a 'doco' about some US returned Vet's getting sick, they thought from spent (shot off) depleted U rounds. (one of the Military Dr.s that was over there testing for them was one of the main people featured, and was saying his ill health was because of that, its safe until it's used and blasted to small bits they were claiming.)

    I wouldn't put it past those gas companies to 'dispose' of depleted U if there was a profit in it for them. I'm not saying they do or don't.. just going on recent history says they shouldn't be trusted. We (all countries) need our governments to keep a very close eye on what we allow to be done to our natural resources, especially the most important ones of air, food and water.

    I think that money for Fracking would be better spent on renewable energy, both R & D and infrastructure, than pumping sh1t into our ground that makes taps, bores and dams flammable... or like here also currently opening up even more coal mines. :(

  40. Fabien L'Amour
  41. Fabien L'Amour

    I have no proof whatsoever what you write and he says is remotely right. I can pretend they dump Alien spaceships in these wells, without proof, it's hearsay.

    I am not pro-fracking but when claims are made that companies are knowingly poisoning their employees with Uranium 235, I need some tangible proof and analysis to give it credential.

  42. TGOBP
  43. TGOBP

    The last I saw here, the MP in charge of it, when asked what was being pumped into the ground, said he didn't know. To me, that's not good enough.

    I also agree, proper evidence is required to back assertions, and as I've indicated, I don't know about Uranium.
    It doesn't take a degree to know that methane bubbling up through the water supply isn't a good thing though.

    When the people doing it for profit, and the people that are supposed to be overseeing it won't give out details, that's not only hard to get any evidence, but does raise a red flag in my mind.
    If it's all harmless... why hide it.

  44. Fabien L'Amour
  45. Fabien L'Amour

    Here is a list of some additives used in the U.S.A. :

    Obviously, they don't use all of these at the same time as they would
    get some explosive chemical reactions. I like that in U.K. they can
    only use 'Non-Hazardous' chemicals. Hopefully, Australia has a similar regulation.

    2634-33-5 1,2-Benzisothiazolin-2-one / 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one

    95-63-6 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene

    123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane

    3452-07-1 1-eicosene

    629-73-2 1-hexadecene

    112-88-9 1-octadecene

    1120-36-1 1-tetradecene

    10222-01-2 2,2 Dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide, a biocide

    27776-21-2 2,2'-azobis-{2-(imidazlin-2-yl)propane}-dihydrochloride

    73003-80-2 2,2-Dibromomalonamide

    15214-89-8 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulphonic acid sodium salt polymer

    46830-22-2 2-acryloyloxyethyl(benzyl)dimethylammonium chloride

    52-51-7 2-Bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol

    111-76-2 2-Butoxy ethanol

    1113-55-9 2-Dibromo-3-Nitriloprionamide (2-Monobromo-3-nitriilopropionamide)

    104-76-7 2-Ethyl Hexanol

    67-63-0 2-Propanol / Isopropyl Alcohol / Isopropanol / Propan-2-ol

    26062-79-3 2-Propen-1-aminium, N,N-dimethyl-N-2-propenyl-chloride, homopolymer

    9003-03-6 2-propenoic acid, homopolymer, ammonium salt

    25987-30-8 2-Propenoic acid, polymer with 2 p-propenamide, sodium salt / Copolymer of acrylamide and sodium acrylate

    71050-62-9 2-Propenoic acid, polymer with sodium phosphinate (1:1)

    66019-18-9 2-propenoic acid, telomer with sodium hydrogen sulfite

    107-19-7 2-Propyn-1-ol / Propargyl alcohol

    51229-78-8 3,5,7-Triaza-1-azoniatricyclo[,7]decane, 1-(3-chloro-2-propenyl)-chloride,

    115-19-5 3-methyl-1-butyn-3-ol

    127087-87-0 4-Nonylphenol Polyethylene Glycol Ether Branched / Nonylphenol ethoxylated / Oxyalkylated Phenol

    64-19-7 Acetic acid

    68442-62-6 Acetic acid, hydroxy-, reaction products with triethanolamine

    108-24-7 Acetic Anhydride

    67-64-1 Acetone

    79-06-1 Acrylamide

    38193-60-1 Acrylamide - sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate copolymer

    25085-02-3 Acrylamide - Sodium Acrylate Copolymer or Anionic Polyacrylamide

    69418-26-4 Acrylamide polymer with N,N,N-trimethyl-2[1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy Ethanaminium chloride

    15085 -02-3 Acrylamide-sodium acrylate copolymer

    68551-12-2 Alcohols, C12-C16, Ethoxylated (a.k.a. Ethoxylated alcohol)

    64742-47-8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbon / Hydrotreated light distillate /
    Petroleum Distillates / Isoparaffinic Solvent / Paraffin Solvent /
    Napthenic Solvent

    64743-02-8 Alkenes

    68439-57-6 Alkyl (C14-C16) olefin sulfonate, sodium salt

    9016-45-9 Alkylphenol ethoxylate surfactants

    1327-41-9 Aluminum chloride

    73138-27-9 Amines, C12-14-tert-alkyl, ethoxylated

    71011-04-6 Amines, Ditallow alkyl, ethoxylated

    68551-33-7 Amines, tallow alkyl, ethoxylated, acetates

    1336-21-6 Ammonia

    631-61-8 Ammonium acetate

    68037-05-8 Ammonium Alcohol Ether Sulfate

    7783-20-2 Ammonium bisulfate

    10192-30-0 Ammonium bisulfite

    12125-02-9 Ammonium chloride

    7632-50-0 Ammonium citrate

    37475-88-0 Ammonium Cumene Sulfonate

    1341-49-7 Ammonium hydrogen-difluoride

    6484-52-2 Ammonium nitrate

    7727-54-0 Ammonium Persulfate / Diammonium peroxidisulphate

    1762-95-4 Ammonium Thiocyanate

    7664-41-7 Aqueous ammonia

    121888-68-4 Bentonite, benzyl(hydrogenated tallow alkyl) dimethylammonium stearate complex / organophilic clay

    71-43-2 Benzene

    119345-04-9 Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis, tetratpropylene derivatives, sulfonated, sodium salts

    74153-51-8 Benzenemethanaminium, N,N-dimethyl-N-[2-[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy]ethyl]-, chloride, polymer with 2-propenamide

    10043-35-3 Boric acid

    1303-86-2 Boric oxide / Boric Anhydride

    71-36-3 Butan-1-ol

    68002-97-1 C10 - C16 Ethoxylated Alcohol

    68131-39-5 C12-15 Alcohol, Ethoxylated

    10043-52-4 Calcium chloride

    124-38-9 Carbon dioxide

    68130-15-4 Carboxymethylhydroxypropyl guar

    9012-54-8 Cellulase / Hemicellulase Enzyme

    9004-34-6 Cellulose

    10049-04-4 Chlorine dioxide

    77-92-9 Citric Acid

    94266-47-4 Citrus Terpenes

    61789-40-0 Cocamidopropyl betaine

    68155-09-9 Cocamidopropylamine Oxide

    68424-94-2 Coco-betaine

    7758-98-7 Copper(II) sulfate

    31726-34-8 Crissanol A-55

    14808-60-7 Crystalline Silica (Quartz)

    7447-39-4 Cupric chloride dihydrate

    1120-24-7 Decyldimethyl Amine

    2605-79-0 Decyl-dimethyl Amine Oxide

    3252-43-5 Dibromoacetonitrile

    25340-17-4 Diethylbenzene

    111-46-6 Diethylene glycol

    22042-96-2 Diethylenetriamine penta (methylenephonic acid) sodium salt

    28757-00-8 Diisopropyl naphthalenesulfonic acid

    68607-28-3 Dimethylcocoamine, bis(chloroethyl) ether, diquaternary ammonium salt

    7398-69-8 Dimethyldiallylammonium chloride

    25265-71-8 Dipropylene glycol

    139-33-3 Disodium Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetate

    5989-27-5 D-Limonene

    123-01-3 Dodecylbenzene

    27176-87-0 Dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid

    42504-46-1 Dodecylbenzenesulfonate isopropanolamine


    37288-54-3 Endo-1,4-beta-mannanase, or Hemicellulase

    149879-98-1 Erucic Amidopropyl Dimethyl Betaine

    89-65-6 Erythorbic acid, anhydrous

    54076-97-0 Ethanaminium, N,N,N-trimethyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy]-, chloride, homopolymer

    107-21 -1 Ethane-1,2-diol / Ethylene Glycol

    9002-93-1 Ethoxylated 4-tert-octylphenol

    68439-50-9 Ethoxylated alcohol

    126950-60-5 Ethoxylated alcohol

    67254-71-1 Ethoxylated alcohol (C10-12)

    68951-67-7 Ethoxylated alcohol (C14-15)

    68439-46-3 Ethoxylated alcohol (C9-11)

    66455-15-0 Ethoxylated Alcohols

    84133-50-6 Ethoxylated Alcohols (C12-14 Secondary)

    68439-51-0 Ethoxylated Alcohols (C12-14)

    78330-21-9 Ethoxylated branch alcohol

    34398-01-1 Ethoxylated C11 alcohol

    61791-12-6 Ethoxylated Castor Oil

    61791-29-5 Ethoxylated fatty acid, coco

    61791-08-0 Ethoxylated fatty acid, coco, reaction product with ethanolamine

    68439-45-2 Ethoxylated hexanol

    9036-19-5 Ethoxylated octylphenol

    9005-67-8 Ethoxylated Sorbitan Monostearate

    9004-70-3 Ethoxylated Sorbitan Trioleate

    64-17-5 Ethyl alcohol / ethanol

    100-41-4 Ethyl Benzene

    97-64-3 Ethyl lactate

    9003-11-6 Ethylene Glycol-Propylene Glycol Copolymer (Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane)

    75-21-8 Ethylene oxide

    5877-42-9 Ethyloctynol

    68526-86-3 Exxal 13

    61790-12-3 Fatty Acids

    68188-40-9 Fatty acids, tall oil reaction products w/ acetophenone, formaldehyde & thiourea

    9043-30-5 Fatty alcohol polyglycol ether surfactant

    7705-08-0 Ferric chloride

    7782-63-0 Ferrous sulfate, heptahydrate

    50-00-0 Formaldehyde

    29316-47-0 Formaldehyde polymer with 4,1,1-dimethylethyl phenolmethyl oxirane

    153795-76-7 Formaldehyde, polymers with branched 4-nonylphenol, ethylene oxide and propylene oxide

    75-12-7 Formamide

    64-18-6 Formic acid

    110-17-8 Fumaric acid

    65997-17-3 Glassy calcium magnesium phosphate

    111-30-8 Glutaraldehyde

    56-81-5 Glycerol / glycerine

    9000-30-0 Guar Gum

    64742-94-5 Heavy aromatic petroleum naphtha

    9025-56-3 Hemicellulase

    7647-01-0 Hydrochloric Acid / Hydrogen Chloride / muriatic acid

    7722-84-1 Hydrogen peroxide

    79-14-1 Hydroxy acetic acid

    35249-89-9 Hydroxyacetic acid ammonium salt

    9004-62-0 Hydroxyethyl cellulose

    5470-11-1 Hydroxylamine hydrochloride

    39421-75-5 Hydroxypropyl guar

    35674-56-7 Isomeric Aromatic Ammonium Salt

    64742-88-7 Isoparaffinic Petroleum Hydrocarbons, Synthetic

    64-63-0 Isopropanol

    98-82-8 Isopropylbenzene (cumene)

    68909-80-8 Isoquinoline, reaction products with benzyl chloride and quinoline

    8008-20-6 Kerosene

    64742-81-0 Kerosine, hydrodesulfurized

    63-42-3 Lactose

    64742-95-6 Light aromatic solvent naphtha

    1120-21-4 Light Paraffin Oil

    14807-96-6 Magnesium Silicate Hydrate (Talc)

    1184-78-7 methanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide

    67-56-1 Methanol

    68891-11-2 Methyloxirane polymer with oxirane, mono (nonylphenol) ether, branched

    8052-41-3 Mineral spirits / Stoddard Solvent

    141-43-5 Monoethanolamine

    44992-01-0 N,N,N-trimethyl-2[1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy Ethanaminium chloride

    64742-48-9 Naphtha (petroleum), hydrotreated heavy

    91-20-3 Naphthalene

    38640-62-9 Naphthalene bis(1-methylethyl)

    93-18-5 Naphthalene, 2-ethoxy-

    68909-18-2 N-benzyl-alkyl-pyridinium chloride

    68139-30-0 N-Cocoamidopropyl-N,N-dimethyl-N-2-hydroxypropylsulfobetaine

    7727-37-9 Nitrogen, Liquid form

    68412-54-4 Nonylphenol Polyethoxylate

    121888-66-2 Organophilic Clays

    64742-65-0 Petroleum Base Oil

    64741-68-0 Petroleum naphtha

    70714-66-8 Phosphonic acid, (phosphonomethyl)iminobis2,1-ethanediylnitrilobis(methylene)tetrakis-, ammonium salt

    8000-41-7 Pine Oil

    60828-78-6 Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-[3,5-dimethyl-1-(2-methylpropyl)hexyl]-w-hydroxy-

    25322-68-3 Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), a-hydro-w-hydroxy / Polyethylene Glycol

    24938-91-8 Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), α-tridecyl-ω-hydroxy-

    51838-31-4 Polyepichlorohydrin, trimethylamine quaternized

    56449-46-8 Polyethlene glycol oleate ester

    62649-23-4 Polymer with 2-propenoic acid and sodium 2-propenoate

    9005-65-6 Polyoxyethylene Sorbitan Monooleate

    61791-26-2 Polyoxylated fatty amine salt

    127-08-2 Potassium acetate

    12712-38-8 Potassium borate

    1332-77-0 Potassium borate

    20786-60-1 Potassium Borate

    584-08-7 Potassium carbonate

    7447-40-7 Potassium chloride

    590-29-4 Potassium formate

    1310-58-3 Potassium Hydroxide

    13709-94-9 Potassium metaborate

    24634-61-5 Potassium sorbate

    112926-00-8 Precipitated silica / silica gel

    57-55-6 Propane-1,2-diol, or Propylene glycol

    107-98-2 Propylene glycol monomethyl ether

    68953-58-2 Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

    62763-89-7 Quinoline,2-methyl-, hydrochloride

    15619-48-4 Quinolinium, 1-(phenylmethl),chloride

    7631-86-9 Silica, Dissolved

    5324-84-5 Sodium 1-octanesulfonate

    127-09-3 Sodium acetate

    95371-16-7 Sodium Alpha-olefin Sulfonate

    532-32-1 Sodium benzoate

    144-55-8 Sodium bicarbonate

    7631-90-5 Sodium bisulfate

    7647-15-6 Sodium bromide

    497-19-8 Sodium carbonate

    7647-14-5 Sodium Chloride

    7758-19-2 Sodium chlorite

    3926-62-3 Sodium chloroacetate

    68-04-2 Sodium citrate

    6381-77-7 Sodium erythorbate / isoascorbic acid, sodium salt

    2836-32-0 Sodium Glycolate

    1310-73-2 Sodium Hydroxide

    7681-52-9 Sodium hypochlorite

    7775-19-1 Sodium Metaborate .8H2O

    10486-00-7 Sodium perborate tetrahydrate

    7775-27-1 Sodium persulfate

    9003-04-7 Sodium polyacrylate

    7757-82-6 Sodium sulfate

    1303-96-4 Sodium tetraborate decahydrate

    7772-98-7 Sodium thiosulfate

    1338-43-8 Sorbitan Monooleate

    57-50-1 Sucrose

    5329-14-6 Sulfamic acid

    112945-52-5 Synthetic Amorphous / Pyrogenic Silica / Amorphous Silica

    68155-20-4 Tall Oil Fatty Acid Diethanolamine

    8052-48-0 Tallow fatty acids sodium salt

    72480-70-7 Tar bases, quinoline derivs., benzyl chloride-quaternized

    68647-72-3 Terpene and terpenoids

    68956-56-9 Terpene hydrocarbon byproducts

    533-74-4 Tetrahydro-3,5-dimethyl-2H-1,3,5-thiadiazine-2-thione (a.k.a. Dazomet)

    55566-30-8 Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS)

    75-57-0 Tetramethyl ammonium chloride

    64-02-8 Tetrasodium Ethylenediaminetetraacetate

    68-11-1 Thioglycolic acid

    62-56-6 Thiourea

    68527-49-1 Thiourea, polymer with formaldehyde and 1-phenylethanone

    108-88-3 Toluene

    81741-28-8 Tributyl tetradecyl phosphonium chloride

    68299-02-5 Triethanolamine hydroxyacetate

    112-27-6 Triethylene glycol

    52624-57-4 Trimethylolpropane, Ethoxylated, Propoxylated

    150-38-9 Trisodium Ethylenediaminetetraacetate

    5064-31-3 Trisodium Nitrilotriacetate

    7601-54-9 Trisodium orthophosphate

    57-13-6 Urea

    25038-72-6 Vinylidene Chloride/Methylacrylate Copolymer

    7732-18-5 Water

    1330-20-7 Xylene

  46. Billiard
  47. Billiard

    Very sad...Americans are throwing their freedoms and future away for very short term monetary gain...our arrogance is staggering.

  48. Fabien L'Amour
  49. Fabien L'Amour

    I found the fracking fluids disclosure for Australia by Halliburton. Just google "halliburton fluids disclosure" then click the Australia map on their website. Looks like it's mostly Water and sand/silica with a few additives that amount to a maximum of 2% of the whole mix.

  50. FullFrontalNerdity
  51. FullFrontalNerdity

    Shhh!!! This is clearly cold war propaganda from the US... The Russians and everyone else need to spend thousands of hours with costly, specialized machines to obtain tiny amounts of "weapons grade" Uranium, but Americans find it just lying around! Good luck in the arms race ya dirty reds! /s

  52. Haut
  53. Haut

    What the F&^K are these PSYCHOPATH Jew Zionist, Puppet polititians doing, Oath Keepers, Militia Time to Take your Government out!

  54. Charles Hoag
  55. Charles Hoag

    Yes we need the energy, we need the jobs, but anyone who does not stand up for our water safety is a coward, yes? Water flows downhill

Leave a comment / review: