Marathon Day: Boston

Marathon Day: Boston

2013, Conspiracy  -   176 Comments
Ratings: 7.76/10 from 179 users.

What really happened in Boston on April 15? Here is a film that will bring you up to speed. Documentary that summarizes the Boston bombing attacks from the perspective of the official story through the eyes of the mainstream media and the questions asked by millions about its credibility, both by alternative media sources and the public!

The film is presented in the form of direct evidence, all media reports are verifiable and presented with direct sources of evidence. These are all available to the public on the Internet, the only source left 'unregulated!' Mainstream vs alternative Internet media is the theme!

What is the truth? Why didn't the mainstream report about the 'Bomb Drill' that was taking place on the day? Why do the witnesses on alternative media contradict the witness reports presented by mainstream.

Why did the mainstream fail to report on the military undercover operatives at the scene of the first explosion? Why was the FBI mentoring the Tsarnaev brothers? Who is really behind this? Who gains from these 'terror attacks' and how have previous attacks reshaped our lives? See the two perspectives and be the judge! Is there a real conspiracy here?

More great documentaries

176 Comments / User Reviews

Leave a Reply to duudly Cancel reply

  1. Oh, how the brainwashed cheer on the more deeply brainwashed known as police officers.

  2. Every single one of these events 9-11, tonkin bay, etc.etc. has so many things wrong with them . The media will show someones new haircut all day long but the aftermath of all these false flags gets jumbled into non existence and Americans patiently wait for the kadashians or some other rediculous "reality show"

  3. You can,t believe anyone anymore,I get sick when I realise all who participate in these deceptions and the innocent that's used.were all open targets,to the sick elite and there deceived and twisted followers,sad they give up the humanity and dignity,I almost can,t wait for the final day of judgment to come.god knows the truly guilty,and can only hope he takes vengence on behalf of the innocent.

  4. Everything is a "false flag" when it comes to Alex Jones. And if you believe this BS...

    1. says someone with the title rev lmao

  5. False Flag!

  6. The naked man was the guy who was carjacked/kidnapped by the bombers. He was naked because the police made him strip, they did not know at the time what his connection was to the bombers. He has since been cleared of anything and has even done some interviews. He was a 26 year old chinese man. You figure the people that made this documentary would include or investigate that but then again it wouldn't fit into their agenda of misleading people. Wonder what else they left out or exaggerated..

    1. the police made him strip naked.... in public..and he was completely innocent!?!? Does that sound rational or even remotely normal.. Get a grip

    2. The police didn't know who he was at the time and they did not know how he was involved with the crime just committed which was an officer being shot or if he was involved with the marathon bombing. All they knew was that he was with just with the people responsible for those crimes, they did not know he was carjacked by them. The police made him strip naked in public, YES! Why? Because of the use of explosives. They wanted to make sure he had nothing on him that would go boom before they got to close to him.. And since I live in this area where this all happened and maybe have a little more info than you, yes sounds rational, I would not say anything about the whole ordeal was remotely normal tho. Get a grip yourself

    3. Oh you live closer to Boston than me.. Yeah you must definitely have a better perspective than me. Oh yeah and if I was naked man I would sue the hell out of them. That's pretty damn degrading he could have lifted shirt or something similar but to strip completely nude in public give me a break. Hope you were happy with martial law when all of that was happening. shut down an entire city and enforce a curfew and make everybody stay inside their homes during the day is absolutely asinine I would have been the first person to go out there mowing my lawn to give the middle finger to the tanks rolling down the street people being forced to let police / military unlawfully search their homes. an absolute disgrace to what America is supposed to stand for. All for two guys who allegedly make bombs out of pressure cookers. The whole thing was a show anyways. What a coincidence they announced that bomb drills were happening that day right across the street where all of this happened. What are the chances !? Get a grip

    4. You sir are an i**ot. You are arguing with me as if I did it. I think you need to get a grip lol

    5. So you think that dude they have naked in the video is the 26 year old Chinese man? Take another look is all I'm saying

  7. I think this is why Edward Davis has stepped down months after the bombing. Either because he had a hand in covering it up or wouldn't continue to lie about it. i'm unclear I knew him from Lowell Police. he was a POS then

  8. This video loses all credibility the second Alex Jones shows his face.

    1. Bryant Pucker - Even your heroes on Lame Stream Media have acknowledged a possible conspiracy. Pull up Mr. Maddow MSNBC Boston Bombing. Just because Pumkin Head Jones is in the video doesn't discredit facts.

    2. I don't understand how, when he has been shown to be quite credible. Many of the things he has talked about for decades is rolling out right before our eyes.

    3. lol Alex is credible? He is an uneducated blow hard just like his audience

    4. Alex Jones is the son of an oral surgeon. He is very smart like his Dad.

    5. The things he has been talking about are ALL out in the open now... he has been vindicated and all you people can keep saying... "he isn't credible"... what a joke. Break out of your shell.

    6. I feel the same way about Alex Jones -- however, he is a disinfo agent. That means that some of what he says is true but it is mixed in with bullshit to lead people away from the really important truths. He's a gatekeeper. The pied piper put there to lead people down the wrong path when they start to ask questions. However, some of what he says is true. So, just because Alex Jones said it doesn't mean that it isn't true.

  9. I have not seen this as I have no need to. Any documentary attempting to show "two sides" to the issue is just trying to cause debate and muddle the issue, using Alex Jones doesn't help either. I have seen frame by frame evidence of the "bombing" in well made videos on you tube and photos and news stories from various sources to know that the whole thing was an elaborate staged hoax. there is enough clear and convincing evidence that any two sided documentary, especially involving Alex Jones, is designed just to lend credibility to the official story. We have seen these things before, many corporations often use this strategy, if you cannot prove your side create a debate to keep people arguing about it.

    1. People who get distracted by Alex Jones have shallow thinking. So what he's in the video. Get over it and focus on the message.

  10. Honestly, I don't even know what to believe anymore. I thought this was just a doc on the crazy bombers, then I saw Alex Jones and it turned into another conspiracy video.

    Before watching the video, I gathered the older brother was disillusioned and really hit the skids when he found out he could not box professionally as he was not a citizen. I also thought his brother kind of went along for the ride as some dumb, younger brothers do.

    And wasn't it announced that the older brother was a person of interest in a murder a few years prior to the incident?

    Now, we hear the FBI has been watching them for a few years. And there's the story about the naked guy.

    Ugh! My head hurts. Wake me up when it's over.

    1. Your head is in the wrong place. Think about how the citizens were forced from their homes at gunpoint like criminals by the police.

  11. 36m 20s - What i is wrong with that guys eyes? Almost looks like they change color.. Are the lizard people behind this? I think I just blew the whole case open.

  12. Something very similar has happened up here in Canada with an acquaintance of mine. He and his girlfriend were arrested on terrorist conspiracy charges outside Vancouver. I knew him when he lived here in Victoria, he was a lanky punk type dude who was a bit strange but always seemed quite friendly to me just not "mainstream," Supposedly, since moving to Vancouver area he and his girlfriend got involved in the Muslim religion and was arrested with bombs that RCMP claim were never a danger to the public. Nothing has been in the news since the arrest but his lawyer pointed out that it almost seems that his client may have been caught in what is called a "Mr.Big" scheme where someone is lead on into something they otherwise wouldn't have by government agents. How else could the RCMP be so assured that they never presented a threat to the public? How could they be so sure that the bombs were impotent if they weren't directly involved? Frankly, I'm surprised the cops would even say that as it leaves even an average joe to ask themselves that question. Scary to see this kind of cancer spreading north.

  13. A few things: Ok, so if the naked guy wasn't tamerlan, who was he? I'm sure he has an interesting story to tell. why has no one found him and asked him what they did and asked? Second: once the FBI told us to stop looking at other suspects, have we found ANY other footage that indicates the tsarnaevs? Third: we know for a fact that kraft international was there, we have the fbi's video of these two at the scene, yet the backpack with the grey stripe does not match either backpack in the video, and DOES match the tall goofy guy in the blue sweatshirt, why has there been no follow up with this? Fourth: there was no other video and only one other picture of Joker Tsarnaev, that's all they have of these guys at the scene?

    There is a lot more to this story, but this was a pretty shallow laying it all out. No mention was made that the mother had been deported for her own stuff, no mentions was made of Tamerlan's involvement in a previous murder... there are some real questions here, and this was little more than a rehash of easy to find footage.


    1. No mention of the uncle being associated with the CIA either

  14. Why I'm still watching this? I don't know. I don't like Alex Jones. He's so egotistical, I can't help but feel he runs his mouth just to hear it, and doesn't care what comes out of it.

    The kid with shredded clothes running from an explosion is not suspicious. Not to me anyways. Obviously he was really close for his clothes to shred. I'd be running too if I could collect myself in that moment.

    The naked guy just seems like some schmuck at the wrong place and time. Yeah they made him strip to assess if he had anything on him. For example, a bomb. I can't say I'd expect someone to pat him down, all things considered. But the thing that really caught my attention here is the cops demeanor when the suspect is placed in the car. The cop's body language tells me the naked dude isn't a threat.

    I know people praise the internet for it's activeness during the incident, but I can't help but feel it acted just as hysterical as the media. Albeit not in the same way. I was really worried, for a moment, that someone was going to get in to some trouble because they had their picture plastered all over reddit and twitter. This is why the FBI directed folks to a specific set of pictures and cautioned everyone to ignore the rest.

    Lets be honest, we're not a society above pitch forks and torches. We are very reactive before the facts, and the responses to this incident only reinforced that.

  15. Its not about Alex, its about the perspectives offered in this fantastic film, mainstream media vs alternative Internet media, that really opens up a bigger picture to the truth!

  16. Alex Jones knows exactly what he's doing. No-one ever went broke underestimating the public.

  17. Interesting documentary until Alex Jones, all credibility lost.

    1. Why so?

    2. Although I agree with much that he says, Jones is a gift to the conspiracy debunkers. His foaming-at-the-mouth ranting undermines the credibility of those who offer reasoned and articulate dissent. He could learn much from Michael Moore.

    3. Alex Jones is proof to the world that most people are suckers for peacockery. If you get distracted by Alex Jones, you lack focus.

    4. What? How to get fatter?

  18. you do have to put terrorism into perspective, how many die from terror each year compared to the amount of money spent plus new legislation compared to say gun deaths in america....something just doesnt fit, something else must be going on.

  19. I hear the guy is being charged with the use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction...aaaahhhh, so if convicted...that must infer that Sadam did have em all along. Redefine a definition, rewrite history. Genius.

    1. And we never heard of him again..... Just like the guy from the batman theater....

    2. You haven't heard because you haven't been looking.

  20. There is a pretty well researched report by Shawn Key that you can access at whatnewhell com. I have no affiliation with him or the site. I just found it looking around one day and I think it is fairly well researched without an injection of opinion. The report does raise some interesting questions but the paper itself attempts to show how unprofessional broadcast journalism proves detrimental in times of crisis such as the Boston bombings. I have seen questions regarding the naked man and who he was. While I do not know who he was it turns out the naked man seen from a helicopter was actually being arrested a block away from the tsarnaev brothers. Instead of verifying the shot the reporter ran with the "naked man" shot as one of the brothers and as such the public understandably began asking questions. On a different note I honestly don't understand why people must resort to ridicule and personal attacks ever... Some people on this site claim that this documentary is more propaganda and then go into a tirade about how people are for believing the movie they just watched. Or how people are for believing what Alex Jones says on his radio show. The fact is that Alex Jones has very credible guests on his show and his info is usually spot on. As far as Alex himself goes I can only tolerate him in small doses. I don't really need someone to constantly "connect the dots" for me. By doing that he essentially is as newsworthy as Bill Maher-and I enjoy his show as well I just don't think their presentation does anything more than entertain. Everyone tries to rationalize things in a way that makes them more comfortable with a tragic event. So I don't think that someone who painstakingly attempts to prove prior knowledge of an event deserves any more ridicule than the media professionals who present the tragedy to begin with. If anything questions and alternate hypothesis should demonstrate the lack of trust in government and I for one always think that is a healthy way of exercising democratic rights-"Question authority" The thing is everyone just wants the truth and they want to feel comfortable with the answers. I would hope that is why anyone watches a documentary to begin with- to facilitate thought about an interesting subject. Nothing is ever as black and white as it is presented and each one of us experiences life differently- not wrong or right. I think most people on this site care about the "truth" and promoting it-whatever it may be so just relax and if someone has a question calmly answer. Otherwise free speech is chilled. Anyways enough of my ranting I shall retire into anonymity and watch my comment viciously attacked.

    1. Goody--time for that vicious attack you've been waiting for!

      Actually, I thought your comment was pretty dead-on: There are bigger points here than what one thinks of Alex Jones, or whether one agrees with all of the opinions expressed by the "alternative media". Inaccurate reporting by mianstream media is one of those bigger issues. Investigative journalism has lost its teeth, as mainstream "news" becomes more and more the mere repetition of a single AP wire output or report. A piece of misinformation finds its way into a thousand other mouths, is repeated again and again, until it either becomes either "fact", or grounds for conspiracy theories ("CNN, Fox, CNBC--they all repeated such-and-such, they're all in on it!"). Journalism used to be about reporters going to a scene, interviewing subjects, digging into backgrounds, asking questions. Now it's more about on-site stand-ups wherein a talking head merely repeats details gleaned from another, unnamed firsthand source. The stand-up makes its way onto the daily news program, which, increasingly, is more concerned with what Britney Spears did with her hair or what the Prince named his son than it is with hard news.

      The press has done a particularly odious job where Barack Obama is concerned. Time after time, he's been left to present his version of a plan or event without a question in sight; the press has conspicuously failed to Press him on important issues, instead showing endless shots of his wife's latest designer gown or his daughter's new haircut. Negative reports about his policies are rarely given attention by mainstream networks; when mentioned at all, they're followed by double the number of positive reports, giving the impression that the country is overwhelmingly behind Obama's every agenda.

      Meanwhile, in the background, the civil rights of citizens continue to be eroded. Some measures are reasonable. Others, far more insidious, are left unexplored and unexplained. This desire to twist and bend the Constitution, to take more and more freedom, autonomy, and opportunity from citizens, even as their government takes more and more money from them to enforce the erosion of their liberty, isn't specific to one political party or the other. Woodrow Wilson did it when faced with the flu pandemic and his determination to bring the country behind him into WWI; George W. Bush did it with his "Patriot Act" (who wanted to be un-patriotic after 9/11?); Obama is doing it now through his systematic undermining of the middle class.

      Ah, the middle class: this seems to be where the focus always lies, where the bloodiest part of the battle takes place, as one administration after the other lies to it, betrays it, and empties its pockets. The idea seems to be to wipe it out altogether, leaving just corporate interests, their wealthy friends, and their political arms, along with the very poor, who are already enslaved by their poverty. So long as everyone can buy an SUV on credit, the country is doing just fine, right? When there is no middle class left, enforcement of any policy will be easier, minds will be closed (people will be too busy just struggling to survive and hang on to their SUVs) and politicians will be free to shove mandates down throats too tired or uninformed to care. Documentaries like this one will not be made, or if made, will not be watched, because who'll care?

      Who will be there to Question Authority?

      To return to your original point, the watchdogs who are supposed to be helping us Question that Authority--the free press--have become unquestioning, unprofessional sources of misinformation. It's up to us to stay informed, to let information in whether we agree with it or not. That is far more productive than name-calling (or vicious attacks).

  21. total fatalities from terrorism WORLDWIDE IN LAST 15 years is waaaay smaller than number of traffic fatalities IN ONE YEAR in USA alone, now you compare the money and media space used in both cases...

    1. That's an interesting point and you got me thinking, how do you define a terrorist act? And would the media space used be better used for the other issues and why?
      I understand your point however, would it not be better to spend that government money on health, education and welfare?

      In my opinion if our media didn't research and report the current issue how would we know. I'm not saying that all we see via the news outlets are completely accurate at all. I'd say it should give you enough information for to the very least give a starting point for your own research to begin, compared with the media of pre internet days.

      There were some valid points and damming evidence about the government covering either there a$$ or something up.
      That always raises concerns when they start refuse to admit what their action for that day had been, would you agree?

    2. i am not talking about the media per se, media just serves 'the money', the same money that could be better used (a you yourself have noticed). my point is that all that 'terrorism' stories is just something used to mask real interests, c'mon you dont seriously believe that usa attacked iraq or afganistan because of terrorists, like i said only couple of thousand ppl died from terrorist bombings worldwide in last 15 years, i mean more ppl die fishing or cooking or something

    3. how did you come up with "more ppl die fishing or cooking or something" and what are you talking about when you say something?

    4. read between the lines... or you can find the list of tragic causes of human deaths, and you will learn that there is a whole bunch of daily activities on it

    5. Maaaate,

      Have you ever thought of saying what you mean, as I reed between the line and I came up with a blank white screen.....:)

      What do you mean when you say "something"?
      Old age is something, natural disaster is something and lets not forget motor vehicle accidents, as you see all figures can be used if applied calculating without factoring in all aspects of the data required and I'm sure "and something" doesn't enter the equation I'd bet!!

      Now can you see the variables that are required to get the accurate figure that you're referring to. With saying that I'm in no way some type of maths guru, it seems logical to me that all factors of argument/debate ie; over what time frame five to ten, all over the world or may just the western world and then we can't forget the ol' US of A god bless ya all.....:)

    6. I take it you're not counting the 600,000 plus fatalities in Iraq that were a direct result of the so-called 'war on terror'?

    7. hmm, but the huge amounts of deaths in Iraq, including possibly 200,000 civilian deaths, are not from "terrorism" directly. That is from the Western response to terrorism. So Lex's point still stands. Wars started or funded by the big powers kill far more people than any terrorist actions, including civilians.

    8. hahahahahaha, c'mon gimme a break 'war on terror' you mean war for Bush industries to make money

  22. Anyone? Is that the Old North Church @ 40:54 in the video? FYI~
    One If by land, Two if by sea
    The enduring fame of the Old North began on the evening of April 18, 1775, when the church sexton, Robert Newman, climbed the steeple and held high two lanterns as a signal from Paul Revere that the British were marching to Lexington and Concord by sea and not by land. This fateful event ignited the American Revolution.

  23. It's clear they had prior knowledge but to call it a false flag op just turns off the majority of people that should know about the facts that occurred. The gov won't admit it now because they didn't stop these two brothers, who they were so confident they'd catch that they allowed the race to happen and lots of were injured.

  24. Propaganda, anyone?.. anyone? That event was such an insanely sloppy false flag that anybody with a working pair of eyes can see through it, no wonder the government and media are trying so hard to repeat their lies and bullsh*it story over and over in the hopes they morph into "the truth"..

  25. question for the editors of this site. why are you censoring out scientific finding from Stanford ??

    1. all posts containing links go to moderation. please read the comment policy.

    2. yes every comment that has a link is held until a mod can see that it isnt spam.

  26. were there even casualties?

    1. Real casualties create liabilities. Hence the use of crisis actors.

  27. boring

  28. Did any of you ever hear the story of the little boy that cried wolf?

    Seriously, if EVERTHING is a conspiracy, then the word loses all of it's impact.

  29. I watched CNN here in the Netherlands, live, when it was said that Tamerlan Tsaernaev was the naked man getting in the car. His aunt identified him as being Tamerlan. Before that is was said that the man lying on the ground was Tamerlan. But when viewing a close up picture it clearly was not. Was he just someone posing as Tamerlan. As reporters are kept away from proximity of the scene, who would know. There is a picture of Dzjokhar Tamerlan stepping out of the boat, unwounded, no blood on the step of the boat. Afterwards there is blood on the step and all of a sudden Dzjohkar is very wounded in his face. I do not like Alex Jones either, found these things elsewhere. Sniffing dogs seem normal to me, nowadays, as are men on rooftops. Same here in the Netherlands before the crowning of the new king. A german expert group was called in with sniffing dogs. Something felt off from the first moment. Tamerlan has a grey backpack, Dzjokhar mostly white. And with so many control by camera's etc. why are there no clear pictures of them both planting the bombs or fleeing the scene. On Facebook Dzjokhar denied all involvement. I guess we will never know. But everyone knows how martial law was applied in the search of Dzhjokhar. And that in itself is worrying. How ordinary citizens are being shouted out of their own houses, having to hold their arms/hands above their heads. The government ordering/owning guillotines, FEMA coffins, the government ordering exorbitant amounts of bullets. Police etc. looking more and more military. Drones everywhere, also above the boston marathon. Mental screening of toddlers, schoolchildren, mandatory vaccinations and GMO food, chemtrails. Why are we as citizens in democratic societies, not respectfully explained all of this. And at the same time of the boston bombings, US drones bombed a village to pieces in Jemen. How come we do not define that as terrorist acts? How come we as adults still swallow the illusion of democracy, our right to vote, when obviously we have no input, no say in what governments decide.

  30. Ah, clearly, the Glenn Beck journalism form--ask questions that imply, challenge with coincidences, assume nefarious motives. What a pile of!!!!!!

  31. I still want to know what happened to the naked guy if it's not the older brother "terrorist". And if not, WHO is he? Any information on him?

  32. A handful of pictures of "contractors" (which are probably undercover police, normal)
    A story from an upset mother that starts with "My sons are innocent, they are not religious extremists" and ends with "The FBI was following my son and knew all the websites he was visiting, they were afraid of him and asked me about him numerous times."

    I see the problem here. Alex Jones still listens to the news and believes it. Then he sources out of date news before the facts are even clear.

    CNN was going ape over the Tornado last week, claiming 50 people were dead. I posted they are hyping this up, and someone commented that it was possibly 200 people dead! Next day; they cut the number to 24, 3 more than the original number.

    People need to stop watching 24 hour news and pick up the paper in the morning, when the facts are straight, like they used too.

  33. Hey Alex, you're full of s*it.

    But you already knew that.

    1. Divide and conquer. Instead of going after the perpetrators of this event, we attack those who are trying to expose the truth. Hence, why America will fall.

  34. Oh For F**KS sake!! Pure, grade A, all-natural, homemade American BULLS*IT once again!!! sigh... r.i.p. G.Carlin

  35. I made it through 10 minutes, about the time I felt acid reflux.

  36. researched directed edited animated & produced by Amel Tresnjic
    (in two weeks)
    operation Paul Revere contest
    Great Job Brave Archer Films
    free Jahar framed setup patsy

  37. It never ceases to amaze me how the delivery system is always out shadowing the payload. If the message has any truth, who cares who's bringing it? The fact that loud mouths like Alex Jones bring attention to shadowy behavior doesn't mean everything he covers is BS. I could say the same about Rush Limbaugh. Another irritating loud mouth who rarely discerns fact from fiction, consistently. And then there's Sean Hannity, one more opinionated jerk who also clouds the story with personal commentary; so choose your loudmouth, please.
    Every one of you who refuse to believe that those in power couldn't possibly have any desire to control or manipulate consensus of thought must have forgotten the laws of history and all the documented proof of past deceit by our elected paragons of virtue and their crone friends who bought their places in government.
    It's interesting to note that the first attack on the Twin Towers was a false flag sponsored by our boys in black, the FBI. The Bombing in Madrid: anti-terrorist drills happening simultaneously, Underground bombings in London; terrorist drills happening simultaneously, 9/11: terrorist drills running simultaneously, Oklahoma City: bomb squads all over the city...anyone noticing a pattern here? But we're all idiots. The odds of chance batting almost a thousand on that and you think suspicion about the lies our government have shoved down our throats, i.e., The Lusitania, which got us all riled up for WWI, the free pass to the Japanese at Pearl Harbor, and the Gulf of Tonkin convolution. Sorry, better get my straight jacket on, I'm starting to question authority.

    1. Bill Moyers, Chris Hedges, and Noam Chomsky, for example... These are three dissenting voices who can BACK UP whatever they have to say. They are reliable, not prone to histrionics, do not blindly adhere to one side or the other, if criticism is called for, and are not in the business of playing off of peoples fears and apprehensions. You can tell these men they are wrong, and they will listen to what you have to say.

      Limbaugh, Hannity, and Jones... not so much.

    2. They are just as emotional in their way, and since they are characters, they tend to stay in character. Of the three, I prefer Bill Moyers.

    3. Chris Hedges, Lt Colonel Anthony Schaeffer, Michael Scheuer, Ray McGovern, The Real Rick Ross, Susan Lindauer, Sibel Edmonds, Ben Swann, Dick Gregory, Cenk from Young Turks, Nomi Prins, Wayne Madsen, Okalahoma City Bombing grand juror Hoppy Heidelberg are all credible witnesses/journalists/whistleblowers etc. and all of them have been on his show at some point or another. You may disagree with what Alex believes is the endgame or his delivery.....that's his own right, but much of the substance of what he reports finally gets caught up with MSM 6-8 months later once the lapdog producers can no longer shamefully not report what's reported in alternative media for months.
      See Anwar Awlaki being exposed, see drone program being exposed after Robert Gibbs for months lying to us....thank you Jeremy Scahill for having the nuts to expose this, see Boston Bombers link to Chechen radicals who Sibel Edmonds had been telling for years were aided and abetted through front groups like the Jamestown foundation/USAID "political influence peddling" at the direction Zibigniew Brezenski and Graham Fuller to liberate Muslims in the Caucuses from the Russians....sound familiar!
      MSM has no credibility and neither does the White House!

    4. So, that is how we can distinguish whether it's a terror attack or a black flag operation. If there's a drill going on anywhere in the vicinity that mimics the attack, it's a government sponsored covert operation. We've finally got it narrowed down. Is there a time limit or distance restriction on that "First Law of Staged Terror"?

      Free pass at Pearl Harbour, huh. I suppose if the American military had intercepted the attack and fought the Japanese fleet in the Pacific the United States would never have gotten into WW2. A major sea battle would never be excuse enough to go to war.

      What does that loudmouth Limbaugh have to do with any of this?

      You can find all the patterns in events you want and you still have no proof. People are mentally hard wired to see patterns in life. Quite often, those patterns don't mean a thing.

      Your concept of evidence leaves a lot to be desired and is based on an intense dislike of the American government. You don't start with an accusation and then find facts to fit your scenario. You gather the facts first and when you have a comprehensive understanding of most of the details you try to deduce who the guilty party might be.

    5. A little warning would have been nice for Pearl Harbor, since although ships are replaceable, human beings are not. That's where you get a leader with blood on his hands. The Boston Marathon bombing was not what it seemed and nobody from outside attacked us. Nor was anyone actually injured or killed at that time. It was a movie and of both benign intent and benign effect (unlike Pearl Harbor). I just don't like living a lie. Sometimes we need the fourth wall to stay where it belongs.

    6. The Boston Marathon is a huge event and there are hundreds of witnesses to the blasts. Are you saying that there were two finish lines? One real, one a film set? Wouldn't those at the real finish line notice that nothing had been blown up? You make no sense. But, I suppose to maintain your vision of life its better not to make any sense.

    7. If anyone spends time on this matter, you learn that indeed the main body of runners (stragglers after the elite runners which took the prize) was diverted onto another street. The crowd is never very large as the race winds down. It is possible to deny people access to the Finish Line, and this is what they did. The runners were able to proceed on a parallel street and take their credit for the whole race. The problem is that someone creates an impression of the event, and unless you are motivated to go into it rather tediously, the official story is what you know. It doesn't come as easily as pre-digested news does.

    8. Well, that's a very nice story. Now, you're going to have to show me why I should believe one word of it. You must have reasons to believe as you do. I think it would be of great service to all if you could back it up.

    9. Do the work. Belief is a weak position to take in any case. Knowledge is better and I know you can find it. Remember if you find your keys they cannot have been somewhere else, no matter where you thought they were before you found them. That's how facts work. Once found, you must try not to lose them. They will be in some unique place at all times, not in the thousand places you might imagine them. And so it is with the facts of the Marathon. The main body of later runners never went over the originally designated finish line. They were stopped. They had to go somewhere else.

    10. I have found a source that claims that she knows what really happened that day. Strange thing is, she won't tell me how she knows. She just keeps repeating her claims over and over again and telling me to do the research. Well, since you know, I will think of you as a source. Show me how you know this to be true. Then, your knowledge will be my knowledge. I would think that if you have impeccable sources you would only be too glad too share them. Yet, you seem to tiptoe around this request time after time. I can't help but wonder why.

    11. I have spoken with multiple people who were there and nothing you are saying is true.

      do you mind explaining why you feel the need to lie?

    12. IN this case, there is excellent documentation of the sheer falsity of the event itself. Yes, there are amputees, but they didn't get them on Marathon day. Our minds (and the media) put them together, in a case of "post hoc" (they are in hospital beds with missing limbs) "ergo prop-ter hoc" (it was because of the explosions we saw). The evidence has been deliberately tampered with, because shortly after the explosions, things like benches and a tree were intact. The next day, the benches were broken up and scattered, and the tree was removed and pulped. That is what you call a hoax, and foreign camera people have gone farther to break it down "frame" by frame. This country is being watched by people who know our leaders are lying. Why don't Americans see it while others do? Are we to remain perpetual children and the laughingstock of the civilized world? Anybody who says this prepares us to be "global citizens" is spouting propaganda, because we are definitely not as sophisticated as we think, and our leaders like it that way. Rubes!

    13. do you have pictures or video showing "The evidence has been deliberately tampered with, because shortly after
      the explosions, things like benches and a tree were intact. The next
      day, the benches were broken up and scattered, and the tree was removed
      and pulped."?

    14. The best place for you to go is MemoryHole - ignore what you have heard about Tracy or about his views of Sandy Hook, if you have any reservations about that. Many articles and comments with lots of footage about the Marathon which are excellent. There's a person named Zaurus snape on YouTube (also commenting at Memory Hole), a researcher from Japan, who has created a lot of close-ups which show props used. The tree outside of Forum (site of second bombing) is visible in early post-explosion photos as having its branches intact - nearby mail-carriers' collection box and lamppost with glass bulbs are also intact. The next day or so, the tree has been removed totally. There is also a set of photos of benches near the Finish Line explosion, seen from above by a person taking pictures from a hotel or possibly a helicopter, after the explosion - the benches are fine then - the next day they have been broken up and scattered. There are also remarks by Zaurus (sometimes seen as Zauras) snape which explain about Finish Line signage which is perfectly intact, along with flags and fence pickets, but which are dramatically torn down to give the impression of their having been breached somehow by the explosion. Be patient. It is very instructive about drill versus real event.

      I think the people doing this think they have good purposes in mind. I object to their deceit.

    15. okay i went to the site mentioned (MemoryHole) the article concerning the injury reports states that the papers got things wrong and some contradict each other. or that they had incomplete information immediately after a confusing event. papers rush to be the first to report in order to get viewership and it would be more convincing of a coverup if they all reported exactly the same thing. this article is evidence of nothing

      as for the videos the author even states "The following videos are presented with the caveat that they may contain
      potentially misleading or uncertain visual information. Readers should
      exercise extreme care when presenting and analyzing such evidence. The
      videos are not conclusive and are intended for research and discussion
      purposes only."

      in the first video he uses a couple of frames of blurry video to deduce the thoughts and intentions besed on facial expressions? how does he/she know what is going on in the mind of the passers by? could they be in shock and hense the expressions? as for the "left hand and left side of face pictures. the first one is clearly been cropped and has no frame of reference for when it was taken. and why crop it? the second has been clearly photo shopped as the skin tone on the hand is different than the rest of he person and he only gives stills (video is harder to edit). and where he points out the absence of broken glass the author states "notice the window says lensecrafters right where the smoke bomb went off" there doesn't seem to be much smoke there for the exact spot where it went off? and would a SMOKE bomb shatter glass? the second video contains heavy editing and why so many cropped pictures again? the third shows possible incompetence by the media nothing more if anything at all.

      at the very least your sourse is very suspect and at the least it proves nothing. can you do better than this?

    16. I'm wondering how this guy can still be conscious after having both legs blown off and why there is no trail of blood behind the wheelchair?

    17. Lots of factors could be at play there. You have an explosion which makes heat which can cauterize smaller vessels. Larger arteries can actually clot as hypovolemic shock sets in. Once you get these patients' BP above 90 systolic the clot pops and they start bleeding again. This is where the idea of "permissive hypotension" came from in EMS. The idea was to intentionally leave these patients blood pressure below 100 systolic to minimize bleeding until you could get them to surgery. It's not really practiced anymore.

      I can say that I had a patient who was shot in the hip and damaged his femoral artery. BP was 88 systolic and he was conscious and speaking to me. As soon as we started IVs and gave him fluid, his BP increased above 100mmHg and he started to hemorrhage from the wound.

      I've seen other videos on Youtube from this incident and people griping about the lack of blood from CCTV video near the scene. These cameras would be running at 24 frames per second or 30 frames per second. You have these guys going frame by frame saying "look here we are 10 frames after the blast and no blood." Um, yeah not even half a second has passed by frame 10, even at frame 120 I wouldn't expect puddles of blood..

    18. Interesting, thanks for the info. Where do you suppose the limbs have gone? I guess what im asking is could they have been completely destroyed in the explotion, and scattered about in tiny pieces? It seems like there would be more damage to the the body. Ive built pressure cooker explosives before and the breaking point seems to be localized to the weakest part of the container which is the top and where the lid closes, the projectile path was always pretty uniform coming up and out in all directions. I guess it depends on which way the container was sitting, upside down most likely which is probably why it shot into the street. If it was up side down I'd imagine there would be more injuries like this guys.

    19. No Problem. As for shrapnel trajectories and all that, I've no idea. It's also hard to speculate on where the rest of the limbs could have gone. The closest thing I have to experience with this specific type of injury was a young man who lost parts of several fingers from a firework that prematurely exploded in the mortar. There was no evidence of the fingers, but those are obviously a lot smaller than legs.

    20. Ya..Nay. You and others make this all "fact" because you can't handle
      that normal looking people around you could do this. This is fear based
      delusional group propelled bulls*it. You and your ilk do NOT use
      crtical thinking. You used fear based agendas that are fill in the blank
      with anything that fits your drama queen agendas. I know for a
      THE DAY BEFORE THE RACE. Stop s*itting on the victims and their
      families with your delsional nonsense. You people are just so scared that you have NO control over the person next to you,hat they indeed could shot you, bomb you or more, that you have to make up conspiracy theories to ay your lack o power and control. AS any of my cohorts that have done studies on this. Many of you are pathetic. Also, Dianne- the term rube really doesn't fit logically. Speak for yourself as we are actually a very techno savvy people.

    21. Do you know what an amputee crisis actor is? Likely, not.

    22. Would you prefer this with a lucid PBS style presentation?

  38. Unmitigated bullsh-t from start to finish, all in the name of pulling in another easy buck for Alex "Douchebag" Jones, out of the gullible masses who just live for this sort of fare since the cancellation of the X-files... (and the cancellation of the Times Square bomber...and the cancellation of the bomb over Detroit... All a part of The Plot, somehow, I'm sure, etc.)

    Why no word from the boys' uncle, who didn't automatically think there was a conspiracy, and who also didn't have too much good to say about that side of the family? I guess he's just prejudiced, huh? Already got his mind made up about it? Why such emphasis given to eyewitness testimony, all of a sudden, the most notoriously unreliable piece of any kind of police work? It's almost certainly going to conflict with whatever the "official version" ends up being, and I'm betting THAT'S why. How convenient for the tin-foil hat crowd: With that, they've always got "dissent" they don't even have to cook up themselves that's ready to shove down your gullet quicker than minute-rice.

    Wow, their mother didn't think they had anything to do with it, I'm shocked. Well, you know what? My mom's little angel got severely plastered one time about 25 years ago and plowed through a country field in the middle of the night in his badass 5-speed, chasing freaked out cows all over the place and mowing down $600 worth of fence like he was Colin McRae himself, and at first she didn't want to believe it, either...

    It's suspicious that there are military personnel at an event like the Boston Marathon? What about the military who were actually running in the event, or those who were there who weren't in uniform? I'm sure a whole helluva lot can be construed out of that... Just give the ball to Alex, he's got more spin skills than a Harlem Globetrotter tweaked out on half a bottle of Adderall.

    Just the same old cr@p from this half-wit... He wants every one of you to be AFRAID, because the GOVERNMENT wants you to be AFRAID... Use even a modicum of common-sense and research skills, and you'll see a big red nose on this clown thereafter, every time he shows his face.

    1. Love the little angel story.

    2. That's what they said he did. He has absolutely no recollection of said events...

    3. hmmm I smell a conspiracy then my friend and you were the victim...

    4. All I was ever able to find out is the dude's last name was Smirnoff. I think he must have been KGB...

    5. Just because you are ignorant of actual documentation of FEMA and other plans to view entertainment and sports events as mass casualty drill events, you don't have to cast aspersions on those who know about them and see how the thinking goes. Tinfoil Hat is a little out of style, but I suppose it dated from the time when the US was spreading radiation with atomic testing. No, that would never happen, would it?

    6. Turns out the Oklahoma tornado was actually a WEATHER WEAPON!
      You'd better leave this non-story and go jump all over that one, little hipster girl. :)

    7. No it wasn't. It was a tornado. There have always been tornadoes.

    8. According to an article on Rawstory last week, that's not what a caller who spoke with Jones on his broadcast had to say about it, and Jones carefully made a point of not exactly disagreeing with him... That sort of thing would be bad for business, wouldn't it? Glad to know you're not so far gone as some, but, honestly, you really need to be careful who you're getting your information from these days.

    9. Sir,
      All of these are related:

      Uncle Rusland - did his tv interview from Fuller's ex residence

      Graham Fuller (Ex father in law of Uncle Rusland)

      NATO & Operation Gladio


      Islamic Radicals of Caucus Mountain Region


      US funding of radicals in Chechnya to "liberate" them from Russia - these same radicals are then often used to spread democracy to Libya, Syria, etc or where the Oil Rich Qatari's , Saudis, UAEs need them to overthrow a leader who doesn't bow down to them. The Cold War never ended. It's not a secret our most top secret agencies knew who Tamerlan was all along as well as Russia. The kids mother said the FBI regularly spoke with her about Tamerlan and knew of his every move.

      The boys aren't innocent by any stretch, but the official story is a piece of crap. Everything the feds have said about Tamerlan has turned out to be a lie - "Can you help us identify these two men?"...yet Tamerlan is on five different watch list. Facts will be rolled out in time, but the FBI, DOJ, and WH need not report on Boston Bombing anymore. They can't even get their stories straight! It's embarassing!

  39. I'm sorry...I was under the impression this documentary was made for the people who fell victim to this horrific act of terrorism...I could barely get through it. It is repetitive, sheds no new light on the issues (then again, I did not think that was the point of the documentary) and loses ground rapidly. I too should have stopped watching when I saw infowars...This documentary, is premature & all over the place. Don't bother...really.

  40. Ah... infowars. Guess I can skip this one.

    1. was interested in this one until Alex Jones popped on the screen. Next....

  41. Good grief, the dust has yet to settle :/

    1. You do have a way that is not altogether straight-forward. I admire that.

  42. You want a conspiracy? Not one hotdog vendor was injured at both bombing locations! Hmmmmmmm coincidence? I don't think so!!!!

    Hotdog vendors = terrorist!!!

    1. OMG! Were...*gulp*...were they KOSHER hot dog vendors?!

    2. Not Japadog, i hope!
      Japadog dot com slash menu
      One is now opening in NYcity.


    3. Or Hebrew National! It's just got to be the Moose-odd, bebe. ;)

    4. With no doubt and with absolute certainty hot dogs will be Hebrew National.

    5. I never did trust those sausage hawkers....... Thanks for your excellent evidence as to their eternal criminal nature.

  43. Wow didnt know there was a bomb 'drill' going on before the race, from my experience almost every time a government is involved in an attack against its own people, their is always some type of drill going on before hand, and the drill is usually very similar to event that takes place, i.e. 9/11, 1993 WTC bombing, London train bombings....coincidence ??? i dont f'n think so.

    1. Do you know now? Where's the source for the bomb drill?

    2. The government has this weird compulsion to telegraph its intentions before any covert operation. It is all part of the plan to confuse us.

      Actually, I don't see how having a drill would help them in a black flag mission. Why not send in the minimal team to get the job done? What would be the purpose of all these other people running around. It makes no sense.

      I suppose security units never have drills. It would make them too efficient at their jobs. Couldn't have that.

    3. Nobody got hurt on Marathon Day. It always was a drill.

    4. Fortunately, you weren't there on that day and didn't have to endure those fake injuries.

      So, how do you do this? If you don't like the version you get from the news, you make up your own version? I, for once, would like to see someone who has the gall to say something like this, actually approach one of the people who lost family that day or was severely injured and interview them. Won't happen though. It would upset your make believe world.

    5. There are real people with amputations. I am sure it hurts to get an amputation and to learn to walk with prostheses. The statistic is staggering: 500 amputations per day in this country, most due to diabetes complications, many due to automobile and motorcycle accidents. A good prosthesis is very expensive - the best ones are $100,000. It would be nice if each of the so-called victims got the care they needed at the new Spaulding Rehab. But they never and I mean never got those injuries at the Marathon because there is no evidence of shrapnel or anything other than smoke bombs. Still, I wish them and all the rest of my fellow Americans forced to deal with amputations all the best of care. I hope there will be breakthroughs. I just don't like the manipulation of this hoax.

    6. even your own source states that there were injuries. it only claims (badly) that the media had conflicting numbers during the confusion immediately after the event.

  44. I get it. The hypothesis is that it was a planned, inside attack. The evidence is null, so let's just tie all the lose ends onto the hypothesis and claim it's a fact. I'll watch it. The British train one was pretty good.

  45. One more documentary asking answers for discrepancies filed under conspiracy.

    1. Yet most things are as they appear to be. The default of nature is to see things as they are. The trick is to know when we are inventing what is not there.

  46. 07:00 Obama says: "Anytimes bombs are used to target innocent civilians, it is an act of terror".

    Obviously not a free flowing speech, he seem to hesitate when he reads the phrase above. One could think his conscience is being ticked....surely not something he would have written.
    Obama may not have real blood on his hands, because presidents don't fight with their bare hands, they send others, but his mind seem to be facing some sort of invisible mirror.
    now on to the rest....

  47. This isn't an anti American post I like the US quite a lot, but you guys have car crashes every day that have more fatalities than this event. So if it's the terrorism factor maybe a thought could be spared by the Boston residents for all the millions upon millions of dollars NORAID received on behalf of the IRA from Boston and New York.

    1. What has the PIRA got to do with this? TOTALLY different kettle of fish. If the PIRA got any support from governments actors it was to prolong the conflict there not aid it. I've noticed attempts to try equate the PIRA with Al Qaeda in the past, usually by the same people setting innocent civilians of fire from the air today, or sending throat cutting, lung eating maniacs into Syria.

    2. I'm not equating the IRA with any other group, they're all perpetrators of cowardly acts on unprepared civilians. Boston and New York were large supporters of the IRA and they have had terrorist acts performed against them. I was wondering if any of them have regretted their donations now they have had a close up view of the kind of actions their money supported.

    3. What is terrorism? I ask because it seems to have a different meaning in every country in the world. When the world finally agrees on the meaning of word, most of the prominent countries in the world would disappear overnight as their own actions would now be defined as terrorism. Why should the people of Boston ask themselves that specific question? Why don't you ask them how they feel about dead Palestinian kids murdered with their tax dollars during the pillar of cloud operation last year?
      Judge a man by his questions as they say.

    4. They should ask themselves that question because at that time they were actively supporting the same act that has been done to them and they seem to be unable to see the similarities. I agree with what you say regarding terrorism, it can be entirely a point of view. Soldiers shooting each other in battle is not terrorism, dropping bombs on civilians on purpose is terrorism, Nazi Germany's blitz on the UK, the UK's massacre of Indian's in Amritsar, The unabomber the list will go on until each country has its place. I didn't ask them about Palestinian kids because that sounds like it could be your job. What of your own country are you innocent?

    5. No flights carrying ammunition or weapons destined for Israel are allowed to land at Irish airports. So yes we are standing up for what is right.

      When you say things like the PIRA attacked 'unprepared civilians' its disingenuous and it ignores what has happened to Irish people at the hands of British forces and their proxies (loyalist paramilitaries), it ignores the collusion, the hunger strikes, Bloody Sunday, the Shankhill butchers, the Miami Showband (shot dead by UDR soldiers). I'm not saying innocent civilians didn't die at the hands of the PIRA, of course they did; in the early days and very few at that. Their objective was to sap the will of the British Army to remain in Ireland. It wasn't all out war on the civilian population like you seem to believe. The thing that goes over the heads of the casual observers is that the people responsible for upholding the law were the people that were committing the most heinous acts of terrorism themselves, even conspiring to kill lawyers (Pat Finucane and Rosemary Nelson). In Northern Ireland that noun 'terrorism' lost all it's meaning; Just as it is doing now in the 'Global War On Terror', its farcical, and its really sad to see that ignorance play out once again.

    6. I would like to bring back the days when the leader/king led the army into battle, not the hunger, disease etc. But the responsibility for the actions, up close and personal. The whole hypocrisy of history, modern and ancient, is nauseating. As Kurt Vonnegut put it "So it goes".

    7. I hope for a day when Governments agree on having armies just large enough to defend up to two hundred miles outside their borders and no more. Maybe even put all that energy into doing something 'humane' for a change.

    8. I totally agree. But I doubt it will ever happen.

    9. "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." No one, I mean no one has any righteous ground to stand on when they talk about their involvement with any historical or political ideology. Terrorism has usually been defined as action taken by the state to intimidate its own citizens. Don't confuse that with War. War is different. War is state sanctioned armed robbery; against an opposing state's citizens. ;)

    10. I know what you mean, and Canadians sent money to the IRA as well.
      Its a crazy world!

  48. wath a joke !!! anyone that trust the mainstreem media , and the Osama Corrupted Dictatorship is d.u.d.=dumb unto death.....confusion+corruption=destruction. The beginning of the end of America going into captivity. I'm awaken and know who rules this world and who is the god of this dumped world. My life is in God ,My creator and thats a fact ! Kill my body i dont care! But my soul and spirit no one else but Yeshua !!Time is so short ,REPENT !!

    1. Having a hard are you?

    2. LOL, seriously Patrick, take your medication!

    3. are you aware that science has now determined that solar activity effects the rate of decay of radioactive elements which could end up proving the bible was correct all along.
      your are being deceived by the educational industrial complex.

    4. "science has now determined..."

      OK, so you can cite us the paper(s), right?

    5. Yes, and published ones as well, not just "Godsreal. com (sarcastic)" crap.

    6. nothing about solar activity could effect the rate of decay to make the age of the earth coincide with the bible. im sorry but you are talking out of your @$$

    7. We now live in a society where we just don't care, we lock out the world almost like it wasn't there ,
      we now live by the rule that we deserve to take not share, and this cant go on we must choose to care.

      who is your master your god or saviour, who is the one you choose to
      favour, who is the one that wrights the rules, that runs your life, you
      stupid fools,
      we are the ones that guide our life's, for we are free
      and by god I know im right because I was born and I have evolved, to
      see this world and all the corporate mould, the world has now become
      infested by a global elite, who's only aim is profit and we stand at
      their feet, we let them do what ever they want, and yet they kill
      millions with out a second thought,
      they strip then gorge on what they steel and the media tells us that its not really real.
      We are the ones who should be writing the rules, and deciding what should be taught in our schools.

      we are the ones that get to say what we need and not some parasitic
      suited dweeb, because we are the power behind this throne so lets make
      them remember that we can still pick a bone, don't let them control you
      with their fear and lies, don't believe what they tell you through their
      media network of spies, because fear is the only true sword they wield
      and if we deprive them of that, then we give earth back its shield.

    8. I'm guessing that you think A. Jones is correct in his allegations. You have a fancy way of saying nothing.

    9. alex jones is a penis of the highest order, his very early stuff was refreshing but as soon as he sold his soul to corporate interests i lost all interest in the man, he was lucky i ever paid him any attention at all, since most of his views have a bull s**t religious under tone anyway.

      the fact is, if you dont think that there is something fishy about this bombing, 911, london 7/7 and numerous other black flag opps, then im afraid its far too late for you to even take one more step in this life, towards any kind of peace or truth.

      i suggest you go back to your church, or maybe in your case the government, for your next installment of lies, that clearly helps you get through day to day life, as i feel, and remember this is only my humble oppinion, that watching docos like this one, will only serve to readdress the very fragile balance your life must enjour for you to exsit.

      sorry to rip you a new one, i am not normaly like that, but to use me and alex jones in the same sentence was simply asking for it
      All the best

    10. You may not like A. Jones but you deliver the same message that he does in nearly the same fashion. You draw conclusions about me without the slightest clue of who I am or what I believe.

      I am an atheist so there goes that assumption. I neither trust or distrust the government any more than I do anyone else. I realize that to maintain a society as complex as ours we need some kind of structure...that structure being a governing body. Sometimes they do rotten things, sometimes not. Just like the rest of humanity.

      I do not make assumptions of guilt without some evidence. There is no evidence that this is a black ops situation...zilch. Not trusting or hating the government is not evidence to prove guilt. Its a personal bias.

      You have no idea of what I have had to endure in my life and the path that I have tread to find the peace in life that I have found. Another assumption on your part. I, also, believe that the path to truth is assessing all information available and finding the truth from all the facts. A guy, in the distance, standing on the roof, is not proof. It isn't even worth considering. An automatic assumption of guilt is no different than the automatic rejection of scientific advancement by the religious. There has been no official testimony or statement given by Jahar but you've already decided that he is innocent and that any evidence given will only be lies. I would think someone who automatically believes all are lying is one who has difficulty finding peace in their lives.

    11. ha... i never said anything about roof tops or jahar being innocent you said that, i also never said that i think all are lieing, the simple fact is i think i have a pretty good bull s**t radar, and in this case it smells strong, i hope im wrong, i realy want to be wrong, because i still have hope for a better world, anyway time will tell all i just fear it will not be in my life time.
      see ya

    12. If you smell something fishy about that day there must be a reason for it. To say the government lies is vague and is a poor reason for a suspicion. My remark about the roof top is just an example of the completely innocuous being used as a reason to doubt the guilt of Jahar and the complicity of the government. Your approach to this topic is one of a tentative accusation which is quickly withdrawn when confronted. You're the person who will say "I have a juicy rumour and I don't know if it's true but I'm going to spread it around, anyway". An opinion given with a caveat that claims no opinion.

    13. Correct about what exactly? Can you provide references? Is satan in control of education? Pah!

    14. Actually, I wasn't aware. So, source please.

    15. Well, that's some late breaking news. What comic book did you get that from?

    16. listen im sick to death of you born again nut jobs hijacking discusions to promote a fictional god and false profits, one of the big no no's your good book bangs on about is "you should not give to receive" correct? so then ask your self this, why are you asked to hand over your very soul and entire life and dedicate it to the word of god in order to get the pay out of heaven when you die,massive contradiction there wouldent you agree! you people need to have faith in your selves and not in some made up bull s**t that was designed to get you to hand over your money you fool, get out of this discusion and jump into somthing about cults or something because your brainwashed mind should not be exposed to the actual real life truth you might find in docos such as this.
      see ya wouldent want to be ya

    17. Your fictional god deserves nothing but utter contempt, he is vile. He would go down as the worse serial murderer in history. A gleeful killer of infants, a mad man who has the power to solve all the problems of humanity but was more interested in watching (and counting how often) we masturbate. Thank fuk he's only imaginary.

  49. I have a bunch of questions for Mr. Jones.

    Why bring out bomb sniffing dogs when you're staging a terrorist attack? You know there is a bomb there

    Why only one witness to the announcement telling people to be calm before the explosion?

    Why warn people at all? People wear back packs all the time.

    Why the big surprise when the FBI agent in charge of the investigation refuses to answer the question about a false flag operation? What person in their right mind would answer such a question?

    Why would Navy Seals be in uniform during a covert operation?

    Why the surprise when the mother and father feel that their sons are innocent? "Johnny is a good boy." is a common response when their child is accused of wrongdoing.

    People on the roofs watching the race is suspicious? I climbed on to the roof of a building to get a better view of a building burning to the ground. Does this make me the arsonist? Or part of the plot?

    1. Thanks You Jack. Is it me, or does this site tend to thrive on conspiracy doccies?

    2. Infowars or Top Docs? Top Docs is entertainment, pure and simple. Conspiracy or historic drama, anything free is published and should be. I find these ones entertaining.
      Infowars created a conspiracy and uses all possible means to keep that conspiracy alive. Every event imaginable is carried out for the purpose of pushing Alex Jones' belief of a globalist agenda.
      It's difficult to listen to his show now. I find his show more fulfilling when I'm in a bad mood, or down on my luck. It's nice to take my anger out and blame the global elite for my problems. Of course; nothing ever changes. I am still responsible for my debts, the quality of food I eat (in a grocery store full of Organic) and the car I chose to drive with the gas prices as they are.

    3. you are right there are lots of conspiracy docs (114 of them) but there are over 300 science docs.

      the lean of this site is clearly towards rational thinking but the nature of internet documentaries means that there will be a WHOLE lot of conspiracy docs. The person posting the docs doesnt endorse or condone any specific docs here.

      but look at the list of recommended docs. those are mostly science docs. that should give you an idea of the owners bias.

    4. You've hit the nail on the head. The same can be said for most of the so-called "truth" Alex Jones comes out with. I don't trust him, never have.

    5. Why do so many trolls
      have IP's out of Israel?

    6. and you have proof for this?

    7. Of course, that is what someone like you would say. You have no proof but you do not require evidence to accuse or indict. The smoke from those bombs hadn't even cleared and you, quite likely, had your own scenario in place.

      I just raised a few questions that should be answered no matter who the guilty party is. Instead of accusing me of being a Zionist, or the like, why not try and answer those questions. My IP is irrelevant but anyone who has visited this site in the last few years has a good idea of where I'm from.

  50. Okay, 30 min in and it just seems like everybody was really confused that day...

    1. Alex Jones wasn't. He had all the answers right from the beginning.

    2. There is a lot more to Alex Jones than meets the eye. I've seen him hijack protests, berate the organizers and treat them like strangers. The very same people who featured heavily in his previous documentaries and provided some really good insights into the problems covered within those docs. Now we have rumors from inside the MSM that this year will be the year of Alex Jones! Really? How about Jeremy Scahill (we would not know that civilians are being droned into the ground in Yemen without this guy), Glenn Greenwald, Chris Hedges (who sued Obama over the NDAA) Matt Tiabbi, John Pilger or Robert Fisk? It's really disappointing to see the disparity in attention these people get in comparison to Jones, when they have in fact exposed the vast amount of the wrong doing being perpetrated on the public. If people payed more attention to those people then we might actually see some of these criminals within government and Wall St. go to jail for once.

    3. Well said. You might check out James Corbett. He's a sort of intellectual's AJ.

    4. I love James!

    5. He certainly always thinks so.

    6. That's... a matter of opinion, I guess.

    7. I hope you realize that I was being sarcastic.

    8. lolol! And there I was, thinking you were just being ironic. :)