9/11 Conspiracy Solved
The events of September 11, 2001 have left lasting scars on the psyche of America and other countries around the world. It set in motion a global understanding of modern terrorism, and sparked an ongoing war that shows no signs of abating. The desire to come to terms with this cataclysmic moment in history has taken many forms over the years - from somber mourning to reignited patriotism to outright rage.
But, one vocal segment of the population is driven by skepticism; from the earliest aftermath of the towers' collapse, they've charged that a mass conspiracy is at play. The boldly titled 9/11 Conspiracy Solved is a representation of this viewpoint.
Based on years of collected research from investigators Michael C. Ruppert, Mark H. Gaffney and Kevin Ryan, the film contends that 9/11 was the ultimate inside job. They assert that the plane attacks were orchestrated to mask a $240 billion dollar covert operation which was largely set in motion many years earlier as a means of weakening the Soviet Union following the Cold War. This operation was funded by $10 million dollar securities which were to become due on September 12, 2001.
Throughout the course of the film, the audience is assaulted with a rapid-fire collection of sketchily detailed charges involving recovered hard drives, specific victims who were targeted in the towers, suspicious money transfers which occurred in the moments before the attacks, and the role that insurance giant AIG may have played in the proceedings.
9/11 Conspiracy Solved isn't conceived with the sophistication or pacing that an experienced filmmaker could bring to the material, and it seems to have no sense of how effectively information can be delivered and absorbed. It's essentially a lecture recited at a break-neck pace and set to a powerpoint presentation. Over the course of 43 minutes, the film's narrator outlines a dizzying series of connections and inconsistencies - some of which could have easily merited deeper exploration on their own - but the very nature of the production, coupled with a troubling lack of authentication for some of its more incendiary claims, undermine the film's efforts to provoke its audience at nearly every turn.
This shows the motives and execution for 9/11. If any aspect of it was planned, then it all was. People don't realise how evil their leaders are. They have run false flag operations all over the world. Why wouldn't they do it at home?
Very informative
I can’t see it via YouTube, sadly.
I SOMEWHAT AGREE WITH THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE, BUT MUST ARGUE SOME KEY POINTS. NONE OF HTE EVIDENCE OUTLINED HEREIN CAN BE REFUTED. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY NOT A PROFESSIONAL QUALITY PRODUCTION HOWEVER AND IS TOO FAST. IT IS SO FAST ACTUALLY THAT I DID SOME REMASTERING IN AUDACITY AND SLOWED IT DOWN TO 93%. PLAYED BACLLK AT NORMAL SPEED HIS ACTUAL VOICE IS MUCH MORE CLEAR AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND. I WOULD ASSUME HE CONDENSED AND ACCELERATED THE SPEED OF THE RECCORDING PLAYBACK FOR HIS FINAL CUT TO SHAVE A FEW SECONDS OFF THE OVERALL PRODUCTION SO HE COULD FIT IT ONTO A SINGLE CHAP DVD FOR DISTRIBUTION PURPOSES. I CLEARLY REMEMBER THAT DAY LIKE MANY OTHERS. MY PERPECTIVE IS DIFFERENT HOWEVER THAN MOST. AS A RADIO ENGINEER AND BUILDING INSPECTOR I HAVE COMPILED MY OWN INVESTIGATION OF SORTS AND CAN BACK UP MOST OF HIS CLAIMS PERSONALLY. GROWING UP ON THE WEST COAST IN EN EXCLUSIVE ENCLAVE I PERSONALLY KNEW CHILDREN OF PEROPLE INVOLVED IN THE 911 COVERUP AND SEVERAL FAMILY MEMBERS OF VICTIMS. THE WORLD IS SO INTERTWINED AND INTERCONNECTED THAT NOBODY CAN BE DISCONNECTED FROM THE TRUTH FOREVER. IT FINDS YOU IN THE DARK. ONE DAY EVERY PERSON NAMED IN THIS VIDEO WILL BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.WE HAVE THE MEANS BUT LACK THE WILL...
So i agree with the positive comments on this video. I was very impressed by the creators ability to keep it concise. There would be hours of rambling if I made this one. Let's just say, as a building science professional, that the facts are indisputable in this case. We all know it was a planned demolition, and anyone who argues that point is not just crazy, but likely paid off. As for the content of this video, I am always impressed, every time I watch it. No matter how many times I have seen it I still catch something new when I watch it. Having connections to the financial world I understand that this is how those people think., numbers are an obsession. I still find it hard to imagine how they could stay silent, but after all they are evil people.
This is the single best 911 video I have seen. Despite being made in 2011 this is still a relevant video. Not many people know who is narrating, and I will not ruin the suprise. Let us just say there are some mind blowing revelations, with info not covered in other documentaries. One of the big quips I have is that we need more details published about the links between Turner Construction and this shadowy Ace Elevator Repair INC.
This is one of the single best low budget documentaries ever made. Given that the production quality is not high, the content is par none. Those who put this video together are truly to be thanked by all. The information is 100% legit and I have cross verified much of this info, long before this video was ever made.
Yet more bs about 9/11.
I believe President Bush was involved. He quickly rushed Osama Benladens family out of the US immedialy after the attack. He had to have known who did it. Othetwise there wod have been no reason to ship Benladens family out of here to protect them. He must have had a part in the attacts, or he would not have known Benladen was responsible for it. Bush HAD TO HAVE BEEN INVOLVED in PLANNING, AND EXECUTING THESE ATTACTS!
The flash before the planes hitting are obvious. They were bombs.
A couple points are not adding up. First how was it possible to recover hard drives from the section of the etc that was hit by a plane or any section of the building for that matter. Second how does someone take work off to talk on a news station about an event that didn’t occur yet?
Amazing to see that many people still cling to the official story...
Can't they understand that steel skyscrapers can't possibly "collapse" in the manner alleged? These structures were designed to support several times their loaded weight. The twins were designed also to withstand aircraft impacts. Burning jet fuel and office equipment can't melt or significantly weaken structural steel. Moreover, for such synchronous, symmetrical collapse, virtually every weight-bearing point on a given floor would have to fail at exactly the same moment, followed by the same thing occurring on the next lower floor, all the way down. This could never, ever happen absent some sort of controlled demolition. If there was some portion of the building that was severely compromised, we would see a localized failure, if anything, with twisting and partial collapse following the path of least resistance, not a symmetrical, total collapse through the core columns and other structural supports. Even if 3 floors were somehow wiped out in a flash, the remaining intact structure below that point would easily withstand the momentum of the falling upper portion, at least deflecting it in one direction or another, not allowing it to fall virtually without resistance through the strongest supports.
Besides the symmetry and synchrony, a dead giveaway is the speed at which the buildings "fell" (did they really fall, or did the towers disintegrate in place?), close to the rate one would see in free fall. It takes tremendous energy to collapse a steel skyscraper, and even more to convert most of it to dust, but a near-free fall collapse means that almost all of the potential energy of the structure and its contents is being used to draw the materials to the ground, without any significant energy left over to collapse anything in its path.
Regarding Building 7, Dutch demolition contractor Danny Jowenko, prior to his untimely death, stated his conviction that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition. It certainly looks like it to my eye, and I find completely unsatisfactory NIST's contention (seconded by Popular Mechanics magazine) that the building buckled inward on one weakened column - the videos of the demise of WTC 7 instead show a symmetrical, synchronous collapse as we would expect in a controlled demolition, just as Jowenko concluded.
These issues explain why NIST dragged its feet on publishing any sort of explanation of the unprecedented collapses (the 3 steel skyscrapers in NYC would be the first 3 in history to collapse primarily due to fire).
And it's not just "conspiracy nuts" who are questioning the official story. Peter Ketcham, a former NIST employee, has gone on record saying that explanation we've been given is highly doubtful. In an interview, he stated among other things, that when he scrutinized the collapse of the 3 NYC skyscrapers, as well as NIST's report thereon, "What became immediately obvious to me was that there was overwhelming evidence that all 3 of those towers - 1, 2 and 7 - collapsed due to controlled demolition."
Those who cling to the official version of events, and claim that no such conspiracy could be concealed from the greater public, may have to revise their views. That is, what's more likely, that the laws of physics were suspended for one day in Lower Manhattan, or that your assumptions need revision about what's possible in the way of a criminal conspiracy?
I never could stand Bush Jr. Even when he was delivering what was supposed to be the most heartfelt speech about this heinous deception on the American public, I couldn't overlook that slight smirk on his self-satisfied mug. I believe he was another puppet involved in this up to his eyebrows, and his day of reckoning will arrive.
Can you shed light on why the thousands of Jewish persons working in the towers were out sick except for three people.
I personally watched flight 93 turn over Cleveland, I was at Lorain waste water treatment plant so was 8 other guys on the back of my truck
Batvette are you serious there because I was under the impression and always have been that steel melts at 1700 I could be wrong there however don't try and tell people that office equipment ,I.e paper , computers ,monitors,tables etc etc when alight get hot enough to melt steel because that would be one of the dumbest claims I've heard since bush , Blair and all the other cronies swore that they had 100% knowledge that saddam had weapons capable of mass destruction I'm no scientist nor a fireman of any description but I know for a FACT that ,that's impossible for an office and all it's equipment to get anywhere near the heat needed not even to melt steel but just weaken it ,it just couldn't happen , you then of course go at the person your trying to belittle by stating the jet was full with it's fuel ,mmmm well generally long flights may fill up with fuel but never from state to state then the plane was hijacked going one way then another so when hit I'll guarantee it didn't even have a quarter of it's intake capability.When plane hit towers most of the fuel as seen went up in flames and the rest ,yes , burnt with the office and it's equipment ,so do me a little favour and find out exactly what heat jet fuel gets too when alight,I'm pretty sure the answer is there somewhere but too be honest from your comment I HONESTLY think it doesn't matter to you because I believe you are one of them that is either paid in one offs or it's your job to contradict anything that goes against the trollop we are fed by govts ,this is undoubtedly the worst cover up in history ,JFK has nothing on this
For them who call disbelievers sheeple are either here to state such idiocy or are total idiots,911 to say was an inside job is clutching at straws true however bush and his cronies knew what was coming and did nothing with thus action they have to take part blame for the deaths unless people are disregarding witnesses I.e Susan lingard , a C.I.A operative or was for she was jailed , stripped if her job because she came out and said that she had tried to warn top brasses and they ignored her then we have other countries mine included who warned USA too which again was ignored ,tower 7 should and would never come down due to a fire caused by falling debris ,the clean up was illegal for the govt got rid quickly of all the evidence after all this was a murder case of gigantic enormity and yet it all sailed over to china,the simple coincidences could and won't ever be portrayed as just that so if I'm a sheeple because I believe in evidence then so be it better that than to be a complete and utter disgrace of a person to believe in what the American govt try feed us all ,I'm no conspiracy nutter but I'm also an honest and truthful person with integrity unlike some sad asses m just like saddam had all them proven weapons of mass destruction and we all know how that panned out don't we
Well done. So much material. The interlocking of the ruling elites is startling yet true. The US is run by crime families and sadly the American public are stupefied beyond redemtion so I am afraid nothing will ever come of this. It's endless war, enslavement and lies until the whole shitaroo gets flushed down the toilet.
Those choosing to believe official govt positions on any number of things can be intelligent in other areas ...but they have an internal WORLD VIEW or CORE BELIEF that the govt is generally made up of people just trying to do good. So Firstly, they CANNOT even consider anything outside this "core belief view of their world" or their whole mental structure they decided they needed to erect to aid in their understanding of the world would be wrong. Secondly, people who need to erect such mental structures for understanding of things have an ego structure which doesn't allow them to be wrong, otherwise, they would consider themselves to be idiots and fools, just like they consider those who don't believe as they do ...RATHER than simply mistaken from jumping to preferred conclusions before they allowed themselves to look at enough evidence.
Fortunately not everyone has this "view of their world" problem which makes it nearly impossible to penetrate. You could waste hours upon hours rubbing their face in evidence and they will go off and find some like minded person who CLAIMS to have debunked or provides some other explanation (as ridiculous as it may be such as the pancake theory) and they will accept such explanations which are most convenient to suit their ego protected view of their world wherein govt is good and helpful; so it couldn't possibly be the govt.
At the moment I couldn't really tell you why some HAVE to DECIDE what is what early on, then refuse all facts and evidence that would go against such a premature decision of how things are or what happened. It could be anything. For some reason they have to decide "THIS is what I believe." It is akin to those who feel hot and jump into a river head first. To those who see that as being unwise they say, "hey its fine." Really? Just because you haven't pile driven your head into a sinker or a rock yet doesn't mean that will always be the case.
There are those who will CLAIM they have no dog in the fight and have unemotionally looked at all the evidence and have come to the conclusion that it wasn't an inside job. One can only laugh. They are exactly the same type as described who want to pretend they are not.
I cannot speak for "truthers" or whatever the mentally blockaded choose to label people who like myself were first initially felt that the military should use the guilty party's heads for soccer practice. However, the mentally unblockaded, upon seeing the evidence, naturally has to question the official line of nonsense.
To be sure the mentally blockaded are supported greatly by the owned propagandists called the major media. Such media continually reinforces what the govt and media have been training in them: If something is called a conspiracy theory to distance yourself from that or you will be considered a kook. That reinforcement has been very effective on a certain segment.
All in all it boils down to an ego problem. Those who run from anything labeled a conspiracy by the media, have been trained and conditioned to do so by the media, fear being wrong AND being considered a kook, so much so that they cannot view evidence as it is. They can look right past it as if it wasn't there and claim they looked at it. And automatically place undue weight upon those they have come across who claims that they have debunked it. Such debunkings of solid evidence means what to those who take evidence as it is, not shaded by their belief system? Nothing, just as it should be.
CitizenX has nailed it. Just trying to explain what I see in some friends who refuse to see. Although I'd prefer not to call them fools, since they are highly functional in other areas, just not when it comes to govt and their refusal to believe that the usa govt would do bad things on purpose.
However, it is a bit beyond naive to consider that such groups (Bergerbilders, CFO, etc.) run by the banksters which control a great deal of govt and the media they own are working for your best interests. If they make their money by getting it from you, just like the govt does, how is that in your best interest?
In fact ONLY the few politicians who have your best interests at heart are working to REDUCE the size and expense of govt thereby leaving you with more of your dough, providing you the ability to do something you want or need to do with it. However, many in govt believe they know better what to do with it, such as skim most of it into their and their friends pockets which is big govt SOCIALISM. They talk a great game, point to others as the guilty, and dribble a little to those they can buy votes from with such talk.
With as much proven FAKE news that has come to light these days (latter half of 2016+) due to independent investigative reporting, it must be apparent that such has been ongoing for a long time. Very evident to anyone not hoodwinked by the obama constant BS and clearly long before; in light of the Church commission questions to the CIA and their admission that they have their people placed within the media. You can view it on Youtube as well as other documentaries on this website. You can also view exCIA agents telling what they did and what went on, from a doc on this website. About supplying fake news and false information to politicians.
More evidence that the "govt is good believers or gullible major media(propagandists) believers" will have to look past.
Will 'NOT' allow, actually.
If ANYONE can watch the way in which the buildings came down and not see that there's a HUGE problem with the government's story on 9/11, no amount of hard evidence can ever convince them of anything their limited intelligence will allow. They should be disregarded as fools.
Dov zak Heiman is also a Jewish Rabbi.
In response to all the posters who come here only to talk about how silly it is people are still focused on this, why are you even posting here? Doesn't that mean you have more free time you could spend actually doing anything else that's functionally worth while than wasting your/everyones time posting poorly thought insults in a thread that, to your own description, is outside of your interest field?
Alas... how terrible is wisdom when it brings no profit to the wise, Johnny?
Hey, you ever watch the Mickey Mouse Club? 'Cause you know what today... today is? Today is Wednesday. It's anything can happen day.
The fruit of the spirit is: Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, hope, honesty, self control, meekness, gentleness, and faithfulness. Cheers friends!
Anyone who has taken an objective look at this event knows that the "official story" is not only improbable but implausible and in many ways actually impossible. It has all but become self evident. People who still believe that the government tells them should be pumping gas and emptying garbage bins for the real human beings.