Did Cooking Make Us Human?

Did Cooking Make Us Human?

7.00
12345678910
Ratings: 7.00/10 from 16 users.

We are the only species on earth that cooks its food - and we are also the cleverest species on the planet.

The question is: do we cook because we're clever and imaginative, or are we clever and imaginative because our ancestors discovered cooking?

Horizon examines the evidence that our ancestors' changing diet and their mastery of fire prompted anatomical and neurological changes that resulted in taking us out of the trees and into the kitchen.

Homo habilis was about a metre tall with long, swinging arms – not much to look at, apparently, but clever. Habilis had a bigger brain (50% bigger) than his forebear, Australopithecus. Was this down to his diet?

In Did Cooking Make Us Human?, a clutch of determined scientists set out to discover the extent to which diet played a role in the evolution of the human brain, using a variety of mildly alarming gadgets.

Professor Peter Ungar has a contraption he calls the Bitemaster 2, a mechanical chewing machine he has fitted out with genuine Australopithecine gnashers.

For the first time in three million years they were set to work on a carrot, with remarkable success, considering.

On raw meat they performed less ably, but teeth from a later human ancestor – smaller, sharper, "crestier" – made short work of it.

You certainly wouldn't want to get your finger caught in there, as Prof Ungar nearly does. "Wait!" he yells at his start-button-happy colleague.

More great documentaries

129   Comments / Reviews

Leave a Reply to Aaron Seyer Cancel reply

  1. Despite the fact, we call ourselves humans we are mammals. We are just the most intelligent and resourceful animal. Having said that, humans are also responsible for the worse atrocities in history. Our fingers play a huge role in our ability to create but there are many examples of people overcoming disabilities which is due to our intelligence and desire.

    Having said all of that diet is extremely important to our health and well being. Eating more vegetables and fruit would improve the health of many people in the world. Raw is even better. However, it takes doing a little research to ensure you are eating a balanced diet for our nutritional needs.

    Reply
  2. This vid is like an ad for the meat/food industry. There are sooo many
    WRONG and unsatisfying statements here its incredible. 11:28 "we THINK ate
    meat", "scientist speculate", "researchers think",
    "one theory", 23:35 “may have been hunters”.There
    are thousands of vegans that THRIVE and NOT only survive on a raw vegan (no
    animal based foods) diet. 1 of the arguments was that it takes to much time to
    eat and still? do not feel satisfied
    (they didnt fed the people any calorie dense veg, fruit or nuts) but they also
    realised how long it took the bushmen to "hunt" their meat with a
    modern day SHOVEL tho.They celebrated the find. so it must be a very rare treat.
    means this people do survive on a plant based diet. to eat a potato raw? is like it eating rice raw. what kinda study is
    that?Why didnt they take a food like spinach which is full of enzymes that help
    the digestion immensely. in fact 1 of the reasons people have digestive issues
    nowadays is because they dont consume enough raw enzymes! also eating a raw
    diet will make u healthier because we are burning the micronutrients with
    cooking, which we need for every activity in our body. yes there are some foods
    that need to be cooked like potatoes!I cant believe they made a study where
    they fed 1 snake? with a whole block of
    meat and the other 1 minced meat and then said that the minced digested faster,
    obviously! its like its been pre chewed! so our brain evolved cuz we started to
    eat meat.what about chimpanzees that are eating meat? should their brain not be getting bigger then?what
    about carnivores? they must be geniuses because their digestive tract is super
    small compared to ours, so their brain should have evolved to super-size since
    they take away much less energy!the cooking of most veg actually slows down the
    digestion because the important nutrients that aid digestion are burned out.
    Please check this things to yourself guys!If u really believe that animal based
    food give u more energy, eat ONLY animal based food and try to work out!be
    warned tho ;). there are 1000's of studies that proof how unhealthy an animal
    based diet is. if you care for your health i would strongly recommend you to
    read/ watch those studies. Dr. Esselstyn, Dr. T. Colin Campbell Phd, Dr. Doug
    Graham, Dr. Neal Barnard. the china study is the most comprehensive study ever
    made on nutrition.

    Reply
  3. I eat vegan except for the eggs of my own chickens:) I eat raw but lots of cooked aswell:) Full raw made me sick.

    Reply
  4. The healthiest people I've ever known were vegan, to me this documentary reeks of meat industry propaganda.

    Reply
  5. I Eat Vegan foods and eat it raw. If anything cooking/eating flesh made us less than human and more toward an animal in the psychological sense. We became nothing more that the social animal plagued by polarised emotions and duality.

    Reply
  6. Ever heard of a vegan diet! This video lies a lot. We cant live on fruits veggies and nuts alone Bull Sh%^! Yeah because today we live on nothing but calories and we don't get enough nutrition . This video want you to continue to eat your **** food thats going to give us caner in the long run.VIDEO IS ILLUMINATI! DOWN WITH FREEMASON DOWN WITH GM FOOD!

    Reply
  7. Cocking alone may have not made us human. But, we couldn't became humans without coking.

    Reply
  8. eating meat was a key change in human evolution but this documentary shows another aspect of evolution applied even to other species like mice and pythons as we saw.

    Reply
  9. yeah... but with cooking food they wouldn't need strong jaw muscles in the back of their skull so more room for brain

    Reply
  10. Woah.. as an earlier commentor said, this doc has a foregone conclusion. Even more disturbingly, it states wild speculation as fact. They claim unequivocally that our early ancestors didn't eat meat and that later meat inclusion in the diet was responsible for an increase in brain size. First of all, even chimpanzees often eat a very high percentage of meat in their diet. It is too bad when a supposedly scientific documentary follows the unscientific approach of fitting facts to a predetermined conclusion - and then puts it all down as unquestionably proven.

    Reply
  11. This doc is full of really gross, slow-motion close ups of people eating. You have been warned! Despite the interesting subject matter, I just couldn't watch all those nasty, gratuitous eating scenes. I had to turn it off after 15 minutes. It's a shame they had to appeal to the lowest common denominator.

    Reply
  12. lol i hate watching people eat, gross.

    Reply
  13. I think the theory that we are human alien hybrids has more credibility, sounds nuts but sounds possible when you look at the evidence

    Reply
  14. I am a raw foodist. 8 years. I dont understand why that study said it wasnt possible. It is.

    Reply
  15. @Atrophy

    Great stuff, next time don't try to resist :)

    Reply
  16. @ Atrophy & Achems

    Atrophy Yes I think that is what I am saying. What I do know is I see jesus's teachings taught in a twisted view to another whole agenda.I do not see what he taught as meaning what they teach.
    I see science and his teachings from a different context as one the same thing.
    Jesus actually is teaching what science confirms.I see so much that I just keep connecting.

    Did you see the fractals Doc that just came out? Even that has meaning to me.. God made us in his own image. Fractals are parts of a whole yet each is a whole of the part.
    This is Sacred geometry that was already known and yet science is just catching on...... These are stuff of the Initiates practices and same stuff our modern religions condemned as sorcery and evil etc.....both in yesterday and today. This is the stuff that the Papal condemmed the scientist the Alchemist for studying and practicing. I could be so very wrong when I get to the end of my trail. but I know this: something is more to all this then we are taught and if it is against modern religions then I want to know about it.I want to know what it is that I see weaved in and out thru the teachings and understandings that I see.

    You know there is something about duality that we must remember. There is one side of duality and then another side. But the most important part to remember is that those are the choices given and we need to hold onto the truth that Just cause their is a duality doesnt mean we have to choode either one. Because there is always a choice to choose neither. There is always a third choice. That choice is our own free will.That is the path I am on. Anyhow We are changing moving this conversation to …”the Primacy of consciousness” i might be behind our car broke down doing our paper route this weekend and things are a bit tough for us until we get caught up from its wake it left.
    Thanks for keeping an open mind

    Reply
  17. @Connie
    So you're supposing that Jesus was a smart man educating people with what passed for science at the time and the previous religion manipulated it to their own advantage ?
    Not entirely impossible given religions continued efforts to infringe on standard education as well as book burning and 'witch hunts' by various powers over time.
    Achems is quite correct, we have run severely off topic :D

    Reply
  18. @Connie:

    Really do not know what to say, because my thoughts are there was no person as Jesus, just the latest in a long line of deities stemming from antiquity with the same characteristics. So my take on that would be moot.

    What you could do is google... "Plato's allegory of the cave", How reality is not what it seems, and start from there.

    I suggest that we pursue this venue on the doc..."the Primacy of consciousness" here on TDF where this discussion will be allowed.

    Reply
  19. @ Achems I wish you would keep an open mind to what I am saying cause I could use your brains in the science area to help me test out my thoughts here as I keep trying to figure this out. I am not talking about religion as commonly known. and I am not talking about the Bible as it is patched together.
    What I mean is the first testament doesnt apply either cause it was the Jews teaching that Jesus was speaking against and trying to tell people the Kingdom of God is within you, That we ourselves possess our own free will.

    He was saying that they did not have it right... and then because he drew such a crowd Constantine used him and made up a whole new version of Jesus that mixed a popourri of religious cults in a pot.

    I think This guy Jesus was trying to open the lid off the can of worms the world was creating and he got used as a pawn for the wrong agenda. I believe what he was teaching was science and Alchemy etc....

    But anyhow that is my own work to figure out.But I find it facinating to read the Bible and see things in this light and when I do a whole new story is unveiling.

    The planes and heavens are dimensions. etc... I could never post all of it... Nor really want to. I dont want to convince anyone anything I just want to finish these thoughts to the end and see what develops.

    I will read your links thanks.

    Reply
  20. @Connie:

    They just came out of the stone age, quantum?? they thought that the world was still flat until galileo, this was the bronze age,

    There will never be a marriage between science and religion! ever!
    I am sorry to say this, but the only way humans can ever progress technology wise is to eliminate all religion. period.

    Reply
  21. @Achems , this is the closest I have been to describing what I have been trying to find conclusive evidence for. And I have not been able to spit out what I think.

    That There was a Jesus who was teaching Quantum physics not religion and the Bible and religion was all part of the sun God worship for the mass control.
    That this Jesus was used by False religious believers to use as control over masses ans still keep thier Sun God while they gained control and steered the christians on a false path by twisting the reality of Jesus.

    I think it is so important for Christians and scientists to work together so the veil can be torn. The only veil I see is religion itself.

    Thats all I was meaning to relate All along

    Reply
  22. @Connie:

    There is nothing wrong with sharing viewpoints. That is what these blogs are about, you are superimposing science with spiritualism I suppose, and then adding religion in the mix to find a common ground. I think in effect you are saying everything comes from the mind. That I do not know, but some reputable scientists/physicists seem to think so. For there are parallels drawn to eastern religions and quantum physics,

    See..."youtube-a conscious universe-the observer effect"

    And..."youtube-the Copenhagen effect"

    And no, was not describing "Genesis" in the bible. Or any invisible so called Gods. even though it may have seemed that way to you. (LOL)

    Reply
  23. @Achems For what ever its worth and not intending to suggest you are purposely suggesting to say this but, You are describing exactly The creation story/ Not the one religees as you call them would describe but instead from peoples who had their stories stolen and twisted for political purposes.

    It is said that Ea. I believe ? Had a thought Then spoke the words and with his breath and word the original genesis story began.

    Quantum physics are the same you think you act as though it is and then the transformation/creation comes.

    To me and others Quantum Physics is the same as what the original genesis story describe. The stuff that coomes from a path of The Magi or Kabbalah path. However take note that many rivers are said to have come from the sea and not all river beds have water.

    The real story of man and creation and being creators are science of today. Somewhat let us say Alchemists but still here there are some dry river beds leading to the seas.

    The genisis Story Is about how Quantum physics works.The world religions have changed the interpretation of it for their own agenda.

    I don't really have a mastery of the vast knowledge of it all so I probably could,not get too far into deep disscussion of it. But while I saw the opportunity to share a viewpoint That parallels what you said I wanted to just mention it.
    Thanks...

    Reply
  24. @Hesus:

    No one knows death of course, no one alive anyway, we can only envision it in the third person, never the first. Only envision death by seeing dead bodies etc:

    Quantum theory is not a paradox, it is even more stranger than that! No words for it.

    Everything comes from ideas first, than mathematical constructs, then theories, then proven facts. One step at a time.

    But science being what it is, always in a state of flux. for new developments.

    No one knows the answers! Maybe there is none.

    Reply
  25. @ Achems

    I think that after death it is much like before birth. What need is there for eternal entity if it only experiences this brief amount of time we have? It would be a paradox if I were not aware of it now.

    Actually quantum seems to be a paradox. It is mostly a mathematical construct in a form of equations. Correct me if I am wrong but reasoning that there are limitless possibilities that all exist is because math works out no matter what variables you put in. Hm... not convincing enough for me. If I can find one impossibility in my reality it means that they are incorrect.

    Too bad as I would love to fly. A more earthly example perhaps is an imprisoned person that is limited to a pool of probabilities in his limited environment.

    Reply