September 11: The New Pearl Harbor
On the very day of "September 11" several commentators drew a parallel with the historical events of Pearl Harbor. But there was also someone on the same day who offered a prediction. In fact the more information that's been emerging about "September 11" the more we've come to realize that many different aspects of the two events bear a chilling resemblance to each other. While both events were needed by the U.S. to go to war, in both cases the ultimate goal was not the one initially stated.
Roosevelt knew a surprise Japanese attack would enrage the public and jumpstart the American war machine. In this way F.D.R. would get backdoor entry into what he really wanted - war with Hitler. According to their own documents, before 9/11, authorities knew that surprise attack like new Pearl Harbor would enrage the public and start a war against Afghanistan. In this way they would get the backdoor entry into what they really wanted - the war with Saddam Hussein.
Before and during the World War II, the propaganda machine made a relentless effort to create a direct connection between Hitler and Japan. One poll, taken immediately after Pearl Harbor, showed that more than 60% of Americans believed that Germany was behind the attack. The Bush-Cheney propaganda machine made an even harder effort to create direct association between Iraq and Osama bin Laden. By the end of 2003 nearly 70% of Americans believed that Saddam was implicated in the "September 11" attacks.
Top levels of the Roosevelt's administration knew in advance that Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked. Secretary of state, Cordell Hull, even knew the exact day of the attack a week before it took place. Before "September 11" many in the intelligence community knew the attacks were on their way.
Vital information on the Japanese attack was kept from those who could've used it to defend the Hawaiian port and to minimize the number of American casualties. Two men could use that information immediately: Admiral Husband Kimmel and Lieutenant General Walter Short, the commanders at Pearl Harbor. But they never get it. Before "September 11" important information was kept from counterterrorism czar, Richard Clarke, who could have organized the defense and even have prevented the attacks altogether.
While the evidence provided by this doco is compelling, the question remains as to why have the neglected to consult Scully and Mulder!
Great documentary but from solid evidence we know no plane hit the pentagon. So why such a long section on the pentagon hit?
This is by far the most comprehensive documentary about the events of 9/11. It tackles the logical fallacies of the debunkers head on with eyewitness documentation, the immutable laws of physics, and the testimony of professionals from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, Pilots for 9/11 truth, and other professionals and whistleblowers. It is impossible, absent blinding cognitive dissonance, to watch this documentary without coming to the conclusion that the official explanation for the events of 9/11 are false. It also opens one's eyes to the existence of an international conspiracy capable of perpetrating the attacks and covering up their guilt through control of the mainstream media and the judicial system. This answers questions and poses questions of its own. Highest recommendation.
Makes you wonder if continuing to allow the President to be in full control over the military is still a good idea.
Don't be swayed by the desperate attempts of someone going by the name batvette, to rescue the ludicrous official story of 9-11...
What gives away that it was an inside job is the unprecedented collapse of 3 steel skyscrapers, primarily from fire. They are the only 3 such buildings to ever collapse due to fire. Moreover, neither NIST nor batvette can explain the extraordinarily symmetrical nature of the "collapses," through the path of greatest resistance, including dozens of massive core columns. Batvette claims that structural steel weakens at 1000-1100 degrees F, and that once one floor collapsed, the portion above that point would fall 3 meters and start an unstoppable total collapse. Highly, highly dubious. One problem is that weakened steel is likely to deform first, rather than neatly snap, and to do so at a certain location rather than at every load-bearing point on that floor, all at once. If we had any examples of steel skyscrapers collapsing from fire, and we don't, we would likely see one portion of the building giving way and then a toppling over, not a symmetrical collapse through the strongest structural elements. Another problem is that the fires had greatly diminished, as evidenced by the preponderance of black smoke, by the time of the "collapses." Still another is the discovery of partially vaporized steel, which requires temperatures north of 5,000 degrees F, impossible in the context of burning jet fuel or office fires.
An even greater problem that the above is that NIST itself abandoned the progressive, pancake collapse theory that batvette describes, in favor of one where the perimeter columns fail first, buckling in while still connected to the sagging floors. This form of collapse is exceedingly hard to reconcile with the symmetry of the destruction of the towers.
Perhaps batvette should get into the business of building demolition. What a bunch of dummies. They carefully plant explosives throughout the structures, and take out floors sequentially, in a carefully choreographed way. What a waste of time and money! All they have to do is rig up a the top few floors and take them out, and batvette's modified laws of physics will neatly collapse the rest of the structure, at near-free fall speed and almost completely within the building's footprint.
Also, too bad batvette wasn't working for NIST during the years they were dragging their feet, delaying an explanation of the symmetrical destruction of Building 7. Their eventual report didn't even pass the eye test, presenting an explanation that involved a buckling in at a single column, a buckling that cannot be observed in the videos of the collapse. I bet batvette would have been able to produce a satisfying explanation within weeks, and avoided all of the conspiracy talk that ensued when no official explanation was forthcoming.
No doubt batvette is very busy, and probably just didn't have time, but this genius forgot to explain why many catastrophic, long-burning infernos in steel skyscrapers have never once caused a collapse, even though office fires routinely reach temperatures well above the temperature where steel weakens.
And I'd love to hear batvette's explanation about where all those thermitic materials came from, that were rampantly present in the WTC dust.
What's impressive in all this is the addition of an infinite corroborations.
Just like needed when a capital sentence need to be judge upon a convict in a country under the Rule of Law.
The point within this documentary is that the so-called "Rule of Law" in the USA is something equivalent to whatever runs Russia or what's left of it.
- Too many corroborations to explain childish incoherence and incongruity.
And you guys have the full freedom to bare arms to protect yourself?
Protect against who?
After Boink Laden, there will be another one.
The Debunkers served a very good role in helping demolish the official tale.
This is a great doc.
This batvette clown smells like a government paid shill sitting at a desk in Herzliya. ;)
This is the most comprehensive documentary on this subject. This is not a "Conspiracy Theory," this is proof and evidence of a conspiracy involving the highest level of government and military officials. Everyone involved should be indicted for treason and mass murder.
People who think three buildings can collapse straight down through the path of greatest resistance just demonstrates the futility of our education system. People are taught by their TVs. As the buildings went down, the path of the military industrial complex was paved all the way to the middle east, oil tycoons and bankster profits went up, our civil rights went down.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Basic physics. Only a fool could argue against this. When experienced architects, engineers, firefighters & pilots tell me their views I put more weight on them than the American Government.
Hey, it reminds me of 'organizations" that I have worked for.......incompetent. Or, was this part of the Master plan?
The Pentagon was not hit by a jet......that's pretty well be rules out....by my 7 year old. I was fooled for a while thought.
its sad to see that the american people have just accepted what the gov has told them, that guy at the end saying 'avenge us' as an outsider looking into america, i think you have already been forgotten about because nobody will listen to the evil conspiracy theorists who want to avenge you, its sad! this documentary is just unbelievably good, if you took this to court the ONLY possible verdict they could come out with would be GUILTY, 9/11 was indeed an inside job, just wow!
At this point this is by far the most comprehensive 9/11 documentary.
This is the best documentary exposing the fiction of the 9/11 commission report. Even without mentioning the nano-thermite topic... (why did they not mention that by the way?)
Much respect and admiration to those who created this particular 9/11 Documentary. namaste
...astounding work here, I'm familiar with just about all of what's touched on, but this documentary is admirable, I don't think I've seen anything that dissects the complex picture quite like this one...so I gave it 9.
It says 284 minutes, but I watched till the end, which was 1 hour and 55 minutes, then additional material had to be seen from buying DVDs...is that correct? – I was on a plane at the time, flight AA81 from Stockholm to Chicago, but ended up in Montreal and had to stay there for several days, which I didn't mind. But the captain never said exactly why, only that airspace had been closed, so I felt I was the last person on earth to find out what had happened...from a Canadian customs person...anyway...American Airlines handled this situation in Montreal fabulously well...when I watched on TV in my room in Montreal, how the towers came down, I was astonished...I said to myself, if those towers were to collapse for whatever reason, it wouldn't look like that....
It was the "Mossad" that did 9/11!
And remember Israel has commited more of these "False Flags"!
Nuff said!
9/11 was Bush's Reichstag. We may think the war against Hitler went well, but now we are propping up the Nazi coup in the Ukraine to start a war with Russia, go figure. And the war against Saddam was just brilliant, we destroyed a secular govt and let the jihadis take over as soon as we left, now we are trying to coax the Baathists into fighting ISIS, who looted all the armories when we bombed Libya. War is a criminal enterprise that kills many innocents and makes most people poorer, but the weapons manufacturers are doing just fine.
The problem with both sides of this argument is you are both trying to PROVE yourselves right and the other wrong. One person keeps trying to answer the respective comments of another by using what they think is fact or proof or undisputed sources etc., and that they can answer ANY argument made against which ever side there on. This is futility at it's glorious best!
I believe that nobody knows exactly what happened on that day and that nobody has all the facts or even a quarter of the facts on every little thing that happened on 9/11. And I think this is the reason we may never get the answers correct from the people involved if we keep to this path.
I believe the solution is to stop watching these documentaries, news programs, so-called experts etc. with the intent of trying to get the correct answers to the questions we all have, on both sides.
I believe that any American who reads or have read the government's official version of 9/11 which is called "The 9/11 commission report" would find that some of their facts or answers they give can easily be questioned at the very least, if not proven wrong. I say any American knowing there is always an exception to the rule and also that there will always, always be devil's advocate's who no matter what will seek to be on the other side of popular or even consensis opinion.
So I believe if we were to stop the futility and arguments, and stop trying to come up with our own facts or our own research and agree that the 9/11 commission report is at best flawed. Then we can move forward by coming up with the most accurate questions we can derive from the report and then not standing on either side of the aisle DEMAND an absolute response from our government and the people "in charge" of compiling all the research and data that went into the final copy of the report.
It is my opinion that this is the only way to get the answers we seek because only those who are responsible for what happened on 9/11 can give accurate (truthful) testimony surrounding the events on this day.
We have to keep asking question's of the people who attempted to give us the answers. Why would you or attempt to answer something you know nothing about?
That would be my 1st question. lol (Everything is IMHO) your free to disagree...
Air traffic controller here...not a pilot, but I do know a few things about aviation. The ground speed and VMO are not calculated in the same ways. Ground speed is what is indicated on radar, and is almost never the same as what pilots are indicating their speeds are in an airplane. That part of the argument is a flawed/incomplete one, without properly explaining the difference of the two.
A little surprisingly, the air traffic control portion of the doc was pretty solid.
Repeat "Its a frame"
False Flag. Operation. Look at Dr. Ray Griffin's Book, the New Pearl Harbor or any youtube lecture by Richard Gage, Architects for 911 truth. Or listen to ABC, NBC, CNN, FOX and get the lies.
I don't know why people have to explain it all over again to the deniers -- as everywhere in the US of A there are a lot of deniers working for the government who have to keep working at trying to justify what was basically a false flag operation co-ordinated by the Bush admin and the CIA or they know that possibly their lives and most certainly their jobs are on the line.