Zero Point

Zero Point

8.05
12345678910
Ratings: 8.05/10 from 145 users.

Zero Point is a three part series consisting of excerpts from freely available information found online.

Zero Point uncovers the messages expressed through ancient monuments worldwide, examines various maps, monuments and artifacts which seem to reveal great secrets about the nature of time, our past and our future.

The film also discusses the Fibonacci Sequence and the Golden Ratio throughout the natural world and in the ancient megaliths are fundamental clues in uncovering the true nature of reality.

Messages from the Past features Graham Hancock, David Wilcock, Terrence McKenna and more, and focuses on a hidden episode in human history, unlocking the secrets of the Precession of the Equnioxes and its significance.

The Structure of Infinity takes a more focused look at the fractal nature of the Universe. Through examination of The Mandelbrot set and Fractal Geometry, Zero Point : Volume II takes us on a journey through the Fractal Universe culminating in a paradigm shifting view on the nature of reality itself.

The Legacy of the Ark concludes by examining the secrets of the Ark of the Covenant. What was the Ark? What was its Purpose? and How did it work?

Beyond, explores the nature of consciousness, examining scientific discoveries that demonstrate the effect of consciousness on the material world and considering the implications.

More great documentaries

147   Comments / Reviews

  1. The success of this documentary is apparent. It got people thinking and talking.

    Reply
  2. Watched this movie but was total bullshit. 10/10 would watch again

    Reply
  3. DustUp....Here here, couldn't have said it better myself . I was just gonna copy and paste your comment but didn't want to be accused of promoting dogma. Lol

    Reply
  4. Enjoyed it. They present ideas. They don't claim everything must lead to the conclusion they came to. They offer something they find more palatable than what they have been fed. The TRUE CONSPIRACY is the supposedly sound scientific dogma they poke holes in.

    Nassim H. makes an excellent point about things going in both directions. Expansion and contraction. That the establishment only speaks of a limited aspect of what is happening. I might add that that is usually the case.

    Interestingly Tesla's description of how electricity flows through a conductor is in stark contrast to what your supposed learned professors teach. His view was that the electrons typically get in the way of smaller particles that carry the charge. And if I remember correctly? he believed the electrons may be causing the resistance. Yet 100 years later we are still taught such that keeps you from understanding things better so that many will not devise something which competes with the vested interests. The few that manage to escape their indoctrination are easy to keep track of and tamp down. Where is the media announcing that Pons and Fleischman were vindicated after all. That a number have been able to replicate cold fusion, for many years now? (which they seem to call LENR nowadays) Where was the apology by the lame weasels claiming it was bunk?

    Why is it necessary to keep promoting the old BS and keep from the student alternative concepts until they are proven? Just say they are not proven. Just like when I was going to school they should have stated that the 2nd law of thermo as it existed at that time, only applies to closed systems ... and that there are very few closed systems. Closest thing is in a lab, restricting as many factors as possible.

    So we have people spending billions stolen from others of more modest means observing what they consider to be an expanding universe. And others spending billions stolen from others of more modest means, to look for smaller particles which last a fraction of a second. And what will they discover? A better weapon to vaporize you with? Unlimited energy? Not likely, and both already exist. The true conspiracy is that the powers that be telling you they don't.

    The matrix has you ...and those who teach. Even Nassim. We have all been infected by it. That is why it is so difficult to make progress. Things we think are basic facts which aren't or only apply under certain conditions. So demonstrated under those certain conditions they mislead claiming that it is universal law.

    Reply
  5. Really people " we know how they created these monuments" ????? Are you living in 1950??? Google baalbek trilithon, 1500 ton rocks stacked 20 feet up. This is currently impossible to us. We cannot achieve this at the current moment. Or Google gobekli tepe , circa 10,000 bc. My god you have Google at your fingertips and you condemn this man for having original ideas. Ignorance in society is astounding. But the again you killed galileo.

    Reply
  6. It is now the end of May 2016 and the world still turns, much the same as 2010.
    G. Hancock main suggestion was not to listen to the dogmatic authorities when evidence leads in other possible directions. It is a very valid point that these so called experts or authorities have a vested interest in keeping their theory as supposed fact. One of the biggest reasons is ego. Most don't like being shown their whole work life revolved around a falsehood.

    HOWEVER, even those experts telling you not to listen to experts, like G. Hancock, pointing to alternatives ...well, the lazy should not fall into taking up their suggested theories so fast either.

    Two or three years prior to 2012, my brother watched some video on the coming 2012 end of Mayan calender and all the perilous end of world stuff that some of those videos proposed. He called to ask if I had heard about the Mayan calender and what I thought about it. I simply said that it is hard to know but they had to end their calender sometime otherwise they would still be carving numbers. Also the calender doesn't really end, from what I've seen, it seems to be an end of an era or age and the beginning of a new era, whatever that meant to the Mayans. It could be that the point 2012 was a convenient stopping point much the same as when I make my own calender with custom photos, I typically stop at a convenient point at the end of December. It doesn't mean the world is going to end then, just that a new year starts. So, it seems the ordinary observation can be as telling as experts on videos.

    I can also say, I've looked at the Elliot Wave theory of the markets close enough to discard it for myself. Like most all market indicators, sometimes they work and sometimes they don't. Those who control the markets, right up until events where they don't, make it most profitable for themselves. Who gets to control the opening bid of the SPY etf? Sometimes it is a logical open price near yesterday's close, sometimes it is very distant with absolutely no reason other than a serious screwing of the sheep to be sheared.
    To a degree, people are pattern matching machines, we are comparators. The market manipulators use every aspect of human nature against you.

    In comparison to this "info" I would reco reading what Nikola Tesla had to say along with Thomas Jefferson. These men were well studied and very insightful in their understanding of the world from their realm. Tesla seemed far beyond some of those regard as the the masters. And if only we had Thomas Jefferson hammering sense into the world leaders of today.

    Reply
  7. I have yet to watch this. Just read through the comments and quite surprised at how many people that sound well educated yet seem to fall short of grasping the concept of documentary's like these. The truth is our ancient past is unknown to us. Mainstream archaeology has many theories in place but they are just that. Much evidence has been exaggerated or modified to nicely fit into modern excepted understanding. To just believe what someone tells you to be true is irresponsible and naive. Like someone else here said, its a big problem of our world today. People get an apparent education and actually believe everything they have learnt is based on hard facts and they will defend their knowledge to the point of anger. This really is the intention of mainstream education - to dissolve any open minded unbiased way of thinking and create a population of robots unable to really evaluate and decide what what really makes sense. To actually believe these ancient megaliths were created using just man power and basic tools highlight's a level of stupidity that can only come from real human brainwashing and social control. Anyone who has dealt with mordern engineering on a practical hands on level knows what goes into constructing anything with substantial weight. For us to recreate what was done thousands of years ago would be too expensive, too time consuming and basically not viable at all. Just to build the great pyramid using modern technology would be an engineering nightmare. People really need to get their head out the clouds and stop excepting something just because its said to be an official fact. What was know to be impossible just decades ago is now common knowledge so who knows what current understandings will change in then future. To believe in anything shows ignorance no matter what it is. If you still think these thousand tonne stones or whatever were carved and moved by hand I suggest you get out their and do some manual work so you can see for yourself the reality of the physics involved. I'm the first one to admit I have absolutely no idea how these ancient structures were built, but for me its crystal clear how they were not. So documentary's like these may get slated by closed minds but at least they are exploring possible options, unlike mainstream archaeology and its naive followers who are happy to fully except a theory as fact and criticise anything that condricts it. True wisdom is knowing you know nothing. Nothing since these sites in history have come even close to the level of skill and and craftsmanship on show. So does this really mean some of the earliest civilised man were the best at building and its gone downhill ever since.... I don't think so. Many of these sites all around the world to me look like just the remains of much larger structures or whole cities even and our know ancestor's just found them, built upon them, remamed them and sometimes even worshiped them as the work of the gods. Is it really that hard to believe that there was once an established civilisation of people living on this planet maybe thousands of years earlier then our relatively modern know ancient history. I tend to lean towards what makes practical sense and the current excepted mainstream views on these sites fall well short of what I can personally process. As far as alien involvement goes I'm completely open to it but without actual proof Im never going to argue the point but it dose still make more sense then a few thousand men with chisels, which to me is an idea even a child can see as ridiculous. It's funny as I've never quite understood any religion and am bewildered that so many people live by and would even die for their chosen religion. However if you see all the gods of every religion as actual physical beings that were not from this earth all of a sudden it all makes sense! Maybe there is truth to it all after all. What a pleasant thought :)

    Reply
  8. Watched this series and then "The Great Year" narrated by James Earl Jones (not on TDF???). One thing to remember is that these topics are all just thought experiments. They were all developed and put forth for you to explore. No one is claiming fact in these type of documentaries except the people who desperately want for them to be dubbed as nonsense. The folks who naysay based on either science or religion are driven by nothing more than Ego. Feels good to call others idiots. Grant it the "ancient aliens" crowd didn't do anybody any favors but it is easy to see that those shows were designed to discredit out of the box thinking much in the way that Alex Jones discredits his field.

    Reply
  9. I can't watch it in the UK! Has anyone worked out away around this? Even using Hola doesn't seem to work!

    Reply
  10. awesome stuff, another great watch is Carl Munck - The code

    Reply
  11. Many wrong facts. Grouping and division of continents is a normal process. Continents will again be grouped in one supercontinent. Google terms "pangea" and "gondwana". This guy missed many scientific facts in his theory of continents. He acknowledged Wegener but did not read Wegener's work till the end. Nothing miraculous about Antarctica's position

    Reply
  12. garbage...more of the same lucifer's propaganda

    Reply
  13. see, God isnt even in the QUESTION for them, its instantly "technology." they must have had high technology

    Reply
  14. Intellectual masturbation. Fun to do... but creates no offspring. I feel slightly cheated by having watched this :)

    Reply
  15. Typically I would never write a comment about superficial things like this, but this started out interesting, and I wanted to keep watching. However, whoever it is that edited this together got really lazy after about 30 minutes. And honestly, the music was so annoying that I had to stop. Yes, music is important to the mood of a documentary, but this was WAY too heavy handed.

    Reply
  16. I thoroughly enjoyed this doc! AWESOME!!

    Reply
  17. Aliens did indeed build the pyramids - FACT

    Reply
  18. This doc is full of facts and good evidence for the first hour and then degenerates into "pseudoscience" at the end. But give these men some credit, they are thinking outside the box and none of them are saying they have an answer. They are merely presenting hypothesis which we can never have enough of. Open your mind to the idea that the established science could be wrong. The earth was the center of the universe and flat not so long ago. Now we are a globe that is an unimportant speck of dust in the vastness of the Universe. Just because the current paradigm accepts something as true does not make it so. There are many interesting ideas in this doc, don't discredit it purely because the people presenting them believe in unconventional ideas. So did DaVinci, so did Einstein, so did Tesla and many of the great minds ahead of their times.

    Reply
  19. coming up with theories isnt the hard part. Putting the proof together takes hard work which these theories lack.
    Part 2 of zero point sums it up nicely, serious (proven) nonsense that takes the whole 'zero point series' down in its credibility. Debunked.... next

    Reply
  20. Time rules, Nature dictates, Change is constant. Humans are just reluctant .

    Everything we think we know will change in time. So all we know are just opinions. In time Truths are just a hindrance of change.

    Reply
  21. Who is the narrator of part 1?

    ...sounds like the actor Brian Cox

    or is that McKenna

    Reply
  22. Terrence McKenna talks about some crazy things... BUT !!! if you see things from his perspective (research him and DMT or Try it lol). Then you would definately be challenging everything you "thought" u knew... I mean that stuffs heavy..

    + They use big stones because they had problems with other rivals building projects elsewhere.. I mean why the hell would go half way across the continent or further to quarry stone... U'd jus jack it off some other derilict building wouldn't u... So they used MASSIVE blocks to construct the important ones they really wanted to go the distance..

    BUT still a very intriging mystery around the mathematics, geological position/orientation and vast similaraties with other supposed unreachable continents..

    Reply
  23. Long but pretty dam awesome !

    Reply
  24. Hard to believe how many are defending this as anything meaningful.
    I watched the entire thing (with some difficulty & pain). What waste of time; it's a load of brown stuff and outright foolishness. Lightweight silliness.

    Reply