HIV = AIDS, Fact or Fraud?
Too many people are making too much money out of it, and money is much stronger than truth. One of the most powerful video documentaries of our time boldly reveals the modern medical-industrial complex’s dire descent into utter corruption. This feature-length expose explains exactly how the 300-Billion-dollar AID$ fraud began, why HIV can NOT be the cause of AIDS, what the real causes could be, and who manipulates the public’s good intentions while poisoning hundreds of thousands with toxic drugs that cause the very disease they are supposed to prevent.
This is a systematic dissection of the HIV/AID$ machine and how they hijacked a program designed to fight a worldwide plight of human suffering and drove it down the road to hell. Yet this program offers hope, inspired by the courage and articulate arguments of a group of growing voices internationally challenging the HIV=AIDS=DEATH hysteria. A MUST SEE for anyone interested in truly understanding the facts about HIV/AID$.
You will meet a number of highly reputable scientists who all agree that HIV doesn’t cause AIDS, including Dr. Peter Duesberg, who was the first scientist to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. He is joined by Nobel Prize winners Dr. Kary Mullis and Dr.Walter Gilbert, along with Dr. David Rasnick, an expert in the field of protease inhibitors.
Is HIV/AIDS the golden idol of junk science? Judge for yourself. Professionally produced, written and researched, acclaimed by physicians, scientists, journalists and humanitarians internationally, this is the video encyclopedia of HIV/AIDS dissident movement! THE defining documentary on the HIV/AIDS fraud.
Watch the full documentary now
April 15th, 2009 at 03:28
A must see! backed by well known scientists. Another case of disagreement among scientists on life-threatening issues. All too often we hear doctors, and governments agencies telling us hand in hand about the safety of products so that they may be consumed, when the real brains have not even settled together on the scientific facts concerning that safety.
money rules the world and your lives people, dont let private interests rule your health. The invisible hand of Adam Smith doesn’t work in the complex field of health and its market, or if it does it is after major disaster only.
It is time to use our clever minds into redesigning the systems that rule mankind. In the meanwhile, keep an eye on the FDA, your governments, and all huge industries. And try paying artisans and small businesses more and big industries less. MONEY MUST NOT BE CONCENTRATED IN THE HANDS OF A FEW, IN PROPORTIONS WHICH ENABLES THEM TO FOOL US ON EVERY FRONT OF PERCEPTION. SO IS STILL THE CASE.
July 26th, 2009 at 02:24
This is a VERY dangerous documentary. The so-called leading experts they focus on in this video have been shown time and again to be quacks. They aren’t considered experts by legitimate science but rather charlatans who are murdering people. You don’t think HIV causes AIDS? Then I suggest you go out and share a needle with someone, contract the virus and don’t take the meds and see how long you last. It’s a shame that people like this are allowed to think yet alone speak.
August 12th, 2009 at 16:07
The basic tried and true science behind why hundreds of scientists are against the HIV=AIDS hypothesis is incontrovertable. No one has yet to show any scientific evidence that HIV causes AIDS
August 30th, 2009 at 12:58
The whole documentary is not based on scietific facts but just on a bunch of idiots. I seriously cannot believe there are so stupid people out there who believe that HIV is not the cause of Aids. I agree with Angelo.
September 19th, 2009 at 06:38
I’m no scientist, but I noticed the dramatic increase in death from aids after AZT was released as a treatment. Makes you wonder…
Angelo, are you suggesting for us to take illegal drugs and die?
November 22nd, 2009 at 19:16
Now 25 years after “THE probable cause of AIDS” was hoisted on the unknowing American Public by Gallo and HHS Sec. Heckler, the obvious FRAUD and MASS genocide is horrific.
People still echo the fear of a Machiavellian tactic to drive people through terror. THIS IS DANGEROUS. like shouting fire in a crowded theater.
NOTE: In 1998 Nature (as AID$ Inc. publication) even published an account itself that blasted the last bit of scientific nonsense behind the HIV=AIDS hype in an article called “Last Nail in the Coffin for Viral Load” by Roder. et. al.98.
So for over 11 years, now the last attempt to explain the HIV=AIDS hypothesis has been dead. But people still cry that the “sky is falling”
Until the public discerns that the real dangers are quacks like Gallo and AID$ Inc. with their fear tactics and toxic drugs like AZT. Instead of phantom viruses like HIV, we are headed for a high-tech dark ages.
November 29th, 2009 at 14:59
cricket:
No, he is not telling anyone to take drugs. (Drug needles aren’t the only way to spread HIV.)
He simply stated that if you think it’s not dangerous, why not test one’s hypothesis. Though I wouldn’t advice to do so since one becomes a walking biohazard after that. Wonder how many HIV infected people out there are spreading the infection because they think they don’t get the condition from it…
In the university there has been no doubtful conversations about this and never has there been a paper in a peer reviewed publish that suggests that AIDS would have a different cause.
And about the rise of numbers in people who have died of the infection..
The population has been on the rise and the disease has become widely spread in areas where there is no medication. So duh, there are casualties. In areas where the medication is available, death rates from AIDS have decreased. The medication does allow a better life quality and halts the virus from infecting more cells.
HIV infects blood cells and once the CD4+ blood cell count drops person’s immunity goes apeshit. That is what AIDS means, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. There is no rational reason to believe that a virus like HIV would not be the cause of AIDS, knowing how it functions. Preventing HIV contraction is the key in fighting the disease.
November 29th, 2009 at 20:45
now can i have sex without condom or no?
November 29th, 2009 at 22:30
I would Kali, only because I find that cleaning the faeces off my penis afterwards makes me heave.
December 8th, 2009 at 18:28
Raps,
I will try to politely say that you are GROSSLY misinformed about at least five things.
First of all, the Centers for Disease Control actually knew back in the early 1980’s that the risks involved with GRID (Gay related Immune Deficiency) where primarily in fast track gay lifestyle men using poppers and other immune suppressing drugs,(also found in IV drug addicts) and they reported this themselves. So long before HIV was discovered the CDC had it right, and were pressured into accepting the phony viral cause with Gallo’s fraud by HHS Sec. Heckler.
The CDC documented over 5,000 cases of “AIDS” without HIV even after HIV was created at the press conference in 1984.
The reason why they came up with HIV 2 was to explain why HIV was NOT causing AIDS anywhere near the same rate in Africa, claiming it was a “weaker” form of the virus.
The constant infection rate in the US at about .05% is indicative of an OLD virus, not a new one, and should have caused an “AIDS epidemic” back in 1795 and on through time. Remember that 50% of the people with HIV since 1984 first being tested in the US are female. Why are US AIDS patients primarily 90% male even after the absurd latency period of 25 years? It doesn’t work in vast amounts of women unless they are drug addicts. So it is not HIV, but drugs causing AIDS.
There was only ONE large group study of couples not using safe sex that has attempted to measure how many would transmit HIV to their uninfected partner. It was called the Padian study and it followed over 150 couples for about 10 years. Guess what? NOT ONE sexual transmission of HIV infection could be documented. Just like the video says, sexual transmission of HIV is less that 1 out of 1,000 encounters or being “hit by lightning” Dr. Walter Dowdle from the CDC’s own research said this.
It’s time to face the facts. HIV=AIDS is absurd!!! Watch the video again and take notes. Try to think about what you are hearing. There is no mass epidemic of AIDS caused by a retrovirus that takes 195 years to cause 29 old diseases that have been in Africa for centuries.
HIV?AID$ is a dangerous genocidal fraud. Like H1N1 it has been way overblown and become a terror tactic of the medical industrial complex wasting over 350 billion tax dollars.
December 8th, 2009 at 18:40
AIDS drugs and Treatments are NOT saving lives.
Here is some info posted recently in “POZ magazine,” an AID$ Inc. publication,
on AZT and death rates: (assuming these statistics are accurate)
Very interesting figures! Like everything else in HIV/AIDS statistics, they
present another mosaic of idiosyncrasies. But that is what we might expect
when they keep adding new diseases, extending the latency period from HIV
infection to AIDS to death, and mixing all kinds of weird and toxic drugs
inside people within several different risk categories.
With any other real disease, one would expect to see some general
correlation between new cases and a constant death rate, given an average
latency period and average rate of disease progression. You might even
expect to see the death rates drop a little if the treatments were doing any
good at all. But the death rate has no correlation with the new cases, and
even increases until 1995, when the mega doses (900 mg or more) were cut
back as the PIs were introduced. AIDS has always been a quagmire of
confusion, but one thing is for sure, death rates continued to rise in
percentage to new cases after the AZT disaster.
Here are the figures:
New AIDS cases / deaths Death % to new cases
1987- 29,105—16,488 56%
1988 -36,126—21,244 58%
1989- 43,499—28,054 64%
1990- 49,546—31,836 64%
1991- 60,573—37,106 61%
1992- 79,657—41,849 52% (new disease definition added, % temporarily drops)
1993- 79,879—45,733 57%
1994- 73,086—50,657 69%
1995- 69,984—51,414 73%
Also, according to the CDC, 62% of the people diagnosed w/ AIDS between 1987
and 1995 (the AZT years) died. 46% of the people diagnosed w/ AIDS between
1996 and 2005 (the HAART years) died.
Also visit: http://www.help4hiv.com
You can listen to many top experts debate and disprove the HIV=AIDS hypothesis on the radio at this link:
http://www.hearitonline.com Click on the Pink box and you can listen for free to the internet rebroadcast of George Berry’s show.
December 14th, 2009 at 05:23
“the magazine Continuum, which consistently denied the existence of HIV/AIDS, shut down when its editors all died of AIDS-related causes.” Wikipedia
LOL!
If you are a denialist, you quite obviously are mentally ill and need immediate psychiatric attention.
December 14th, 2009 at 05:40
Jari: That would be so funny if it wasn’t so sad! I watched a doc like this on another website and yahooed the woman speaking and she too died from AIDS related causes as well as her daughter.
I also watched a documentary that suggested the cause of AIDS in people was chimpanzees used for polio vaccines in the 1950. I think I will look for that doc now and see if it can also be posted here.
KK
December 14th, 2009 at 07:35
Simply appalling. Is there anything that we can actually agree on? It seems that there’s a denialist movement to every fact. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a documentary out there trying to show how popcorn actually comes from potatoes.
The Age of AIDS is a way better AIDS doc, and it’s also on this site. I noticed it’s not on the “You might also like” list. Most of those are conspiracy/mystery docs. Which is fitting, because that’s what this one is.
By the way, the HIV/AIDS hypothesis has led to effective treatments that have helped people. What have the denialists done besides help hundreds of thousands die in South Africa? People need to think seriously before they cry “conspiracy.”
December 14th, 2009 at 08:55
Tim: Perhaps you might know the answer to this. I’m still really confused about this topic. I know HIV causes AIDS. Dah! But, aren’t the triple drug cocktails keeping people “healthy” now except for the side-affects and the fact that they can’t ever stop the treatments? Are people on the drug cocktail still getting full-blown AIDS and dying while taking the drugs like they should? Looks like they would stop pushing this agenda if people stopped dying like they did back in the late 1980’s after they started the drugs.
December 14th, 2009 at 09:39
Charles: There’s a lot of conflicting info about the cocktail treatment. Whatever position you take, you can find data to support it, and that does make it all extremely confusing. The treatment doesn’t work the same for everyone, and for some people it can have terrible side effects. But it does have the potential to help, and that wouldn’t be the case if it was based on false science. If the denialists were right, they would’ve come up with a much better treatment by now. And they’ll probably never stop pushing their agenda. Denialist movements push on even in the face of overwhelming evidence. If Holocaust denialism is still alive, you can bet AIDS denialism will endure for at least another 50 years.
December 14th, 2009 at 10:02
Tim: I refuse to believe “denialism” is a real force in the world today and there is nothing you can do to change my mind!
Thanks, that was actually a very informative answer.
December 14th, 2009 at 13:58
Kelly K.
The woman’s name was Christine Maggiore. Her 3-year-old baby was called Eliza Jane and she died of pneumonia as a complication of AIDS so they cannot blame drug use on the baby’s death. Maggiore blamed the baby’s death on “antibiotics” given shortly before the baby died. “Pneumonia as a complication of AIDS” was the official cause of death for the baby’s autopsy, and then later Christine Maggiore also died from the same thing, though no autopsy was made. She never believed their illnesses were caused from HIV. It is thought the baby contracted the HIV from breastfeeding.
December 14th, 2009 at 19:02
Well I hope you’re right Charles! Fortunately these denialist movements don’t get much respect in our society.
a-q-m: That’s really sad. Denial is a powerful thing isn’t it.
December 18th, 2009 at 03:22
morons, this are the same people advising the African Government back when they denied citizens treatment for the disease,the excuse? AIDS was a myth.. LOL..
January 22nd, 2010 at 21:00
This is stupid… we all know that HIV/AIDS research gets virtually no funding anymore. It’s not cured, however medications of today work so well, that people can live a full productive life with HIV with out it progressing to AIDS.
No one cares.
Admittedly, HIV/AIDS is still a serious problems in impoverished countries, but Americans don’t care about that, just like they don’t care about TB and Leprosy.
Out of sight…
Out of mind.
March 2nd, 2010 at 22:27
I followed my heart and intuition regarding the HIV/AIDS topic which led me to watch this truthful documentary.
March 2nd, 2010 at 23:57
You may be on to something Emmanuel. I say you follow your heart, it’s good to see people out there that have still got that spirit.
Forget these hacks that say Orville and Wilbur Wright, I mean what kind of names are those, invented the aeroplane. It was Sir George Cayley, almost 100 years before those hillbilly brothers, but Cayley died almost unknown, a privte soul who flew just for his own enjoyment.
But not you Emmanuel, I have a feeling about you. You are cut from different cloth, just lie Dr. Barry Marshall. He won a nobel prize because of a feeling he had, a feeling deep within his bones. He did the only thing people like you guys do in a situation like that. They experiment on themselves. Marshall ingested a bacteria that he had cultivated to see if bacteria actually caused stomach ulcers, it was the only logical option. Turns out it did cause it and it was one of the most most radical and important changes in the last 50 years in the perception of a medical condition.
Go for it, get HIV, and prove to us all that it doesnt cause AIDS.
You would win a Nobel Pize too. But don’t forget to mention me at your acceptence speech.
Your muse,
Stevie
March 5th, 2010 at 11:21
The evidence that HIV-infection is the cause of immune-disease is extreme.
Getting certain diseases – like PHP, or CD4 count less than 200 – gives you an AIDS diagnosis right away. Don’t even need to test for HIV (though most people insist on it), unless you have special reasons for being immunocompromised (like treatment after a transplantation).
March 5th, 2010 at 11:28
Maggiore was a school example:
If you are HIV positive, and not treated before giving birth, half of your children in average will get the virus, and have, still untreated, only one chance in 20 to see their 4th birthday.
March 5th, 2010 at 21:30
Kelly K. You may not realize this but you are actually in danger of a slander lawsuit about E.J and Christine Maggiore in your obvious non-medical or expert declaration of the “cause” of these deaths being HIV/AIDS. These non-verified and now debunked diagnoses have been reviewed in court cases by the evidence and analysis of the actual cause of death and HIV AIDS was not determined to be the cause.
Lawsuits may follow the sources and further spreading of these slanderous lies, beginning with the LA examiners who made the initial misdiagnosis.
This is typical of people who believe religiously in Gallo’s fraud, and follow blindly without any validation.
March 5th, 2010 at 23:20
Hi Will See,
both E.J. and Christine died from AIDS, and the story is, as I wrote, the most likely statistical outcome.
There are no court-case outcomes supporting any other view. Are you referring to the lawsuit where releasing an autopsy report that gave E.J’s death cause as AIDS-related pneumonia? The lawsuit, settled out of court, was about the _release_ of this information, not about whether it was correct or not.
The only such support I have been able to find comes from the notorious Al-Bayati, who is a well-known denialist with a very relaxed attitude towards the truth.
_His_ reports has been debunked numerous times.
First a young child die from AIDS, then the mother, from PCP, a disease that only hits immuno-compromized people. Solution for the denialists? Lie about it.
March 6th, 2010 at 01:27
we just have to keep in the back of our minds that medical science is more applied than it is researched, ok?
How many practioners prescribing a drug for how many men and women actually finding and verifying it?
It is just to keep in mind that the system of checks and accountability in the medical market and regulatory system in place does not allow for anyone nor for a practionner to be so sure… and the real point of this documentary is to show you that even researchers may disagree while the society has already agreed.