Silenced: TWA 800 and the Subversion of Justice
This documentary proves that the U.S. government-including the FBI and DOJ-are totally corrupt and involved in serious felony crime and the outrageous cover-up of truth concerning the mysterious crash of TWA Flight 800 on July 17, 1996.
As you will see, Flight 800 was actually destroyed by a surface-to-air missile. Every allegation made in this film is backed up with facts-none more dramatic than those that come from the Federal government itself.
You'll learn what the 736 official eyewitnesses actually saw; why aviators reject the CIA "cartoon" explanation; how the Feds criminally suppressed reporting; the critical witness drawings; the rigged NTSB hearings; the damning radar data and documentation; the altered physical evidence; undeniable proof of explosive residue proving a missile strike; the stinging report from the machinist union; and much more!
I knew one of the lead engineers on the AEGIS missile system, he was a radar engineer who worked at Telephonix. He was in contact with an Admiral who was overseeing the standard missile test that night on a drone in a electronic warfare scenario that included large amounts of electronic warfare. The drone was tracked, locked, the missile launched and before the seeker (radar in the missile that actually guides it after the mid course updates from the launch platform) became active the lock was lost. The default behavior for those missiles which can hit mach 5 is to turn on its radar pointing at the last known target location and lock on to the best target according to its programming. TWA flight 800 was a much larger target than the little drone and it cut right through the plane. Why didn't they find explosives and fragments? Because it was a dummy warhead, can't have live warheads landing in populated areas however traveling at 5 times the speed of sound it will still do tremendous damage to an aircraft. That is how and why the plane was shot down. Now that is speculation between a elite radio engineer and a naval admiral, the crew only ever saw that the track was lost. There was so much jamming nobody really knows for sure that is what happened but I trust this person implicitly and is an expert in his field, he also worked on the low level radar system they use to detect small low flying planes trafficking drugs into the US.
I recall hearing Dan Rather say that the only military aircraft in the area were P-3 Orions. Then when on to say, they do not have missile capability. I was beyond stunned, as I was part of Navy History while serving in VP-26. I was on the observing P-3 while the CO and XO's planes shot Maverick missiles at an Italian ship the Navy bought. I recall looking up at my "love me wall" at a picture taken on that mission of a P-3 shooting out a Maverick Missile.
Looking back now at the reporting and the ridiculous propaganda coming from government officials it's beyond angering. Absurdly ridiculous coverup
more upset at the fact they could not lie better. or is it that when you have so much power you get lazy?or don't have too? what ever. Almost seems like a test run for 9/11 type events. like opp's thought we could get away with this but guess we need to have more control to do so and better execution.
Clinton was up for re-election and once they covered it..up...they couldn't undo that...
The only question that remains which was not addressed... is 'Who was on that plane when it was hit?' This was not a random missile attack or it would have been advertised as such by a so called terror cell. If the boat that fled that day was in fact part of a radical cell... then who was responsible? Most if not all terror cells take credit for such an atrocity. Yet not one person or entity came forward. The lone nut theory begins to take place if an organization was not involved, which would atomize the story as nothing more than a stunt gone bad by either the boat crew or part of the military was involved but gagged at the last possible moment to save face.
If that was the case then the FBI, CIA, and the NSA did everything illegal in order to cover up that mistake. The NTSB would have followed protocols but the FAA itself was astounded that the local detachment of the FBI requested that they look the other way. This is a telling piece of evidence that one, a missile was used... two, a commercial flight was in the wrong place, at the wrong time, and third, losses of life was the catalyst to an in depth investigation that rallied most if not all the three letter entities to put a stop to that investigation. If it was known that the government was testing a missile close to friendly waters in the US then the political body itself would be under intense scrutiny. Yet if it was a rogue faction or someone who didn't realize that the flight was underway and hit the plane by accident by test firing the missile then of course they would escape the scene of the crime.
Except why did the FBI try so hard to put it under the table? Why go so far as to change people's testimonies in order to come up with an alternate theory? Why? To put it simply... it was to hide something. What it would be or who nobody will ever know. If there was an important person on that plane that could have been a danger to them, or to the political body had to be silenced. Permanently. Again, sacrificing lives in the process to cover up an agenda making it look like a mechanical failure. This classic scenario is still used by those in power, but what they do not realize is that the citizens who do the actual investigating are the ones who come up with the truth.
Why so many people had to die is a mystery. Who it was that was on that plane is a mystery. Why attack it in the first place is a mystery. The idea is ludicrous isn't it? Perhaps not since many other notable attacks have been made over the course of ten years, such as 9/11, Oklahoma, the towers in 1993 by the FBI themselves. Oklahoma was in fact the stepping stone to passing legislation in order to push bills in congress literally taking away people's rights. Institutions such as Homeland security, the patriot act and many others. This was just a new form of bill blueprint to push in congress in order to bolster additional security within airports.
In a certain way that is a good thing, but also at the same time humiliating to the passengers who cross borders into another country with ridiculous practices such as X-ray machines of people's bodies, cavity searches, or some other form of embarrassing protocol. Flight 800 will remain as the only cold case file in the history of aviation because your government, and their agendas intercede with your rights. Nobody is safe any longer. Over the next twenty years or so, many will call for marshal law.... and it will come to pass sooner than expected.
A good informative speech will not only inform, but provide an action to take. What is missing is a link to a petition to sign for a proper investigation or some other action. Another investigation may also prove fruitless if the same authorities conduct it. FBI Internal Affairs may be of some help if they haven't been corrupted as well. My non-profit organization, the Agents Of Change, does attempt to address corruption by promoting a move away from representative democracy towards direct democracy, runoff or ranked voting in all elections, the adoption of a national holiday for voting or moving the vote to a holiday already established such as Marting Luther King Day, the removal of campaign contributions, and other important social and governmental reforms. Volunteers ready to take alternative actions and those with special skills are encouraged to write to the address provided and you will be contacted if you can be of service to our cause and country.
I believe flight 800 was shot down with one, perhaps two RIM-66D Standard missiles , fired from the GMLS MK 13 onboard the CGN-37, USS South Carolina. I remember the video broadcast by CNN in 1996 (one that I never again was able to find) and told my father at the time "that is a missile track." Mr. Wire (sp?) describes perfectly the flight of a SAM. The "wavering" he describes is a SAM leaving and re-syncing on a directional radar illuminating a target. I was a GMM in the navy, on board the So-Car's sister ship.
To all those speculating on why Flight 800 was shot down, it had been reported that the flight was packed with top brass from the Egyptian military. Another interesting fact; the air traffic controller responsible for Flight 800 was also working at Logan International Airport on 9/11 and was responsible for both flights that hit the World Trade Center. This was pointed out in the German documentary The Sensible Doubt.
TWA 800 is what happens when false flag occurs without coperation of FBI. They get mad and go full berserk on investigation until it goes up in the food chain and cover-up is not only needed but irreversibly evident.
Someone should look at who was on that plan !! then you people would no why the Gov blow it up I seen something like this happen in Russia !
I'm not saying there wasn't a cover up, but my question is why would the government cover this up? To what purpose?
Let me see, most of the eyewitnesses were not allowed to speak at the hearings, and were not thoroughly debriefed regarding what they saw for evidentiary analysis; specific data was deleted from the radar event itself, and a reporter and his wife were charged with conspiracy, although their evidence was not allowed in their court proceedings. Yup, sounds like a free, democratic, society to me. (we hold these truths to be self evident)
But, hey, don't sweat it, Obama has your back, just like Bush before him. Rest assured the metadata they are collecting on everyone, and the new laws they have been passing (patriot act 1 & 2) have everyone's best interests at heart.
P.S:After you found out that the easter bunny, and Santa Claus were a lie, then how could anyone sell you on the idea of freedom 55, sodamn insane, osome have been lyin, or a lone assassin with the magic bullet theory? Personally, I have no doubt that there is intelligent life somewhere in the universe; you just won't find it here on earth!
It all started when they took over by shooting JFk, and Robbie- That was the beginning of the end for USA democracy- Just keep filling your prison's it makes "the land of the free" seem quite silly.
Great video. I always suspected something was wrong when so many average NYers said they saw a missile. I took that to the bank on Day One. When the official"reports" didn't match the eye witness accounts, I knew we were in trouble. We should always be suspect of government, no matter which party is in power. What I find inexcusable are the inactions of our sycophant journalists and media. Thanks only to average citizens and the heroic actions of those who choose to stand, do we get the truth.
I think the main weakness of this documentary is its unnecessary partisan swipes at the corruption of the Clinton administration and its alleged unwillingness to deal with "terrorism."
What if the truth is that a right-wing cabal within the CIA carried this out as a false flag operation with the intent of accusing Iranian terrorists, and that the FBI refused to go along with the scheme? In such a scenario, it's possible that the Clinton Administration averted an earlier 9/11-like falsified trigger event.
I'm no fan of any recent Democratic or Republican administration, but I know that the deep-state fascists are evil.
This is some how related to the 911 false flag event just five years later.
The CIA cartoon shows the nose of TWA 800 breaking off way ahead of the leading edge of the wing due to the explosion of the center fuel tank. However, the center fuel tank on the 747-100/200 is located back in the wing center section right where the wing meets the fueslage. The tank is about 30 feet aft of where the video shows the nose breaking off. Also, nobody says where the nose was located in the debris field. It should have been the very first debris found. None of this was presented in the video. While I, and most other airline pilots, believe it was a missile that brought the plane down, the video was not as convincing as I thought it would be. For example, the evidence of the mysterious ship was very sketchy. I am a Boeing 767 captain and the only time we use our
weather radar in flight to look at ships is when we do it just for fun. At this point in th e flight, we would be too busy to look at ships for fun. You would not normally see a ship on weather radar as they must be within about 20 miles and the radar antenea must be pointed at a down angle. Our radar antenae is normally pointed level with the horizon or just slightly down. Also, if there are no storms around, we would not have the radar on.
Inside Job
Great video, but please get rid of the music, it is distracting and unnecessary.
Who was on the aircraft that they wanted suicided. These are the same evil people that brought the towers down and sell our children drugs and death.
Also, American Airlines flight 587 . . .
Most of us in the industry don't buy that crap they
put out. I and probably you never bought the idea of Center tank explosion
especially at 14,000 ft, cockpit procedure, and with the tank being vented to
the outside there was probably to rich a mixture of fuel vapors and a lack of
oxygen that even if a short did occurred in the center tank probably nothing
would have happened and since the center tanks were empty I am sure that the
crew would have had the fuel boost pumps for the center tanks turned off just
as cockpit procedure requires and since the fuel boost pumps would have been
turned off I do not recall any other source of voltage and current sufficient
to cause a spark. I suppose that the fuel quantity indicator system could have
gotten a stray voltage on it but the likely hood of that happening would
probably have been written up long before it became a problem do to inaccurate
fuel quantity indication and subsequent investigation of the fuel quantity
system which is a "Capacitive System". What they say just does not
fly if you consider the physics of what transpired. The story contains a lot of
smoke and mirrors and no substance to their scenario. Even with all the paperwork and the tons of
data it still ends up being a not so very good magic show on the government’s
part, but the better question is how do you suppress all the people that were
on those ships that were part of the exercise, surely someone would be willing
to come forth to supply some answers, after all it is not a National Security
issue, we all know that the system exists, it just had some bugs that failed to
get worked out before a National tragedy was the result. Why can’t the government face up to its
mistakes? Does a hundred years have to
pass before the truth is exposed?
This is not surprising. I was told that the senario
goes something like this. The Navy was testing a new missile defense system off
the Hawaiian Islands prior to the tragedy of TWA 800. It appears that the
system was in good working order but was not tested in a high density real
world situation. Several components were needed to complete the system, A
launch vehicle to act as a missile
threat by launching a missile with a dummy warhead, a countermeasure
vehicle to intercept the threat missile, a look over the horizon radar system,
supplied by an airborne tracking system and to act as an interface system
between the ocean vessels or land launch vehicles, a computer capable of
identifying, tracking, discriminating between friend and foe of multiple targets
and providing, speed, trajectory, altitude, and flight path, and projected
target, multiple being the key word. These things were needed to check the
operational requirements of the system; Hawaii did not prove to have sufficient
density in airborne traffic to supply the military components the necessary
environment to test the system in a real threat situation. Three things were needed to check the
operational requirements of the system. Hawaii did not provide sufficient density
in airborne traffic to test the system.
Those three things were; A restricted military Zone, A high density of
airborne traffic, and the “Defense System”.
The area off the Coast of New York provided the right components; A restricted
“No Traffic Area” for Military Use Only and an area with lots and lots of
Airborne targets, each with a transponder emitting an “ID”. Simple, but something went terribly
wrong. The flight recorder recorded a
significant piece of information that has been suppressed. A pressure wave was recorded that exceeded the
physical ability of the aircraft to make such a rate of change in altitude even
in an explosion. Kerosene burns at
something in the area of 700 ft per second, while the recorder recorded a
pressure change exceeding 2000 ft per second.
One of the TWA engineers on the investigation site reported that a hole forward
of the Wing and aft of the cargo door, at or below the floor line was clearly
visible, with a subsequent exit hole on the left side of the aircraft and above
the overhead storage bends. That line of
flight when projected backwards puts the launch site clearly in the middle of
the “Naval Operations Restricted Area”.
I would like for someone to research the records for what US Naval
Submarines that were in port in Nova Scotia a few days prior to the downing of
Flight 800, among that crew is a child of one of TWA Mechanics. He has some answers that a lot of people
would like answered. It is ironic that
an offspring of a TWA mechanic would be involved in and part of the cover-up by
the US Navy’s critical mistake of the Downing of Flight 800.
This is not surprising. I was told that the senario
goes something like this. The Navy was testing a new missile defense system off the Hawaiian Islands prior to the tragedy of TWA 800. It appears that the system was in good working order but was not tested in a high density real world situation. Several components were needed to complete the system, A launch vehicle to act as a missile threat by launching a missile with a dummy warhead, a countermeasure vehicle to intercept the threat missile, a look over the horizon radar system, supplied by an airborne tracking system and to act as an interface system between the ocean vessels or land launch vehicles, a computer capable of identifying, tracking, discriminating between friend and foe of multiple targets and providing, speed, trajectory, altitude, and flight path, and projected
target, multiple being the key word. These things were needed to check the operational requirements of the system; Hawaii did not prove to have sufficient density in airborne traffic to supply the military components the necessary environment to test the system in a real threat situation. Three things were needed to check the
operational requirements of the system. Hawaii did not provide sufficient density in airborne traffic to test the system.
Those three things were; A restricted military Zone, A high density of
airborne traffic, and the “Defense System”. The area off the Coast of New York provided the right components; A restricted “No Traffic Area” for Military Use Only and an area with lots and lots of
Airborne targets, each with a transponder emitting an “ID”. Simple, but something went terribly wrong. The flight recorder recorded a
significant piece of information that has been suppressed. A pressure wave was recorded that exceeded the physical ability of the aircraft to make such a rate of change in altitude even in an explosion. Kerosene burns at something in the area of 700 ft per second, while the recorder recorded a pressure change exceeding 2000 ft per second. One of the TWA engineers on the investigation site reported that a hole forward of the Wing and aft of the cargo door, at or below the floor line was clearly visible, with a subsequent exit hole on the left side of the aircraft and above the overhead storage bends. That line of flight when projected backwards puts the launch site clearly in the middle of the “Naval Operations Restricted Area”. I would like for someone to research the records for what US Naval Submarines that were in port in Nova Scotia a few days prior to the downing of
Flight 800, among that crew is a child of one of TWA Mechanics. He has some answers that a lot of people would like answered. It is ironic that an offspring of a TWA mechanic would be involved in and part of the cover-up by the US Navy’s critical mistake of the Downing of Flight 800.
Also, consider this. The military was there for a specific purpose. Someone knew what was to occur and they readied forces to conceal what was happening. They had to bring that plane down and everyone onboard was a liability. Too much evidence if that plane landed intact.
You're all focusing on the explosion and who did that. The real question is why?
After the recovery of the plane and passengers a group of coroners were shown pics of the deceased and asked for their opinions. With the exception of about 35 passengers, no body recovered suffered ANY damage and was fully intact. This does not happen in an explosion or crash. Plane parts, fire, etc., wreck havoc on the bodies. They were advised to have closed coffins anyway.
Also, all 35 passengers that were seated together in one section of the plane, had had their spines SURGICALLY removed as if with a laser. Very cleanly done. No other signs of trauma on their bodies.
These pics so upset the coroners and my teacher as well, that he returned home a changed, quiet man. He just could not entertain for a second the possibility facing him. We all had to sign a paper of confidentiality prior to this news. However, the public has a right to know this. Enough time has passed.