Snowball Earth: Planet Covered in Ice
The Lascaux cave paintings in modern-day France date back to around 17,000 years ago, during a time of great upheaval on our planet. The world was then experiencing an intense ice age when snow and ice covered almost a quarter of the Earth's surface. This period would be the last major glacial maximum, and while it was tough for the paleolithic humans to survive, it was not impossible. There were still places that were not totally frozen, particularly the Southern parts of Europe, including Lascaux. Many humans would go there and seek refuge from the cold and regroup as they recorded their hunting expeditions.
However bad this last ice age was, geological clues found worldwide hint at an even harsher - and colder - time on Earth. About 500 million years before the artists at Lascaux painted their caves, the Earth might have been covered in snow. This theory is informally called "Snowball Earth" within the climate scientists community today, and if these total "global glaciations" did occur, how did it affect whatever lifeforms existed back then? Did anything survive? What circumstances led to this phenomenon, and how did it end?
Fast forward to 1913, when Australian geologist Douglas Mawson finally made it back to Australia after surviving a disastrous expedition to map the coastline of the Australian portion of Antarctica. As a Professor of Geology, he soon came up with the theory that ice must have once covered Australia to explain why mysterious rocks and other glacial-type sediments would turn up in the middle of the sun-baked Outback.
His theory was eventually shot down when science explained that plate tectonics caused them. But the idea of a prehistoric, ice-covered Australia stuck and evolved into an ice-covered planet, especially when other geological puzzles began to emerge. These include 650 million-year-old glacial deposits found in places that were once in tropical areas and "drop stones", or large pebbles that look like they were dropped from high ground and may have once been on top of icebergs that melted.
But if ice and snow covered the world, life would not have been able to survive at all. Or would it? It was thought that while many of the planet's cycles and processes stopped due to the frozen temperatures, the planet's interior tectonic activities continued, allowing earthquakes and volcanoes to erupt and forcing gases into the atmosphere leading to temperature changes and beyond.
These temperature swings could have served as "evolutionary triggers" that drove simple organisms, such as aquatic algae, out of the oceans to cross over and become land plants. These simple plants would have then evolved into more complex lifeforms; the rest is history.
"Snowball Earth" would have been one of the most difficult and challenging times on the planet, yet, if the theory is proven true, the Earth's still found a way to reinvent itself, and for the tenacity of life, it still found a way to evolve.
Directed by: David Kelly
I was under the impression that Australia was once part of the India subcontinent, not part of Antarctica.
What is it that compels the wack political nutjobs to spew their paranoid schizophrenia into the discusson of a scientific video about paleoclimatology??
observe. do not absorb... master this.
In the Sonora Desert in Southern Arizona they have found rocks with imprints of Fish in them thereby proving that the Desert was once a Lake.
Climate on Planet Earth has always been in a state of change, just like everything else on Planet Earth, mankind thinks they can now control the climate when they cant even control their own thoughts.
Authoritarian collectivists control most politically, e.g., economically, psychologically, by brainwashing from early childhood (so-called public ed) and follow up with constant MSM propaganda. Thinking as an individual is politically unpatriotic, as in "Ask not what the govt. can do for you, but what you can do for the govt.". "Mankind" doesn't think. It is told what to believe by parasites who exploit it. If just 10% thought, they would boycott rulers, rules (law backed by force, not reason, rights, choice). But they don't think, they self-enslave and call it freedom.
Apart from Polar and nearby areas , the striations marks on rocks were not caused by ice , but by MUD FLOWS. Therefore the greater part of this documentary is not correct !