The Truth Behind the Moon Landings

The Truth Behind the Moon Landings

2003, Conspiracy  -   793 Comments
6.49
12345678910
Ratings: 6.49/10 from 220 users.

The Truth Behind the Moon LandingsDocumentary debunking the conspiracy theories surrounding the first moon landing. Amid an era of global political suspicion the greatest conspiracy theory of all time casts doubt on what should be the greatest achievement of the age.

Did the Apollo 11 astronauts really land on the moon, or was this an elaborate hoax by NASA to satisfy political demands?

Bill Kaysing the former head of technical publications for Rocketdyne is considered, by many, to be the father of moon conspiracy theorists.

Both he and Ralph René the author of NASA Mooned America set out their stall with all the evidence supporting their theory:

Contradicting shadows in photographs, moon walk was a slow motion film, no stars in night sky, flag fluttering in a breeze, lack of Computing power to land the lunar module, can't manipulate camera to take photographs, dust below lunar module should have been disturbed, film would be damaged by radiation... etc.

More great documentaries

guest

793 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim
Jim
1 month ago

The 'cultural vandalism' observation is spot-on, and is often how I introduce doubters to this film. Conspiracy cranks embody estrangement from progress. They project their internalised Western self-hatred on to those who have the audacity to continue defending science and human endeavour.

Paula Hampton
Paula Hampton
2 months ago

Moon landing deniers mentality in a nutshell: I don't understand how it is possible to land on the moon, so therefore all landings were faked.

Rick
Rick
3 months ago

An interesting question is how they got the lunar roving vehicle,(LRV) to the moon. Well, here's your chance deniers! Basically it was a battery powered dune buggy that was folded up and placed in the descent stage of the lunar module, in a small bay with its underside facing out. A series of pulleys, and ropes were used to help deploy it. The LRV was used on missions 15, 16, and 17.

Jenn starkey
Jenn starkey
4 months ago

Come on, it's so simple to prove these dumb theories wrong. theguardian.com, the conversation.com.... google those sites. They are only a few of the many sites explaining why moon landing
deniers are idiots. The retroreflectors are still on the moon, and no they weren't installed by robots. They are still used by NASA to this day. All transmissions were tracked. Samples were examined from the moon. I can go on, however, non believers will never accept the truth.

Mariah
Mariah
5 months ago

The moon landing always sparks controversy, despite being explained billions of times. Non believers claim to see all sorts of anomalies, that prove it was a hoax . Well, honestly, no hoax evidence even exists, despite some claiming it does. The moon landings are a hard scientific facts it's that simple. Photos, moon rock samples, videos, will all be labeled as fake, so don't bother using any of that as proof, because hardcore skeptics will laugh in your face. Take the same backdrop lie. Well, on the moon, there are no trees, bushes or smog to obscure your view, so when the astronauts(not astronots) pilot the moonbuggy, the mountains in the background sometimes miles away, hardly seem to move. Thus, it gives the appearance of the same backdrop. Remember you are on the moon. Now on earth, if you travel in your car, the mountains in the distance don't seem to move, but the trees outside the car move by quickly. Think about this for a second, How many Billions of dollars does NASA have, and some want to claim they were so cheap, they used the same backdrop? Come on everyone. Hoax theories are dumb to begin with, and all of them have been explained a billion times, despite people claiming they weren't. Russia, and other countries were tracking the missions, and would be the first to expose the US, had anything been faked. Now, I've seen sites try to promote lies like Russia was "in on it too". Again, there is no evidence to support such nonsense. If you want to go old school, you can go to the library, and read the history books. Full of lies too right? Look , no one is saying to believe everything we are told, or see on TV, however just do research, and use credible sites. An old video, " A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" is sometimes used as proof of a hoax. Well, it's a dumb video riddled with misleading claims, and false information. The clown who directed it, was tin foil hat wearer, Bart Sibrel, con man, and ex taxi driver, turned self appointed expert on moon landings. Next, David L Percy, along with Bill Kaysing round out the top nutters that claim man never landed on the moon. All these men are liars, and should be ignored. Moon landing deniers, Anti vaxxers, COVID deniers, and Holocaust deniers, are all delusional, and immune to facts and logic. You cannot have a logical conversation, as they will make fun of you, and simply call you names. Numerous TV shows tried tackling the hoax claim, and concluded, that man landed, and the hoax was false, however, that's another thing that will get you laughed at. " It's all scripted , and they are paid to lie" that's your response from them. We as believers have facts and logic, all the hoaxers have is just their wild claims.... The flag waiving in the wind..... No stars in any pictures... No blast crater... We haven't been back, etc. All of these claims are easily explained, all anyone has to do is look it up. Remember the false sites can claim whatever they want, but that doesn't make it true. Most deniers never even took a physics class. Am I going to listen to their babbling, or trust people who were trained for years and have an education on the subject? When the Artemis project finally returns to the moon, in the upcoming years, are those going to be labeled fake as well? If the non believers were taken to the moon, and shown the landing sites, they would still claim it's fake. There really is no talking to people like that.

Derek
Derek
7 months ago

Well, I stand corrected, my websites have been wrong after all, and misleading. I did take some advice from people, and checked other sites, and they do indeed explain everything, and why I was wrong. Man has landed on the moon, after all. I hope everyone will forgive my outbursts.

Frank
Frank
7 months ago

Apollofeedback, is just filled with silly opinions. Bart Sibrel, is a con man loser, and laughing stock. He's not an expert in anything. David Piercy is another fool who is wrong, and old Bill Kaysing is some old fart who used to work at rocketdyne, and is another one who knows squat. Hello lived in a trailer with a bunch of cats. Yeah, he's real credible. Anyone believing the lies on that site is totally lost. The hoax theory is old news, and has been explained, but sadly, fools like Derek will continue to believe their lies and deceptions. Even showing you facts is useless, as you simply look the other way, and keep flashing your "website" as proof. It's only proof of how foolish you look.

Derek
Derek
7 months ago

View many media omments at this site:- apollofeedback.atspace.co.uk

Jeff donner
Jeff donner
8 months ago

Believing in a conspiracy or hoax, make some people feel smart. Some feel the government is always lying, so why would the moon landings be any different? There never was any hoax evidence to begin with. It's mostly uneducated paranoid people believing what they read on YouTube, and conspiracy sites. All of the misinformation is very easy to debunk. The problem is most of these individuals will refuse any and all evidence anyone puts in front of them . As you can see, it's generally a waste of time to even bother trying to teach them something. You'll be called all kinds of names, from a sheep, to a moron, if you try and have a conversation with any of them.

Dana
Dana
10 months ago

Many uneducated foreigners deny the moon landings, as part of their hate America religion. Anyways, people who claimed we never went to the moon, should give back their high school diploma. I can already hear the skeptics..... All the schools are in on it, as well as NASA, and our government. These dumb hoaxes can all be explained with science and physics, however some just want to spout off on here and try and look like they are smart . No matter what a skeptic is shown, they will deny it. If they claim something can't be accomplished, that's it. No amount of proof will change their mind.

Daniel Caldwell
Daniel Caldwell
1 year ago

The amount of dumb people who believe a man walked on the moon in 1969 is ludicrous. But, not a surprise, I mean, just look at the state of the current world we live in. Imagine going at 24,200 km/h in space, and being able to detach the CSM, flip it, docking the lunar module, and extract it. All of this traveling at 24,200 km/h in space. Lmao. You have to be really, really dull to believe in this, and this is only in the beginning, I mean, remember the whole tank that was left behind to get out of the earth's orbit? Now they don't have any fuel to get out of Moon's orbit. They need at least a third of the fuel. But a lonely flame did it. And went to dock with the CSM which isn't anchored, is orbiting, so they had to kind of guess its location. And then they had to come back to earth. Like, cool story bro, never happened, and to be fair, most likely never will, as the new Artemis mission is only going to do a fly by. LOOl, bro, after all these years, you're telling me you can't do the same feat with a 1000x better technology? Better rockets, better engines, better transmissions, better cameras, better suits? Yeah, right. bUdGeT. And if humans will be actually able to do a fly by close to the moon's orbit it will be an amazing achievement, no doubt about it, but until then...

Fred Avolio
Fred Avolio
1 year ago

I never understood moon landing deniers. The notion that proponents have made a vast coverup, that has fooled everyone, except themselves, is hilarious. The implication is that they are all special, while the rest of us are merely deluded fools, believing everything we are spoon fed, or watched on tv. Never mind the fact that non believers, watch a few YouTube videos, and are instantly convinced. Talk about believing everything you see! Many videos are manipulated by hacks that fall for the hoax fairy tale. People have invested way to much time down their rabbit hole, to admit they are wrong. First off, some easy ones......... The Van Allen Belts are a favorite among hoax believers, as proof we never landed. Well, it's sort of like firewalkng, you don't linger in the middle, that's how you get burned. The trajectory to the moon spent as little time in the belts as possible, while going through quickly. They are scientists, that trained for all of this, not some keyboard warrior, claiming it's "fake". Another form of evidence, is there were about 8400 publicly available photos, thousands of hours of footage, mountains of scientific data, full transcripts of all air to ground conversations. Plus 382 kilograms of moon rocks samples were brought back and examined by scientists from all over the globe. They must have all been NASA shills right??? Lol. There was also third party evidence as well, independent of NASA. One of my favorite hoax claims, was the no stars thing....... Well, first problem, is it's daylight on moon!! Second, the stars are too dim to be seen on the brightly lit surface of the moon. Go out at night, and snap a picture of the night sky, and see how many stars you will see. Also, shadows appear to go in different directions on the moon. Well, the terrain plays a role as well, plus the sun isn't the only light source. The lem, moon dust, and astronauts reflect light. Just remember...... The earth is not the moon!!!. Anyhow, the Nasascam site.... Is nonsense. How do you people believe this junk??? They are claiming the same backdrop is being used in some photos. So NASA is so dumb they forgot???? Sure...... That's idiotic to think they would make that kind of mistake!!. What's actually happening, is on the moon, there is no atmosphere, so therefore, objects don't become faded out over the distance. Like here on earth, pass a large mountain, with trees in front, the trees move, but the mountain barely does. Get the picture???? It's actually a slap in the face to all the thousands of hard working people who worked on the missions just to call them all "fake" No credible source ever said the moon landings were faked, that's a load of crap. There are a bunch of know it all's online claiming the earth is flat, the moon isn't real, and the government is being controlled by shape shifting lizards. These are the kinds of geniuses we are dealing with. All paranoid, and ignoring facts, but believing lies. are actual sites with facts!! Not opinions and lunatic theories like the rest of the conspiracy sites. There are tons of sites explaining all the lies that hoax believers follow, the problem? Most won't bother to learn or listen. Many feel they know it all already. There is no moon hoax, get over it already. All conspiracy sites are filled with bad science, and misinformation, but some people just accept it as the truth. The moon landings are factual, all the deniers have, is plain ignorance. If anything goes against their "theory" is not true, and dismissed. I guess I am a paid shill then.

Shakia
Shakia
1 year ago

Ah, the old moon hoax, it's always a fun subject. It's a shame one of man's greatest achievements is doubted by some who are looking for attention on the internet. These conspiracy theorists have no good answers to anything, besides, it's all been done to death. I think many don't realize how hard it would have been to pull off a hoax. You would have to fake all the telemetry data that all the amateurs and professionals were using. All the launch missions, practice launches would be staged. When the rocket went up, the astronauts would have to have been removed, without anyone seeing them, which is not as easy as it sounds. Most of the common arguments from conspirators, are based on a lack of basic knowledge on photography, physics, cinematography, visual effects of the late 60's, radiation, and politics of the area. A total of 12 men walked on the moon, for a total of six manned missions. It's very easy to tell the truth from their "theories" , and all have been dismissed as silly, but sadly, most will never listen anyway, and they will claim they are right, and everyone else is wrong, despite all the scientific facts that prove them wrong.

Vincent Bertollini
Vincent Bertollini
1 year ago

Ok, Ok, I get it! Conspiracies galore, fake mission from the beginning?
Here is what I know. I worked on the NIKEX project on the Kwajalein Atoll in 1964. I know a bit about rockets, how they work and how good computers were and are a part of every Atlas, Titan, Saturn et al. There is absolutely no way that Apollo 11, 1969 could have landed and reconnected to the Orbitor, no possible way. Obiter at 60 miles above the surface of the moon Obiter traveling at 3760 miles per hour. After launch the partial Lander had to "jump" to altitude, turn at the exact moment (remember, this is burning fuel like crazy in this little package} and generate enough fuel and momentum toe meet this Orbiter after 3 revolutions to the so called connection of the two. ALL THIS ACCORDING TO NASA, VIDEOS, COUNTDOWNS AND MORE! I contend that is was all fake because the lander could have never taken off and hooked up with the Orbiter! There was no computing power at that time to do it and there was no way the astronauts had the wherewithal to do it! Yes, we all cheered and even wept at the adventure and we were all bamboozled. It was great for us to beat the Ruskies and set us apart from the world. I love America, served in the military with pride, and now watching everything turn to garbage with the Commies in control now!

Wreck it Ralph
Wreck it Ralph
1 year ago

Wow, people actually believe their is a moon???? Lol

Antoinette
Antoinette
1 year ago

Remember Bill Kaysing lived in a trailer with a bunch of cats, so does he really seem like a credible source? Absolutely not. Just his opinion. Some have claimed they used the same backdrops in certain scenes, wrong again. Those mountains are sometimes a mile or two away. Just like here on earth, visit mountainous terrain, then move a mile or so, the mountains are still there, only on the moon, there are no trees or bushes to block your view. Lastly, on of my favorite claims is that the astronauts were on wires. Actually it's the antenna from their backpacks. No conspiracy. One word of caution to people trying to convince hoax cheerleaders their beliefs are wrong, forget it!!! I tried, along with many others, they just won't listen. I have ran into many who make fun, call us NASA shills, sheep etc. So what their saying, is the schools are in on the hoax, as well as NASA, and the government, along with anyone else involved. Or, they will claim only the top few knew, while the others did what they were told. There is no evidence to support any of this nonsense, just the same old tired claims.

Frank
Frank
1 year ago

Bill Kaysing is one main culprit who helped start the hoax fairy tale. Since then, there have been tons of inaccurate claims made over the years. Funny part, it's all easily explained, but some just won't listen to reason, or facts. It's so easy guys! Google It! Tons of websites debunk your "evidence". It doesn't strike anyone as strange that Russia or other countries didn't call bs? Nowadays you can't get away with anything without someone finding out sooner or later. I remember years ago going the National air and space museum, learning what it took to go to the moon. Guess that was fake too.... lol. Guess we will see some more friendly comments from our official space experts... aka hoax believers. Anyway, Nasa had an answer for the moon landing deniers... "Yes we did".

Bill Fredrick
Bill Fredrick
1 year ago

Well, many claim there are no stars in any photos, so therefore it must be staged. Wrong,
it is due to the exposure times of the camera. The stars are there, they are just to dim to be picked up, due to the camera settings, something hoaxers didn't bother to research. It was also daylight on the moon as well, which also helps explain the no stars thing. Just basic photography.

James Maddox
James Maddox
1 year ago

I love a good conspiracy!! Lol however this is not one of them. How do we know there was a Titanic that sank? How do we know their was a civil war? What about the Holocaust? Its part of history, although I'm sure some claim those never happened as well. Many don't believe the landings because they distrust the government, with incidents like the Pentagon papers, and Watergate, that eroded Americans trust in their government. Most skeptics "Proof" is based on perceived anomalies in the images transmitted from the moons lunar surface. Unfortunately, they give they same old tired arguments again and again. Many should spend less time searching the illuminati, the reverse vampires, Zionists, the saucer people, and Freemasons, and take an introductory physics course. There is plenty of available information to put the hoax theory to rest, the problem is, what evidence will skeptics accept? The lunar reconnaissance orbiter took high resolution pictures from low orbit, there are thousands of photographs taken, hundreds of hours of video, rock samples brought back, and examined, telemetry books, corroboration from The Soviet Union, China, and other countries. There is also third party evidence, from neither Nasa or our government. Now this is just scratching the surface. Every single argument claiming that NASA faked the moon landings has been discredited. Personally, The Russia thing is what gets me. They would have revealed any fraud in the blink of an eye without hesitation. Of course, I do understand that usually, no evidence of any kind can convince someone who believes in a fake moon landing, so its a waste of time to even try. Today with the internet, people can manipulate facts and pictures very easily. I see many people falling for conspiracy theories, simply because some sites post misinformation. There are tons of websites debunking all the wild claims from people, the problem is, most have willful ignorance, we on the other hand, have facts. No hard feelings to anyone, believe what you want, but there were close to half a million engineers, scientists, and just regular people like us. Why has no one ever come forward then? Well, I heard a few claims that only a select few knew about the landings, the rest did as they were told. Again, not one credible source came forward. I think after the movie Capricorn one came out, it helped fuel peoples claims. I love the move, but its just fiction. Well, I'm sure this debate will continue for years to come, I don't see skeptics believing any facts no matter who or where they are from. On the bright side, thank God we are in America, so we can have freedom of speech to disagree with one another.

Sam mancino
Sam mancino
1 year ago

Derek, YOU are the only one spewing lies. The moon hoax is old news. Go back to your YouTube hideaway, and believed your foolish claims.

Sam Mancino
Sam Mancino
1 year ago

What I find interesting, is anyone can just search moon hoax, and literally there are dozens of sites explaining all the errors made by skeptics, plus debunking their claims. So what's the problem? Usually, a skeptic always goes opposite of whatever the official story is. We know Bill Kaysing was full of crap, plus Bart Sibrel, and all the other self appointed experts claiming it was all staged. Every single claim made by skeptics has been explained, but unfortunately, they will continue to spread their misinformation.

Rodney
Rodney
1 year ago

Russia would have been all over the US if anything was fake. The skeptics only have silly things like "Oh we haven't been back in years, that's proof that we haven't gone". That's just plain dumb. Lack of interest, and getting funding were the main objectives, plus it is dangerous. People should really do better research before posting their nonsensical claims. Besides, in this day and age claiming the US faked the moon landings, is just plain silly. There is so much evidence proving all the loons wrong. Most of these geniuses know little about rocket technology, or basic photography, but they sit behind a keyboard, and make bold claims, like there are no other choices, except theirs. Like people have already said, it's to big to be kept quiet for this many years. Man landed on the moon, that's a fact of history. Anyone can research and in minutes expose all these sites claiming it was staged. I can make a video, and say the earth is a square, and guess what? People will believe it.

Meredith
Meredith
1 year ago

Nice try Jada, but all photos are genuine. Just because someone is skeptical, that doesn't make it fake. Most hoax nuts ignore how thrust behaves in a vacuum, or how people claim the sun is the only light source on the moon, when it has multiple sources. Moon dust is reflective, light is reflecting off the surface of the moon, the lander, itself, and even the astronauts. Remember...... The Earth's not the moon! Take a look how the dust behaves, it falls up and right down again, exactly how it would behave in a vacuum. If it was on earth, their would be dust clouds. Some will claim they are in a giant chamber with all the air removed. Believe me, hoax claims can get ridiculous, all because they refuse facts. Many claim the missions were to perfect, but they forget all the accidents and problems associated with space travel, it's dangerous. To me, there is no use in explaining anything, some nuts will refuse all evidence contradicting their wild claims. I guess I'm a paid NASA shill as they say!

Vinnie
Vinnie
1 year ago

Every single argument that says man never walked on the moon has been discredited. All sorts of claims like no stars in the photos, the photos look fake, why haven't we been back,.no blast crater, have all been explained in detail. Usually, the skeptics ignore anything that goes against their beliefs, facts be damned. I have heard many claim the same backdrop was used for some pictures on the moon. Yeah, like NASA is going to do something stupid like that,come on guys. The lack of atmosphere causes the illusion that some mountains are close by, when they are actually far apart. Don't try and explain this to a hoax nut, they will only laugh. The no stars thing, is easily debunked, it's the camera shudder speed. The stars are there, but the camera is adjusted to see the astronauts. Try going outside with your cell phone, and take a picture of the night sky. That's a perfect example of the little things hoax believers miss and ignore. The moon landing hoax is the weakest of the conspiracy theories, simply because it's foolish, and there is no proof to support it. Every claim has been dismissed as nonsense. Any credible scientist will tell you.

Steve
Steve
1 year ago

If I wrote a book on how the sky is really green instead of blue, i bet some would believe it. That's all it takes. That or post a video with lies and misinformation, and some people will accept it as fact. That is where many of the nuts that believe the fake landings get their information from. There are many facts that debunk all skeptics claims, and it's been that way for years. Every event in history has someone claiming it never took place. The Holocaust, the Moon landings, The great depression, it goes on and on. There are dozens of websites explaining everything, so I don't get why so many people still believe in useless trash like faking a moon landing. Every single claim has been explained and fact checked, however many will go to their graves maintaining man never landed on the moon. I know I am talking to a wall, because hoaxers never listen, they just insult everyone that disagrees with their claims. So much for their " open minded " claim that they always try to push.

Ross
Ross
1 year ago

Most non believers have an attitude that they are smarter than all the hard working scientists that studied for years. That to me, is hilarious. They know little, but want to claim it's fake. They forget about how thrust behaves in a vacuum, or how reflective the moondust is. Why hasn't this been all over the news? Are they "in on it too?" Russia would have loved to expose the USA. Of course, skeptics claim all kinds of silly things, with no evidence, just their word.

Randy Sykes
Randy Sykes
1 year ago

Man never went to the moon, the earth is flat, and vaccines don't work. These are the types of people to block on social media. Most hard core skeptics, like to believe they are the only "free thinkers", in a world filled with "sheeple". There are many YouTube videos spreading inaccurate information, but facts are irrelevant to a hoax believer. Bill Kaysing is the one who helped start all this hoax mess, and there are still millions of people who still believe in this fairy tale. I can go on and on and show evidence, but really, what good is that? Hoax nuts believe everyone is in on the hoax, and the government lies 24/7, all evidence in is fake, and anyone who goes against them, is a paid NASA shill.

Carla
Carla
1 year ago

An interesting note, the conspiratards have many silly claims. Take the moonbuggy, and the no tracks claim. In some photographs, the astronauts simply walked over the tracks and wiped them out with their bootprints. To take pictures of the rover they had to get off the vehicle, and walk away from it, so it makes sense that they sometimes walked over the freshly formed tracks.in one case, on the "conspiracy" site, they had to make an improvised repair using duct tape,clamps and laminated maps, so of course they had to walk all around the fender this erasing any wheel tracks. The rover didn't have tires or solid thread. They were made of an open metallic mesh on which space titanium laminas were applied in a Chevron pattern. Now, Dereks "proof" in the last picture, is the lem which is made up gold foil, which is a sandwich of different materials. Aluminized polymide sheet, or kapton,mylar, with a sandwich of inconel skin, inconel mesh, and foil. These all keep the equipment safe from the extreme temperatures of space. Now, the outer thermal blanket is very thin, and flimsy, but it's not what provides structure support to the spacecraft. And it doesn't have to be sturdy to do its job. So Derek, your conspiracy site is wrong, just like you are with all your silly claims. Would someone believe an actual scientist or engineer who studied for years, or a graduate from YouTube University? I think you know the answer. Overall, I never expect to win any argument with a conspiratard. They refuse all facts, and everyone else is a fool, and only THEY are smart enough to know it was faked. They are blinded by their own ignorance. I tried being nice, but they just call everyone names and laugh. What's the point.
Anyway there were six manned missions to the moon
Why would the USA fake it that many times and risk getting caught? It's a dumb hoax theory. Someone would have spoken up years ago. It would be all over the news, and media. Here's something else.... Many nutjobs claim we didn't have the technology back in 69. The computer was not advanced enough. Well, look at it this way, it's like a road map vs gps. The road map is very basic, but it can get the job done. In conclusion, just because someone thinks something is a hoax, doesn't make it one. Man landed on the moon, get over it already!

Carla
Carla
1 year ago

Well Derek, your little conspiracy website is wrong . Had you actually researched instead of trying to insult everyone, and deny history, maybe you would have learned something! Skeptics post a load of easily explained lies. First off, on the moon there is no atmosphere, a lot of pictures are taken miles apart, even though they look similar. My personal favorite is the flag is waiving, when there is no wind on the moon. It's not, it is due to inertia. The flag only moves when the astronauts are securing it into the moons surface, so it flaps like a pendulum. There is less resistance, so the flag will move longer than it would here on earth. My question to you, is why would NASA make these mistakes knowing people will be cherry picking everything? They wouldn't. It's just plain silly. The rocket also had different stages as well, not just the lander on the moon that you claim is a mess. You aren't even an expert on space so why would anyone believe you? Hoax believers are the laughing stock of the internet because they never listen. You might as well go watch "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" another load of easily debunked lies.

Derek
Derek
1 year ago

apolloreality2.atspace.co.uk

Just take a look at the last picture on site.

Red Baron
Red Baron
2 years ago

Most skeptics just deny everything, and that's it. I bet they don't even know there were three stages to the Apollo Rockets. To me, arguing with any hoax believer is a waste of time, because they never listen.

Charlie
Charlie
2 years ago

Only the uneducated spread nonsense like a fake moon landing. Someone would have spoken up years ago. Russia watched our every move. So where did all the money go to fund NASA?. Most skeptics don't look at the big picture, and what's involved in a cover up. Most just make assumptions, and claims, with no proof any kind to back it up. I guess for some the truth is too dull, and they want to believe in a conspiracy, that has been discussed and thoroughly debunked numerous times. Usually, if someone denies something, it's because they haven't researched it enough, and all it takes is one or two YouTube videos , with someone claiming this, or that was fake, and some believe them, no questions asked. It's sad, but many perpetrators of a hoax profit off of gullible people falling for these stories. Remember trust...... but verify.

Randy
Randy
2 years ago

There is no hoax evidence, only paranoid individuals spreading lies. There is tons of evidence that prove humans landed on the moon. It's a shame stuff like this has to be taught. There is so much inaccurate information being spread online, and people believe it.

Melanie
Melanie
2 years ago

Most moon hoax believers don't even know there are different types of radiation. The Van Allen Belts are dangerous, but only if the astronauts lingered. The traveled through the weakest parts and did so quickly. There is a reason the scientists at NASA studied for years, unlike many of the self proclaimed hoax believers.

Sheri
Sheri
2 years ago

Anyone still hoping for a hoax is going to be out of luck, if they just do a little research. Most non believers are believing sites that are loaded with inaccurate claims, and bad science.

Kevin Hauptmann
Kevin Hauptmann
2 years ago

It's pretty safe to say the moon hoax, is a fairy tale. It has been debunked ages ago, and is about as silly as can be. However, there are still persistent people who will go to their graves maintaining we never went to the moon. Wouldn't it be all over the news if it was fake? Other countries would have pounced all over the USA for faking it. We would be the laughing stock of the world. The missions were tracked and monitored by other countries. If there was any hoax, there would be movies, exposing everyone and everything involved. Just use common sense. Capricorn One is an example, I love the movie, but it's fiction. Some will argue that Hollywood is trying to send a secret message through the movie. Any proof to support this claim? None. Some will argue that all evidence is fake. Eyewitnesses, samples from the moon, videos, pictures, all fake???? Is anything real?. Is NASA going to make all these mistakes knowing people will be cherry picking the videos? No way. I heard some claim that although thousands were involved in the landings, only a small number of people new what was really going on. Proof? Lol, and everyone else is a sheep, that has no idea what's going on? Most people don't realize the moon is not the earth. The moon is a vacuum. Let's leave all this to the experts who studied for years , and actually KNOW something about space, and rocket technology, instead of hoax believers who go on Facebook and YouTube, and simply say, " the landings were fake". Remember, a moon landing denier can claim whatever they want, but it doesn't make it true. People can make up their own opinions, but not their own facts. The landings are genuine.

Kendrick
Kendrick
2 years ago

Every answer is available on Google. All the mistakes the hoax crowd make, are there as well. Beware, the hoax crowd tends to belittle anyone who disagrees with them.

Marshall
Marshall
2 years ago

A NASA Astronaut once said, “I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond….The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we DESTROYED that technology and its a painful process to build it back again! “

Reggie
Reggie
2 years ago

If anyone does a Google search, they will see all the mistakes this mess of a video has, but sadly it's never going to end. People believe everything is a hoax, simply because they don't believe it's possible. The same thing they accuse the believers of the moon landings. there is so much evidence skeptics do not even know about. If someone comes on tv and says something never happened, that's pretty much it. They will believe them, and ignore thousands of scientists who actually worked on the missions and know something about science, and space.

Kim
Kim
2 years ago

So Bart Sibrel knows everything, and everyone else is wrong. Ok let's believe him. Lol this is so silly, I can't believe people are taken in by his lies. This mockumentary, is hilarious. It's got so many errors, it's not even funny. Well, let the skeptics go on making fools of themselves, it's what they are best at.

Jerry
Jerry
2 years ago

Bart's work has been debunked . It's a load of nonsense. I guess non believers never bothered to fact check, they just think that everyone lies, except anyone affiliated with a conspiracy. Lol. How convenient. Russia would have exposed any lies right away. Many claim the USA and Russia were working together both with their own conspiracies. Yeah......sure, and not one person exposed it. You have to admit these sites are loaded with some interesting claims.

Jeff Cohen
Jeff Cohen
2 years ago

We'll, I say keep the non believers around, it's fun seeing just how uninformed they are with all the misinformation they spread.

Elizabeth
Elizabeth
2 years ago

What's the point in trying to teach hoaxers anything? They aren't going to believe you, regardless of what they are shown. Man did not have the technology to fake a moon landing in 1969. These people are blinded by their own ignorance. Every question they can dream up has been explained. There were six manned missions, why would NASA risk getting caught that many times? That's insane. I'm sure some smart person will have some silly comment on why it's a hoax, and why believers are wrong.

Paul
Paul
2 years ago

Skeptics should watch the way the moon buggy kicks up dust, it falls up and right down again. It doesn't produce clouds, like on earth. That's exactly what would happen in a vacuum. Of course the hoaxers will simply say it's fake, or it's a giant sound stage with all the air taken out. That's why non one takes them seriously.

Jen
Jen
2 years ago

The film used by the astronauts was special temperature resistant and radiation proof. Also they are in a vacuum unlike here on earth. There are different types of radiation. Do skeptics think NASA just faked everything? Lol they studied for years to learn all about space and radiation. Unlike the hoax believers . Skeptics are sure hurting for education. All this information is available to anyone if the just do a Google search. I guess that's to hard for people like Henry to do. Lol. Just believe everything they are told by their King old Bart, the total lunatic. No, there is nothing wrong with asking questions, or questioning what we are told, however this hoax junk is old news. I guess some people hate being told what they believe is wrong. As someone said, any fakery would be all over the news, and all the other countries would have exposed the USA. There is still the persistent bunch that will not accept any fact , or evidence, as long as it goes against their theory. You also can't even have a conversation with any of them, as they will belittle you and just call you names. They are a sad bunch.

Sophie
Sophie
2 years ago

It's also possible to create dinosaurs from mosquitoes the way they did in Jurassic park, but the government is keeping it a secret. Lmao Yeah, people like Henry are all over the internet spreading their nonsense. Another graduate from YouTube University. First of all, temperature extremes refer to the lunar surface from which the films were insulated by a vacuum. Temperatures were far lower because they landedon the moons shortly after the beginning of the two week long lunar day at the landing sites. The film's used were also a heat resistant type used for high altitude reconnaissance, and the cameras were treated to reflect the heat from direct exposure from the sun which is comparable with the heat from sunlight on a mountaintop on earth. There are many misconceptions about temperatures in space. Non believers need to do actual research, instead of calling everyone "dorks". The internet is a great tool, just be careful of bad science like Barts mess of a documentary. There are many facts available online debunking any hoax about the moon landings. It's a shame some people don't have faith in what man can accomplish.

henry
henry
3 years ago

Wow! I bet all these believers also think Bin Laden had something to do with 9-11 . Incredible to see these DORKS criticize those who were shown valid information refuting these events. As a photographer, there is no possible way any film could survive surface temperatures on the moon. Has anyone of the believers even looked this up ? At 350F , where is the climate control in the suits showing out-going exchange of gasses ? Lead lined carriers for film would be forbidden extra weight. Wearing thick gloves makes it impossible to focus or operate smoothly the camera. Bart Sibrel has it right. The 2 competent accomplished speakers here are saying something basic to how it couldn't be done . My YT channel has an entire playlist of moon hoax videos (Fluteristic) . The perplexed expressions at news conferences unable to utter a prepared response to basic questions tells you they are winging it. The materials available can't withstand heat from friction on landers. Do more research before you dismiss the doubters. Go back and watch "Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" . Or remain stoopid.

Dwayne
Dwayne
3 years ago

Many hoax believers don't even know the science behind their silly claims. Conspiracy theorists are in denial.

Mark Eborn
Mark Eborn
3 years ago

Many open minded thinkers, aka conspiracy theorists love Bart Sibrel, Bill Kaysing, and all the other self appointed experts that clam all the landings were fake. These men have no credibility but they spew the nonsense people want to hear. People just love conspiracies, they are way more exciting than saying man landed on the moon. However it is just a bunch of lies. Now really, one can never win any debate with any person claiming we cannot go to the moon, all they will do is argue, they have their minds made up, and nothing can convince them, that they are wrong. Some have even said they still wouldn't believe it even if they were taken to the landing sites and had a look for themselves. The problem? Most of these people do not even have a clue what goes on at Apollo, they just sit back on their computer, and deny anything they do not understand.

Henry somma
Henry somma
3 years ago

Well, you can tell from the amount of ignorant comments from people like Buck Wheat, that most of these space experts never even read a book, or ever did any research. It must be hard to get out from under that rock! Another graduate from Youtube University. Maybe Buck Wheat can make the non essential employee of the month this year. I wouldn't take anything these people say seriously, most of them do not want to learn, they just want to argue, and say that everything they don't understand is fake. The education system has failed again...........