The Bible Unearthed

The Bible Unearthed

6.45
12345678910
Ratings: 6.45/10 from 259 users.

The Bible UnearthedThe Bible is both a religious and historical work, but how much is myth and how much is history? When and why was the Old Testament written, and by whom? What do contemporary archaeologists know about the Patriarchs? The Exodus?

The Conquest of Canaan? Kings David and Solomon? Where do the people of Israel originally come from? Why were the historical accounts of the Bible written down?

A masterful archaeological and biblical investigation, The Bible Unearthed visits digs in Egypt, Jordan and Israel - including Megiddo, the cradle of biblical archeology, where 7,000 years of history have been excavated.

This far-ranging exploration of biblical history also makes use of archival footage of previous archaeological excavations, maps, biblical illustrations and computer animation, revealing ancient architecture, cuneiform tablets and other rare artifacts.

Based on the best-selling book of the same name, this enthralling documentary features interviews with archaeological specialists and biblical scholars from all over the world, including experts from the Louvre, the Museum of Cairo, the Museum of Jerusalem, and the British Museum.

The Bible Unearthed does something which has never been done before: it reveals a still-unraveling revolution of what we know of the society, the history, and the men who wrote the Bible.

More great documentaries

798 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rachel Buchner
Rachel Buchner
11 years ago

You know what there's really no point arguing, everyone has a bias, we process stuff through are bias if facts go against what we believe we discard it, if facts go towards what we believe we accept it. That true of all humans.

jezz12
jezz12
11 years ago

On this subject of Exodus being dis-proven. Way back before the start of creation, when there was war in heaven, between Micheal and his angels against Lucifer and his angels, this war evidently was over the rest day, the sabbath day, where Lucifer also wanted to be exalted above God, praised, worshiped, by rest of the Heavenly angels on this day of rest. O.K now in Genesis when the Earth was created in 6 days and on the 7th the Lord rested blessed it hallowed it for the the rest of generations to come. Now with Exodus and the Ten Commandments especially the 4th commandment to remember the Sabbath day to keep it Holy. Well to those who think that this is a whole lot of mumbo jumbo! Well in history if you look into what Constantine had done to this 4th commandment through Catholicism, and a time which was recorded as The Dark Ages where Catholicism suppressed the scriptures, death or torture was the penalty if found in possession of a bible. What I am trying to get at is I'm not blaming Catholicism or any other denomination but there is a dark force that is rearing it's head down through the generations. Now they want to take the book of Exodus out of the equation, or could it be this 4th commandment that Satan despises. Who or what is he going to influence next to oppose or destroy the Bible the Scriptures and it's followers...as the saying goes history's repeating its' self.

fender24
fender24
11 years ago

Catalepsy! i know of that, funny u bring it up im sure there are hundreds of illnesses i can come up with which fits this events. It's the science answer to everything they can't explain:D, just like Paralyze sleeping. Please i guess youre intelligence can think outside the box, u got any personal experience?. What do u think happen when we die? Do u think there is more advanced civilizations in the universe? Why did u choose to message me if u do not believe in this?
I base my evidence from my personal belief, experience and what people i know have told me. My mother has 40 years of experience with healthcare. in the operation department and home nursing, she know kids have died . U just dont believe it and its fine, but dont go around saying they are delusional and call me a lier then do youre research. I'm not insulting you here cause i dont know you., but acording to what u wrote it seems like you ignore the evidence of exodus Ron Wyatt proves what im saying. That there are people who do not believe the biblical accounts of the ancient history of the Israelites is not new. What is new in "Doubting the Story of the Exodus" (LA Times, April 13, 2001) is that doubt seems to have been turned into historical fact. Readers were told that there is a consensus of biblical historians and archaeologists that the Exodus did not happen. In reality, though, no such consensus actually exists.

Vern Miles Dillon
Vern Miles Dillon
11 years ago

christianity's paradigm: humankind is born a sinner because of the Fall, and jesus saves humankind by people creating organizations that expand globally to convert other people to the worldview.

there was no fall.

at the end of chapter three of the genesis, god said:" Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever."

The serpent said this before god: "For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."

Read Genesis from chapter 1 to 3.
read it mindfully.
see if you can see a pattern with me: a pattern of god blessing his creation as good, and blessing it to be fruitful;
a pattern of god's power being transfered to his creation;
a sociolization of male domanice;
and most excitingly, what were the words of adam? did he ever worshopped god when he was created, and what did he say to "the women" after god cursed them to a difficult life?
- not what st paul hoped.

also, what was eve's motive to eat from the tree of knowledge? was it for "a desire to be wise"?

in chapter two gives the motive for god to create man: "the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground." he then made man out of dust. better than a monkey or alien methink.

read the genesis friends.
what i was doing is called many things, like deconstruction or induction, or maybe critical reading.

my ending two cents is the first verse in the bible where the letter iee is used to signife self-awareness, and it doesnt began with god, but with adam and the women after they ate of the fruit and realized that it was cold:

"And when the woman saw that the tree was GOOD for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be DESIRED to make one WISE, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the COOL of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.

9And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?

10And he said, iiiiiiiiiiiii heard thy voice in the garden, and iiiiiiiii was afraid, because iiiiii was naked; and iiiiiiiiiiii hid myself.

And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked?"
pause...
What a question.
who told you that you were naked?
was that shame? i think not.
for god at the end of the myth gives meaning and control over our lives -or why life is difficult: said this, "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." (no hell, but dirt.)

And! right after, hear what adam said: And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living." not a bitch.

___ANd to futher dive into the weather, the next verse writes, "Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them." (not so angry.)

lastly:

"And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

23Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken." (motive)

Attention: google map the flaming sword!
So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of EdeN...a FLAMeING SWORD which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life."

plato and many say that immortality is the ultimate goal. thaT's wHy i belive in jesus: so i can live forever with the Good or God. then why not go to the tree of life instead? because it is humankinds journey to "become" like "one of us." fore the serpent was in the Know, and -THERE IS NO FLAMEING SWORD TO GUARD THE TREE OF LIFE IN REAL LIFE! THUS IT MUST BE SYMBOLIC! AND TAKEN AS SUCH.

READ THE GENESIS INDUCTIVELY. THERE WAS NO FALL, THUS NO SIN, THUS NO SAVIOR. ONLY A WORLDVIEW TO BRING MEANING AND CONTROL.

the genesis was written after other epics. life was hard before langague.

forgive me for my sins: spelling, structure, focus, gram. etc. i hope you coperhend my writting as pieces of a puzzle, and you read the chapters of genesis and complete a freshing picture.

Jeremy
Jeremy
11 years ago

Gotta love the religious people immediately claiming this is all bogus, when in fact, it is supported more by history, than their own bibles. Get a hint people, don't fall for the good ol' "Sky cake" myth. Grow up and get a life.

David
David
11 years ago

In the final passages of Exodus Moses has an argument with God. God has given the Ten Commandents to Moses and they both see that the Israelites are worshipping a golden calf (an egyptian deity) and God says that he is going to smite them. Moses says that the Lord has brought them out of bondange, brought the seven plagues on Egypt to do so, made him part the waters and drowned Pharoahs army to keep them safe, and now your're going to kill them? God relents. In the ancient world, one did not argue with a god, let alone win the argument. Who was he talking to?

mingala123
mingala123
12 years ago

interesting and beautiful presentation but I was wondering why they put stupid music background in most of the documentary film. Some are even worse.

Jo McKay
Jo McKay
12 years ago

Okay, this is an IMO of the documentary and some 'best rated' comments. Is this worth watching? Yes Absolutely. However, it will challenge some to stay awake and may need a few viewings as a result (this narrator truly has a calling to do meditation and sleep tapes). Honestly at first view I fell 'asleep' (more then dozed off) at least 3x; then after a full and refreshing night's rest I tried again and even though I was genuinely interested, still wanted to 'drift off' a few times! HA. I sincerely doubt the producers intended that effect.
So, if you can stay focused, you may discover the evidence that 'writing' laws and rules of conduct (and Histories btw) were the business of Governments & Kings. The generally accepted reason that so many rulers of antiquity built huge monolithic structures or monuments to themselves,was because they knew the 'next' kings/rulers would try to wipe out any history of previous rulers; in fact wherever and whenever possible heroic stories of previous people would be 'borrowed' and written into the histories of current kings. Ever has been the case, whether in writing a history (his story- almost always his, and definitely a 'story') or building a structure to leave as a legacy... As the doc demonstrates (with 'evidence') in the 7th century BCE, increased settlement and literacy led a minor King Josiah to begin the 'writing' of religious stories. His intention seems to have been the hopes of bringing all the mixed tribes together under one heroic God, providing both a fantastic past for the history of the people and a messianic (hope filled, someday) future. It worked and for the next few hundred years, other kings added and edited what by about 300 BCE would become the Judaic bible. - This is not a huge surprise to scientists and theologians; it is however, the shear numbers of evidence stacked that concerns current religious leadership in how they can 'spin these kinds of findings'. The FACTS, when added to how much of history in the past 2000 years has become more accessible and transparent (though there is much still lost from book burnings and conquerors/colonialists re-writing of histories) in My (humble :) Opinion, point to the 7th Century as the beginning of Social Control through religious written text, by and for the benefit of the ruling elite.
Without question, 'history' proves that it is much much easier to rule a people who emotionally and culturally 'belong' to a religion with a doctrine that is, and can be constantly flexible to upgraded interpretation. Rulers simply need to 'own' the preachers, then they can 'own the people'.
Now you can know where it all started, and why?

oddsrhuge
oddsrhuge
12 years ago

I love labels...In fact in my "next" life I want to be in charge of the "sticker" department. Then I can coin and print the bumper stickers:

Evolutionist
Creationist
Atheist
Christian

My favourites, however, would include those, never cited in this type of argument. Like:

Acceptance
Tolerance
Curiosity
Intelligence
Open Minds
Sanity
Peace (for peace's sake...not because all your enemies are dead)

I guess in "my perfect world" nobody uses a label to oppress another group or individual.

Sorry, obviously I am not taking my meds again.

Craig Holsey
Craig Holsey
12 years ago

now why don't you guys do a doc. called "unearthing the Book of Mormon"
then we all would be amazed ! at all the the the red dots on your forehead
from laser gun sights the richest church of man would have you killed because there nothing to find ! it's like the higgs bozon ! it's all church of man and has nothing to do with truth

Craig Holsey
Craig Holsey
12 years ago

anything with finkelstein in it is not credible

Richard Shannon
Richard Shannon
12 years ago

I'd like to posit a conditional question. Were Biblelover's ideas of religion, Christianity, God, The Trinity, The Catholic Church, Muslims, etc. etc. etc. all true and confirmed to you beyond any doubt whatsoever in whatever way were necessary, would you actually change your tune and start to worship and adore his version of the Christian God?

Personally, I would still find him too much of a narcissist and wierdo (God that is, Biblelover doesn't seem overly narcissistic to me), but I might give him a quick "thanks for the ride".

oddsrhuge
oddsrhuge
12 years ago

God created “sentient beings”. Otherwise, we could all be like dogs and smell one another's butts with impunity. THAT was his first mistake. (Leaving “pot” growing everywhere was his second)

But God is infallible....now I’m REALLY confused....therefore, it must be the devil? Is he like the banker that god has to go to, to get a loan for a miracle?

oddsrhuge
oddsrhuge
12 years ago

The "angels" of section 92...IE: the "typing pool". Sure...I will advance this theory.

Somebody "prove" me wrong.

yallcomebacknowuhear
yallcomebacknowuhear
12 years ago

Does anyone else find it ironic that the Edinburgh scientists have named their new subatomic particle the "God particle"? Strange how they don't believe in God yet they recognize he is the one who created these particles to begin with. Makes them seem to be a hypocrite, don't you think?

robertallen1
robertallen1
12 years ago

@Epicurus and Achems_Razor

I'm curious. Have you read any of Bart Ehrman's books and if so, what do you think?

Richard Shannon
Richard Shannon
12 years ago

My father recently got remarried, and he decided to visit the Creationism Museum in Kentucky for his honeymoon (I know, how romantic!).

The point being, I stopped trying to have these conversations with him years ago because they are absolutely pointless. Best of luck to you guys, but find a more difficult target, this one is too easy.

(Hint to Biblelover) If you want to best these guys in an argument, get back to the documentary we are supposed to be commenting on. It is such a big pile of garbage, you can make anybody look like a fool who tries to use its contents to attack Christianity.

biblelover
biblelover
12 years ago

I believe in God, not the devil,however he exists and is the adversary.We have victory in Christ by the blood and the name.Jesus destroys the works of the devil I read the book-I know who wins.

Richard Shannon
Richard Shannon
12 years ago

Yeah man, had those read back in the 8th grade, but even in 5th I knew animal domestication dates back 10's of thousands of years, so the first millennium mark seemed a bit specious.

Richard Shannon
Richard Shannon
12 years ago

It's around 36:30 when the silly girl says, "According to the archeological evidence, the camel could not have been domesticated as a beast of burden before the first millennium BC."

Which is proven false by all of Epicurus's sources, and quite frankly, common sense.

hayesane
hayesane
12 years ago

The Big Bang Theory is a scientific assumption=full of "Maybes" and "uncertainties". Even evolution is also an assumption by Charles Darwin..It is God who created all...

Only a fool will say, "There is no God!"

Richard Shannon
Richard Shannon
12 years ago

Wow, that was my first comment here, I didn't realize we needed footnotes, but it seems someone has beat me to the punch. But really, did we need to look it up? I mean it seemed completely illogical to me such a late date for the domestication of an animal that begs to be domesticated, especially in that area of the world. What is more troubling is that this "scholar" went on to say that there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever for the camel's domestication in East Asia before this date, which is a downright prevarication as proven by several sources including those mentioned below.

Richard Shannon
Richard Shannon
12 years ago

Not many comments about the doc. It was basically garbage, there is no evidence of Camel domestication before 1000 BC.??? Come on, I knew that was a downright falsehood the moment it rolled off his tongue, nevertheless I looked it up just to be sure, before calling it out here.

biblelover
biblelover
12 years ago

Anyways Ive decided not to preach if possible on here anymore because I just end up getting a bunch of hate mail.And another thing I found out is that I am wrong or could be wrong about the earth being only 6 thousand years old,however,during my sabbath it came upon my heart to look up the first earth age and this gave me some answers.I still believe that this current civalisation is only 6 to 14 thousand years old.So I repent of my mistakes and peace to you all.

robertallen1
robertallen1
12 years ago

@C_and_N

And I never had any respect for you--but Epicurus phrases it far more elegantly than I can.

robertallen1
robertallen1
12 years ago

I expected you to turn it into something silly--anything in the name of your idiotic beliefs.

If you break your leg, are you going to beg (pray) your god to heal it, are you going to consult a faith healer or are you going to visit an orthopedist? If the plumbing in hour house fails, who are you going to call in, a diety or a plumber?

A lot has happened since the bible was codified.

yallcomebacknowuhear
yallcomebacknowuhear
12 years ago

It amazes me how so many self proclaimed geniuses continually prove themselves to be just the opposite on this forum. Why do you find it so necessary to belittle others? Is it to make you feel better about yourself? Be careful it's a long way to fall off that high horse your sitting on.

over the edge
over the edge
12 years ago

for anyone new to this discussion let me break down the last couple of days
in my made up discussion
biblelover- i am right because the bible tells me so
everyone else- how do you know the bible is correct?
biblelover- because it is the word of god
lulu- look at me i am bat freaking nuts ( not a direct quote but close enough)
everyone else-up the dosage lulu
everyone else- how do you know it is the word of god?
biblelover- because the bible tells me so therefore i am right
everyone else- (bangs head on keyboard)
biblelover now on to science. it is wrong because i don't understand it and somebody told me some crazy things that i believed without confirming.
charles- (can't remember it exactly but compared to the others on the side of religion it seemed rational and he agreed with some science)
everyone else_ hey biblelover here are some facts and evidence supporting the scientific claims
biblelover- these facts are wrong and i am wight because the bible tells me so
overtheedge ouch is this what an aneurysm feels like? forget it stop the bus i will walk the rest of the way

robertallen1
robertallen1
12 years ago

@Epicurus

I read through the site you recommended. Seems dense and awfully speculative. Cannot see how it relates to the issues I raised. Perhaps you can enlighten me.

LouSipher
LouSipher
12 years ago

@biblelover
you need more attention than we can give you here. Quite obviously your god ignores you badly. Might as well give up ... nobody has seen any god ever ... sorry my mistake ... i have ... i have seen the godfather ;-)

biblelover
biblelover
12 years ago

Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?Tell me,if you have understanding?Who determined its measurements?Surely you know! Or who stretched the line upon it.To what were its foundations fastened?Or who laid its cornerstone.When the mourning stars sang together.And all the sons of God shouted for joy.Or who shut the sea with doors.When it burst forth and issued from the womb.When I made the clouds its garment,And thick darkness its swaddling band.Have the gates of death been revealed to you?Or have you seen the doors of the shadow of death?Have you comprehended the breadth of the earth?Tell Me if you know all this.Have you entered the treasury of snow,Or have you seen the treasury of hail,Which I have reserved for the time of trouble,For the day of battle and war?By what way is light diffused,Or the east wind scattered over the earth?Can you bind the cluster of of Plieiades.Or loose the belt of Orion?All mankind and all the brilliant sciencetists,archologists and the rest of them have no idea how powerful the eternal Almighty God really is and either do I.Its incomprehensible,but I know this I choose to fear Him,love Him and keep his commandments.

biblelover
biblelover
12 years ago

Does anybody know what this knew bill they just are trying to put into law.Apparently its a felony.Thats the US gov for you.Pretty soon ,if not already they are reading our e-mail to see who the dissedents are.Thats ok If they get me its my time.flesh and blood cant go into the kingdom. The way I understand we will have to die for our faith.No rapture.

Achems_Razor
Achems_Razor
12 years ago

I see the religee's are still at it, at least they are on the right doc.

These "fundamentalists" (crazies) breeds, Christianity and such are basically a new disease/virus of the mind. They have mutated in a span of about 150 years.

Now of course they are mutating even faster now because of the information highway, the net.

Epicurus
Epicurus
12 years ago

knew from the start it was a waste of time to comment to lulu and biblelover.

what is the point in talking to people who believe in magic? what is the use? you cant use logic and reason to change someones mind when they didnt use logic and reason to get to that position in the first place.

saying things like "why arent we still evolving" shows VERY little education. if someone is able to ask a question so stupid, perhaps they should realize they dont have enough information to even question evolution.

lulu went from the bible to UFOs to HAARP all in one post...if that doesnt scream uneducated and delusional i would say that the patients have taken over the asylum.

Guest
Guest
12 years ago

I know what one doesn't sound like.

Guest
Guest
12 years ago

Haha,looks like I'm a man again :)

Guest
Guest
12 years ago

The under standing of one's perception of spirituality should never be shared, because no one can perceive it the same way. Most people who comment on religious books or on the meaning of life make their comment on the words of someone they read or heard, not on the original thoughts that would have sprouted from reading or feeling it personnaly.
Nothing can create more opposition than discussing one's view of the whys and hows of fundamental values of life itself, even within people of same religion.
We can argue physical reality because in the end it can be proven or disproven, not so with the intangible....we take it to death and do not take it back from death.
az

Qbmc Qman
Qbmc Qman
12 years ago

Is this a Seventh Day Adventist website? SDA Video?

robertallen1
robertallen1
12 years ago

@Biblelover

I'm just curious. Do you agree with Deuteronomy 25:11-12:

"If men strive together, one with another, and the wife of the one draweth near for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth him, and putteth forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets:

"Then thou shalt cut off her hand, thine eye shall not pity her."

over the edge
over the edge
12 years ago

hey guys, i think you are being too hard on biblelover i mean the bible is full of useful information. as he/she mentions the 10 commandments well the first three are about worshiping god i know but he has a confidence problem so that is understandable, the rest are great i mean who hasn't wanted to covet his neighbors donkey ? and i am sure the rest weren't illegal or immoral before the commandments. also i can't count the number of times i needed a guide as to how to treat my slaves and what if i beat one so bad they die. " However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 "or " When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 " and for the new testament fans "47 "That servant who knows his master's will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows. 48 But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows. From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked. ." (Luke 12:47-48"and this is just a taste of the great information contained in the bible. if you need to know when it is ok to rape,or why you hate homosexuals or just want to kill foreigners all the while getting the blessing of god this book is for you

Elmo Putz
Elmo Putz
12 years ago

This site proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that none are more religiously zealous than Atheists!

Achems_Razor
Achems_Razor
12 years ago

There is such a thing as religious addiction, religion is a mind disease, a mental disorder, for me it is similar to mad cow disease.

"The god of the old testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction, jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser, a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."

Richard Dawkins, "The God Delusion

Top_Quark
Top_Quark
12 years ago

@C_and_N, I must admit that I couldn’t have been as damning as roberallen1 even if I had wanted to. You started with the old Jesus vs Alexander analogy which many Christian fundamentalists refer to. First you have to compare apples to apples. Alexander wasn’t depicted in history as a messiah or a god or son of god but a soldier, military leader/conqueror who left many historical and cultural traces of his military conquests in far away regions. The correct analogy would be Jesus and somebody like Krishna, Osiris, Mithras, Dionysus, or even Abraham & Moses (even though these 2 were not worshipped).

You assumed that I was an atheist on the basis that I had implied that maximalism was bunk and minimalism has far more evidence in its favour. The fact is that in the 21st century maximalist scholars or archaeologists are not taken seriously anymore not because the whole world is turning anti-Christ but because there is overwhelming evidence that debunks biblical stories not only from an archaeological perspective but from a host of scientific disciplines including cosmology, geology, paleontology, biology, anthropology etc. Apart from some well-funded fundamentalist biblical archaeologists, all biblical scholars/archaeologists are now minimalists.

Therefore the bible is far from being a ‘written record’ as you claim. It has got at least some things right such as names of ancient towns and people. The ‘entire group of people’ that you mention could be Hittites who went undiscovered until the early 20th century. But the Bible mentions Hittites as a small Canaanite tribe living in the hills when in fact they lived far to the north in modern-day Turkey and had a strong empire that rivaled Egypt and Assyria. So, it is still disputed whether the biblical Hittites were the Hittites of Hattusa or yet another case of biblical anachronism (like so many other inconsistencies that are shown in this documentary).

Archaeology offers both confirmation of parts of the biblical record and also poses challenges to the naive interpretations made by some. Careful examination of the evidence demonstrates that the historical accuracy of the first part of the Old Testament is greatest during the reign of Josiah and the accuracy diminishes the further backwards one proceeds from this date. This seems to confirm that a major redaction of the texts seems to have occurred at about that date.

Samuel Morrissey
Samuel Morrissey
12 years ago

The bible unearthed? My advice would be to bury it again, preferably under some nuclear waste. Failing that, put it on the shelf in its proper place next to 'Lord of the Rings' - both are largely fantasies, and both contain valuable moral lessons.

biblelover
biblelover
12 years ago

Lets ask the sea(beast)what her mark is? Of course the Catholic church claims that the change(Sabbath to Sunday)was her act,and the act as a MARK of her ecclesiastical authority.Sunday is our Mark of authority...the church is above the Bible,and this transference of Sabbath observance is proof of that fact-Catholic Record of London,Ontario Sept 1 1923.The land beast (USA)will enforce this Mark by law in the near future.Check Sunday law in America on youtube.The church is not above the bible,and does this mean if you are going to church on Sunday you have the mark.No,until it is enforced and we can"t buy or sell will be the test.Rev.22v14 Blessed are those who do His commandments,that they may enter through the gates into the city.

LuLu
LuLu
12 years ago

The 666 refers to the 6th vile, the 6th trump and the 6th seal in the book of Revelations. That's when the anti-christ (aka the beast, death, serpent and a bunch of other names) comes pretending to be Jesus and performing fake miracles and supernatural wonders that fools a lot of the world into praying to him and following him. The true Jesus Christ comes in on the 7th trump 7th seal and the 7th vile and kicks butt and takes names !!! So don't trust the first one he's a fake !!! I sure do love my God, he's so good to me !!! :)

biblelover
biblelover
12 years ago

I know that God(Jesus)exits because of happened to me at my last Biblestudy.It was better than any drug (which I stopped)Glory to God.The Holy Spirit came to me plus the miracles in my life are well documented by others including doctors,No Binny Hinn about it . Too bad there is false teachers out there giving Jesus a bad name.Spirituality Is God given and religion is man-made usually its more of a business.They will have to explain that on judgement day.

Top_Quark
Top_Quark
12 years ago

The minimalists’ argument also suggests that the creation of the modern Zionist state in Israel on the basis of the Bible (Jews’ divine right to return to their promised land and all related propaganda) is not justified if the biblical stories were simply made up. Even Finkelstein, who perceives a political will at work behind the biblical texts, has received a lot of criticism in Israel for his work from conservative elements in the society that are aware of what it means for the Biblical underpinnings of Zionism.

Cool E Beans
Cool E Beans
12 years ago

Who wants to know the name of the Beast?

Using a single sheet of lined paper, write the letters A through Z on the left hand side. Next to each letter (you can put in a dash - or = sign) write the numbers 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 etc. so that A-6, B-12, C-18 through Z.

Then write the following letters (in alphabetical order) in a column in the middle of the page.

C E M O P R T U

Find the values of each letter (C-18, E-30 etc.) and add them to find the total. If done correctly these letters add up to 666. Now unscramble the letters.

You should find that this Beast can identify you by markings in your hand or in your forehead.

If you need more explanation, just ask.

Yeung Xiao
Yeung Xiao
12 years ago

Information dense and dramatic music light, the way a doc should be.