Guns and Ammo
Thomas Morton goes to Albuquerque to check out the new face of school security, and Shane Smith travels to old battlefields of Iraq to see what the ongoing cost of war is when the shooting finally stops.
After the bloodbath in Newtown Connecticut the unceasing debate over gun control in United States reached a highly agitated state. Both sides think they're categorically right and no one is willing to see the middle ground.
Since one of the most intense battles is over whether equipping the teachers with weapons will make schools safer, Thomas went to a school where they actually practice that. Lillie Allen is the principal of New Life Baptist Academy, a church school in Albuquerque with 250 students, 20 teachers, and at least 5 loaded firearms distributed among them.
So every pupil at New Life, from the youngest all the way up to seniors, are involved in active marksman training. It's mostly basic drill, just instead of preparing for a disaster; they're getting prepared for an armed lunatic coming into their doors.
The problem with armed conflict is, it's always far worse than we assume it's going to be. It's not manly bullet grazes and bruises; it's rather permanent disabilities and death. And sometimes the repercussions of war are even worse.
One of the first ways that Iraqi found out about their country's after-war environmental disaster was that lot of people were coming into the hospitals with radiation contamination. At first doctors didn't know why, but soon concluded that they were all scrappers. They were collecting parts from trucks, tanks and helicopters, and all the obsolete scrap that had been bombarded during the war, and then they found out that all of this junk is actually radioactive.
Now of course we are all aware that war is awful. But we don't know just how awful until it's over. Because the weapons used in modern armed conflict have horrible and lasting effects, long after the bloodshed has stopped.
Anti USA Doc Simple and sweet...makes us out looking like gun nuts and war criminals....maybe both are true but this is pretty one sided.
Going to the range and shooting can be just as relaxing as spending some time on the golf course. My (A)rmalite (R)ifle model 10 hasn't ever been pointed and fired by itself. It takes an operator to do that! Personally some people shouldn't have guns, but that doesn't mean that they should be banned for the whole population. Just look into democide over the last century. When the population gets disarmed tyranny finds a home.
Is this a documentary? Technically, these are two special reports in a sort of '60 Minutes' format. Although I found them both informative, I wonder if they belong embedded here plucked from their appropriate location on the Youtube Vice Channel. It's hard to rate or recommend two such disparate stories.
"this is the world through our eyes" ... epic fail quote from a supposed news source. That's like trying to be a cop and saying "these are the people i don't like and want to arrest" ... when vice gonna wake up and be objective already? THEY ... ARE ... NOT .. NEWS.. if they're not gonna be objective.
I suppose the bloodmath is just a bad joke! Never the less its a nice documentary
oufff! what have we came to? first the school, have they watched the movie 'red dawn' too often or what? it s not a question of outside invasion that caused the shooting in the schools, it was uncontrolled harassment, the shooters felt that they had been judged by their pairs, I have nt heard them talk about preventing that at anytime, what about those armed teachers? what if they fall in depression? they now have a gun, is nt there any danger that they might use it? don t they get that the aggressors might be even more ruthless because they know that they have guns? how about that old lady? how hard could it be to snatch her purse, and get her gun? they might feel safer having one, but, really, they are not, these things don t happen on impulse, every incident was planned a few days ahead, not knowing which teacher has a gun, makes sense shooting them all... radical behavior calls for radical response, I wish them luck, and that they one day come to their senses to find a better way to deal with this issue. as for irak, depleated uranium? who the heck was the nut who authorised such weapons? the u.s. will now have to face generations of angry people, such atrocity! what horror! it makes saddam look like a party animal! everytime I look at irak issues, it looks worse and worse, god knows how and when we will ever get the wrongs fixed right for those people where will they ever get the strength to forgive us? shame on those responsible!
Can't watch this in my country :( Ah well, I'll just stick my headphones on and relax with Junior Murvin.
"police and thieves in the street
Scaring the nation with their guns and ammunition ....."
After spending most of my adult life unscrewing my head from the screwed up childhood I had in an evangelical christian home about how the devil was going to get his sharp claws into me & I would face an eternity in hell if I sinned, I can only imagine how these children will grow up into emotionally & mentally scarred adults with the knowledge of a real flesh & blood "bad guy" always out to get them.
I have only recently regarded my upbringing as child abuse. With what these poor children are going through, I can only say: I would not want to be around them when they are adults. These people are abusing their rights as parents & teachers & potentially raising an entire generation of unstable, paranoid children who will ultimately become a threat to each other & society as a whole unless they too discover reality, further education & seek alternate lifestyles than that which they are being raised in.
This is extreme child abuse & no different than recruiting child soldiers in war torn countries frowned upon by the west. Very frightening.
Ha, Ha. They went to Albuquerque. The cops are the real problem in Albuquerque these days!
First Sentence: "Bad Guy's coming"... Good vs Bad duality, what a brainwash. P "You guys are getting ready to die if your not paying any attention"
teaching tactical emergency drills for children and adults is a great idea. Especially those of: fire evacuation, hand to hand combat (including weapons disarmament), even disaster relief is right.
As it trains the mind as well.
Although; first and foremost firearms, do not belong anywhere near a school. Its just decreasing the amount of potential variables, that lead to firearm related injuries or deaths.
I agree that this should have been two documentaries instead of one. The title doesn't make any sense either. "Giving Schoolteachers Guns and Giving Iraqi Babies Radiation Poisoning with Uranium Ammo" would not have made a good title either, but It would make more sense and would have related better to the actual content. I wonder; Did they not have enough footage to make a full documentary about either subject? Shifting back and forth between the these two disparate subjects with no seque really bothered me. The only thing that Iraq has in common with New Mexico is that they are both deserts. Unless the schoolteachers are also using depleted uranium ammo and giving their pupils cancers I just can't make the connection.
I wonder about the approach 'Vice' takes to documenting sometimes. Here they have two somewhat tenuously related issues given a few minutes each and crammed into a 29 minute slot. I suppose doing things this way you reach an audience that you wouldn't otherwise but conversely you never give either subject any kind of in depth treatment. Perhaps it's only right that the onus is on the viewer to follow up on anything they find of interest. Is that the intent? I don't know.
I won't comment on the first segment other than to say I found it absolutely bizarre to see kids in a 'school' been put through that silly training charade.
It was interesting that during the second segment they brought up the U.S. usage of 'Agent Orange' during the Vietnam war but still stopped short with the depleted Uranium comparison. To say that they didn't want to give up using the depleted Uranium weaponry because of the tactical advantage it offered is disingenuous to say the least. It's about maximizing long lasting damage, impressing the enemy with the atrocities you are prepared to inflict and yet keeping exposure of all this just below the point where there's a turning point in international outrage. It's why they didn't carpet bomb civilian population centres on the scale they really wanted to during Vietnam, why 'Agent Orange' was so much more effective.