9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out
For preview only. Get it on Amazon.com  #ad.

9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out

2011, 9/11  -   1,508 Comments
8.56
12345678910
Ratings: 8.56/10 from 431 users.

Join 23-year architect Richard Gage, AIA, in this feature length documentary with cutting-edge 9/11 evidence from more than 50 top experts in their fields - high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and more.

Each is highly qualified in his/her respective fields. Several have Ph.D's - including National Medal of Science awardee Lynn Margulis.

She, along with the other experts, exposes the fraud of NIST and discusses how the scientific method should have been applied and acknowledges the overwhelming evidence of high temperature incendiaries in all dust samples of the WTC.

High-rise architects and structural engineers layout the evidence in the features of the destruction of these three high-rises that point inevitably to explosive controlled demolition.

More great documentaries

1.5K Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TroyB
TroyB
10 years ago

Hilarious how much people fall for this cr*p. All this apparent evidence and not ONE enemy country of the US or even terrorist group has come out to expose the US government for lying about 9/11, why? because they aren't. The only people that are, are the internet sellers of this rubbish. Too many fools on the planet that wouldn't know how to discriminate the truth to save themselves. "Experts speak out" hilarious tripe.

Normo
Normo
10 years ago

How is it that another investigation can not be carried out? For such a dramatic event - people deserve to know the truth!
If the USA govt has nothing to hide then whats the problem with confirming their so called original findings!

Tomasgolfer
Tomasgolfer
10 years ago

Physics was suspended on 9/11/01, as was the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Same could be said of international law.

Tom Delay
Tom Delay
10 years ago

It's fairly obvious from scanning through a good deal of the post that the majority of people posting here haven't even watched the documentary. There's a term brought up near the end of the documentary that fits quite well with these serial posters..."cognitive dissonance". Look it up guys.

Jerry
Jerry
10 years ago

9/11 was a terrible day and a tragedy for the thousands of family s who had their loved ones murdered by these vile terrorists I have been fair and watched all this program but it has to go down as one of the most biased things I have ever seen. It is always good to question things and governments but these people are awash with theories but none of them have listened to their far more experienced peers who on mass have explained the events of this sad day. I don't understand the motive for this but they should but forward their evidence or ideas for peer review I also note PhD's are thin on the ground in this work.

Alv V
Alv V
10 years ago

"The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it." Joseph Goebbels

Alv V
Alv V
10 years ago

This documentary made me seriously worried, so I can only imagine how it feels like to live in USA, where people get mass-murdered by a government that did not get elected, in order to justify the invasion of another country not involved in the terror-act, killing countless of other civilians, killing and torturing any direct opposition, where the people being held responsible for crime have no rights, and making it obviously clear that if anyone dares stand up against them and fight back...

How does that feel?

Guest
Guest
10 years ago

They keep speaking of "ordinary office fires." Doesn't jet fuel burn hotter than an ordinary office fire, and wouldn't a jet knock out some of these support beams?

Marin ?orluka
Marin ?orluka
10 years ago

you all talking "you knew" this, "you knew" that. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ABOUT IT ??
Spread the news, go out on streets, people that govern your country (which is not your government btw) are going to be the demise of us all.

Worried guy from Croatia.

David
David
10 years ago

to a-no-n maybe you ve never heard eye witness acounts given that very day and a few times after by poeple including firefighters and police and even first responders that they DID IN FACT hear several seires of explosions or maybe youve got your fingers in an orifice where your head is stuck listen closely to the recordings of the firemen who died inside the buildings you can even hear some explosions in the background you really are a frightened little sheeple if you believe the "official report" the first list of suspects was laughably stupid as some of them were found to still be ALIVE

Su'ana Mompittseh
Su'ana Mompittseh
10 years ago

I was not in NY when this happened...I was watching it live on TV as the towers fell. I knew for years beforehand that there was a core steel structure, and the first thing I said to the people around me, was, "That is not possible! There is a solid steel core structure, and for these buildings to fall like that, the core must have been turned to liquid!"
I am not a scientist, but I am a metalworker. I knew that jet fuel would not burn hot enough to melt steel, and that there was NO way, that heat at the top of a solid steel core, would be able to move downward towards a heat sink of bedrock...It would move away from the heat sink which meant upwards.
I wonder why no one mentions that the granite and earth under the buildings, is a heat sink. Maybe it is so elementary they don't feel the need to, but there it is.

anna miller
anna miller
10 years ago

This is the documentary to watch for anyone interested in 9/11
conspiracy. I thought the 9/11 event was off, from the very beginning.
The buildings came down too fast and too clean. Here why 50 engineers, architects, and demolition experts are requesting an
official review of 9/11. It is well worth 2 hours 19 min of your life.

vangogo
vangogo
10 years ago

A controlled demolition is fascinating to watch, it seems surreal because it is so unnatural, it is a man made occurance manipulating the laws of gravity and physics, a precisely orchestrated series of explosions with exact timing, which experts can use to make a building fall into its own foorprint. Buildings falling by themselves do not collapse in the same manner. When people watch 3 controlled demolitions in the same day and accept it as a natural occurance, I have to wonder about those people. When they are told a jet flew into the pentagon, with no visible sign of the plane, no debris characteristic of plane crashes, and they are told a 200ft plane fit inside a 16ft hole, again I have to wonder about those people. When they defend the cover-ups and lies fed to them by the officials, lies which offer no facts or explanation, I have to wonder about those people. Why cant they see the truth, plain as day infront of them? Why do they not accept factual evidence, and make intelligent and informed conclusions based on those facts and evidence? Why do those people accept and defend an 'official report' that ignores and omits evidence, and offers no plausible explanation? The response many people have to 911 are even more strange than the event itself, not only does it leave us seeking explanations for 911, now more than ever Im looking for signs of intelligence on ths planet.

Marky Mark
Marky Mark
10 years ago

The architect that they interview has helped design 2 buildings neither of which was more than 15 stories tall as one of the people who says that he doesn't believe that fire brought these 3 buildings down LOL. They might as well of just interviewed people on the street.

Matthew Flynn
Matthew Flynn
10 years ago

This was a very compelling documentary. All these specialists and experts who all agree on how these buildings came down. It's unreal but the evidence is right there. People still deny that something bigger took place that day because they are afraid. It's time to wake up and take back our country.

Mark Bruska
Mark Bruska
10 years ago

Why was it important that the buildings collapse? Did the government think that nobody would care if planes merely hit the buldings?

Roy Rose
Roy Rose
10 years ago

One would think that the official investigation would have been flawless. The building debris field should have been secured and sifted through piece by piece instead it was guarded while the government shipped it to China of all places with no inspection at all. That is a criminal act. More money was spent on the OJ Simpson trial than was spent on the 9/11 investigation. All Americans should be outraged.

lee
lee
10 years ago

now i think we all no the truth its time for change in the world and i think its happen slowly peace to all and we can do this

Donna
Donna
10 years ago

I wonder if Thang Tran, probably not his real name, had lost family in the collapse, if he would be taking on such a m*ron attitude. If you watch and read the evidence by extremely educated people, I'm speaking about Phd's, not the Thang Tran's of the world, then you will see why so many are questioning what really happened. Just the thermite alone is enough to raise red flags, and along with what the firemen, police, and people on the street had to say at the time, raises a whole lot of red flags. Then there is Building # 7. It was a "controlled" collapse, as were the two towers! It is time we help the families who are looking for answers and go forward to find out the truth and bring those responsible to justice!

Lina Nicolia
Lina Nicolia
10 years ago

The best I have seen on 9/11. You cannot beat scientists and experts opinions v/s statements from politicians. A no brainer.

Lastviewer
Lastviewer
11 years ago

Not bad but a little bit old.
I mean that they didn't know (At the time of this movie production) that most if not all security companies involved in the WTC was a foreign one.
I don't feel that many US Gov Org were involved as conspiracists suggest.
Peoples gets lost in this. It ought to be simpler than this.
After the "Protection failure", Gov wasn't keen to talk about it nor picking up the pieces. Who would?

Harold Williamson
Harold Williamson
11 years ago

very good documentary what is wrong with the American people we need to investigate this again these people are not conspiracy nuts in this documentary.

bulldetector
bulldetector
11 years ago

ingybob; Many thanks for your contributions, well thought out, well presented. All your posts, point to one conclusion. TIME FOR ANOTHER INVESTIGATION IN TO THE EVENTS OF 9/11

ingybob
ingybob
11 years ago

Once again, I will ask if any "security" safes were found in the clean up after the collapse [of the WTC buildings 1,2 &7].

ingybob
ingybob
11 years ago

My curiosity has been whetted by reports of hot spots, liquid metal and other very strange phenomena relating to the events surrounding the destruction of the WTC 1, 2 & 7.
My qualifications, primarily are in Metallurgy.

Hot spots: Could be caused by a controlled thermo nuclear reaction, this can be clearly ignored as there has been no radio-activity above background readings in the area.
Next, these hot spots could be the result of pools of molten metal.
How do you get a pool of molten metal?
Where can these hot spots originate?

1. You can melt metal in a furnace (Electric steel making). Improbable
2. You can reduce iron oxide in the presence of limestone, carbon [coke] and lots of hot air (An over simplified Blast Furnace). Improbable
3. You can melt pig iron, scrap iron, steel with coke and limestone (An oversimplified Cupola for making cast iron).Improbable but not impossible.
4. You can have a thermitic reaction between an metallic oxide and an elemental metal (e.g. Fe2O3 & Al.). Improbable, as this requires the placement of huge quantities of thermite in strategic positions, but not impossible.
5. You have to exclude a thermonuclear reaction, because of it's implausibility.

My experience is limited to a little over 6 metric tons of molten steel, because that it the maximum the furnace that we had, would hold, we were casting a wrecking ball of about 8 MT and the mould contained about 3 MT of pre-warmed steel.
This took several days to cool, exactly how long I am not sure. After 3 days the top was removed and hosed down to cool. It was still very very hot.
As a guess it would take more that 6 tons of molten iron or steel to create the heat signature that has been shown to exist on the WTC site.

To form 1 metric ton of molten iron from the thermitic reaction Fe2O3 + Al you will need approximately 482 kilos of finely divided Aluminium and more than 1,430 kilos of finely divided Fe2O3, the volume of this mixture is going to be pretty incredible but not so incredible as the amount of kj's in the reaction, Fe2O3 + Al giving 2Fe + Al2O3 given as -822.2(x2) kj/mol.
To put this in perspective @ approx 160 g/mol of Fe2O3, so 160 grams of Fe2O3 will give 1644 kj's., at 100% efficiency.
In an induction furnace for melting steel you need 540 to 680 KWH/ton (taken from details supplied by Magnalenz).

1,430,000 grams (that is 1,430 Kilos) of Fe2O3 will produce 14,700,000 kj's this is roughly equivalent to 4,000 KWH,
So if my sums are right the energy in the thermite reaction is not only sufficient to produce molten Iron, but to melt lots of steel and anything else that it comes in contact with.

Any molten metal will find it's lowest point, like any liquid, any cooling of any molten metal will be a slow process, as the ground, in essence forming the crucible, will have come to a sort of equilibrium and there are few air currents to help. Thus heat loss is basically by radiation. Also, do not forget that there will be a slag of sorts, over the top of the melt.

The liquid metal pouring out of the North Tower WTC, is without doubt in my mind, molten Iron, plus still reacting thermitic material, the sparks given off are probably the result of liquid Iron solidifying and giving off energy in the form of light or a spark. The amount of molten metal is not easy to determine, but as a guess, it would be somewhere in the region of several kilos per minute, not very much at all, but at that rate, given the cooling effect of the atmosphere, it is a wonder that it flowed at all.

I do not believe that molten Aluminium gives off a yellow colour when superheated and it will vapourize at the temperature of the Fe2O3/Al reaction, as will the Al2O3.

If someone can convince me that the metal pouring out of that building is Aluminium, I am willing to listen.

Please sensible comments only, without the usual agendas, I am only here to satisfy my own curiosity.

BTW, the Chinese know exactly what happened to the WTC 1, 2 & 7., as they have had most of the evidence delivered to them. Maybe somebody should ask them.

ingybob
ingybob
11 years ago

Batvette, if you do not understand this fixation with declaring things “free fall” or otherwise, let me explain.
“Free fall” is shorthand for Newton's second law of motion, you are aware, I am sure, of all of these laws, but just in case here they are again:

I. Every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it.
II. The relationship between an object's mass m, its acceleration a, and the applied force F is F = ma
III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

All of these laws are vital for discussions on the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7.

Now let me bring things into perspective, my comment was:-

“Regarding WTC 7, if the lower vertical steel components of the structure failed due to fire, then the velocity of the collapse of the building in the first instance would be free-fall, would it not?
Yet the structure did not achieve free-fall until moments later.
Was this due to the time taken for the primary collapse to occur? “

Perhaps I could have added the word “central” before vertical, which would make the question a little clearer.

Was this due to the time taken for the primary collapse to occur?

Your answer is not an answer to my question.

I do not ask questions to further an agenda, I simply wish to know.

The first instant of the collapse of building 7 WTC (the main structure, not the penthouse on top),
begins slowly at first, then the fall is roughly equivalent to the fall of an object due only to the force of “gravity” (32feet per second per second), until the debris falling meets the debris that has already fallen.

The building (WTC 7), was already collapsing when the penthouse disappeared from view, then there is a gap in time before the main building begins to collapse, and when it starts collapse it is slower at first than “free fall”.

If we take the big bang theory to be true, then we know what happened in the first milliseconds of the Universe, someone must have a theory as to what happened in the last 10 seconds of building 7 WTC.

ingybob
ingybob
11 years ago

rufusclyde, most if not all of the major players have used their agendas to further their aims for Centuries, if not Millennia.

I would like to ask my previous question again, to see if there are any answers.

"There is a problem that troubles me, most of the offices in the WTC 1 & 2 would have had security safes in them, these safes are by their very nature almost indestructible, were any found in the clean up after the collapse?"

ingybob

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

My last comment, the USA still has the death penalty for egregious acts of loss of life. The only way this can't happen is lack of knowledge of such an effective loss of life. Both the enactors and those who cover up such events are culpable. Someone (anyone) needs to pursue this atrocity.

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

Lastly, I'm so glad to see the architectural experts putting themselves in harms way to get the scientific and educational point of view across. Kudos where it really deserved, don't let the ba@stards get away with it!

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

The really sad thing is I can relate to all these people trying their best to save us from all rest of the people of the world, real tears ... The ultimate in old age cynisism ... BTW Churchill was carrying an alcohol burden about 15-20% what I'm currently at ... go figure ...

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

Ho hum, yes I'm an alcoholic well into a binge. Just remember I have my sober moments too ...

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

I once worked in a building, which won awards for best architecture in the early 70's, (Frizzel insurance, Bournemouth, UK), that could survive the destruction of 1/3rd of its support beams. The entire building was one floor above ground (parking) level except for an elevator core.

Yeah, like they can't already identify me.

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

For the first time in my life I'm glad PA has the least restrictive gun laws! OMG ..

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

Still, what would these people know, they're just experts in their field. We all know 'W' is much more qualified!

UnclearFizzyCyst
UnclearFizzyCyst
11 years ago

Oh, and bythe the wty, the Chinese have the evidence ...

DNAambassador
DNAambassador
11 years ago

9/11 is an inside job, look at what followed how can we say it was not. Western powers have always been instigating, whether it be the UK support of both sides during the Nigerian Civil war, or the US nuking of Japan even though evidence shows that Japan's generals already surrendered prior. 9/11 was used like the US call's for enlisting against Germany, same propoganda same scare and emotianal tactics. Also why no official investigation into 9/11 surely authorities are there to uncover the truth and not hide it. Bush, Blair and journalists who are in bed with the US administraion should have a price on their head.

ingybob
ingybob
11 years ago

Regarding WTC 7, if the lower vertical steel components of the structure failed due to fire, then the velocity of the collapse of the building in the first instance would be free-fall, would it not?
Yet the structure did not achieve free-fall until moments later.
Was this due to the time taken for the primary collapse to occur?

ingybob
ingybob
11 years ago

There is a problem that troubles me, most of the offices in the WTC 1 & 2 would have had security safes in them, these safes are by their very nature almost indestructible, were any found in the clean up after the collapse?

logical911
logical911
11 years ago

The real key to the whole debate is WTC7. Given that no other steel and concrete building...EVER!...ANYWHERE! has collapsed from fire! and other buildings have had more intense fires for far far longer! is a total and complete utter give in to what happened to all three buildings. To think that was not some form of controlled demolition "you would have to be very ignorant indeed"

Jules Defreitas
Jules Defreitas
11 years ago

why don"t they build the world trade center like a tall pentagon joining one another.built not by paper,but a special grade of rubber with concrete type posts in the center of rubbers.

Jules Defreitas
Jules Defreitas
11 years ago

why don"t they build the new wold trade center more like a twin tall pentagon joining together, not using paper but a high grade type of rubber with concrete pillars in the center of the rubber blocks.

rufusclyde
rufusclyde
11 years ago

If the official explanation is correct, then the internal and external columns were being pulled inward as the falling floors crashed down, forming an increasing mass. As the colums did not remain standing, bowed toward where the floors were, they must have come apart. Did all the bolts attaching the spandrels fail, and all of the bolts holding the trusses to the truss seats and the dampening units also fail? If the falling floors were shearing each successive lower floor from the spandrels, why didn't the columns remain upright? Were all of the column trees intact and simply not connected anymore as the bolts all sheared?

hockeypop200
hockeypop200
11 years ago

The point not being discussed here is the amount of steel/debris pile after the buildings were destroyed. Their are plenty of photos showing this 'pile' on 9-11, and several days after,the LACK of debris is astonishing. Yes, there is steel, other materials laying about, but look at the mass of those two buildings standing, I mean LOOK at them, picture them dropping straight down in 10 seconds, and then look at the pile remaining. Its non existent. Their has been a very thorough investigation, it can be found at Dr Judy Woods website, or in her book 'Where did the towers go'. Also on Facebook. It will open your eyes!!

JasonTooTallBourne
JasonTooTallBourne
11 years ago

Agreed Colin.

Colin Doran
Colin Doran
11 years ago

If the WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, cutting the steel columns on all the floors of those buildings, then cut steel columns would be everywhere. Where are they? Anyone seen any? -or reported that they saw any? All of this steel with both ends cut with big diagonal molten cuts. There were hundreds and hundreds of people, first responders, rescue workers, firefighters , demolition workers at ground zero moving and removing all of that steel ,for months , putting chains around them , hoisting them into the air, putting it on trucks and driving them through the public streets of NY to the piers and moving them on barges to the dump site. Hundreds of pieces of steel were examined, photographed , during the rescue operations and the in clearance of the site every single piece of steel was seen by the people who were there and there is not one report ,photograph, statement by anyone who saw steel with cut ends. None at all.

Dave Robbins
Dave Robbins
11 years ago

Not an engineer, nor an architect, nor a physicist... but let's say the so-called experts are right, and the WTC towers were imploded...what is never explained by these folks is the amount of people who would have to be involved in such a conspiracy, and how they got the demolitions into place within the building, and then the timing of"hijacked" planes to offer a 'plausibility' of explanation as to why the buildings then collapsed etc. How are these people convinced that such actions were conscionable, and/or how is their silence guaranteed... which seems to my way of thinking the very argument against 'conspiracy theories' to begin with... Since there is no way the demolitions needed for such 'implosions' were put into place after the planes struck, one must assume they were done prior... when, and how so without raising the suspicions of people working there everyday. That seems more impossible to believe than the NIST document.

jacks374
jacks374
11 years ago

Never paid any attention to the 9-11 World Trade Ctr collapse before. However, having an engineering background myself and after watching this video, especially the collapse of building 7, the government needs to reopen the investigation. Just too many things seem to defy physical laws and material properties.

Al Scott
Al Scott
11 years ago

The trolls are still here and people still argue with them. Mathematically, everyone should question 911.

ceedot
ceedot
11 years ago

let me make sure that i understand you.
we are all unable to choose or decide if we will be corrupted because corruption is the breaking down of something, and it is inevitable due to instability inherent in all things.(you say breaking down, i say taint...but then, i do tend to gibber, um, ish...)
and i guess accountability would be based on if have been naughty or if you have been nice this year.....

Rene
Rene
11 years ago

NIST are now complaining amongst themselves,...not enough of budget, were steered in a certain direction, some evidence withheld, set up to fail from the beginning and a? couple of other points that i have forgot.