From the author: The so-called 'terror-attack' of 9/11 was nothing but a psyop or, in other words, a gigantic make-believe simulation.
It was pulled off with the active support of the mainstream newsmedia - and their complicity continues to this day. The entire World Trade Center complex - 9 buildings in all - was of course demolished (in bright daylight - hidden behind a smokescreen ) but what we saw on TV was nothing but a prefabricated 'Hollywood' movie.
No planes were involved (thus no passengers died) - and no people were killed in the (empty) twin towers. For the perpetrators to kill 3000 white collar workers in New York City would have been the silliest self-inflicted aggravation imaginable.
Now, all this may come as a shock to many people. However, the evidence is overwhelming and has been consolidated by the steady efforts of independent researchers from all over the world - who have nothing to gain from spreading false information.
Ultimately, it is up to every open-minded individual to look at the available evidence for him/herself. However, please keep in mind that most 'conspiracy theories' you may have bumped into (such as Michael Moore's blockbuster Fahrenheit 9/11 and the internet blockbuster Loose Change) were created to uphold our illusion of living in a world graced with freedom of speech.
This is completely retarded
As proof of the censorship…NO we do not have freedom of speech. Only the illusion of free speech. What manages to get out is what is allowed to get out. And not perceived to be dangerous by and to the powers that be.
SHEEP R DANGEROUS.
"However, please keep in mind that most 'conspiracy theories' you may have bumped into (such as Michael Moore's blockbuster Fahrenheit 9/11 and the internet blockbuster Loose Change) were created to uphold our illusion of living in a world graced with freedom of speech." Isn't the fact that you made this and have it out here proof that we have freedom of speech?
Just wondering what the hell happened to the passengers. I love the video, excellent work!
Just one question......those jumpers were fake?
3:42 I am unsure if anyone else saw it, but there is another mystery object at the very top of the screen, right in the middle.
The makers of this film a really reaching to come up with these allegations.
This must be part of some psyop to discredit real truthers. Skeptical people would fully back official narrative after watching this BS.
The emotional baggage on display here is par for the course...."The planes are real!! My Vagina told me so!!"...911 is fake news, people...deal with it...and of course the shills are here begging you not to watch it...been there...done that...
My September Clues documentary can now be viewed at www(dot)septemberclues(dot)info
Cheap documentary. Crap in fact. Crap conspiracy rubbish. Too many movie makers smoking weed. Bunch of wankers.
Seriously, it's obvious that NONE of you have ANY kind of experience with top of the line high end recording equipment? You can litteraly manipulate reality with the kind of gear that is avaliable today (Especially for big media corps)
This is, if not, fully in line with what really happened, why wouldn't the media (atleast a couple few of them) be aware of the fact that this event was going to happen?
Don't mind the people on the news, they are actual puppets. They have someone that is literally telling them what to say, that's their job.
If you still don't believe that people would get together, plan things together and execute the plan, you are wrong.
These reviews are absolutely mind boggling. Funny at times, but largely a sad reflection of peoples inability to comprehend the truth. It is utterly pointless even writing a lament, but I feel compelled anyway. Some people we say we have a 'religious gene' because so many are willing to have faith in something mystical, but it also seems people are more inclined to believe fairy stories rather than face a truth that your Government is your captor to an extent rather than your carer. Perhaps too much fat and wealth than softens people? Why are people so driven to see a lie and deceit rather than confront the fact that Simon has that rare talent for sniffing out bullshit, analysing it an spotting the flaws! What is most sad is that many comments allude to not having even watched the documentary and yet still commenting!
Wait why is there a dedication to all the lives lost on 9/11 when apparently it was fake and nobody was killed?
Nobody likes to admit they have been fooled. Jack1952 is permanently blinded by his patriotic awe of the great america. I belive that if george and dick publicly stated that no planes were used on 9/11, jack and many others here would still not believe the truth. Just remember this, if you have never had a top secret security clearance, you dont have a clue what reality is, you should never comment on anything using the words truth and fact because both are beyond your knowledge and comprehension. Just forget all your worries, hug your teddybears and of course, keep suckling at uncle sams teet while paying your taxes.
If you look at the facts minus all the emotion, what you see is that he is showing you video that has obviously been manipulated. I don't think anyone can deny that. Based on that fact alone, one must question everything we've been told about 911. I find it puzzling that so many attack the maker of this video. If people were that passionate about truth and justice, maybe we'd have some real answers.
Lol. The vitriol being poured on this documentary suggests to me that it might have something to say after-all.
You protested too much :D
The premise of September Clues is brilliantly simple -- the corporate media fed us manipulated live shots. What chutzpah! The shot of the nose of the plane coming out of the other side of one of the towers proves that it is a graphic -- then we are shown the literal coverup of that "shot". The plane should have crumpled on impact. However, the jaw-dropping moment is when the shot is reversed and the camera zooms back out -- there is no plane flying towards the towers.
And all this evidence is based on the corporate media "live" shots from that fateful day.
PS To all the critics -- I notice that some of you still find it hard to accept that there were no WMDs in Iraq. Well, if you still can't see that conspiracy, there's no way you are going to understand the "New Pearl Harbor".
PPS Check out that book, "New Pearl Harbor" -- the instigators actually documented their goals.
The reason nobody was at LAX was because they cancelled all air flight nobody could get there, they evacuated and if you remember all air traffic was stopped and people were stranded for days. I do know IT people had full run of the towers weeks before this attack and I would not put it past he Islam IT guys for planting explosives. I don't think people are that unfeeling, uncaring, that some truth to this would have leaked out too many cut throat back stabbers someone would have come forth. Your discrepancies in the sound could be from satellite feed. The photos could all be real just the pixel and type of camera used. You claim there was no plain did the firefighters fake their deaths too? And the suicides were they planned. Nobody in the military or civilian would keep this secret. I was Air Force and a good soldier would not keep such things of great sgnificance to himself we have a world of snitchers and media whores. The time you waste in conspiracy theories you could have fed some homeless or given to sick child or they all fake too.
I would like to know how at 23:40 the plane wing disappears behind a building that is some distance away ??
is there any other medium besides YOUTUBE that can represent these "conspiracy theory" related docu films? Seems no one questions anything unless the view it on YOUTUBE. Is YOUTUBE all encompassing and is this the only medium in the world able to get to the bottom of any debatable event ie THE TRUTH? Or Is this the only place where you can sway public opinion. CNN doesnt do this? Fox? NBC? I am no more convinced by people who use YOUTUBE to dispence their garbage then some other group using CNN (or other) to dispence theirs. All new and or 'other' information dispencing media ALL have their own agenda's: READER/LISTENERship. No one out there is "biased" free. The truth is out there folks. Which/who's truth do you want? How much $$ do you have?
It's sad that there are people so hell-bent on discrediting other, legitimate 9/11 films that they feel the need to make up blatant lies intended to discredit anyone who questions the official story of 9/11.
easily a 10/10
I felt manipulated, insulted, and outraged by this compilation of video and graphics that the creator, incredibly, has the nerve to call a documentary. Mr. Shack kept using words like "clearly" and "obviously", as if describing his theories that way would actually make them clear and obvious. They didn't. All I saw were grainy, bit-mapped news shots with arrows pointing to shadows and differences in perspective. There could be many, many explanations for these differences and inconsistencies, but none of these explanations were examined, let alone even mentioned. The leading, opinionated, and sarcastic comments got very old very quickly. A good argument will hold up against scrutiny, but this film was so bent on convincing the viewer of the inside-job theory that the theory itself was attenuated. There were too many examples of things that people said or did that, upon examination, would render them meaningless to the argument, but the film maker didn't bother to examine them. He was lazy and used snarky comments instead, casting doubt on the witnesses' accounts of what they remember seeing. He offers a blanket condemnation of the people of New York City, implying that they were lying, acting (the Oscar Award thing was just tacky), or stupid enough to be duped. He began with a premise and gave what he called evidence to give it credence, working backward to make it fit. He then had the arrogance to proclaim that "now we know the truth", as if watching this film was the answer to the huge lie he keeps saying was perpetrated on all of us. I'm certainly no fan of the Bush administration, and will go so far as to say that the whole WMD stash in Iraq was a bald-faced lie to start an illegal occupation in that country, but to say that the attack we suffered was a complete hoax? It's just over the top, and nothing in this film convinced me of anything but Mr. Shack's incompetence as a filmmaker.
Loved this documentary, very interesting, brought up issues
thatno other 9/11 has, really got me seeing it from a different angle, always thought it was inside job, the power was down in the tower the week before, news reported wtc 7
I take this video and Simon Shack's other material with an open mind for the reasons that there are too many physical impossibilities in the official story regarding aircraft and materials particularly.
However viewing one video of Shack's out of about 11 which deal with his theory of video fakery on 9/11 is inadequate to allow comprehension of that theory. Digital manipulation is a highly technical field not understood by most and practiced by even fewer. So paying close attention to the 11 videos in the series is essential to be able to appreciate and understand - or to condemn and discount.
Most people will not give that time to the question and therefore may condemn without justification - or applaud similarly! I have viewed all the material available more than once and thus feel that there is certainly a valid argument here - and one no more fantastic than the official story!
This is like something a 12 year old did in his parent's basement. Horrible.
This is one of the better 9/11 documentaries I've watched. This is a convincing argument focussing on the validity of news footage from all major News networks. If you don't believe in a 9/11 conspiracy, chances are you will after you watch this.. or at least have many more questions than before.
I lived ten miles from the WTC and it was real. I had friends who had siblings and spouses working over there and by the grace of God they were saved from death that day. I could see the skyline and the WTC from my street where I lived and I could see it burning like a mushroom cloud over the buildings that had been wiped out that day. Our local newspapers printed the pictures and stories of everyone who had been killed in the paper daily for weeks after. I knew police officers who spent every day after for a year sifting through the debris that was trucked to them on that barge and who found evidence of the deaths. We were completely terrorized by the events of that day and after. No planes flew in the skies for about 3 months after.
Oh my, this is just so poorly put together. I posit the following to anyone looking for fresh information or evidence who doesn't want to waste their time sifting through the bad stuff on here to get to the good: Whoever put it together makes cosmic leaps of assumption based on extraordinarily little real evidence, expecting the viewer to blindly follow them down the rabbit's hole. I thoroughly enjoy a good documentary based on strong evidence which can teach me something new. This was neither a good documentary, nor one based on strong evidence, and had nothing new to say. Unless you're someone who refuses to believe the US could be caught with their pants down, and is looking for something to feed their delusions, don't bother.
I can't recommend semptemberclues enough. Of all the 9-11 documentarys (and some are good) this one is the most jaw dropping.
Occam's Razor comes to mind
of course the newscaster is going to say there is an explosion inside -- that's what he is viewing on the tv monitor... he is looking at the smoke and fire erupting after the plane hit the tower... not everyone was saw the plane hit the building but most people noticed what happened as a result of it.... you have to know that most witness accounts to any event are loaded with errors and inconsistencies.... luckily the film shows what truly happened.
witness two talks about an explosion because the jet fuel did explode.. then she witnesses the second plane and actually states another plane and then an explosion but this still isn't good enough...you have to find fault...America has to be involved somehow right? You have to face the fact that we were vulnerable and foreigners are responsible... we are not the mighty world powers we would like everyone to believe... we got hit and hit hard... why is it so hard to believe that we are not invincible? Instead of nit picking eye witness accounts...which are usually only half accurate - why don't you try talking to victims family members or joining a group that does something positive for the people that survived this attack... instead of slapping them all in the face with these paranoid delusions.
I am sorry .. I do not believe everything our government says and I do not think planes took down the towers but I cannot go so far as agree that it was empty buildings. I have a real sister that was in one of the higher floor that came down the stairs and passed firefighters going up. How would they get family to lie to family ... and I don't think she is lying so how did they pull that off?
I meant, truly, to watch this film with an open mind. But from its initial captions--"All pieces of evidence were quickly removed"-- I knew I was in trouble. There was no "quick removal" of anything from the Heap, the Pit, the Hole, Ground Zero--as the former towers were known by the end of that September day in 2001. The spot was a smoldering, sizzling wreckage that was barely approachable. Yet ordinary New Yorkers--like me--did approach. We came and saw it: the noxious ruin of what had formerly been our compass, the two things on the island which you could see from so many places, which told you instantly where you were.
And we had seen it all the day before--millions of us. We had bid our families and coworkers farewell as they went off to work in the towers. Or we had set off for downtown ourselves. Then, later, we were arbitrarily filming, taking a photo of someone in the foreground, only to catch the images of the planes hitting the towers in the background. We were shopping in Century 21, in the WTC complex, when a huge noise came from far above us and sent us into the street. We were waking up across the river and looking at the skyline when we saw jetliners where none should be, and then saw fireballs emerge from the tops of the towers. We took the phone calls. From the flight attendants and passengers on the planes as they swept toward the towers. From those in the towers themselves who had just seen, felt, and heard the planes hit and gotten out, those making their way down the stairs, those trapped above the fire zone, those standing in the street, watching and listening as the bodies falling and jumping from the towers hit the ground.
There is such a thing as going so far to get attention that you fall into obscenity. This film achieves that. Nothing more. The filmmaker, I think, can only be truly evil, laughing at our gullibility, and at the notion that he might make money by getting someone to take him seriously. I kept waiting for the punchline, wherein he'd announce that if you could be so easily, maliciously fooled, you should take a look at your love of conspiracy theories, the blind need to make smoke and mirrors of the obvious.
Conspiracy theories seem to be driven by the same things: an inability to accept that great, random horrors can be generated by motives that seem too small for the events they create, and the need to believe in superhuman forces, even if those forces are malign. Surely the killing of JFK couldn't be as simple as the desire of one misguided, seething nobody to be a Somebody on the world stage. Surely a tragedy like 9/11 couldn't simply be the work of Muslim fundamentalists, led to believe that by killing innocents they were defending Islam from imaginary enemies. Surely there must be some greater evil at work--a vast network of evil forces, all acting in perfect concert, pursuing their aims in cloak-and-dagger fashion with endless power and money at their disposal, and then superbly protecting each other and hiding enormous Truths.
Conspiracy theorists are also alike: they scatter random bits of information everywhere, like pearls on the ground; the fact that the pearls are never restrung to form a whole chain doesn't matter to them, as it seems not to matter to their adherents. Throw enough of those pearls around, and some of them are bound to bump against others; that is presumed to be proof enough that Something is Out There, even if no one knows exactly what it is.
Like proof, logic and the realities of human nature have no place in grand conpsiracy theories. The notion that the thousands of people who would have had to be involved in the various "conspiracies" behind JFK's murder could make each step go off without a hitch, then keep their mouths shut, never come forward as a group, or leave a single trace of documentation behind, never strikes proponents of those theories as preposterous. In the case of this film, we are talking about millions of people; yet still there is someone willing to believe.
Are there real conspiracies? Yes, of course. And how do we know about them? Because, unlike God, the minds of people are not unknowable. They operate out of knowable motives: greed, fervor, self-interest, mania, fear. And they talk. Or they leave evidence--real evidence, not amazing coincidence, or suspicious activity, or random particles. The pearls are strung together, and sure enough, they form a chain; and that is called Proof.
This film is beyond the Michael Moore and "Loose Change" sort of thing. It is a vile desecration of the memories of millions of people affected by what really happened on 9/11. What really happened is that Muslim terrorists, guided by Osama bin Laden, took a nation by suprise with a brilliantly simple plan, while politicians and strategy makers ignored countless warnings that they were about to strike. There are the pearls, there is the string. We who picked those pearls up as they fell and put them together can only find this film an atrocity.
I do believe that the U.S government was behind the 9/11 attacks. this documentary is most likely made by someone working in the interest of those behind these murders. most of us have by now figured out that the attacks were an inside job. this documentary is our government saying, yes we did do it, but no one was actually killed, so give us a break. the only break they deserve is their necks breaking as they are hung for treason and crimes against humanity.
If you want to watch a documentary that shows the most likely reasons behind the governments decision to murder 3000 people, I recommend, 9/11 conspiracy solved, which is on this site.
I have seen it all now...What a pathetic and ludicrous conspiracy theory. Mental health professionals would have a field day with the maker and some believers of this joke.
For everyone that believes this pathetic and sickening **** I have a pennie in my pocket to sell you for 499 billion trillion dollars. Oh and I not only saw the planes hit, I am responsible for many of the photos you see on youtube showing the planes and yes planes that hit it. So any of you tool sucking disrespectful wanna buy my pennie? Oh I forgot the pennie was signed by George Washington, Jesus Christ, Moses, and some guy named Milt....
One of the best documentaries ever made. Exposes the entire scam as a military/media psychological operation and only begins to scratch the surface. There is a lot more evidence that has surfaced since this film was made. For those not convinced I encourage you to watch it several times, watch Simon's other videos and study the information at cluesforum.info Simon Shack, you have opened my eyes and I will continue to spread this far and wide. Thanks to this research, the veil has been lifted and we are much closer than ever before ....
We lost a friend in the 9/11 tragedy,in fact named a child after him.I saw the events unfold live on tv.I can assure you there were no airliners involved only a light aircraft with a propeler that crashed into the roof and a missile shaped object that hit the tower.I remember it very clearly and i have friends that saw it with me I do not usually comment on such things but I feel so strongly about this .I know the truth I saw it with my own eyes. The american government killed its own people as an exscuse to take conrol of the oil in iraq and kill innocent people in the process.
this has to be the dumbest, most idiotic "documentary" ever made. even watching it for a few minutes is a pretty bad waste of time.
Well...I don't know who was behind 9/11 but everybody knows that the way it was presented was bull, too many things make no sense and are hidden from the people, lied to. That for one, that I agree with.
BUT. I haven't watched the documentary nor do I want to, anyone saying that there were no victims must have a braindamage from all "the truth that is out there". 'Empty towers' referrs to that the people who usually worked in the WTC were all bought off and send to an isolated island?
I do believe it was an "inside job" as it's called. Was it by government? Could have been, could have been some other nutcases.
Saying that the WHOLE of 9/11 was a hoax is just plain stupid and beyond any morals. People died, families were broken. Or are You saying that the dead are not really dead? don't really understand.
You can say "haters gonna hate", "most people don't want to know the truth" etc. I'm all for the truth as long as it stays true to it.
This is not it.
This as bull as the whole 9/11 story - the "official" story.
please don't encourage sick minds to create crap like this for it is a slap in the face to all of the victims and their families. To say that there were no victims in the towers or on the airplanes is equivalent to putting your head in the sand and denying the reality of this tragic day. In honor of the victims we will never forget----which means there can be no denial.
excellent & thought provoking, what a shame i'd left 9/11 in the hands of topdoc fanboys & the like for all these years.
well done simon shack!
busy researching every minute of 9/11
you can not argue with people that do not know they are sick
If the footage was faked, why was it done so badly? People with enough power and influence to create fake video footage that influenced everyone, as this film alleges, surely would have the resources to do a better job. Unless of course, given that reality is not perfect, they worked in some imperfections to make it seem believable (a perfect fake would have stood out more). Not everything ties up, with statements, etc, but as someone else has mentioned here, there are always differences in accounts. The footage argument proposed here is not as conclusive as it seems to think, in my view. Still, I think this film is ultimately designed to make people think and question what happened that day, and I think that that is important.
Why would Larry Silverstein lease buildings that he knew he would have to pay at least 3billions for asbestos abatement? Larry was involved in this cover up and There are motives supporting that, The destruction of WTC, for certain interests, have been both desirable and profitable. Why did Larry choose to "pull" (which is a controlled demolition term) building 7 in the end of the day? because they couldn't sustain a small office fire?
If this is not an inside job Why didn't media show the real footage of building 7 collapse? But instead 20 minutes before the collapse BBC world announced the collapse of building 7 when in the screen behind the reporter it was still standing.
July 24, 2001 Larry bought the 99 year lease for 3.2 billion even he was outbid by Vornado Realty! was Vornado forced to withdrew? then Larry made sure the insurance included the alleged terrorist attacks which happened just a few weeks later how lucky for Larry. But his luck continues.
The twin tower were due for some major upgrades. in recent years the complex had the reputation of being A financial misfit, unsuited to modern fiber-optic and Internet technologies, and burdened with an inefficient and costly elevator system. under New York state law the Clean air act, the asbestos was going to have to be removed. The Port Authority in 1991 filed suit in U.S. District Court against insurers in the hope of recovering funds to help pay for needed asbestos-abatement work at the WTC and one of the region's airports. In the suit, "Port Authority of NY vs. Affiliated FM Insurance Co.," the port authority lost.
The Twin Towers couldn’t be demolished, and because of the asbestos, they couldn’t be upgraded. And disassembling them floor by floor would have run into the double-digit billions of dollars. Explicity included in the [lease] agreement was that Silverstein and Westfield 'WERE GIVEN THE RIGHT TO REBUILD THE STRUCTURES IF THEY WERE DESTROYED." 'the lease has an all-important escape clause: if the buildings are struck by "an act of TERRORISM," the new owners' obligations under the lease are void.
The buildings were attacked 6 weeks after Silverstein took over. wow how convenient eh!
The problem could not be fixed legally, at least not economically, so blow it up and blame it on the Muslims. It’s the Trifecta: Silverstein gets the insurance, the war industry gets their war, and the medical industry gets thousands of more customers, everybody gains.
I'm not real big on conspiracy theories but this video makes some good points. Anyone who has followed the facts on 911 must question the possibility that it was fabricated. My favorite footage on this video concerns WTC #7. It was obviously brought down with explosives (no plane crash there). Experts also claim high concentration of nanothermite (explosive) in the ash deposits (not mentioned in this video). I do however believe the media is controlled. Any event that I've first hand knowledge of always gets reported wrong by the media.
So what about ALL the New Yorkers who stood there and SAW it happen? Ridiculous and extremely disrespectful to those of us who lost friends and family
This documentary convinced me enough to completely dismiss the "official" version. Mainstream media's purpose has always been one of misdirection; to instruct people to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.