Best UFO Cases Ever Caught on Tape

Best UFO Cases Ever Caught on Tape

2007, Conspiracy  -   292 Comments
6.77
12345678910
Ratings: 6.77/10 from 371 users.

An increasing number of UFO cases have been reported by people all over the world. Video cameras are now capturing hundreds of these baffling unidentified flying objects which puzzle both those who believe and those who don't.

On this program there'll be presented the most compelling videotaped evidence of extraordinary and unknown craft ever shown anywhere and hear from a top government physicist, a video analyst, and the eyewitnesses themselves. Could these be actual alien spacecraft, sophisticated military vehicles hidden from the public or incredible hoaxes? You decide for yourself as we examine the best UFO cases ever caught on tape.

A startling, domed flying machine was videotaped over America on May 24th, 2003. It appeared to be a mysterious device displaying some unknown propulsion system. The crystal clear footage was shot by a videographer, Jeff Willes, while standing outside his home in Phoenix, Arizona.

Some top UFO experts believe this is the kind of compelling evidence that should get the US government's attention. Willis, a dedicated videographer, has taped several inexplicable UFOs over Phoenix - a city that many experts claim has the most UFO activity of any American city.

But it's his focused efforts to document strange, disc-shaped craft and eerie, night-time formations that have produced some of the strongest UFO evidence on record. On December 11th, 2004, in the clear blue skies above Phoenix, Willis managed to tape a disc hovering for several minutes before a strange second object passed it from above.

Then on May 24th, 2005, the two-year anniversary of his astounding dome saucer sighting, Willis captured an enigmatic craft navigating over his house. It too appears to be a metallic device displaying unknown flight characteristics. Moving silently the UFO appeared to be two objects or had split into separate parts somehow linked together.

Just a few months later Willis videotaped day-like disc which incredibly turns into an orange, glowing orb before vanishing behind the building. But the nighttime UFO encounters Willis managed to record during the same period are perhaps even more difficult to explain, and were witnessed by a fellow sky-watcher.

More great documentaries

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

292 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lily
Lily
1 year ago

I have a really good recording

Matthew Shelley
Matthew Shelley
1 year ago

I filmed 4 different clips of a UFO how can I sell the footage

Matt
Matt
1 year ago

Some things are just hard to believe, until you see them for yourself! then you know. and also think of this.. if you we're the Aliens, you too would stay far far away from humanity! just look at us! we'll never get anywhere because of the way we are.. creating and repeating the same ol problems. we're not worthy of meeting them yet and probably never will be. we're an embarrassment!

Joseph Stupey
Joseph Stupey
3 years ago

Not one single video was clear enough to accept as hard evidence.

Phil
Phil
4 years ago

I will be happy to share if respect and sincerity are observed. I’m unsure about what exactly to believe but I’m sure I see it in my video and picture. It was so fast I never saw it live I was just getting shots of the mountain after repairing my chimney rot for paint

Phil
Phil
4 years ago

I have a brand new video of a little ship zipping around the sky insanely fast and reversing direction with no more than a millisecond pause as in none!

James Carter
James Carter
4 years ago

I didnt know who to contact,we were raised up on a mtn here in Va.When I was a kid my daddy always told us not to go deep in a valley behind our house,he said THE LONGHAIRS WOULD GET MAD AND CAUSE PROBLEMS,we always thought it was a family.Our family have lived deep up in this mtn for hundreds of years,only one other family lived up here and they made liquor so we never went on their side of the mtn.When we killed hogs,deer,or got our garden up daddy would always haul some up for the Longairs.I never saw them until one night we were coon hunting and my best dog went off up in that holler. I went about 5 miles looking for him when I heard a loud howl,then I started seeing movements.I finally got hold of my dog,when I started getting rocks throwed at me,I shined my light to see what and who the Longairs were,they were what people call BIGFOOT.Its only one way in this mtn,and its so steep on the backside you couldnt climb down if you tried.Who do I tell about this,my family have always got along with these things.They tore up a chicken house and took a bunch of chickens,for me coming up there that time.I know they still up in there,at night you can hear them holler,I dont want them hurt,and I dont want alot of people up in here.But I do know I could help them,dont try to figure out how and where I am.I used a friends phone and name to do this.This is no hoax,I will meet with 2 people and take them and show them.For years my grandpa said the Longairs would come get us if we were bad,they were saying Longhairs,

john orengo
john orengo
5 years ago

Witnessed two different sightings. One in new Jersey on about September 4th in 2002. At the time the Comet was visible for two weeks in the sky. We had a severe thunderstorm at dinner time, with about 45 minutes of lightning then the sky was clear. I stepped out of my mother in-laws house and lit a cigarette as I gazed up at the comet. Then I was distracted by a large towering cloud under the comet. As gazed at the cloud 4 or 5 gold discs appeared on the left and circled around the cloud! All of a sudden the craft on the left wing position dropped below the others and positioned itself on the right wing position! It was as if it did not want to fly through the cloud! The went behind the cloud and must have gone north, they did not appear again. My second sighting was in California, in Sacramento. I was with a friend at the coffee shop on South 16th Street, also known as Freeport Blvd. I was outside enjoying a cigarette and while gazing up at the stucco work on the apartments above, a large saucer appeared above the building! As I watched in horror and amazement it was followed by three more! The were about 60-70 feet wide and 15-20 feet apart. Flying in formation from right to left. They made no sound, there were no lights, and they were not spinning. I could easily see a scorched metal silver and gray finish as if caused from entry to our atmosphere! They were only 100 feet above me! I could have hit one with a rock! They flew slowly about 6mph. I was going to follow them but it meant leaving my friend and the street has cars on both sides. It is hard to look up and drive on 16th street going north. I have since seen no more, yet. Trust me they are real and I no longer wonder if they are.

flybow
flybow
7 years ago

Look, a UFO. Now where is my potato. I must film it.

thebot69
thebot69
8 years ago

I just spent an hour reading every comment. Very entertaining I have to admit, far more so than the documentary itself. It was obvious to me that most of these things could be anything other than extra-terrestrial craft and that it is too easy to jump right to the E.T. theory. All I can say is that as a young man I once witnessed an object that wasn't a helicopter, airplane , or anything we could think of,[I was with three other people] hovering over a corn field at three A.M. And considering the distance it was huge. To this day I have no idea what it was and to be honest, don't much care. It was interesting at the time. My only real comment in answer to all the others is this, Their are more things in heaven and earth Horatio, then are dreamt of in our philosophy.

Mr Doback
Mr Doback
8 years ago

@Olin T Flowers - Maybe you aleady have

tigger1970
tigger1970
8 years ago

I read about 20 of these comments & are you f#@%ING kidding me????? Aliens are here and have been here since the beginning. The proof is out there all u have to do is open ur eyes, close ur mouth & pay attention. No wonder the government thinks we're sheeple! Unf%#$ ING believable. You probably think bin Laden took down the twin towers from a cave also..
LOOK ALIVE PEOPLE!!!!

Kurt
Kurt
8 years ago

Scientists estimate that there are a BILLION stars is our galaxy ( the milky way ) and and estimated BILLION galaxies in the see able Universe. For those who do not realize, our Sun is a Star so this mean that there is an estimated 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the known universe. That's 1 QUINTILLION! That is such an enormously large number that is incomprehensible to the human brain. Taking in to consideration that there are a Quintillion! stars and each star is a Sun with the capability of warming a planet as to create the primordial soup for biological creation ... you have to be completely out of your mind to still think that there is no such thing as extraterrestrial life.
With those odds, it would be mathematical fact! that life would exist outside our planet. FACT!

SUMESH CHACKO
SUMESH CHACKO
8 years ago

why only ufo's are seen in US? why not in Afghanistan, Pakistan and countries which are less technologically advanced? there is no ufo's or aliens. there will be a day when US will come up with aircraft which look like flying saucers and will say this is result of a old research that started years ago.

winston
winston
9 years ago

Check out UFO'S SEEING IS BELIEVING (Peter Jennings, it's online) If you want to see a good piece on this subject.

Peter JC
Peter JC
9 years ago

How come we don't have flying teacups, we got the saucers. I like the case of the flying anvil. This compilation of shit has convinced me that some people just have too much time on their hands and highlights the shortcomings of our mental health system.

dukkencuvva
dukkencuvva
9 years ago

Total pish, this is actually some of the worst ufo footage I've ever seen and I've seen A LOT. I don't understand how they could spend so much time talking up the importance of the sightings in Israel and not show the footage of the ufo over the dome.

Hardcard
Hardcard
9 years ago

22:52, LOL. Pay attention to this part, LOL. They are showing images of a NASA mission which consisted in deploying a satellite to a higher Earth orbit using a cable (because they wanted to find a cheap way to do so). Then the people who made this dumbcumentary add some TOTALLY UNRELATED images of... whatever that is (it seems underwater footage showing marine creatures) and play an audio track of some astronauts saying that there's debris out there, LOL. You are supposed to think that those astronauts are talking about that underwater footage you are seeing, but, in reality, they are referring to real debris the images of which you are not seeing, LOL. Another video-bait for fools.

23:12 Yep, that's definitely underwater footage. You can see the shadows of every element over the marine soil. If that footage had been taken in space, THERE WOULD BE NO SHADOWS PROJECTED OVER THE FREAKING VOID, LOL. Also, we wouldn't see that illuminated area because the void can't be illuminated, light doesn't bounce off against the void, LOL.
The areas that are closer to the spotlight are brighter and everything gets darker as you look away from the illuminated area, becoming totally dark in the end... That's clearly a spotlight illuminating the marine soil at an angle, and those round things floating around are probably marine creatures and floating pieces of other stuff, which is typical underwater. Also, you can see the stones and sand, those bright things on the bottom aren't stars, LOL, they are small stones over the marine soil.
"I measured approximately 2 to 3 miles in diameter against the 12 mile length of the tether" XD. What tether????!!!!! LOL That's not the tether from that mission you moron! The cable was cut and went away along with the satellite, and if you paid attention you'd have noticed that the cable started to wrinkle right after it got severed.
Do you see any wrinkles there? And where the hell is the satellite? I guess it got confiscated by the aliens, LOL.
That's not "pulsating spacejunk", LOL, that's a marine creature breathing/eating/swimming. That's another element that confirms this is underwater footage.
"This spiral, to me, suggests a gravity wave that is stronger than light. This, to me, is proof, in quantum physics, that these ufos are utilizing very advanced forms of gravity energy and zero-point energy. " First, that's not a spiral, second, this guy is mentioning some kinds of energy that are currently being investigated just because they sound cool, complicated, weird, etc. He probably has no clue of what "gravitational energy" (that's the correct name, btw) and zero-point energy really are or how they work, but since they sound futuristic, aliens are probably using them, LOL.
That's a great logic, which shows the level of this guy.
Also, he probably meant "a gravitational wave FASTER than light", not "stronger", but, anyway, that doesn't make sense either, LOL

After some more fakes and hoaxes we see another fake video in which the guy speaks Spanish> 32:43. First off, this guy seems r*****ed, secondly, what he really said is this "you know what? Call some...some stuff of the media". I'm translating it literally, it's not that my English is bad, as I said, this guy seems r*****ed or something, LOL. he doesn't say anything about Alpha Centauri (I doubt that guy knows what Alpha Centauri is, LOL) and he definitely doesn't say "how are you?", the guy that gives us the false translation is simply lying.

InvisibleHandInMyPants
InvisibleHandInMyPants
9 years ago

Laughable.
The chances to viewing a "UFO" are staggeringly high. But the dude in Phoenix videotapes multiple UFO's over a short period of time? Absurd.
When I was a child, back in the 1960's, I was fascinated with UFO's. Then I grew up.
These "examples" are silly, pathetic, juvenile and idiotic. The people behind the videos are in for the notoriety and for the money.
How many people in the world now have cell phones? Its one billion people. That many cell phone cameras and not a single decent image of an unknown flying craft? I just wasted 50 minutes of my life.

Lauriesheri
Lauriesheri
10 years ago

Oh, God, just started watching this; and Jeff Willes seems like a really, really, bad, third-rate actor. But, I'll watch to end.

oQ
oQ
10 years ago

According to Drunvalo Melchizedek:
In modern esoteric teachings, it is taught that the MerKaBa is an interdimensional vehicle consisting of two equally sized, interlocked tetrahedra of light with a common center, where one tetrahedron points up and the other down. This point symmetric form is called a stella octangula or stellated octahedron which can also be obtained by extending the faces of a regular octahedron until they intersect again. In his books, researcher and physicist Drunvalo Melchizedek describes this figure as a "Star Tetrahedron", since it can be viewed as a three dimensional Star of David. By imagining two superimposed "Star Tetrahedrons" as counterrotating, along with specific "prana" breathing techniques, certain eye movements and mudras, it is taught that one can activate A NON VISIBLE 'saucer' shaped energy field around the human body that is anchored at the base of the spine. Depending on the height of the person doing the exercise, this field is about 55 feet across. Once activated, this 'saucer' shaped field is capable of carrying ones consciousness directly to higher dimensions.
----------------
He lives and teaches in Sedona and surrounding areas of Phoenix, and has thousands of followers.
I wonder what he thinks of flying saucers.

eze60
eze60
10 years ago

Science, Proof And The "UFO"

Val Germann,

Here is one of the stickiest wickets in the whole field of Ufology. The debunkers all say "where is the proof?" And the "Ufologists" keep trying to turn themselves into physicists and produce it. But the plain facts are these:

If there is a another, non-human intelligence operating on the Earth then "science" could be of little help and there may be no "proof" available except as these "others" desire. The concept of "proof" requires that there exist a human agency possessing the ability to determine with authority what is happening in the world. When "science" is dealing with things like sulphur dioxide or chimpanzees there is no problem. But if "UFOs" are the products of a superior technology then where is the "authority" to determine what is really going on? We must remember that scientists are neutral, objective observers only within their narrow specialties. They are all, regardless of specialty, part of a self-selecting social elite. They have a position to protect. Someone has to pay for "science" and every last scientist. Science and scientists are caught up in the economic and military systems that dominate the United States and most other nations. These systems are paid for by the average citizens of these nations and those average citizens must retain confidence in that which is taking so much of their money.

Who is the "jury" who must be convinced by "evidence" for the existence of "UFOs" as "artifacts of another intelligence?" The same people who would be severely damaged if that "evidence" ever were to become "proof!" It is not rational for "Ufologists" to expect science and scientists to cooperate in their personal diminuation. It is not going to happen. The proof of a superior technology and civilization operating on the Earth would be a tremendous blow to all of our various elite groups, including scientists. This is so even though the first reaction of the average man might be an "us against them" reflex that would actually enhance the power of our current human leaders. In the long run (several decades) present human social arrangements would have to change, and drastically, if we were to "make contact" with another intelligence. Those at the top of the current heap understand that clearly, whether the rest of us do or not.

The 1987-89 statements of John Lear and William Cooper are interesting mostly because they deal with the issues above. Is it conceivable, as these two men claim, that our scientific and governmental elites have sold us out to "others" from off the Earth? "NO," say most of those who have heard the charge. But for many people, more and more all the time as we Americans are sold out to earthly "foreigners" by our social and economic betters, the answer is becoming, "Well, it might be possible, should such creatures exist." This last is the starting point for our discussion.

The Three Arenas Of Proof:

1) Legal "Proof" 2) Scientific "Proof" 3) Intelligence Proof

The Three Arenas Of Proof: 1) Legal "Proof"

In the legal profession "proof" does not exist until a jury has been convinced and a conviction obtained. Before that time "proof" was simply "evidence." Jurors hear the statements of witnesses and experts. The "physical evidence" in a trial is given by a police expert and it is HIS credibility that makes the evidence, whatever it is (ballistics, fingerprints, etc.), stand up in court. If the jury convicts evidence becomes "proof." There is no such thing as "machine proof." A human being always has to testify as to what sophisticated machines are saying. Machines cannot speak for themselves. They are only tools and have no legal standing to testify. "Proof" at trial is a human thing, not a machine thing.

Let us take the legal paradigm and put it into the world of the UFO. Let us suppose that a "crashed disc" is brought before the nation. It looks for all the world like a Flying Saucer. Let us suppose further that it REALLY IS a Flying Saucer! What would make it real to the public at large? Would seeing it on TV be enough? No, it would not. The thing could be fake, right? Hollywood can make anything look real these days.

No, it would be a statement of strangeness given by a figure in authority that would make that "crashed disc" real. The artifact in itself is NOT sufficient. A human being in authority has to PROCLAIM a mute physical thing to be what he believes it to be! That puts it into the human system, that's the proof! This is the absolute core of the issue.

In the modern world a thing is not necessarily what it IS but what someone in authority SAYS it is. The rest of us must then take the word of this authority about the "reality" of any artifact or process. We, just like a jury at trial, have to take someone else's word about nearly everything. The only question is: whose word are we going to take?

In 1954 I saw a large, diamond-shaped object go over my five-year-old head. My best estimate is that this object was some hundreds of feet across and several thousand feet above me. I did not see it close to the horizon but had a sudden urge to look straight, and I mean straight, up--to the zenith. I had to bend over backwards to do this. Then and only then did I see this thing. It made no sound and was cruising smoothly and rapidly under a solid overcast. It frightened me deeply.

For me, this event is experience--beyond proof. I am a witness. The questions are:

1) Do YOU believe me? 2) Does my sighting resonate emotionally with you? 3) Does it fit in with what you believe to be the "reality" of the current human situation? Or is it emotional anathema to you and you want to send me a sharp note of protest, telling me that my mental processes must be defective? To you my sighting is a "story," but so is much of the rest of the world!

It is unfortunate but true that as long as great numbers of "Ufologists" continue to insist on "proof" we are going to learn very little about what is actually happening. "Proof" is simply not available. This is something that "they" (if they exist) understand quite well and use against us. Ufology has been spinning its wheels for four decades, chasing lights in the sky in a vain search for "proof," while the real action has been right here on the ground. In the opinion of UFOSearch this has not been an accident.

The Three Arenas Of Proof: 2) Scientific "Proof"

The following is a quote from a letter I recently received: "Ufology ought to be a scientific study of a legitimately puzzling phenomenon." You see, I just can't agree with that. In my opinion, "Ufology" can never be truly "scientific." This is because of the nature of science and the probable nature of the "UFO." If in fact the "UFO" represents another intelligence of some kind then the fundamental assumptions of "science" and "scientists" are null and void. These assumptions are:

1) The universe is objective (totally material, in effect, dead) and knowable with certainty by human beings, i.e., by scientists, who are the most human.

2) The scientific method is the best way to study the universe and its language is quantification--mathematics. The ideal here is the "hard, physical evidence" that can be deemed "proof" by the ultra-materialists of the world of science.

3) The highest form of "science" therefore is physics, the most provable, with chemistry a strong second.

But if the UFO is not "objective," if instead it is under the control of an agency equal or superior in intelligence to humans, then the UFO is not necessarily knowable at all, let alone knowable with certainty. Science assumes that humans are at the top of the universal brain chain. Science has not really looked at what it might mean if we are not.

The "scientific method" demands repeatability either of experiment or observation. It assumes "control" of one kind or another by human beings. But if the "UFO" represents another intelligence then that "control" may not be available. And if that control is not there then science is not going to give us what we need. We need more than science.

In the final analysis science is not a whole lot different from the legal profession. Both scientists and the jury at trial see only a part of the real world and they both make rule-bound assumptions concerning both evidence and the nature of that world. To the scientist the universe is a gigantic mechanical device and the results of experiments and observations are valid for that reason. If enough evidence can be assembled then the majority of scientists (the "jury" of science) will accept that evidence as proof. That's how it works.

The Three Arenas Of Proof: 3) Intelligence Proof.

For two generations America has been the most powerful country on Earth and fought war after war to acquire and maintain that power. Yet to the average American his country is as pure as the driven snow, innocent of the "great power" sins of older empires. It is no wonder that "Ufology" is making no headway with the public. That same public is bullet-proof to even the obvious truth about its own CIA and NSA. In this environment of blissful unknowing what chance does something really strange and dangerous have? None.

Americans in general know nothing of the world of intelligence and the power that intelligence can give. In the world of intelligence the universe is not mechanical, rather it is covertly or overtly hostile. In the world of intelligence there are only opponents and very little is "objective." The intelligence game is not "us against a mechanical universe" but instead "us against an enemy who means us harm." In this arena if you wait for proof--you'll see it from the afterlife. This is the world of the UFO.

For the intelligence operative "science" is a weapon of great power against all opponents and High Technology determines who wins and who loses. The patty-cake, patty-cake of ideal science is out the window. In the years following World War Two a new science came to the fore -- power science, a discipline much too important for our true elites and their intelligence services to ignore. America was now a world power in a world full of enemies. What type of proof was required here? What was the role of "science" now?

Most Americans are totally innocent of this. Oh, they know there is a CIA and that it spies on people, sure. They have heard something about the FBI spying on "subversives" in the 1960s and they may know of the National Security Agency. But not one American in a thousand has any idea of what is actually happening. If the most powerful country in the world is going to "maintain innocence" then its people must not know very much and it is this public ignorance and apathy that helps make many things, including the "UFO," so hard for most people to accept. People who are unaware of the bizarre things their own elites are doing have no way to deal with what ANOTHER civilization might be up to!

Thus the "threshold of belief" is just too high for most people where the "UFO" is concerned. In the opinion of UFOSearch this is the DESIRED result of a covert plan. Until this planned wall of ignorance is broken down for a large number of Americans there will be no real progress on the "UFO front."

Science, "Intelligence" and Power

Into the intelligence world came thousands of scientists during World War Two. For most of them it was new. Some, however, had already served in this "nether world" through the brutal domestic and overseas extraction industries, mining and the oil business. The scientist had no doubt of his cultural superiority over the rest of Earth's human beings. His machines needed resources and they would get them--one way or another. As a result of World War Two the marvelous inventions of the previous one hundred years were turned into weapons beyond history, true planet killers. Horror and shock spread through civilization. Today we are numb to it but in the 1940s and 1950s is was real and palpable. For the first time large groups of scientists had been admitted to REAL POWER and given huge resources for their work. As the Cold War against the Russians gained momentum, fueled by dreams of "imperialism on the cheap," the position of "scientist" rose higher and higher. The horror of the new weapons and the hatred of the USSR drove America's cadre of emigre scientists and their home-grown colleagues onward and upward. By 1947 the best and brightest of the Western World increasingly and willingly began contemplating planetary-scale destruction. Von Braun's prediction had come true, America could afford the very best.

This became that "nether world" of the "power scientists" like Vannevar Bush and Lloyd Berkner, Edward Teller and Detlev Bronk. This was the world of the European refugee and his pathological fear of the USSR. It was the world of the American physicist who in 1940 had a budget of five hundred dollars and who by 1945 was spending millions.

It was these people who soon defined the terms of engagement for the military types who "ran" the various intelligence services. "Science" was NEVER, EVER going back to the 1930s, never going back to the days when the elite of the Earth had to grovel for a plumber's wages. It was a member of the A.E.C. (Rockefeller operative Strauss) who goaded the Air Force into monitoring the stratosphere for possible products of a Soviet atomic explosion, three years before any "military expert" thought there was even a possibility of a Soviet bomb. Proof? It was enough that the Russians existed and that we had the bomb and that they would certainly try to get it. A very dangerous, multi-million-dollar operation was set in motion on the basis of a "hunch" on the part of an influential scientist. Of course, the "hunch" did fit the paranoia of the day. The "hunch" fed the power complex. And when the "hunch" was proven right (instrumental data was acquired), it wasn't "a hunch" or "paranoia" anymore, it was revealed truth! It was the "scientists" who pushed for the U-2 and Atlas, Polaris and Discoverer -- over the objections of carrier-happy Admirals and stick-happy Generals. The scientists were the ones who made The National Reconnaissance Office possible and gave The National Security Agency its abilities.

Who pushed for the H-Bomb and saw to it that the American scientist Oppenheimer was discredited? Hungarian Edward Teller. Who sat on their hands as Eisenhower tried to get a test ban treaty to cool off the Cold War and stop the Strontium 90 from showing up in my milk in Carrollton, Missouri? The former General Of The Armies pleaded with his scientific advisors for help but none came. None of them were curtailing their brand new power. It is said that Eisenhower feared the "military-industrial complex." That may be true. But behind that was the arrogance of the new elite, an elite that had tasted forbidden fruit and was lusting for more. Thus the "scientists" helped crush the old government elite during the so-called "McCarthy Era" and pushed the "weapons culture" ahead as fast as possible. There was no effective resistance to any of this within the scientific community and by 1954 scientists of Oppenheimer's persuasion were either keeping a low profile or had been driven out of government through "security checks" and McCarthy-Era purges. Opposition to the new "power science" was pushed to the fringes, along with Astrology and the UFO.

By the middle of the 1950s half of the scientists and technical people in the USA were working for the War, er, the Defense Department--as they do today. For almost two generations now our very best people have been totally concerned with power and the projection of power--raw military power. This set them against many of their own ancient traditions; power does that. Thus was created the situation we see today: "Science" as part of the Cold War establishment, hip-deep in weapons research, spying and God knows what else. Today, "Science" is not always a noble work, not always a part of an ancient "liberal" tradition (based on the rule of law and the free exchange of information) but can now be an integral part of an imperial system riven with secrecy and power mania. In this world nearly anything goes--anything. In this world, a world of arrogance, duplicity and bad faith on a planetary scale, planetary blackmail becomes possible.

This is the world of Lear and Cooper, in my opinion the real world of the UFO. Not that everything that Lear or Cooper says is "true," whatever that means. I mean that when you really start down the rabbit hole of the "UFO," when you stop looking into the sky and start looking at things on the ground, you have left the mythical world of "science" and entered the world of intelligence and power. The rules here are different. This is serious.

The existence of "aliens" from another planet, another dimension or even another part of the Earth would be both a shock and a threat beyond tolerance for our elites. It is easy to say things like "human culture would change if we make contact" but when you are on top of the current heap you don't want to hear things like that. Not at all.

Now we're where we need to be. "Flying Saucers," in and of themselves, would be a tremendous threat to existing human society. Add to that what I suspect became known in the 1950s about implantation and abduction, mutilation and disappearance, and the Eisenhower years became a living nightmare for many of our new economic and scientific elites. They were ripe for blackmail, overweeningly proud and yet insecure in their new positions. If our little grey friends (or those behind them) didn't seem to care about human social arrangements and said they just needed a few things from us and a little help in getting them (from 50 or 100 light years away they probably couldn't bring the whole store) then by God they were going to get the stuff--from our own elites using our tax dollars. And if a little inducement were offered, such as high technology, well, all the better. A little bribe makes a guilty conscience a whole lot easier to live with.

We here at UFOSearch can well believe that in exchange for "protection" our new scientific elites would have eagerly provided assistance to others, even if part of the "deal" involved harm or even death to average Americans. We must remember that these are the same people who would bring the world willy-nilly nuclear testing and Thalidomide. They view the "average man" as not much better than a dog. It would have been a deal that they could hardly have refused, a deal they would already have made with the nuclear devil.

Does UFOSearch believe that our hereditary elites (the employers of Allen Dulles, James Forrestal and William Casey) would trade a few million lives for their continuance in power? Yes. Do we believe that the people who created Project Phoenix would trade a million or so of our lives for a power that might put them on top, over and above their old- line earthly superiors? Yes. Was a "revolt of the Dulleses" possible? Yes.

All of these people have one interest in common--staying on top. For them, as for the many scientists, the common people are a common herd and occasionally some slaughtering must be done--that's the way it is. Our nuclear progams have killed thousands of Americans over the years. None of them care. What would they do for the power of the Gods? Would they kill us all? We fear they might.

proud2bpoor
proud2bpoor
10 years ago

I can only assume this was made by someone who does not believe in extra terrestrials having visited earth. Simply put these are some of the worst documented cases not the best, there are many other videos circulating that are far more convincing than the ones presented here. Just my opinion but it seems most of the actual convincing videos are disappearing from the internet in recent years and it is being flooded with bogus crap from people crying for attention, how is it some have 10 or 20 chances to film ufo sightings while others never see one. I believe they exist but the real cases are usually presented by an accidental filming of the object by someone whos never seen anything like it before not a ufo hunter lmfao. Wish i had a link for many of the videos ive seen that show the point im trying to make but as ive said type ufo in on google and u get more crap now than ever before.

kafka11
kafka11
10 years ago

jeez, what is it with these professional serial debunkers, there is some excellent 'clear' footage, reading the comments it is like listening to a bunch of primitive neanderthals in serious denial. We are not the only intelligent (i say that with weary irony) in the vast universe, how can a relatively dumb race "humans' speak so arrogantly about absolutes when we could be light years behind these other races, they could mess with dimensions, have force fields around the craft etc etc, just because it is not in hi freakin def does not mean all the thousands of sightings and film are balloons or hoaxes, UFOs to debunkers is like calculus to 5 year olds, get over yourselves, we are nothing special!

dewflirt
dewflirt
10 years ago

I liked the flying Aga thing, more convincing than the light up yoyo's ;)

mostly human
mostly human
10 years ago

At the very least it's good that films like this get people talking. I enjoy the comments more than the video most of the time. Personally, like most people I cannot say for sure if we have been visited. I look at the vastness of space, I think about the millions of chunks of debris full of bacteria from earth that are flying through interstellar space. We now know that bacteria can survive open space and re-entry so chances are that even if we were the only ones in the beginning, earth has seeded a few places and bacteria from here is now there. And from there to other places eventually. Looking at the scale of things it's quite likely that we could have began the same way but if not, it's begun now. Looking at the grand scheme of things if we don't destroy ourselves we do know that in a few billion years our sun will die. By then if we're still around it would be very unlikely that we wouldn't have the technology to permanently survive in a space craft. We technically could do so now. By then science may allow for virtually unlimited life spans. There is a planet only 5 light years from earth that has been found in the goldy-locks zone. Quite doable if you live in space for a few hundred years or have a multi generational population on board. To be honest we could go there ourselves if it was found to be habitable. It would just take someone willing to make a one way life long trip. If we can do this now a few hundred years into the industrial age and 12 thousand years out of an ice age it opens up possibilities. Looking at the scale of time that we know, earth could have seeded a local solar system and planet by now. Considering how much time we have spent in ice ages here, it is conceivable that we could have seeded a world that has surpassed us. Even with the ridiculously ignorant notion that we had life here first we have probably spread it ourselves by now.There are too many possibilities with trillions of chances for life to take hold too many ways. I think we will have trouble not finding at the very least, bacterial life virtually everywhere.

dmxi
dmxi
10 years ago

a study has shown that most sightings occur near fault lines,meaning
energy releases from below the ground can have effects on human brainwaves inducing visions or even producing 'orb-like' phenomena (for orb-like phenomena check arnold boscowitz' book from 1898-"earthquakes")...
but still there are minute cases which can't be explained (yet),so the mystery prevails....but that has always been a motor for fantasy which is an evolutionary key of the human psyche which helped us getting here where we are now...............'lost/somewhere in nowhere'!>smirk<
anyhow,i've learned by researching this topic that the slight 'eccentric type' brings forth 'eccentric-claims' with a slight of evidence,imo!...but that is not denial to the subject...just caution to the messenger,if you will!dr.greer,for example,begs for scrutiny as in comparison to the aforementioned 'von daeniken' ,whom should be avoided with 'occam's barge-pole!'the china footage of the slow moving 'aircraft' is known as a 'lentikular-cloud' in meteorlogical circles....as for the end 'object in the film (around 38 mins in)reminds of an 'apple' commercial gone wrong.....but the worst comment comes at the end.....concluding that everything is boiling down to the 'holyland'......'GOD' beware (pun intended)!
summa summarum:very bad summation of an interesting subject!

a_no_n
a_no_n
10 years ago

all the thousands upon thousands of high definition cameras in the world today, and yet still nobody can get an image of a 'ufo' that isn't fuzzier than an episode of the muppets or shaking like an epileptic at Japaneese comicon.

the first videos are clearly all balloons...he probably released them himself. As for the lights, it was most probably helicopters on a military training exercise (assuming they aren't doctored)...I got bored after that and stopped watching so i can't comment on the rest.

paramare
paramare
10 years ago

What if we are the most advanced civilization in the universe?

Eric71Can
Eric71Can
10 years ago

I have stopped watching the video as soon they pronounced the name Eric Von Daniken.

And about the lights, of course they form a triangle formation because 3 lights in open space will always form a triangle.

Jack1952
Jack1952
10 years ago

For a videographer, this Willis guy doesn't take very clear pictures. Then, whoever uploaded this video, didn't even bother to upload in HD. It's weird, enough, but nothing that says aliens. Why would aliens fly the billions of miles to get here and then only hover for a couple of minutes and leave? No video here that proves a thing.

Fabien L'Amour
Fabien L'Amour
10 years ago

Only thing I can agree with is some are Unidentified Flying Objects. That doesn't mean they came from space at all. It's the least probable explanation. Why would alien civilizations travel for light years to fly around in our atmosphere with no logical purpose? That is not how exploration works.

When we send probes into space, we send them to explore for as long as we can as we want some information for the time and money spent. If aliens sent something our way, it would be active for more then a few minutes. When Columbus discovered America, he didn't sail past the land and say : "Ok I found land, let's go back home."

Kansas Devil
Kansas Devil
10 years ago

This is the best they could find? Either they need better cameras or they need lessons on how to hold a camera.

phil
phil
10 years ago

i've never seen on film or in real life ,a really convincing sighting so i believe we are alone in the Universe . So lets love and respect the life ,we have in abundance here on earth

Ervin Schrader
Ervin Schrader
10 years ago

I don't believe this stuff for a second. If there were really such things we would have been visited before by these so called alien visitors. I just don't see anything that would make me believe it or any other so called evidence.

Paul Gloor
Paul Gloor
10 years ago

There is an abundance of relatively cheap technology out there that can get us a few clean shots. Even the "best" images were little more than blobs of light, half of which could very easily be balloons.
There is also a proliferation of cheap technologies that would allow someone to hoax these things so well they would look quite legit to someone who wants to believe. I am still skeptical even though I've seen lights in the sky with my own eyes, I assumed a satellite or a very high aircraft, that turned a 90 degree angle.